Pipeline transportation of crude oil in Canada: Environmental risk assessment using modified diffusion models

References

• Abkowitz M, Lepofsky M, Cheng P. 1992. Selecting criteria for designating hazardous materials highway routes. Transp Res Rec. 1333(2.2): 30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Bagheri M, Verma M, Verter V. 2014. Transport mode selection for toxic gases: Rail or road? Risk Anal. 34(1):168–186. doi:10.1111/risa.12063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batta R, Chiu SS. 1988. Optimal obnoxious paths on a network: transportation of hazardous materials. Oper Res. 36(1):84–92. doi:10.1287/opre.36.1.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brody TM, Bianca PD, Krysa J. 2012. Analysis of inland crude oil spill threats, vulnerabilities, and emergency response in the Midwest United States. Risk Anal. 32(10):1741–1749. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01813.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DF, Policastro AJ, Dunn WE, Carhard RA, Lazaro MA, Freeman WA, Krumpolc M. 2000. Development of the initial isolation and protective action distances for the 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook. Decision and Information Sciences Division, Argonne National Laboratory, ANL/DIS-00-1.
   Google Scholar
• CAN. 2010. CAN/CSA-ISO 31000-10. Risk Assessment – Principles and Guidelines. January.
   Google Scholar
• Carneriro MC, Ribas GP, Hamcher S. 2010. Risk management in the oil supply chain: A CVaR approach. Ind Eng Chem Res. 49:3286–3294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CBC. 2017. Anything that is recoverable will be. [accessed Sep 13]. http://www.cbc.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley FK, Lines IG, Mather J. 2003. Oil and gas pipeline failure modeling. Trans IChemE. 81(1):3–11. doi:10.1205/095758203762851930
   Google Scholar
• Dey P, Tabucanon MT, Ogunlana SO. 1994. Planning for project control through risk analysis: A petroleum pipeline-laying project. Int J Project Manage. 12(1):23–33. doi:10.1016/0263-7863(94)90006-X
   Google Scholar
• Dey PK. 2003. Analytic hierarchy process analyzes risk of operating cross-country petroleum pipelines in India. Nat Hazards Rev. 4(4):213–221. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2003)4:4(213)
   Google Scholar
• D&T. 2013. Deloitte & Touche LLP and affiliated entities. Energy East: The economic benefits of TransCanada’s Canadian Mainline conversion project. September.
   Google Scholar
• Dziubiński M, Frątczak M, Markowski AS. 2006. Aspects of risk analysis associated with major failure of fuel pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 19(5):399–408. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckle P, Burgherr P. 2013. Bayesian data analysis of severe fatal accident risk in the oil chain. Risk Anal. 33(1):146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Ingolfsson A. 2000. Catastrophic avoidance models for hazardous materials route planning. Transp Sci. 34(2):165–179. doi:10.1287/trsc.34.2.165.12303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Tjandra S, Verter V. 2007. Hazardous materials transportation. In: Barnhart C, Laporte G, editor (s). Handbooks in operations research and management science. Vol. 14. Amsterdam: Elsevier. p. 539–621.
   Google Scholar
• Erkut E, Verter V. 1995. A framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment. Risk Anal. 15(5):589–601. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00755.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng X, Jainrong S, Xing H. 2003. Study on quantitative estimation model of accident effect happen in water environment. Shanghai Environ Sci. S2:64–71.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer HB, List JE, Loh CR, Imberger J, Brooks NH. 1979. Mixing in inland and coastal waters. San Diego (CA): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gharabagh MJ, Asilian H, Mortasavi SB, Mogaddam AZ, Hajizadeh E, Khavanin A. 2009. Comprehensive risk assessment and management of petrochemical feed product transportation pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 22(4):533–539. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinte TV, Gunton TI, Day JC. 2007. Evaluation of the assessment process for major projects: A case study of oil and gas pipelines in Canada. Impact Assess Project Appraisal. 25(2):123–137. doi:10.3152/146155107X204491
   Google Scholar
• Hosseini SD, Verma M. 2017. A Value-at-Risk (VaR) approach to routing rail hazmat shipments. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 54:191–211. doi:10.1016/j.trd.2017.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini SD, Verma M. 2018. Conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) methodology to optimal train configuration and routing of rail hazmat shipments. Transp Res Part B Methodol. 110:79–103. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2018.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu H, Cheng G, Li Y, Tang Y. 2009. Risk-based maintenance strategy and its applications in a petrochemical reforming reaction system. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 22(4):392–397. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji W, Wang Q, Huang Q, Huang Z, Ma C. 2010. Health risk assessment for groundwater environment related to hazardous waste storage. Environ Sci Technol (China). 33(4):160–164.
   Google Scholar
• Jo Y, Ahn BJ. 2005. A method of quantitative risk assessment for transmission pipeline carrying natural gas. J Hazard Mater. 123(1–3):1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.01.034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jo Y, Ahn BJ. 2006. Analysis of hazard area associated with hydrogen gas transmission pipelines. Int J Hydrogen Energy. 31(14):2122–2130. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolankai G. 1997. Basic river water quality models, IHP-V. Technical documents in Hydrology, Vol. 13. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C. 2014a. Value-at-Risk model for hazardous material transportation. Ann Oper Res. 222(1):361–387. doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1285-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang Y, Batta R, Kwon C. 2014b. Generalized route planning model for hazardous material transportation with VaR and equity considerations. Comput Oper Res. 43:237–247. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2013.09.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koornneef J, Spruijt M, Molag M, Ramirez A, Turkenburg W, Faaij A. 2010. Quantitative risk assessment of CO2 transport by pipelines – A review of uncertainties and their impacts. J Hazard Mater. 177(1–3):12–27. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.068
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lake SP. 2017. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [accessed Sep 13]. http://www.wikipedia.com.
   Google Scholar
• Lee JHW, Chu PCK, Yau TWC. 1996. Lateral mixing of continuous line source: An introduction to turbulent diffusion. Int J Mech Eng Educ. 24(4):265–278. doi:10.1177/030641909602400405
   Google Scholar
• Li X, Chen G, Zhu H, Zhang R. 2017. Quantitative risk assessment of submarine pipeline instability. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 45:108–115. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEB. 2017. National Energy Board: Energy East and Eastern Mainline Projects. [accessed Sep 13]. http://www.neb-one.gc.ca.
   Google Scholar
• Nipigon L. 2017. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [accessed Sep 13]. http://www.wikipedia.com.
   Google Scholar
• Omajali JB, Hart A, Walker M, Wood J, Macaskie LE. 2017. In-situ catalytic upgrading of heavy oil using dispersed bionanoparticles supported on gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Appl Catal B. 203:807–819. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.10.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez J, Seguin C, Weir D, Ferdous R. 2010. Development and implementation of a liquid pipeline quantitative risk assessment model. Proceedings of the 10th International Pipeline Conference (IPC 2014), Calgary, Alberta, Canada. September 29–October 3.
   Google Scholar
• Restrepo CE, Simonoff JS, Zimmerman R. 2009. Causes, cost consequences, and risk implications of accidents in US hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure. Int J Crit Infrastruct Prot. 2(1–2):38–50. doi:10.1016/j.ijcip.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rita T. 2017. 2017 worldwide pipeline construction report. Pipeline Gas J. January: 16–20.
   Google Scholar
• Saccomanno F, Haastrup P. 2002. Influence of safety measures on the risks of transporting dangerous goods through road tunnels. Risk Anal. 22(6):1059–1069. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00273
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seo IW, Cheong TS. 1998. Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams. J Hydraul Eng ASCE. 124(1):25–32. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9429(1998)124:1(25)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shear velocity. 2017. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [accessed Sep 13]. http://www.wikipedia.com.
   Google Scholar
• Shebeko YN, Bolodian IA, Molchanov VP, Deshevih YI, Gordienko DM, Smolin IM, Kirillov DS. 2007. Fire and explosion risk assessment for large-scale oil export terminal. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 20(4–6):651–658. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2007.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui A, Verma M. 2013. An expected consequence approach to route choice in the maritime transportation of crude oil. Risk Anal. 33(11):2041–2055. doi:10.1111/risa.12049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sklavounos S, Rigas F. 2006. Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 19(1):24–31. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TSB. 2016. Transportation Safety Board: Statistical Summary Pipeline Occurrences 2015-Data Table. [accessed Jul 13]. http://www.bts-tsb-gc-ca/eng/stats/pipeline/2015/ssep-sspo-2015-tbls.asp.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 1999. United States Environmental Protection Agency: The Vadose and Saturated Zone Modules Extracted from EPACMTP for HWIR99. Office of Solid Waste, Washington, DC, August.
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2016. United States Environmental Protection Agency: National Recommended Water Quality Criteria-Human Health Criteria Table. [accessed Oct 18]. http://www.epa.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Verter V, Kara BY. 2001. GIS-based framework for hazardous materials transport risk assessment. Risk Anal. 21(6):1109–1120. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.216179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner T. 2004. Hazardous waste: Evolution of a national environmental problem. J Policy Hist. 16(4):306–331. doi:10.1353/jph.2004.0024
   Google Scholar
• Zhao J, Verter V. 2015. A bi-objective model for the used oil location-routing problem. Comput Oper Res. 62:157–168. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2014.10.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar