Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological security pattern based on an optimized assessment framework and circuit theory: a case of Fuzhou City, China

References

• Airiken M, Zhang F, Chan NW, Kung HT. 2022. Assessment of spatial and temporal ecological environment quality under land use change of urban agglomeration in the North Slope of Tianshan, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(8):12282–12299. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16579-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An M, Xie P, He W, Wang B, Huang J, Khanal R. 2022. Spatiotemporal change of ecologic environment quality and human interaction factors in three gorges ecologic economic corridor, based on RSEI. Ecol Indic. 141:109090. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao Z, Shifaw E, Deng C, Sha J, Li X, Hanchiso T, Yang W. 2022. Remote sensing-based assessment of ecosystem health by optimizing vigor-organization-resilience model: a case study in Fuzhou City, China. Ecol Inf. 72:101889. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan BA, Gao L, Ye Y, Sun X, Connor JD, Crossman ND, Stafford-Smith M, Wu J, He C, Yu D, et al. 2018. China’s response to a national land-system sustainability emergency/704/844/685/704/172/4081 perspective. Nature. 559(7713):193–204. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0280-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccato P, Gobron N, Flasse S, Pinty B, Tarantola S. 2002. Designing a spectral index to estimate vegetation water content from remote sensing data: part 1 theoretical approach. Remote Sens Environ. 82(2-3):188–197. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00037-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen J, Wang S, Zou Y. 2022. Construction of an ecological security pattern based on ecosystem sensitivity and the importance of ecological services: a case study of the Guanzhong Plain urban agglomeration, China. Ecol Indic. 136:108688. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Yu L, Du Z, Xu Y, Zhao J, Zhao H, Zhang G, Peng D, Gong P. 2022. Distribution of ecological restoration projects associated with land use and land cover change in China and their ecological impacts. Sci Total Environ. 825:153938. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153938.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Ma Y, Pan J, Zhang S, Zhang X, Wu R, Li X. 2023. Integrating ecosystem health diagnosis into the construction of ecological security network—a case study in Qujing City, China. Ecol Indic. 146:109780. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 1992. Toward an operational definition of ecosystem health. In: Costanza R, Norton BG, Haskell BD, editors. Ecosystem health: new goals for environmental management. Washington DC, US: Island Press; p. 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Costanza R. 2012. Ecosystem health and ecological engineering. Ecol Eng. 45:24–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das M, Das A, Mandal A. 2023. Exploring the factors affecting urban ecological risk: a case from an Indian mega metropolitan region. Geosci Front. 14(1):101488. doi: 10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan F, Liu Y, Chen J, Dong J. 2021. Scenario-based ecological security patterns to indicate landscape sustainability: a case study on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Landscape Ecol. 36(7):2175–2188. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01044-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan F, Wen X, Feng Z, Gao Y, Li W. 2022. Optimizing urban ecological space based on the scenario of ecological security patterns: the case of central Wuhan, China. Appl Geogr. 138:102619. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2021.102619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan X, Cheng Y, Tan F, Zhao T. 2022. Construction and optimization of the ecological security pattern in Liyang, China. Land. 11(10):1641. doi: 10.3390/land11101641.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao J, Du F, Zuo L, Jiang Y. 2021. Integrating ecosystem services and rocky desertification into identification of karst ecological security pattern. Landscape Ecol. 36(7):2113–2133. doi: 10.1007/s10980-020-01100-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan D, Jiang Y, Cheng L. 2022. How can the landscape ecological security pattern be quantitatively optimized and effectively evaluated? An integrated analysis with the granularity inverse method and landscape indicators. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(27):41590–41616. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16759-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang BX, Chiou SC, Li WY. 2021. Landscape pattern and ecological network structure in urban green space planning: a case study of Fuzhou city. Land. 10(8):769. doi: 10.3390/land10080769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Yu H, Han D, Zhang G, Wei Y, Huang J, An L, Liu X, Ren Y. 2020. Declines in global ecological security under climate change. Ecol Indic. 117:106651. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamran M, Yamamoto K. 2023. Evolution and use of remote sensing in ecological vulnerability assessment: a review. Ecol Indic. 148:110099. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang P, Chen W, Hou Y, Li Y. 2018. Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: a case study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci Total Environ. 636:1442–1454. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatun R, Das S. 2022. Exploring ecosystem health of wetlands in Rarh tract of West Bengal through V-O-R model. Ecol Inf. 72:101840. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2022.101840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai S, Sha J, Eladawy A, Li X, Wang J, Kurbanov E, Lin Z, Wu L, Han R, Su YC. 2022. Evaluation of ecological security and ecological maintenance based on pressure-state-response (PSR) model, case study: Fuzhou city, China. Hum Ecol Risk Assess. 28(7):734–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee H, Lautenbach S. 2016. A quantitative review of relationships between ecosystem services. Ecol Indic. 66:340–351. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leprieur C, Kerr YH, Mastorchio S, Meunier JC. 2000. Monitoring vegetation cover across semi-arid regions: comparison of remote observations from various scales. Int J Remote Sens. 21(2):281–300. doi: 10.1080/014311600210830.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Liu W, Feng Q, Zhu M, Yang L, Zhang J, Yin X. 2023. The role of land use change in affecting ecosystem services and the ecological security pattern of the Hexi Regions, Northwest China. Sci Total Environ. 855:158940. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158940.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Li M, Xia B-C. 2020. Spatio-temporal dynamics of ecological security pattern of the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration based on LUCC simulation. Ecol Indic. 114:106319. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu C, Li W, Xu J, Zhou H, Li C, Wang W. 2022. Global trends and characteristics of ecological security research in the early 21st century: a literature review and bibliometric analysis. Ecol Indic. 137:108734. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108734.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Zhao C, Liu X, Chang Y, Wang H, Yang J, Yang X, Wei Y. 2021. The multi-dimensional perspective of ecological security evaluation and drive mechanism for Baishuijiang National Nature Reserve, China. Ecol Indic. 132:108295. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick J, Alqadhi S, Talukdar S, Pradhan B, Bindajam AA, Islam ARMT, Dajam AS. 2021. A novel technique for modeling ecosystem health condition: a case study in Saudi Arabia. Remote Sens. 13(13):2632. doi: 10.3390/rs13132632.
   Google Scholar
• Mcgarigal K. 2015. FRAGSTATS HELP document. [accessed 2023 May 21]. https://web.archive.org/web/20200812053053id_/http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/documents/fragstats.help.4.2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• McRae BH. 2012a. Barrier mapper connectivity analysis software. Seattle (WA): The Nature Conservancy. https://circuitscape.org/linkagemapper/.
   Google Scholar
• McRae BH. 2012b. Centrality mapper connectivity analysis software. Seattle (WA): The Nature Conservancy. https://circuitscape.org/linkagemapper.
   Google Scholar
• McRae BH. 2012c. Pinchpoint mapper connectivity analysis software. Seattle (WA): The Nature Conservancy. https://circuitscape.org/linkagemapper.
   Google Scholar
• McRae BH, Dickson BG, Keitt TH, Shah VB. 2008. Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. Ecology. 89(10):2712–2724. doi: 10.1890/07-1861.1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae BH, Kavanagh DM. 2011. Linkage mapper connectivity analysis software. Seattle (WA): The Nature Conservancy. https://circuitscape.org/linkagemapper.
   Google Scholar
• NCP. 2023. InVEST 3.13.0. Stanford University, University of Minnesota, Chinese Academy of Sciences, The Nature Conservancy, World Wildlife Fund, Stockholm Resilience Centre and the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences. [accessed 2023 April 21]. https://naturalcapitalproject.stanford.edu/softwa.
   Google Scholar
• Nie W, Xu B, Yang F, Shi Y, Liu B, Wu R, Lin W, Pei H, Bao Z. 2023. Simulating future land use by coupling ecological security patterns and multiple scenarios. Sci Total Environ. 859(Pt 1):160262. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pan N, Du Q, Guan Q, Tan Z, Sun Y, Wang Q. 2022. Ecological security assessment and pattern construction in arid and semi-arid areas: a case study of the Hexi Region, NW China. Ecol Indic. 138:108797. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Z, He J, Liu D, Wang J, Guo X. 2021. Ecosystem health assessment based on ecological integrity and ecosystem services demand in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Sci Total Environ. 774:144837. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Liu Y, Wu J, Lv H, Hu X. 2015. Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health: a case study in Shenzhen City, China. Landscape Urban Plann. 143:56–68. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Wang Y, Wu J, Zhang Y. 2007. Evaluation for regional ecosystem health: methodology and research progress. Acta Ecol Sin. 27(11):4877–4885. doi: 10.1016/S1872-2032(08)60009-8.
   Google Scholar
• Peng J, Yang Y, Liu Y, Hu Y, Du Y, Meersmans J, Qiu S. 2018. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Sci Total Environ. 644:781–790. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng J, Zhao S, Dong J, Liu Y, Meersmans J, Li H, Wu J. 2019. Applying ant colony algorithm to identify ecological security patterns in megacities. Environ Modell Software. 117:214–222. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2019.03.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiao X, Gu Y, Zou C, Xu D, Wang L, Ye X, Yang Y, Huang X. 2019. Temporal variation and spatial scale dependency of the trade-offs and synergies among multiple ecosystem services in the Taihu Lake Basin of China. Sci Total Environ. 651(Pt 1):218–229. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.135.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ran C, Wang S, Bai X, Tan Q, Wu L, Luo X, Chen H, Xi H, Lu Q. 2021. Evaluation of temporal and spatial changes of global ecosystem health. Land Degrad Dev. 32(3):1500–1512. doi: 10.1002/ldr.3813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ran Y, Lei D, Li J, Gao L, Mo J, Liu X. 2022. Identification of crucial areas of territorial ecological restoration based on ecological security pattern: a case study of the central Yunnan urban agglomeration, China. Ecol Indic. 143:109318. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikimaru A, Roy PS, Miyatake S. 2002. Tropical forest cover density mapping. Trop Ecol. 43(1):39–47.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty T. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—what it is and how it is used. Math Model. 9(3–5):161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi F, Liu S, Sun Y, An Y, Zhao S, Liu Y, Li M. 2020. Ecological network construction of the heterogeneous agro-pastoral areas in the upper Yellow River basin. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 302:107069. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2020.107069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan J, Li H, Lin W. 2022. Integrating ecosystems and socioeconomic systems to identify ecological security pattern and restoration strategy in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Front Environ Sci. 10:1–16. doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.862310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang C, Yu C, Chen T, Feng Z, Hu Y, Wu K. 2020. Can the establishment of ecological security patterns improve ecological protection? An example of Nanchang, China. Sci Total Environ. 740:140051. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Yu Q, Qiu S, Xu C, Ma J, Liu H. 2023. Study on the relationship between topological characteristics of ecological spatial network and soil conservation function in southeastern Tibet, China. Ecol Indic. 146:109791. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang F, Yuan X, Zhou L, Zhang M. 2022. Integrating ecosystem services and landscape connectivity to construct and optimize ecological security patterns: a case study in the central urban area Chongqing municipality, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 29(28):43138–43154. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-16281-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang P, Li X, Gong J, Song C. 2001. Vegetation temperature condition index and its application for drought monitoring. In: IGARSS 2001, editor. Scanning the Present and Resolving the Future. Proceedings. IEEE 2001 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (Cat. No. 01CH37217); Sydney, NSW, Australia: IEEE. 1. p. 412–418. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/976083/citations#citations
   Google Scholar
• Wang W, Gong J, Yang W, Zeng J. 2022. The ecology-economy-transport nexus: evidence from Fujian Province, China. Agriculture. 12(2):135. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12020135.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Liu X, Wu Y, Chen R, Wang S. 2023. Dynamic assessment and change analysis of ecosystem service value based on physical assessment method in Cili County, China. Forests. 14(5):869. doi: 10.3390/f14050869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang L, Song Y. 2022. Study on the construction of the ecological security pattern of the Lancang River Basin (Yunnan section) based on InVEST-MSPA-circuit theory. Sustainability. 15(1):477. doi: 10.3390/su15010477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Luo K, Zhao Y, Lechner AM, Wu J, Zhu Q, Sha W, Wang Y. 2022. Modelling regional ecological security pattern and restoration priorities after long-term intensive open-pit coal mining. Sci Total Environ. 835:155491. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155491.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford WG, Rapport DJ, DeSoyza AG. 1999. Using resistance and resilience measurements for “fitness” tests in ecosystem health. J Environ Manage. 57(1):21–29. doi: 10.1006/jema.1999.0287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiang T, Meng X, Wang X, Xiong J, Xu Z. 2022. Spatiotemporal changes and driving factors of ecosystem health in the Qinling-Daba mountains. IJGI. 11(12):600. doi: 10.3390/ijgi11120600.
   Google Scholar
• Xu W, He M, Meng W, Zhang Y, Yun H, Lu Y, Huang Z, Mo X, Hu B, Liu B, et al. 2022. Temporal-spatial change of China’s coastal ecosystems health and driving factors analysis. Sci Total Environ. 845:157319. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.157319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi L, Yu Z, Qian J, Kobuliev M, Chen C, Xing X. 2021. Evaluation of the heterogeneity in the intensity of human interference on urbanized coastal ecosystems: Shenzhen (China) as a case study. Ecol Indic. 122:107243. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R, Yin G. 2010. China’s primary programs of terrestrial ecosystem restoration: initiation, implementation, and challenges. Environ Manage. 45(3):429–441. doi: 10.1007/s00267-009-9373-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Chen H, Ma Y, Liu D, Liang X, Chen W. 2023. Identification of priority areas for ecological restoration based on ecological security and landscape elements. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30(12):35307–35325. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24711-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Shao H, Li X, Xian W, Shao Q, Yin Z, Lai F, Qi J. 2022. Spatiotemporal dynamics of ecological security pattern of urban agglomerations in Yangtze River delta based on LUCC simulation. Remote Sens. 14(2):296. doi: 10.3390/rs14020296.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Hu B, Jiang W, Qiu H. 2023. Construction of ecological security pattern based on ecological carrying capacity assessment 1990–2040: a case study of the Southwest Guangxi Karst - Beibu Gulf. Ecol Modell. 479:110322. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Z, Liu Y, Wang Y, Liu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang Y. 2020. What factors affect the synergy and tradeoff between ecosystem services, and how, from a geospatial perspective? J Clean Prod. 257:120454. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Huan Y, Wang L, Lan Y, Liang T, Shi B, Zhang Q. 2023. Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify priority conservation and restoration areas from an ecological network perspective. Sci Total Environ. 873:162261. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou Q, van den Bosch CCK, Chen J, Zhang W, Dong J. 2021. Identification of ecological networks and nodes in Fujian province based on green and blue corridors. Sci Rep. 11(1):20872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99416-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zongfan B, Ling H, Huiqun L, Xuhai J, Liangzhi L. 2023. Spatiotemporal change and driving factors of ecological status in Inner Mongolia based on the modified remote sensing ecological index. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 30(18):52593–52608. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25948-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar