A hybrid risk prioritization method based on generalized TODIM and BWM for Fine-Kinney under interval type-2 fuzzy environment

References

• Bai-Cheng Y, Zhi-Lei Z, Hai-Li C. 2019. Human error risk analysis of coastal water collision accidents based on Fine-Kinney method of fuzzy rule base. J Dalian Maritime Univ. 45(1):40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Chai KC, Jong CH, Tay KM, Lim CP. 2016. A perceptual computing-based method to prioritize failure modes in failure mode and effect analysis and its application to edible bird nest farming. Appl Soft Comput. 49:734–747. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2016.08.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta P. 2017. Modeling of variability and uncertainty in human health risk assessment. MethodsX. 4:76–85. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2017.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng N, Li M. 2011. An information systems security risk assessment model under uncertain environment. Appl Soft Comput. 11(7):4332–4340. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2010.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes LFAM, Lima MMPP. 1991. TODIM: basics and application to multicriteria ranking of projects with environmental impacts. Found Comput Decis Sci. 16:113–127.
   Google Scholar
• Gomes LFAM, Lima MMPP. 1992. From modeling individual preferences to multicriteria ranking of discrete alternatives: a look at prospect theory and the additive difference model. Found Comput Decis Sci. 17:171–184.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M. 2018. A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 24(7):1723–1760. doi:10.1080/10807039.2018.1424531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Celik E. 2018. Fuzzy rule-based Fine–Kinney risk assessment approach for rail transportation systems. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 24(7):1786–1812. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1422975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Celik E, Akyuz E. 2017. A hybrid risk-based approach for maritime applications: the case of ballast tank maintenance. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 23(6):1389–1403. doi:10.1080/10807039.2017.1317204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guneri AF, Baskan M. 2018. An occupational risk assessment approach for construction and operation period of wind turbines. Glob J Environ Sci Manag. 4:281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Gul M, Guven B, Guneri AF. 2018. A new Fine-Kinney-based risk assessment framework using FAHP-FVIKOR incorporation. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 53:3–16. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2017.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Li Z(S), Liu H-C. 2017. New approach for failure mode and effect analysis using linguistic distribution assessments and TODIM method. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 167:302–309. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabir S, Geok TK, Kumar M, Yazdi M, Hossain F. 2020. A method for temporal fault tree analysis using intuitionistic fuzzy set and expert elicitation. IEEE Access. 8:980–996. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2961953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khorshidi HA, Gunawan I, Nikfalazar S. 2016. Application of fuzzy risk analysis for selecting critical processes in implementation of SPC with a case study. Group Decis Negot. 25(1):203–220. doi:10.1007/s10726-015-9439-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinney GF, Wiruth AD. 1976. Practical risk analysis for safety management. Technical Publication 5865, Naval Weapons Center, California.
   Google Scholar
• Kokangül A, Polat U, Dağsuyu C. 2017. A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies. Saf Sci. 91:24–32. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2016.07.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y-S, Shih H-S. 2016. Incremental analysis for generalized TODIM. Cent Eur J Oper Res. 24(4):901–922. doi:10.1007/s10100-015-0427-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Wu C, Zhang L. 2015. An intuitionistic fuzzy-TODIM method to solve distributor evaluation and selection problem. Int J Simul Model. 14(3):511–524. doi:10.2507/IJSIMM14(3)CO12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang D, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Jamaldeen A. 2019. Pythagorean fuzzy VIKOR approaches based on TODIM for evaluating internet banking website quality of Ghanaian banking industry. Appl Soft Comput. 78:583–594. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2019.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, Liu L, Liu N, Mao L-X. 2012. Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis with extended VIKOR method under fuzzy environment. Expert Syst Appl. 39(17):12926–12934. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2012.05.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu H-C, You J-X, Lin Q-L, Li H. 2015. Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Comput Integr Manuf. 28(7):701–714. doi:10.1080/0951192X.2014.900865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P. 2011. A weighted aggregation operators multi-attribute group decision-making method based on interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Expert Syst Appl. 38(1):1053–1060. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.07.144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Yu X. 2014. 2-Dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making. Knowl-Based Syst. 57:69–80. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llamazares B. 2018. An analysis of the generalized TODIM method. Eur J Oper Res. 269(3):1041–1049. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2018.02.054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maniram Kumar A, Rajakarunakaran S, Pitchipoo P, Vimalesan R. 2018. Fuzzy based risk prioritisation in an auto LPG dispensing station. Saf Sci. 101:231–247. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marhavilas PK, Filippidis M, Koulinas GK, Koulouriotis DE. 2019. The integration of HAZOP study with risk-matrix and the analytical-hierarchy process for identifying critical control-points and prioritizing risks in industry – a case study. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 62:103981. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2019.103981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendel JM, John RIB. 2002. Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 10(2):117–127. doi:10.1109/91.995115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merrick JRW, Dinesh V, Singh A, van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi T. 2008. Propagation of uncertainty in a simulation-based maritime risk assessment model utilizing Bayesian simulation techniques. Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference. Vol. 1, pp. 449–455.
   Google Scholar
• Qin J, Liu X. 2015. Multi-attribute group decision making using combined ranking value under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Inf Sci. 297:293–315. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin J, Liu X, Pedrycz W. 2017. An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment. Eur J Oper Res. 258(2):626–638. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.09.059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J. 2015. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega. 53:49–57. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezaei J. 2016. Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: some properties and a linear model. Omega. 64:126–130. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2015.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffo P, Bazzana L, Consonni A, Corradi A, Saltelli A, Tarantola S. 2006. Hydrocarbon exploration risk evaluation through uncertainty and sensitivity analyses techniques. Reliab Eng Syst Saf. 91(10-11):1155–1162. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyadi Tooranloo H, Ayatollah AS. 2017. Pathology the internet banking service quality using failure mode and effect analysis in interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst. 19(1):109–123. doi:10.1007/s40815-016-0265-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian D, Yang B, Chen J, Zhao Y. 2018. A multi-experts and multi-criteria risk assessment model for safety risks in oil and gas industry integrating risk attitudes. Knowl-Based Syst. 156:62–73. doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2018.05.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu X, Qin J. 2019. Risk priorization for failure modes with extended MULTIMOORA method under interval type-2 fuzzy environment. IFS. 36(2):1417–1429. doi:10.3233/JIFS-181007
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu X, Qin J, Liu S. 2019. An extended generalized TODIM for risk evaluation and prioritization of failure modes considering risk indicators interaction. IISE Trans. 51(11):1236–1250. doi:10.1080/24725854.2018.1539889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu X, Qin Y. 2018. A fuzzy Fine-Kinney-based risk evaluation approach with extended MULTIMOORA method based on Choquet integral. Comput Ind Eng. 125:111–123. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2018.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Liu X, Qin Y, Fu Y. 2018. A risk evaluation and prioritization method for FMEA with prospect theory and Choquet integral. Saf Sci. 110:152–163. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2018.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu Q, Zhou L, Chen Y, Chen H. 2019. An integrated approach to green supplier selection based on the interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst and extended VIKOR methods. Inf Sci. 502:394–417. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.06.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie J, Zeng W, Li J, Yin Q. 2019. Similarity measures of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers for fault diagnosis. Soft Comput. 23(6):1999–2014. doi:10.1007/s00500-017-2914-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yazdi M, Kabir S, Walker M. 2019. Uncertainty handling in fault tree based risk assessment: state of the art and future perspectives. Process Saf Environ Prot. 131:89–104. doi:10.1016/j.psep.2019.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z. 2013. Hesitant fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Inf Sci. 234:150–181. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar