Information processing in the “not-in-my-backyard” strategy: An empirical study of anti-nuclear behavioral responses

References

• Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 50:179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alhakami AS, and Slovic P. 1994. A psychological study of the inverse relationship between perceived risk and perceived benefit. Risk Anal. 14:1085–96. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00080.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki N. 2018. Who would be willing to accept disaster debris in their backyard? Investigating the determinants of public attitudes in Post-Fukushima Japan. Risk Anal. 38:535–47. doi:10.1111/risa.12858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asif M, and Muneer T. 2007. Energy supply, its demand and security issues for developed and emerging economies. Renew Sust Energy Rev 11:1388–413. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2005.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bisaga I, Parikh P, Mulugetta Y, and Hailu Y. 2019. The potential of performance targets (imihigo) as drivers of energy planning and extending access to off‐grid energy in rural Rwanda. Wires Energy Environ. 8:e310. doi:10.1002/wene.310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bughio FA. 2014. Critical analysis of political discourse: a study of Benazir Bhutto’s last speech. Baloch J Ling. 2:79–95
   Google Scholar
• Christodouleas JP, Forrest RD, Ainsley CG, et al. 2011. Short-term and long-term health risks of nuclear-power-plant accidents. N Engl J Med. 364:2334–41. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1103676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coles D, Frewer LJ, and Goddard E. 2015. Ethical issues and potential stakeholder priorities associated with the application of genomic technologies applied to animal production systems. J Agric Environ Ethics. 28:231–53. doi:10.1007/s10806-015-9529-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Groot JI, Steg L, and Poortinga W. 2013. Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Anal. 33:307–17. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunwoody S, Griffin RJ. 2014. The role of channel beliefs in risk information seeking. Behav Res & Ther 12(4):327–34. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(74)90007-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finucane ML, Alhakami A, Slovic P, and Johnson SM. 2000. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J Behav Decis Making. 13:1–17. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-0771(200001/03)13:1<1::AID-BDM333>3.0.CO;2-S
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, and Beyth R. 1975. I knew it would happen: Remembered probabilities of once—future things. Org Behav Hum Perf. 13:1–16. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(75)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell C, and Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res. 18:39–50. doi:10.1177/002224378101800104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg MR, Apostolakis G, Fields T, et al. 2019. Advancing risk‐informed decision making in managing defense nuclear waste in the United States: opportunities and challenges for risk analysis. Risk Anal. 39:375–88. doi:10.1111/risa.13135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin RJ, Dunwoody S, and Neuwirth K. 1999. Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environ Res Sect A. 80:S230–S245. doi:10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin RJ, Neuwirth K, Giese J, and Dunwoody S. 2002. Linking the heuristic-systematic model and depth of processing. Commun Res. 29:705–32. doi:10.1177/009365002237833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, and Li Y. 2016. Online amplification of air pollution risk perception: the moderating role of affect in information. Inf Commun Soc. 21:80–93. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2016.1261170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y, Ru P, Su J, and Anadon LD. 2015. Not in my backyard, but not far away from me: Local acceptance of wind power in China. Energy 82:722–33. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.01.082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes AF, Montoya AK, and Rockwood NJ. 2017. The analysis of mechanisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equation modeling. Aust Mark J. 25:76–81. doi:10.1016/j.ausmj.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He G, Mol APJ, Zhang L, and Lu Y. 2014. Nuclear power in China after Fukushima: understanding public knowledge, attitudes, and trust. J Risk Res. 17:435–51. doi:10.1080/13669877.2012.726251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultquist C, and Cervone G. 2019. Comparison of simulated radioactive atmospheric releases to citizen science observations for the Fukushima nuclear accident. Atmos Environ. 198:478–88. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huurne ET, and Gutteling J. 2008. Information needs and risk perception as predictors of risk information seeking. J Risk Res. 11:847–62. doi:10.1080/13669870701875750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). 2015. IAEA Power Reactor Information System as of October 8. http://www.iaea.org/pris/; [accessed 2015 10 08].
   Google Scholar
• Kahlor L. 2010. PRISM: a planned risk information seeking model. Heal Commun. 25:345–56. doi:10.1080/10410231003775172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahlor LA, Yang ZJ, and Liang MC. 2018. Risky politics: applying the planned risk information seeking model to the 2016 US presidential election. Mass Commun Soc. 21:697–719. doi:10.1080/15205436.2018.1498900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Wu D, Li J, and Li M. 2017. A comparison of 17 article-level bibliometric indicators of institutional research productivity: evidence from the information management literature of China. Inf Process Manag. 53:1156–70. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2017.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, and Perry RW. 2012. The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence. Risk Anal. 32:616–32. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindell MK, Mumpower JL, Huang S-K, et al. 2017. Perceptions of protective actions for a water contamination emergency. J Risk Res. 20:887–908. doi:10.1080/13669877.2015.1121906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu C, Xu W, Shen H, et al. 2019. MIMO channel information feedback using deep recurrent network. IEEE Commun Lett. 23:188–91. doi:10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2882829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maanan M, El Barjy M, Hassou N, et al. 2018. Origin and potential ecological risk assessment of trace elements in the watershed topsoil and coastal sediment of the Oualidia lagoon, Morocco. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 24:602–14. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1394176
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell JD, Schunck N, Higdon D, et al. 2015. Uncertainty quantification for nuclear density functional theory and information content of new measurements. Phys Rev Lett. 114:122501. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.122501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mistur EM. 2017. Health and energy preferences: rethinking the social acceptance of energy systems in the United States. Energy Res Soc Sci. 34:184–90. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore N. 2002. A model of social information need. J Inf Sci. 28:297–303. doi:10.1177/016555150202800404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patz JA. 2001. Public health risk assessment linked to climatic and ecological change. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 7:1317–27. doi:10.1080/20018091095023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prati G, and Zani B. 2013. The effect of the Fukushima nuclear accident on risk perception, antinuclear behavioral intentions, attitude, trust, environmental beliefs, and values. Environ Behav. 45:782–98. doi:10.1177/0013916512444286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal RN, and Real K. 2003. Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change: Use of the risk perception attitude (RPA) framework to understand health behaviors. Human Comm Res. 29:370–99. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2003.tb00844.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab MM, Reidy M, Hegarty J, et al. 2018. Men's information-seeking behavior regarding cancer risk and screening: a meta-narrative systematic review. Psychooncology. 27:410–9. doi:10.1002/pon.4506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl R, Moser C, Stauffacher M, and Krütli P. 2013. Perceived risk and benefit of nuclear waste repositories: four opinion clusters. Risk Anal. 33:1038–48. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01897.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, and Peters E. 2006. Risk perception and affect. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 15:322–5. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00461.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P, Flynn JH, and Layman M. 1991. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science. 254:1603–7. doi:10.1126/science.254.5038.1603
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smerecnik CM, Mesters I, Candel MJ, et al. 2012. Risk perception and information processing: the development and validation of a questionnaire to assess self‐reported information processing. Risk Anal. 32:54–66. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01651.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soni A. 2018. Out of sight, out of mind? Investigating the longitudinal impact of the Fukushima nuclear accident on public opinion in the United States. Energy Policy. 122:169–75. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen JH, Shumpert BL, and Vogt BM. 2004. Planning for protective action decision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place. J Hazard Mater. 109:1–11. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2004.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terpstra T, and Lindell MK. 2013. Citizens’ perceptions of flood hazard adjustments. Environ Behav. 45:993–1018. doi:10.1177/0013916512452427
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo CW. 2002. Information processing and risk perception: an adaptation of the heuristic-systematic model. Inf Process Risk Jud. 52:367–82. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02550.x
   Google Scholar
• Trumbo C, and McComas KA. 2003. The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Anal. 23:343–53. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers VHM, Keller C, and Siegrist M. 2011. Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: investigating an explanatory model. Energy Policy. 39:3621–9. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vyncke B, Perko T, and Van Gorp B. 2017. Information sources as explanatory variables for the Belgian health‐related risk perception of the Fukushima nuclear accident. Risk Anal. 37:570–82. doi:10.1111/risa.12618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Wang J, Lin S, and Li J. 2019. Public perceptions and acceptance of nuclear energy in China: the role of public knowledge, perceived benefit, perceived risk and public engagement. Energy Policy 126:352–60. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Yang B, Zhang M, et al. 2016. Numerical simulation and experimental verification of microstructure evolution in large forged pipe used for AP1000 nuclear power plants. Ann Nucl Energy. 87:176–85. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2015.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitfield SC, Rosa EA, Dan A, and Dietz T. 2009. The future of nuclear power: value orientations and risk perception. Risk Anal. 29:425–37. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01155.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson TD. 2000. Human information behavior. Inf Sci. 3:49–56. doi:10.28945/576
   Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi I, Shimura T, Terada H, Erik RS, and Kunugita N. 2018. Lessons learned from radiation risk communication activities regarding the Fukushima nuclear accident. J Natl Insti Public Heal 67:93–102. doi:10.20683/jniph.67.1_93
   Google Scholar
• Yuan X, Zuo J, Ma R, and Wang Y. 2017. How would social acceptance affect nuclear power development? A study from China. J Clean Prod. 163:179–86. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zablotska LB. 2016. 30 years after the Chernobyl nuclear accident: time for reflection and re-evaluation of current disaster preparedness plans. J Urban Heal. 93:407–13. doi:10.1007/s11524-016-0053-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng J, Wei J, Zhao D, et al. 2017. Information-seeking intentions of residents regarding the risks of nuclear power plant: an empirical study in China. Nat Haz. 87:739–55. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2790-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang M, and Liu G-L. 2015. The effects of consumer's subjective and objective knowledge on perceptions and attitude towards genetically modified foods: objective knowledge as a determinant. Int J Food Sci Technol. 50:1198–205. doi:10.1111/ijfs.12753
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu W, Wei J, and Zhao D. 2016. Anti-nuclear behavioral intentions: the role of perceived knowledge, information processing, and risk perception. Energy Policy. 88:168–77. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2015.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar