Temporal Consequences, Message Framing, and Consideration of Future Consequences: Persuasion Effects on Adult Fruit Intake Intention and Resolve

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175–1184. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.44.9.1175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, M. H., Wood, M. D., & Erickson, L. R. (2016). The effectiveness of message framing and temporal context on college student alcohol use and problems: A selective e-mail intervention. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 51(1), 106–116. doi:10.1093/alcalc/agv091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192–203. doi:10.2307/3152047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogers, R. P., Van Assema, P., Kester, A. D. M., Westerterp, K. R., & Dagnelie, P. C. (2004). Reproducibility, validity, and responsiveness to change of a short questionnaire for measuring fruit and vegetable intake. American Journal of Epidemiology, 159(9), 900–909. doi:10.1093/aje/kwh123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brug, J., Ruiter, R. A., & van Assema, P. (2003). The (ir)relevance of framing nutrition education messages. Nutrition & Health, 17(1), 9–20. doi:10.1177/026010600301700102
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. doi:10.1086/422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covey, J. (2015). The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychology, 33(1), 52–65. doi:10.1037/a0029305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G. J., Brug, J., & Van Lenthe, F. J. (2009). Neuroticism, conscientiousness and fruit consumption: Exploring mediator and moderator effects in the theory of planned behaviour. Psychology & Health, 24(9), 1051–1069. doi:10.1080/08870440802428241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G. J., de Groot, R., van den Putte, B., & Rhodes, R. (2009). Conscientiousness, extroversion, and action control: Comparing moderate and vigorous physical activity. Journal of Sports and Exercise Psychology, 31(6), 724–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G. J., Out, K., & Rhodes, R. E. (2014). Testing the effects of message framing, kernel state, and exercise guideline adherence on exercise intentions and resolve. British Journal of Health Psychology, 19, 871–885. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G. J., Spaans, P., Jansen, B., & Van ‘t Riet, J. (2016). Testing the effects of a message framing intervention on intentions towards hearing loss prevention in adolescents. Health Education Research, 31(2), 161–170. doi:10.1093/her/cyw00
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bruijn, G. J., Visscher, I., & Mollen, S. (2015). Effects of previous fruit intake, descriptive majority norms, and message framing on fruit intake intentions and behaviours in Dutch adults across a 1-week period. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behaviour, 47(3), 234–241.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jneb.2015.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Graaf, A., De Bruijn, G., & Van den Putte, B. (2015). Effects of issue involvement and framing of a responsible drinking message on attitudes, intentions, and behaviour. Journal of Health Communication, 20(8), 989–994. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., Rothman, A., & Pietersma, S. (2011). The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory. Psychology & Health, 26(8), 1036–1048. doi:10.1080/08870446.2010.526715
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimmock, A., Jackson, B., Clear, E., & Law, H. (2013). Matching temporal frame to recipients’ time orientation in exercise messaging: Does argument quality matter? Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(6), 804–812. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, R., Kawabata, M., & Thomas, S. (2015). Prediction of fruit and vegetable intake: The importance of contextualizing motivation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 20(3), 534–548. doi:10.1111/bjhp.12123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioural Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., & Cullen, M. (2008). Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behaviour. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1167–1173. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., & Maner, J. K. (2011). Fear, anger, fruits, and veggies: Interactive effects of emotion and message framing on health behaviour. Health Psychology, 30(4), 420–423. doi:10.1037/a0021981
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., Fry, A. F., & Myerson, J. (1994). Discounting of delayed rewards: A life-span comparison. Psychological Science, 5(1), 33–36. doi:10.1111/psci.1994.5.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2004). A discounting framework for choice with delayed and probabilistic rewards. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 769–792. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.769
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, L., Myerson, J., & Ostaszewski, P. (1999). Discounting of delayed rewards across the life span: Age differences in individual discounting functions. Behavioral Processes, 46(1), 89–96. doi:10.1016/S0376-6357(99)00021-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hing Lo, S., Smith, S., Taylor, M., Good, A., & Von Wagner, C. (2012). The effect of temporal framing on behavioural intentions, expectations, and behaviour: The case of healthy eating. Journal of Applied Biobehavioural Research, 17(3), 202–213. doi:10.1111/j.1751-9861.2012.00085.x
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, L. T., Ruiter, R. A., & Jansma, B. M. (2010). Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: Neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychology, 29(4), 346–354. doi:10.1037/a0019372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2015). Consideration of future consequences and HPV vaccine uptake among young adults. Journal of Health Communication, 20(9), 1033–1040. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2016). Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages: The case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0093650215626980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutchyn, Y., & Yzer, M. (2011). Construal level theory and theory of planned behaviour: Time frame effects on salient belief generation. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 595–606. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1984). Public communication as a strategy for inducing health-promoting behavioural change. Preventive Medicine, 13(3), 299–319. doi:10.1016/0091-7435(84)90086-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1), 159–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nan, X., Zhao, X., Yang, B., & Iles, I. (2015). Effectiveness of cigarette warning labels: Examining the impact of graphics, message framing, and temporal framing. Health Communication, 30(1), 81–89. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.841531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, D. B., Warttig, S., Conner, M., & Lawton, R. (2009). Raising awareness of hypertension risk through a Web-based framing intervention: Does consideration of future consequences make a difference? Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 14(2), 213–219. doi:10.1080/13548500802291618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviours: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. doi:10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Malley, D., & Latimer, A. (2013). Gaining perspective: The effects of message frame on viewer attention to and recall of osteoporosis prevention print advertisements. Journal of Health Psychology, 18(11), 1400–1410. doi:10.1177/1359105312456323
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., & Hagger, M. (2006). Temporal framing and the decision to take part in type 2 diabetes screening: Effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on persuasion. Health Psychology, 25(4), 537–548. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.25.4.537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., & Kyriakaki, M. (2008). Temporal framing and persuasion to adopt preventive health behaviour: Moderating effects of individual differences in consideration of future consequences on sunscreen use. Health Psychology, 27(6), 770–779. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.27.6.770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orbell, S., Perugini, M., & Rakow, T. (2004). Individual differences in sensitivity to health communications: Consideration of future consequences. Health Psychology, 23(4), 388–396. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.4.388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rappange, D. R., Brouwer, W. B., & Van Exel, N. J. A. (2009). Back to the consideration of future consequences scale: Time to reconsider? Journal of Social Psychology, 149(5), 562–584. doi:10.1080/00224540903232324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. E., & de Bruijn, G. J. (2010). Automatic and motivational correlates of physical activity: Does intensity moderate the relationship? Behavioural Medicine, 36(2), 44–52. doi:10.1080/08964281003774901
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. E., & Horne, L. (2013). Deepening the measurement of motivation in the physical activity domain: Introducing behavioural resolve. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 14(4), 455–460. doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. E., & Matheson, D. H. (2005). Discrepancies in exercise intention and expectation: Theoretical and applied issues. Psychology & Health, 20(1), 63–78. doi:10.1080/08870440412331296071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. E., Plotnikoff, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2008). Predicting the physical activity intention-behaviour profiles of adopters and maintainers using three social cognition models. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 36(3), 244–252. doi:10.1007/s12160-008-9071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (1997). Protection motivation theory. In D. Gochman (Ed.), Handbook of health behaviour research 1: Personal and social determinants (pp. 113–132). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, A., & Salovey, P. (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behaviour: The role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 3–19. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheeran, P. (2002). Intention-behaviour relations: A conceptual and empirical review. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1–36. doi:10.1080/14792772143000003
   Google Scholar
• Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742–752. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stroebe, W., van Koningsbruggen, G. M., Papies, E. K., & Aarts, H. (2013). Why most dieters fail but some succeed: A goal conflict model of eating behaviour. Psychological Review, 120(1), 110–138. doi:10.1037/a0030849
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suresh, K. (2011). An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences, 4(1), 8–11. doi:10.4103/0974-1208.82352
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.110.3.403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assema, P., Martens, M., Ruiter, R. A., & Brug, J. (2001). Framing of nutrition education messages in persuading consumers of the advantages of a healthy diet. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 14(6), 435–442. doi:10.1046/j.1365-277X.2001.00315.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van ‘t Riet, J., Ruiter, R., & De Vries, H. (2012). Preaching to the choir? The influence of personal relevance on the effects of gain- and loss-framed health-promoting messages. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(5), 712–723. doi:10.1177/1359105311421047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van ‘t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A. C., Werrij, M. Q., Candel, M. J. J. M., & De Vries, H. (2010). Distinct pathways to persuasion: The role of affect in message-framing effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(7), 1261–1276. doi:10.1002/ejsp.72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshaw, P. R., & Davis, F. D. (1985). The accuracy of behavioural intention versus behavioural expectation for predicting behavioural goals. Journal of Psychology, 119(6), 599–602. doi:10.1080/00223980.1985.9915469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioural intentions engender behaviour change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–268. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviours over the long-term. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(3), 472–485. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, D. M., & Rhodes, R. E. (2016). The confounded self-efficacy construct: Conceptual analysis and recommendations for future research. Health Psychology Review, 10(2), 113–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2003). Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a joint WHO/FAO expert consultation (Vol. 916). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1985). Measuring the involvement construct. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 341–352. doi:10.1086/jcr.1985.12.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar