60
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Integrating ecosystem service value in the disclosure of landscape ecological risk changes: a case study in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

, , &
Pages 326-351 | Received 30 Oct 2023, Accepted 12 May 2024, Published online: 21 May 2024

References

  • Abera W, Tamene L, Kassawmar T, Mulatu K, Kassa H, Verchot L, Quintero M. 2021. Impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on ecosystem services in the Yayo coffee forest biosphere reserve, southwestern Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv. 50:101338. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101338.
  • Agra J, Ligeiro R, Heino J, Macedo DR, Castro DMP, Linares MS, Callisto M. 2021. Anthropogenic disturbances alter the relationships between environmental heterogeneity and biodiversity of stream insects. Ecol Indic. 121:107079. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107079.
  • Bellard C, Bertelsmeier C, Leadley P, Thuiller W, Courchamp F. 2012. Impacts of climate change on the future of biodiversity. Ecol Lett. 15(4):365–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01736.x.
  • Bongaarts J. 2019. IPBES, 2019. Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science‐Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Popul Develop Rev. 45(3):680–681. doi: 10.1111/padr.12283.
  • Costanza R, d‘Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O'Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature. 387(6630):253–260. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2.
  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change. 26:152–158. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
  • Daily GC, Ruckelshaus M. 2022. 25 years of valuing ecosystems in decision-making. Nature. 606(7914):465–466. doi: 10.1038/d41586-022-01480-x.
  • Dalloz MF, Crouzeilles R, Almeida-Gomes M, Papi B, Prevedello JA. 2017. Incorporating landscape ecology metrics into environmental impact assessment in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Perspectiv Ecol Conserv. 15(3):216–220. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.07.002.
  • Danneyrolles V, Dupuis S, Fortin G, Leroyer M, de Römer A, Terrail R, Vellend M, Boucher Y, Laflamme J, Bergeron Y, et al. 2019. Stronger influence of anthropogenic disturbance than climate change on century-scale compositional changes in northern forests. Nat Commun. 10(1):1265. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09265-z.
  • De Lange HJ, Sala S, Vighi M, Faber JH. 2010. Ecological vulnerability in risk assessment—a review and perspectives. Sci Total Environ. 408(18):3871–3879. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.009.
  • Faber JH, van Wensem J. 2012. Elaborations on the use of the ecosystem services concept for application in ecological risk assessment for soils. Sci Total Environ. 415:3–8. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.059.
  • Farley J. 2008. The role of prices in conserving critical natural capital. Conserv Biol. 22(6):1399–1408. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01090.x.
  • Franklin J, Serra-Diaz JM, Syphard AD, Regan HM. 2016. Global change and terrestrial plant community dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 113(14):3725–3734. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519911113.
  • Fu Z, Xu X. 2001. Regional ecological risk assessment. Adv Earth Sci. 16(2):267–271.
  • Gallopín GC. 2006. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environ Change. 16(3):293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.004.
  • Gong J, Zhao C, Xie Y, Gao Y. 2014. Ecological risk assessment and management of Bailong River Basin in Gansu Province based on landscape pattern. Chin J Appl Ecol. 25(7):2041–2048. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.20140425.005.
  • Grêt-Regamey A, Brunner SH, Altwegg J, Bebi P. 2013. Facing uncertainty in ecosystem services-based resource management. J Environ Manage. 127:S145–S154. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.028.
  • Guo Y, Fu B, Xu P, Wang Y, Liu X. 2021. Mapping regional differences in payment for ecosystem service policies to inform integrated management: case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. J Environ Manage. 278:111396. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111396.
  • Heenkenda MK, Bartolo R. 2015. Regional ecological risk assessment using a relative risk model: a case study of the Darwin Harbour, Darwin, Australia. Human Ecol Risk Assess Int J. 22(2):401–423. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2015.1078225.
  • Huang M, Zhong Y, Feng S, Zhang J. 2020. Spatial-temporal characteristic and driving analysis of landscape ecological vulnerability in water environment protection area of Chaohu Basin since 1970s. J Lake Sci. 32(4):977–988.
  • Hunsaker CT, Graham RL, Ii GWS, O'neill RV, Barnthouse LW, Gardner RH. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environ Manage. 14(3):325–332. doi: 10.1007/BF02394200.
  • Kang P, Chen W, Wang M. 2016. Advancesin ecosystem service-based ecological risk assessment. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 36(5):1192–1203.
  • Lee Y-C, Ahern J, Yeh C-T. 2015. Ecosystem services in peri-urban landscapes: the effects of agricultural landscape change on ecosystem services in Taiwan’s western coastal plain. Landscape Urban Plan. 139:137–148. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.023.
  • Levine SL, Giddings J, Valenti T, Cobb GP, Carley DS, McConnell LL. 2019. Overcoming challenges of incorporating higher tier data in ecological risk assessments and risk management of pesticides in the United States: findings and recommendations from the 2017 workshop on regulation and innovation in agriculture. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 15(5):714–725. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4173.
  • Liang J, Li X. 2018. Characteristics of temporal-spatial differentiation in landscape pattern vulnerability in Nansihu Lake wetland. Chin J Appl Ecol. 29(2):626–634.
  • Liang F, Liu L. 2011. Quantitative analysis of human disturbance intensity of landscape patterns and preliminary optimization of ecological function regions: a case of Minqing county in Fujian province. Res Sci. 33(6):1138–1144.
  • Li Y, Lin J, Sun X. 2017. An early warning method on ecological risk and its application to improve landscape ecological security pattern regulation. Geograph Res. 36(3):485–494. doi: 10.11821/dlyj201703007.
  • Li X, Li S, Zhang Y, O’Connor PJ, Zhang L, Yan J. 2021. Landscape ecological risk assessment under multiple indicators. Land. 10(7):739. doi: 10.3390/land10070739.
  • Liu S, Hou X, Zhang Y, Yin Y, Wang J. 2017. Assessment of and controlling strategies for ecological risks of land consolidation based on ecosystem services. J Ecol Rural Environ. 33(3):193–200.
  • Liu X, Li X, Jiang D. 2021. Landscape pattern identification and ecological risk assessment using land-use change in the Yellow River Basin. Transact Chin Soc Agricult Eng. 37(4):265–274. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2021.04.032.
  • Liu Y, Li J, Shi X, Yuan Q, Pu R, Yan L. 2016. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Tampa Bay Watershed of American during 1985-2015. Bullet Soil Water Conserv. 36(3):125–130.
  • Liu Y, Li T, Zhao W, Wang S, Fu B. 2019. Landscape functional zoning at a county level based on ecosystem services bundle: methods comparison and management indication. J Environ Manage. 249:109315. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109315.
  • Liu M, Wang Y, Pei H. 2020. Landscape ecological risk assessment in Bashang area of Hebei Province based on land use change. Bullet Soil Water Conserv. 40(4):303–311.
  • Li F, Wang F, Liu H, Huang K, Yu Y, Huang B. 2023. A comparative analysis of ecosystem service valuation methods: taking Beijing, China as a case. Ecol Indic. 154:110872. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110872.
  • Li W, Wang Y, Xie S, Sun R, Cheng X. 2020. Impacts of landscape multifunctionality change on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing. Ecol Indic. 117:106681. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106681.
  • Li H, Zhou Q, Li B, Guo H, Wang F-H, He C. 2021. Spatiotemporal change and correlation analysis of ecosystem service values and ecological risk in three gorges reservoir area in the past 30 years. Res Environ Yangtze Basin. 30(3):654–666.
  • Lü L, Zang J, Sun C, Wang X, Zheng D. 2018. Landscape ecological risk assessment of Xi river Basin based on land-use change. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 38(16):5952–5960. doi: 10.5846/stxb201708111440.
  • Lu S, Tang X, Guan X, Qin F, Liu X, Zhang D. 2020. The assessment of forest ecological security and its determining indicators: a case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China. J Environ Manage. 258:110048. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110048.
  • Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson PA. 2003. A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Global Environ Change. 13(4):255–267. doi: 10.1016/s0959-3780(03)00054-2.
  • Luo F, Liu Y, Peng J, Wu J. 2018. Assessing urban landscape ecological risk through an adaptive cycle framework. Landscape Urban Plan. 180:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.08.014.
  • Mann D, Anees MM, Rankavat S, Joshi PK. 2021. Spatio-temporal variations in landscape ecological risk related to road network in the Central Himalaya. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 27(2):289–306. doi: 10.1080/10807039.2019.1710693.
  • Metzger MJ, Schröter D. 2006. Towards a spatially explicit and quantitative vulnerability assessment of environmental change in Europe. Reg Environ Change. 6(4):201–216. doi: 10.1007/s10113-006-0020-2.
  • Mo W, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Zhuang D. 2017. Impacts of road network expansion on landscape ecological risk in a megacity, China: a case study of Beijing. Sci Total Environ. 574:1000–1011. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.048.
  • Munns WR, Jr., Rea AW, Suter GW, II, Martin L, Blake-Hedges L, Crk T, Davis C, Ferreira G, Jordan S, Mahoney M, et al. 2016. Ecosystem services as assessment endpoints for ecological risk assessment. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 12(3):522–528. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1707.
  • Nienstedt KM, Brock TCM, van Wensem J, Montforts M, Hart A, Aagaard A, Alix A, Boesten J, Bopp SK, Brown C, et al. 2012. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci Total Environ. 415:31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.057.
  • Ouyang Z, Song C, Zheng H, Polasky S, Xiao Y, Bateman IJ, Liu J, Ruckelshaus M, Shi F, Xiao Y, et al. 2020. Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 117(25):14593–14601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117.
  • Pan T, Wu S, Dai E, Liu Y. 2013. Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on In VEST model. Chin J Appl Ecol. 24(1):183–189. doi: 10.13287/j1001933220130140.
  • Paukert CP, Pitts KL, Whittier JB, Olden JD. 2011. Development and assessment of a landscape-scale ecological threat index for the Lower Colorado River Basin. Ecol Indic. 11(2):304–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.05.008.
  • Peng J, Dang W, Liu Y, Zong M, Hu X. 2015. Review on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica. 70(4):664–677. doi: 10.11821/dlxb201504013.
  • Piet GJ, Knights AM, Jongbloed RH, Tamis JE, de Vries P, Robinson LA. 2017. Ecological risk assessments to guide decision-making: methodology matters. Environ Sci Policy. 68:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.009.
  • Ran P, Hu S, Frazier AE, Qu S, Yu D, Tong L. 2022. Exploring changes in landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a spatiotemporal perspective. Ecol Indic. 137:108744. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108744.
  • Ribeiro EMS, Lohbeck M, Santos BA, Arroyo‐RodríGuez Víctor, Tabarelli M, Leal IR. 2019. Functional diversity and composition of Caatinga woody flora are negatively impacted by chronic anthropogenic disturbance. J Ecol. 107(5):2291–2302. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.13177.
  • Rolando JL, Turin C, Ramírez DA, Mares V, Monerris J, Quiroz R. 2017. Key ecosystem services and ecological intensification of agriculture in the tropical high-Andean Puna as affected by land-use and climate changes. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 236:221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.12.010.
  • Song M, Jin G, Yan W. 2021. Which pro-environmental farming behaviors should be priorities for funding? An approach based on matching ecosystem services (ESs) demand and supply. J Environ Manage. 297:113368. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113368.
  • Sonter LJ, Johnson JA, Nicholson CC, Richardson LL, Watson KB, Ricketts TH. 2017. Multi-site interactions: understanding the offsite impacts of land use change on the use and supply of ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 23:158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.12.012.
  • Su C, Fu B. 2012. Discussion on links among landscape pattern, ecological process, and ecosystem services. Chin J Nature. 34(5):277–283.
  • Sun C, Yan X, Zhong J. 2014. Evaluation of the landscape patterns vulnerability and analysis of spatial correlation patterns in the lower reaches of Liaohe river plain. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 34(2):247–257.
  • Toro J, Duarte O, Requena I, Zamorano M. 2012. Determining vulnerability importance in environmental impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev. 32(1):107–117. doi: 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.005.
  • Turner L, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Luers A, Martello ML, et al. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 100(14):8074–8079.
  • USEPA. 1992. Framework for ecological risk assessment. Washington, DC, USA: Risk Assessment Forum.
  • USEPA. 1998. Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. Fed Regist. 63(93):26846–26924.
  • van Bueren EM, Lammerts van Bueren ET, van der Zijpp AJ. 2014. Understanding wicked problems and organized irresponsibility: challenges for governing the sustainable intensification of chicken meat production. Curr Opinion Environ Sustain. 8:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.06.002.
  • Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM. 1997. Human domination of earth’s ecosystems. Science. 277(5325):494–499. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5325.494.
  • Wang H, Liu X, Zhao C, Chang Y, Liu Y, Zang F. 2021. Spatial-temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang National nature reserve in Gansu Province, China. Ecol Indic. 124:107454. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107454.
  • Woli P, Jones JW, Ingram KT, Hoogenboom G. 2014. Predicting crop yields with the agricultural reference index for drought. J Agronomy Crop Sci. 200(3):163–171. doi: 10.1111/jac.12055.
  • Xie G, Lu C, Leng Y, Zheng D, Li S. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J Nat Res. 18(2):189–196.
  • Xie G, Zhen L, Lu C, Xiao Y, Chen C. 2008. Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Res. 23(5):911–919.
  • Xue L, Zhu B, Wu Y, Wei G, Liao S, Yang C, Wang J, Zhang H, Ren L, Han Q. 2019. Dynamic projection of ecological risk in the Manas River basin based on terrain gradients. Sci Total Environ. 653:283–293. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.382.
  • Xu W, Wang J, Zhang M, Li S. 2021. Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large-scale opencast coal mine area. J Cleaner Prod. 286:125523. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125523.
  • Xu X, Yang G, Tan Y, Zhuang Q, Li H, Wan R, Su W, Zhang J. 2016. Ecological risk assessment of ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China from 1985 to 2020. Sci Total Environ. 554–555:7–16. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.02.120.
  • Zhang J, QG, Cheng S. 2023. Spatiotemporal changes and correlation between landscape ecological risk and ecological service value in Hanjiang eco-economic belt. Bullet Soil Water Conserv. 43(4):294–306. doi: 10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2023.04.035.
  • Zhao T, Ouyang Z, Zheng H, Wang X, Miao H. 2004. Forest ecosystem services and their valuation in China. J Nat Res. 19(04):480–491. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3037.2004.04.010.
  • Zhuang D, Liu J. 1997. Study on the model of regional differentiation of land use degree in china. J Nat Res. 12(2):105–111. doi: 10.11849/zrzyxb.1997.02.002.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.