721
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Inaccuracy in Health Research News: A Typology and Predictions of Scientists' Perceptions of the Accuracy of Research News

References

  • Borra, S. T., Earl, R. & Hogan, E. H. (1998). Paucity of nutrition and food safety “news you can use” reveals opportunity for dietetics practitioners. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 98, 190–193.
  • Brechman, J., Lee, C. & Cappella, J. N. (2009). Lost in translation: A comparison of cancer-genetics reporting in the press release and its subsequent coverage in the press. Science Communication, 30, 453–474.
  • Brodie, M., Hamel, E. C., Altman, D. E., Blendon, R. J. & Benson, J. M. (2003). Health news and the American public, 1996–2002. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 28, 927–950.
  • Bubela, T. M. & Caulfield, T. A. (2004). Do the print media “hype” genetic research? A comparison of newspaper stories and peer-reviewed research papers. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 170, 1399–1407.
  • Cline, R. J. W. & Haynes, K. M. (2001). Consumer health information seeking on the Internet: the state of the art. Health Education Research, 16, 671–692.
  • De Semir, V., Ribas, C. & Revuelta, G. (1998). Press releases of science journal articles and subsequent newspaper stories on the same topic. Journal of the American Medical Association, 280, 294–295.
  • Dunwoody, S. & Scott, B. T. (1982). Scientists as mass media sources. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 52–59.
  • Entwistle, V. (1995). Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. British Medical Journal, 310, 920–923.
  • Glynn, C. J. (1988). Science reporters and their editors judge sensationalism. Newspaper Research Journal, 6, 69–74.
  • Glynn, C. J. & Tims, A. R. (1982). Sensationalism in science issues: A case study. Journalism Quarterly, 59, 126–131.
  • Hartz, J. & Chappell, R. (1997). Worlds apart: How the distance between science and journalism threatens America's future. Nashville, TN: First Amendment Center.
  • Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Kua, E., Reder, M. & Grossel, M. J. (2004). Science in the news: A study of reporting genomics. Public Understanding of Science, 13, 309–322.
  • Logan, R. A., Peng, Z. & Wilson, N. F. (2000). Prevailing impressions in science and medical news: A content analysis of the Los Angeles Times and The Washington Post. Science Communication, 22, 27–45.
  • MacDonald, M. M. & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (1993). A retrospective study of the accuracy of cancer information in Ontario daily newspapers. Canadian Journal of Public Health, 93, 142–145.
  • Maille, M., Saint-Charles, J. & Lucotte, M. (2010). The gap between scientists and journalists: The case of mercury science in Quebec's press. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 70–79.
  • McCall, R. B. (1988). Science and the press: Like oil and water. American Psychologist, 43(2), 87–94.
  • Molitor, F. (1993). Accuracy in science news reporting by newspapers: The case of aspirin for the prevention of heart disease. Health Communication, 5, 209–224.
  • Moore, B. & Singletary, M. (1985). Scientific sources' perceptions of network news accuracy. Journalism Quarterly, 62, 816–823.
  • Moyer, A., Greener, S., Beauvais, J. & Salovey, P. (1995). Accuracy of health research reported in the popular press: Breast cancer and mammography. Health Communication, 7, 147–161.
  • Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London, England: Sage.
  • Pellechia, M. G. (1997). Trends in science coverage: A content analysis of three US newspapers. Public Understanding of Science, 6, 49–68.
  • Peters, P. H. (1995). The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society, 17, 31–48.
  • Pulford, L. (1976). Follow-up study of science news accuracy. Journalism Quarterly, 53, 119–121.
  • Salomone, K. L., Greenberg, M. R., Sandman, P. M. & Sachsman, D. B. (1990). A question of quality: How journalists and news sources evaluate coverage of environmental risk. Journal of Communication, 40, 117–131.
  • Singer, E. (1990). A question of accuracy: How journalists and scientists report research on hazards. Journal of Communication, 40, 102–116.
  • Suleski, J. & Ibaraki, M. (2010). Scientists are talking, but mostly to each other: A quantitative analysis of research represented in mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 115–125.
  • Tankard, J. W. & Ryan, M. (1974). New source perceptions of accuracy of science coverage. Journalism Quarterly, 51, 219–225.
  • Tichenor, P. J., Olien, C. N., Harrison, A. & Donohue, G. (1970). Mass communication systems and communication accuracy in science news reporting. Journalism Quarterly, 47, 673–683.
  • Trumbo, C. W., Dunwoody, S. & Griffin, R. J. (1998). Journalists, cognition and the presentation of epidemiologic study. Science Communication, 19, 238–265.
  • Voss, M. (2003). Why reporters and editors get health coverage wrong. Nieman Reports, 57(1), 46–48.
  • Weigold, M. F. (2001). Communicating science. Science Communication, 23, 164–173.
  • Woloshin, S. & Schwartz, L. M. (2002). Press releases: Translating research into news. Journal of the American Medical Association, 287, 2856–2858.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.