1,276
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Modern Measurement Approaches to Health Literacy Scale Development and Refinement: Overview, Current Uses, and Next Steps

, , , &

References

  • Bann, C. M., McCormack, L. A., Berkman, N. D., & Squiers, L. B. (2012). The Health Literacy Skills Instrument: A 10-item short form. Journal of Health Communication, 17(Suppl. 3), 191–202. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.718042
  • Ellis, B. B., & Mead, A. D. (2002). Item analysis: Theory and practice using classical and modern test theory. In S. G. Rogelberg (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 324–343). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Embretson, S. E. (1996). The new rules of measurement. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 341–349. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.341
  • ETS. (2012). Health Activities Literacy Scale. Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/literacy/about/content/health_activities_content
  • Gibbons, L. E., Feldman, B. J., Crane, H. M., Mugavero, M., Willig, J. H., Patrick, D., … Crane, P. K. (2011). Migrating from a legacy fixed-format measure to CAT administration: Calibrating the PHQ-9 to the PROMIS depression measures. Quality of Life Research, 20(9), 1349–1357. doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9882-y
  • Guttersrud, O., Dalane, J. O., & Pettersen, S. (2014). Improving measurement in nutrition literacy research using Rasch modelling: Examining construct validity of stage-specific “critical nutrition literacy” scales. Public Health Nutrition, 17(4), 877–883. doi:10.1017/S1368980013000530
  • Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development. Instructional topics in educational measurement (pp. 38–47). Retrieved from http://coeweb.gsu.edu/coshima/EPRS8410/cttandirt.pdf.
  • Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Haun, J. N., Valerio, M. A., McCormack, L. A., Sorensen, K., & Paasche-Orlow, M. K. (2014). Health literacy measurement: An inventory and descriptive summary of 51 instruments. Journal of Health Communication, 19(Suppl. 2), 302–333. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.936571
  • Lee, S.-Y., Bender, D. E., Ruiz, R. E., & Cho, Y. I. (2006). Development of an easy-to-use Spanish health literacy test. Health Services Research, 41(4 Pt. 1), 1392–1412. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00532.x
  • Lee, S.-Y., Stucky, B. D., Lee, J. Y., Rozier, R. G., & Bender, D. E. (2010). Short Assessment of Health Literacy-Spanish and English: A comparable test of health literacy for Spanish and English speakers. Health Services Research, 45(4), 1105–1120. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01119.x
  • Leung, A. Y. M., Cheung, M. K. T., Lou, V. W. Q., Chan, F. H. W., Ho, C. K. Y., Do, T. L., … Chi, I. (2013). Development and validation of the Chinese Health Literacy Scale for Chronic Care. Journal of Health Communication, 18(Suppl. 1), 205–222. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.829138
  • Nakagami, K., Yamauchi, T., Noguchi, H., Maeda, T., & Nakagami, T. (2014). Development and validation of a new instrument for testing functional health literacy in Japanese adults. Nursing & Health Sciences, 16(2), 201–208. doi:10.1111/nhs.12087
  • Nguyen, T. H., Han, H.-R., Kim, M. T., & Chan, K. S. (2014). An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. The Patient, 7(1), 23–35. doi:10.1007/s40271-013-0041-0
  • Nguyen, T. H., Park, H., Han, H. R., Chan, K. S., Paasche-Orlow, M. K., Haun, J., & Kim, M. T. (in press). State of the science of health literacy measures: Validity implications for minority populations. Patient Education and Counseling. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.013.
  • O'Neill, B., Goncalves, D., Ricci-Cabello, I., Ziebland, S., & Valderas, J. (2014). An overview of self-administered health literacy instruments. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e109110. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0109110
  • Osborne, R. H., Batterham, R. W., Elsworth, G. R., Hawkins, M., & Buchbinder, R. (2013). The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health, 13, 658. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-658
  • PROMIS. (2012). Instrument development and psychometric evaluation scientific standards (pp. 1–72). National Institutes of Health. Retrieved from http://www.nihpromis.org/Documents/PROMIS_Standards_050212.pdf.
  • Sauceda, J. A., Loya, A. M., Sias, J. J., Taylor, T., Wiebe, J. S., & Rivera, J. O. (2012). Medication literacy in Spanish and English: Psychometric evaluation of a new assessment tool. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association, 52(6), e231–e240. doi:10.1331/JAPhA.2012.11264
  • Schapira, M. M., Walker, C. M., Cappaert, K. J., Ganschow, P. S., Fletcher, K. E., McGinley, E. L., … Jacobs, E. A. (2012). The numeracy understanding in medicine instrument: A measure of health numeracy developed using item response theory. Medical Decision Making, 32(6), 851–865. doi:10.1177/0272989x12447239
  • Steckelberg, A., Hulfenhaus, C., Kasper, J., Rost, J., & Muhlhauser, I. (2009). How to measure critical health competences: Development and validation of the Critical Health Competence Test (CHC Test). Advances in Health Sciences Education, 14(1), 11–22. doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9083-1
  • Stucky, B. D., Lee, J. Y., Lee, S. Y., & Rozier, R. G. (2011). Development of the two-stage Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Dentistry. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 39(5), 474–480. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2011.00619.x
  • Ware, J. E., Jr., Bjorner, J. B., & Kosinski, M. (2000). Practical implications of item response theory and computerized adaptive testing: A brief summary of ongoing studies of widely used headache impact scales. Medical Care, 38(9 Suppl.), II73–II82.
  • Yost, K. J., Webster, K., Baker, D. W., Choi, S. W., Bode, R. K., & Hahn, E. A. (2009). Bilingual health literacy assessment using the Talking Touchscreen/la Pantalla Parlanchina: Development and pilot testing. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(3), 295–301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.02.020
  • Zickar, M. (1998). Modeling item-level data with item response theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 7, 104–109. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.ep10774739

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.