904
Views
34
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

Physician Review Websites: Effects of the Proportion and Position of Negative Reviews on Readers’ Willingness to Choose the Doctor

, , &

References

  • Asch, S. E. (1946). Forming impressions of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41, 258–290.
  • Azu, M. C., Lilley, E. J. & Kolli, A. H. (2012). Social media, surgeons, and the Internet: An era or an error? The American Surgeon, 78, 555–558.
  • Bajari, P. & Hortacsu, A. (2004). Economic insights from Internet auctions. Journal of Economic Literature, 42, 457–486.
  • Biswas, D., Biswas, A. & Chatterjee, S. (2009). Making judgments in a two-sequence cue environment: The effects of differential cue strengths, order sequence, and distraction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 19, 88–97.
  • Cacioppo, J. T. & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. In T. V. Merluzzi C. R. Glass & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309–342). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Chakravarty, A., Liu, Y. & Mazumdar, T. (2010). The differential effects of online word-of-mouth and critics’ reviews on pre-release movie evaluation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 24, 185–197.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
  • Duffy, M. E. & Thorson, E. (2009). Emerging trends in the new media landscape. In J. C. Parker & E. Thorson (Eds.), Health communication in the new media landscape (pp. 93–116). New York, NY: Springer.
  • Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Qing, Q. & Wahl, S. T. (2007). The influence of computer-mediated word-of-mouth communication on student perceptions of instructors’ credibility and attractiveness. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 12, 189–194.
  • Ellimoottil, C., Hart, A., Greco, K., Quek, M. L. & Farooq, A. (2012). Online reviews of 500 urologists. The Journal of Urology, 189, 2272–2276.
  • Emmert, M., Sander, U. & Risch, F. (2013). Eight questions about physician-rating websites: A systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, 102–111.
  • Gao, G. G., McCullough, J. S., Agarwal, R. & Jha, A. K. (2012). A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: Analysis of patients’ online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14, 38.
  • Harris, K. M. (2003). How do patients choose physicians? Evidence from a national survey of enrollees in employment-related health plans. Health Services Research, 38, 711–732.
  • Harris, K. M., Buntin, M. B. & Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (2008). Choosing a health care provider: The role of quality information. Research Synthesis Report, 14, 1–32.
  • Haugtvedt, C. P. & Wegener, D. T. (1994). Message order effects in persuasion: An attitude strength perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 205–218.
  • Hennessy, M., Fishbein, M., Curtis, B. & Barrett, D. W. (2007). Evaluating the risk and attractiveness of romantic partners when confronted with contradictory cues. AIDS and Behavior, 11, 479–490.
  • Horgath, R. M. & Einhorn, H. J. (1992). Order effects in belief updating: The belief-adjustment model. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 1–55.
  • Houser, D. & Wooders, J. (2006). Reputation in auctions: Theory, and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 15, 353–369.
  • Jain, S. (2010). Googling ourselves—What physicians can learn from online rating sites. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 6–7.
  • Kadry, B., Chu, L. F., Kadry, B., Gammas, D. & Macario, A. (2011). Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13, e95.
  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Lagu, T., Hannon, N. S., Rothberg, M. B. & Lindenauer, P. K. (2010). Patients’ evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: An analysis of physician-rating websites. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 942–946.
  • Lee, E. J. & Jang, Y. J. (2010). What do others’ reactions to news on Internet portal sites tell us? Effects of presentation format and readers’ need for cognition on reality perception. Communication Research, 37, 825–846.
  • Li, C. (2010). Primacy effect or recency effect? A long-term memory test of Super Bowl commercials. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 9, 32–44.
  • Livingston, J. A. (2005). How valuable is a good reputation? A sample selection model of Internet auctions. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 87, 453–465.
  • Lopez, A., Detz, A., Ratanawongsa, N. & Sarkar, U. (2012). What patients say about their doctors online: A qualitative content analysis. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27, 685–692.
  • Lorence, D. P., Park, H. & Fox, S. (2006). Assessing health consumerism on the web: A demographic profile of information-seeking behaviors. Journal of Medical Systems, 30, 251–258.
  • Luchins, A. S. (1958). Definitiveness of impression and primacy-recency in communications. Journal of Social Psychology, 48, 275–290.
  • Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N. & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 55, 223–233.
  • Mostaghimi, A., Crotty, B. H. & Landon, B. E. (2010). The availability and nature of physician information on the Internet. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25, 1152–1156.
  • Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
  • Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668–672.
  • Petty, R. E. & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Reimann, S. & Strech, D. (2010). The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Services Research, 10, 332
  • Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Swanson, J. & Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment. Experimental Economics, 9, 79–101.
  • Rosnow, R. (1966). Whatever happened to the ‘law of primacy.’ Journal of Communication, 16, 10– 31.
  • Segal, J. (2009). The role of the Internet in doctor performance rating. Pain Physician, 12, 659–664.
  • Segal, J., Sacopulos, M., Sheets, V., Thurston, I., Brooks, K. & Puccia, R. (2012). Online doctor reviews: Do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(2), e50.
  • Stewart, R. H. (1965). Effect of continuous responding on the order effect in personality impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 161–165.
  • Walther, J. B., DeAndrea, D., Kim, J. & Anthony, J. (2010). The influence of online comments on perceptions of anti-marijuana public service announcements on YouTube. Human Communication Research, 36, 469–492.
  • Walther, J. B. & Jang, J. W. (2012). Communication process in participatory websites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 2–15.
  • Westerwick, A. (2013). Effects of sponsorship, web site design, and Google ranking on the credibility of online information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 194–211.
  • Willemsen, L. M., Neijens, P. C. & Bronner, F. (2012). The ironic effect of source identification on the perceived credibility of online product reviewers. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 18, 16–31.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.