1,179
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ARTICLES

The Influence of Weight-of-Evidence Messages on (Vaccine) Attitudes: A Sequential Mediation Model

, , &

References

  • Afifi, W. A. & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14, 167–190. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2004.tb00310.x
  • Askelson, N. M., Campo, S., Lowe, J. B., Smith, S., Dennis, L. K. & Andsager, J. (2010). Using the theory of planned behavior to predict mothers’ intentions to vaccinate their daughters against HPV. Journal of School Nursing, 26, 194–202. doi:10.1177/1059840510366022
  • Berger, C. R. & Calabrese, R. J. (1975). Some exploration in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a developmental theory of communication. Human Communication Research, 1, 99–112. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00258.x
  • Berinsky, A., Huber, G. & Lenz, G. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk. Political Analysis, 20, 351–368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057
  • Bolsen, T., Leeper, T. J. & Shapiro, M. A. (2014). Doing what others do: Norms, science, and collective action on global warming. American Politics Research, 42, 65–89. doi:10.1177/1532673X13484173
  • Boykoff, M. & Boykoff, J. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 15, 125–136. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001
  • Brainard, C. (2013). Sticking with the truth: How “balanced” coverage helped sustain the bogus claim that vaccines can cause autism. Retrieved from http://www.cjr.org/feature/sticking_with_the_truth.php?page=all
  • Brashers, D. E., Goldsmith, D. J. & Hsieh, E. (2002). Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Human Communication Research, 28, 258–271. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00807.x
  • Brewer, P. R. & Ley, B. L. (2012). Contested evidence: Exposure to competing scientific claims and public support for banning bisphenol A. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 395–410. doi:10.1177/0963662512449993
  • Bruggemann, M. & Engesser, S. (2014). Between consensus and denial: Climate journalists as interpretive community. Science Communication, 36, 399–427. doi:10.1177/1075547014533662
  • Chang, C. (2013). Men's and women's responses to two-sided health news coverage: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 1326–1344. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.778363
  • Clarke, C. (2008). A question of balance: The autism-vaccine controversy in the British and American elite press. Science Communication, 30, 77–107. doi:10.1177/1075547008320262
  • Clarke, C., Dixon, G., Holton, A. & McKeever, B. (2014). Including “evidentiary balance” in news media coverage of vaccine risk. Health Communication. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.867006
  • Clarke, C. & McComas, K. (2012). Seeking and processing information about influenza vaccination: A study of healthcare workers. Health Communication, 27, 244–256. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.578332
  • Clarke, C., Niederdeppe, J. & Lundell, H. (2012). Message strategies used by public communication campaigns about social determinants of health and health disparities. International Journal of Environment and Public Health, 9, 4254–4277. doi:10.3390/ijerph9124254
  • Cohen, J. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication & Society, 4, 245–264. doi:10.1207/S15327825MCS0403_01
  • Corbett, J. B. & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129–151. doi:10.1177/1075547004270234
  • Cunningham, R. M. & Boom, J. A. (2013). Telling stories of vaccine-preventable diseases: Why it works. South Dakota Medicine, (Spec), 21–26.
  • Dixon, G. & Clarke, C. (2013a). The effect of falsely balanced media representations of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavior. Health Education Research, 28, 352–359. doi:10.1093/her/cys110
  • Dixon, G. & Clarke, C. (2013b). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism-vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35, 358–382. doi:10.1177/1075547012458290
  • Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24, 199–216. doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022
  • Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman S. Dunwoody & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59–79). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Dunwoody, S. (2005). Weight-of-evidence reporting; What is it? Why use it?. Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100595
  • Durham, M. G. (1998). On the relevance of standpoint epistemology to the practice of journalism: The case of “strong objectivity.” Communication Theory, 8, 117–140. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00213.x
  • Entman, R. (1989). Democracy without citizens: Media and the decay of American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Friedman, S. M., Dunwoody, S. & Rogers, C. L. (Eds.). (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x
  • Gerend, M. A. & Shepherd, J. E. (2012). Predicting human papillomavirus vaccine uptake in young adult women: Comparing the health belief model and theory of planned behavior. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44, 171–180. doi:10.1007/s12160-012-9366-5
  • Goodlee, F., Smith, J. & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield's article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. British Medical Journal, 342, 64–66. doi:10.1136/bmj.c7452
  • Green, M. C. (2008). Research challenges in narrative persuasion. Information Design Journal, 16, 47–52. doi:10.1075/idj.16.1.07gre
  • Griffin, R. J., Dunwoody, S. & Neuwirth, K. (1999). Proposed model of the relationship of risk information seeking and processing to the development of preventive behaviors. Environmental Research, 80, S230–S245. doi:10.1006/enrs.1998.3940
  • Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., Dunwoody, S. & Giese, J. (2004). Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology, 6, 23–61. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_2
  • Gross, L. (2009). A broken trust: Lessons from the vaccine–autism wars. PLoS Biology, 7, e1000114. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000114
  • Gunther, A. C., Edgerly, S., Akin, H. & Broesch, J. A. (2012). Partisan evaluation of partisan information. Communication Research, 39, 439–457. doi:10.1177/0093650212441794
  • Han, P. K. J. (2013). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 70S, 14S–36S. doi:10.1177/1077558712459361
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Hiles, S. S. & Hinnant, A. (2014). Climate change in the newsroom: Journalists’ evolving standards of objectivity when covering global warming. Science Communication, 36, 428–453. doi:10.1177/1075547014534077
  • Holton, A. & Molyneux, L. (in press). Branding (health) journalism: Perceptions, practices, and emerging norms. Digital Journalism.
  • Igartua, J-J. & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62, 514–531. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.x
  • Jensen, J. D., Bernat, J. K., Wilson, K. M. & Goonewardene, J. (2011). The delay hypothesis: The manifestation of media effects over time. Human Communication Research, 37, 509–528. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01415.x
  • Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., King, A. J., Bernat, J. K., Davis, L., Yale, R. & Smith, J. (2011). Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 486–503. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.546491
  • Jensen, J. D. & Hurley, R. J. (2012). Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientist's credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 689–704. doi:10.1177/0963662510387759
  • Kahan, D. (2013). What's a valid sample: Problems with Mechanical Turk study samples, part 1. Retrieved from http://www.culturalcognition.net/blog/2013/7/8/whats-a-valid-sample-problems-with-mechanical-turk-study-sam.html
  • Kahlor, L., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. J. & Giese, J. (2003). Studying heuristic-systematic processing of risk communication. Risk Analysis, 23, 355–368. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00314
  • Kata, A. (2010). A postmodern Pandora's box: Anti-vaccination misinformation on the Internet. Vaccine, 28, 1709–1716. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.12.022
  • Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M. & Landry, S. (2011). Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions. Health Affairs, 30, 1151–1159. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0396
  • Krupnikov, Y. & Levine, A. S. (2014). Cross-sample comparisons and external validity. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 1, 59–80. doi:10.1017/xps.2014.7
  • Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E. & Vaughan, S. (2013). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720
  • Lewis, J. & Speers, T. (2003). Misleading media reporting? The MMR story. Nature Reviews Immunology, 3, 913–918. doi:10.1038/nri1228
  • McWhirter, J. E. & Hoffman-Goetz, L. (2014). A systematic review of visual image theory, assessment, and use in skin cancer and tanning research. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 738–757. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.837562
  • Meyer, P. (1988). Defining and measuring credibility of newspapers: Developing an index. Journalism Quarterly, 65, 567–574. doi:10.1177/107769908806500301
  • Molyneux, L. & Holton, A. (2015). Branding (health) journalism: Perceptions, practices, and emerging norms. Digital Journalism, 3, 225–242. doi:10.1080/21670811.2014.906927
  • Mooney, C. (2004). Blinded by science: How “balanced” coverage lets the scientific fringe hijack reality. Columbia Journalism Review, 6, 1–10.
  • Moyer-Guse, E., Jain, P. & Chung, A. H. (2012). Reinforcement or reactance? Examining the effect of an explicit persuasive appeal following an entertainment-education narrative. Journal of Communication, 62, 1010–1027. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01680.x
  • Nagler, R. H. (2014). Adverse outcomes associated with media exposure to contradictory nutrition messages. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 24–40. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798384
  • Niederdeppe, J., Shapiro, M. A. & Porticella, N. (2011). Attributions of responsibility for obesity: Narrative communication reduces reactive counterarguing among liberals. Human Communication Research, 37, 295–323. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2011.01409.x
  • Paolacci, G., Chandler, J. & Ipeirotis, P. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5, 411–419. hdl.handle.net/1765/31983
  • Powell, M., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R. & Neuwirth, K. (2007). Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 323–343. doi:10.1177/0963662507074491
  • Saunders, D., Bex, P. & Woods, R. (2013). Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: A comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e100. doi:10.2196/jmir.2620
  • Stocking, S. H. & Holstein, L. W. (2009). Manufacturing doubt: Journalists’ roles and the construction of ignorance in a scientific controversy. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 23–42. doi:10.1177/0963662507079373
  • Taylor, L. E., Swerdfeger, A. L. & Eslick, G. D. (2014). Vaccines are not associated with autism: An evidence-based meta-analysis of case-control and cohort studies. Vaccine, 32, 3623–3629. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.04.085
  • U.S. Census Bureau. (2015). State and county quickfacts. Retrieved from http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html
  • van der Linden, S. L., Leiserowitz, A. A., Feinberg, G. D. & Maibach, E. W. (2014). How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: Plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Climatic Change, 126, 1–8. doi:10.1007/s10584-014-1190-4
  • Weeks, B. E., Friedenberg, L. M., Southwell, B. G. & Slater, J. S. (2012). Behavioral consequences of conflict-oriented health news coverage: The 2009 mammography guideline controversy and online information seeking. Health Communication, 27, 158–166. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.571757
  • Weinberg, J. D., Freese, J. & McElhattan, D. (2014). Comparing data characteristics and results of an online factorial survey between a population-based and a crowdsource-recruited sample. Sociological Science, 1, 292–310. doi:10.15195/v1.a19
  • West, M. D. (1994). Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure approach. Journalism Quarterly, 71, 159–168. doi:10.1177/107769909407100115
  • Zillmann, D. (2006). Exemplification effects in the promotion of safety and health. Journal of Communication, 56, S221–S237. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00291.x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.