Temporal shifts in Americans’ risk perceptions of the Zika outbreak

References

• Brewer NT, Weinstein ND, Cuite CL, Herrington J. 2004. Risk perceptions and their relation to risk behavior. Ann Behav Med. 27(2):125–130. doi:10.1207/s15324796abm2702_7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns WJ, Peters E, Slovic P. 2012. Risk perception and the economic crisis: a longitudinal study of the trajectory of perceived risk. Risk Anal. 32(4):659–677. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01733.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champ PA, Brenkert-Smith H. 2016. Is seeing believing? Perceptions of wildfire risk over time. Risk Anal. 36(4):816–830. doi:10.1111/risa.12465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke L, Chess C. 2008. Elites and panic: more to fear than fear itself. Soc Forces. 87(2):993–1014. doi:10.1353/sof.0.0155
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutchin MP, Martin KR, Owen SV, Goodwin JS. 2008. Concern about petrochemical health risk before and after a refinery explosion. Risk Anal. 28(3):589–601. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01050.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cvetkovich G, Siegrist M, Murray R, Tragesser S. 2002. New information and social trust: asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Anal. 22(2):359–367. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.00030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillon RL, Tinsley CH, Burns WJ. 2014. Evolving risk perceptions about near-miss terrorist events. Decis Anal. 11(1):27–42. doi:10.1287/deca.2013.0286
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhoff B, Slovic P, Lichtenstein S, Read S, Combs B. 1978. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci. 9(2):127–152. doi:10.1007/BF00143739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flint CG. 2007. Changing forest disturbance regimes and risk perceptions in Homer, Alaska. Risk Anal. 27(6):1597–1608. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00991.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup Poll. 2017. Zika virus not a worry to Americans. [accessed 2018 Mar 26]. http://news.gallup.com/poll/207422/zika-virus-not-worry-americans.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Geoffard P-Y, Philipson T. 1996. Rational epidemics and their public control. Int Econ Rev. 37(3):603–624. doi:10.2307/2527443
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein H. 2011. Multilevel statistical models. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haas CN. 2014. On the quarantine period for Ebola virus. PLoS Curr. 6. doi:10.1371/currents.outbreaks.2ab4b76ba7263ff0f084766e43abbd89
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harvard School of Public Health/SSRS. 2014. Ebola poll topline. [accessed 2016 Oct 4]. http://cdn1.sph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/08/ebola_Topline_final_08-20-14.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ibuka Y, Chapman GB, Meyers LA, Li M, Galvani AP. 2010. The dynamics of risk perceptions and precautionary behavior in response to 2009 (H1N1) pandemic influenza. BMC Infect Dis. 10:296. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-10-296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB. 2018. Residential location and psychological distance in Americans’ risk views and behavioral intentions regarding Zika virus. Risk Anal. 38(12):2561–2579. doi:10.1111/risa.13184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB. 2019. Hazard avoidance, symbolic and practical: the case of Americans’ reported responses to Ebola. J Risk Res. 22(3):346–363. doi:10.1080/13669877.2017.1378252
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB, Slovic P. 2015. Fearing or fearsome Ebola communication? Keeping the public in the dark about possible post-21-day symptoms and infectiousness could backfire. Health Risk Soc. 17(5–6):458–471. doi:10.1080/13698575.2015.1113237
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson BB, White MP. 2010. The importance of multiple performance criteria for understanding trust in risk managers. Risk Anal. 30(7):1099–1115. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01405.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan DM, Braman D, Gastil J, Slovic P, Mertz CK. 2007. Culture and identity‐protective cognition: explaining the white‐male effect in risk perception. J Empir Legal Stud. 4(3):465–505. doi:10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahan DM, Jamieson KH, Landrum A, Winneg K. 2017. Culturally antagonistic memes and the Zika virus: an experimental test. J Risk Res. 20(1):1–40. doi:10.1080/13669877.2016.1260631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S. 1988. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal. 8(2):177–187. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima ML. 2004. On the influence of risk perception on mental health: living near an incinerator. J Environ Psychol. 24(1):71–84. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00026-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein G, Mather J. 1990. Dynamic processes in risk perception. J Risk Uncertainty. 3(2):155–175. doi:10.1007/BF00056370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayorga M, Johnson BB. 2019. A longitudinal study of concern and judged risk: the case of Ebola in the United States, 2014–2015. J Risk Res. 22(10):1280–1293. doi:10.1080/13669877.2018.1466827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertz CK, Slovic P, Purchase IFH. 1998. Judgments of chemical risks: comparisons among senior managers, toxicologists, and the public. Risk Anal. 18(4):391–404. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00353.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan American Health Organization. 2020. PLISA Health Information Platform for the Americas: Zika. [accessed 2020 Aug 27]. https://www.paho.org/data/index.php/en/mnu-topics/zika.html.
   Google Scholar
• Raude J, McColl K, Flamand C, Apostolidis T. 2019. Understanding health behaviour changes in response to outbreaks: findings from a longitudinal study of a large epidemic of mosquito-borne disease. Soc Sci Med. 230:184–193. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner B, Schüz B, Sniehotta FF. 2008. Preventive health behavior and adaptive accuracy of risk perceptions. Risk Anal. 28(3):741–748. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01047.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist M. 2013. The necessity for longitudinal studies in risk perception research. Risk Anal. 33(1):50–51. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01941.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siller M, Sigman M. 2008. Modeling longitudinal change in the language abilities of children with autism: parent behaviors and child characteristics as predictors of change. Dev Psychol. 44(6):1691–1704. doi:10.1037/a0013771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1987. Perception of risk. Science. 236(4799):280–285. doi:10.1126/science.3563507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic P. 1993. Perceived risk, trust, and democracy. Risk Anal. 13(6):675–682. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith VK, Michaels RG. 1987. How did households interpret Chernobyl? A Bayesian analysis of risk perceptions. Econ Lett. 23(4):359–364. doi:10.1016/0165-1765(87)90145-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson RF. 2009. Habituation: a history. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 92(2):127–134. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2008.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo C, Meyer MA, Marlatt H, Peek L, Morrissey B. 2014. An assessment of change in risk perception and optimistic bias for hurricanes among Gulf Coast residents. Risk Anal. 34(6):1013–1024. doi:10.1111/risa.12149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2020. Statistics & Maps, 2015–2017 Case Counts. [accessed 2020 Aug 27]. https://www.cdc.gov/zika/reporting/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Viscusi WK, O’Connor CJ. 1984. Adaptive responses to chemical labeling: are workers Bayesian decision makers? Am Econ Rev. 74:942–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visschers VHM, Siegrist M. 2013. How a nuclear power plant accident influences acceptance of nuclear power: results of a longitudinal study before and after the Fukushima disaster. Risk Anal. 33(2):333–347. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01861.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White MP, Eiser JR. 2005. Information specificity and hazard risk potential as moderators of trust asymmetry. Risk Anal. 25(5):1187–1198. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00659.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirz CD, Mayorga M, Johnson BB. 2020. A longitudinal analysis of Americans’ media sources, risk perceptions, and judged need for action during the Zika outbreak. Health Commun. doi:10.1080/10410236.2020.1773707
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar