Participants’ Role Expectations in Genetics Research and Re-consent: Revising the Theory and Methods of Mental Models Research Relating to Roles

References

• Adams, R. J., & Parrott, R. (1994). Pediatric nurses’ communication of role expectations to parents of hospitalized children. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22, 36–47. doi:10.1080/00909889409365385
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. A., Ammarell, N., Bailey, D., Jr., Colón-Emeric, C., Corazzini, K. N., Lillie, M., McDaniel, R. R., Jr. (2005). Nurse assistant mental models, sensemaking, care actions, and consequences for nursing home residents. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1006–1021. doi:10.1177/1049732305280773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. A., Lombardi, W. J., & Higgins, E. T. (1988). Automaticity of person x situation effects on impression formation: It’s just a matter of time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 599–605. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkanovic, E. (1972). Lay conceptions of the sick role. Social Forces, 51, 53–64. doi:10.1093/sf/51.1.53
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, L. L., Parrish, J. T., Janakiraman, R., Ogburn-Russell, L., Couchman, G. R., Rayburn, W. L., & Grisel, J. (2008). Patients’ commitment to their primary physician and why it matters. Annals of Family Medicine, 6, 6–13. doi:10.1370/afm.757
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, L. M., Burke, W., Fullerton, S. M., & Sharp, R. R. (2012). Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: Opportunities and challenges. Genetics in Medicine, 14(4), 490–496. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biemann, T., Ellwart, T., & Rack, O. (2014). Quantifying similarity of team mental models: An introduction of the rRG index. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 125–140. doi:10.1177/1368430213485993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bledsoe, M. J., Clayton, E. W., McGuire, A. L., Grizzle, W. E., O’Rourke, P. P., & Zeps, N. (2013). Return of research results from genomic biobanks: Cost matters. Genetics In Medicine: Official Journal Of The American College Of Medical Genetics, 15(2), 103–105. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredenoord, A. L., Onland-Moret, N. C., & Van Delden, J. J. M. (2011). Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: In favor of a qualified disclosure policy. Human Mutation, 32(8), 861–867. doi:10.1002/humu.21518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, N., Barnes, R., Calnan, M., Corrigan, O., Dippe, P., & Entwistle, V. (2013). Trust in the health-care provider-patient relationship: A systematic mapping review of the evidence base. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 25, 682–688. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzt063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. M., Drake, B. F., Gehlert, S., Wolf, L. E., DuBois, J., Seo, J., Kaphingst, K. A. (2016). Differences in preferences for models of consent for biobanks between black and white women. Journal of Community Genetics, 7(1), 41–49. doi:10.1007/s12687-015-0248-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burtscher, M. J., Kolbe, M., Wacker, J., & Manser, T. (2011). Interactions of team mental models and monitoring behaviors predict team performance in simulated anesthesia inductions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byram, S., Fischhoff, B., Embrey, M., De Bruin, W. B., & Thorne, S. (2001). Mental models of women with breast implants: Local complications. Behavioral Medicine, 27, 4–14. doi:10.1080/08964280109595767
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, M. K., Magnus, D., Constantine, M., Lee, S. S., Kelley, M., Alessi, S., Wilfond, B. S. (2015). Attitudes toward risk and informed consent for research on medical practices: A cross-sectional survey. Annals of Internal Medicine, 19, 162(10), 731–732.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, K. D., Roberts, J. S., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., Kardia, S. L. R., McBride, C. M., Linnenbringer, E., & Green, R. C.; for the REVEAL Study Group. (2015). Associations between self-referral and health behavior responses to genetic risk information. Genome Medicine, 7, 10. doi:10.1186/s13073-014-0124-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cichon, E. J., & Masterson, J. T. (1993). Physician-patient communication: Mutual role expectations. Communication Quarterly, 41(4), 477–489. doi:10.1080/01463379309369907
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, E. W., & McGuire, A. L. (2012). The legal risks of returning results of genomics research. Genetics in Medicine, 14(4), 473–477. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condit, C. M., Korngiebel, D. M., Pfeifer, M., Renz, A. D., Bowen, D. J., Kaufman, D., Edwards, K. (2015). What should be the character of the researcher-participant relationship? Views of participants in a longstanding cancer genetic registry. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 37(4), 1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damman, O. C., & Timmermans, D. R. M. (2012). Educating health consumers about cardio-metabolic health risk: What can we learn from lay mental models of risk? Patient Education and Counseling, 89, 300–308. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.06.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Palmer, M. T. (1999). Structuring the concept of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 66, 49–65. doi:10.1080/03637759909376462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Solomon, D. H., & Samp, J. A. (1996). Framing social reality: The relevance of relational judgments. Communication Research, 23, 703–723. doi:10.1177/009365096023006004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dressler, L. G., Smolek, S., Ponsaran, R., Markey, J. M., Starks, H., Gerson, N., & Consortium, G. (2012). IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 215–222. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. L., Korngiebel, D. M., Pfeifer, L., Goodman, D., Renz, A., Wenzel, L., Condit, C. M. (2016). Participant views on consent in cancer genetics research: Preparing for the precision medicine era. Journal of Community Genetics, 7(2), 133–143. doi:10.1007/s12687-015-0259-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, K. L., Lemke, A. A., Trinidad, S. B., Lewis, S. M., Starks, H., Snapinn, K. W., Burke, W. the GRRIP Consortium. (2012). Genetics researchers’ and IRB professionals’ attitudes toward genetic research review: A comparative analysis. Genetics in Medicine, 14(2), 236–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlich, Y., Williams, J. B., Glazer, D., Yocum, K., Farahany, N., Olson, M., Kain, R. C. (2014). Redefining genomic privacy: Trust and empowerment. PLOS Biology, 12(11), e1001983. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewing, A. T., Erby, L. A., Bollinger, J., Tetteyfio, E., Ricks-Santi, L. J., & Kaufman, D. (2015). Demographic differences in willingness to provide broad and narrow consent for biobank research. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 13(2), 98–106. doi:10.1089/bio.2014.0032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, A. P. (1992). The four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99, 689–723. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.4.689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabay, G. (2015). Perceived control over health, communication and patient-physician trust. Patient Education and Counseling, 98, 1550–1557. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao, W., Ma, G. X., Tan, Y., Fang, C., Weaver, J., Jin, M., & Lai, P. (2014). Factors associated with willingness to participate in biospecimen research among Chinese Americans. Biopreservation and Biobanking, 12(2), 131–138. doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, N. A., Sathe, N. A., Antommaria, A. H. M., Holm, I. A., Sanderson, S. C., Smith, M. E., Clayton, E. W. (2015). A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States. Genetics in Medicine, published online 19 November 2015. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollust, S. E., Gordon, E. S., Zayac, C., Griffin, G., Christman, M. F., Pyeritz, R. E., Bernhardt, B. A. (2012). Motivations and perceptions of early adopters of personalized genomics: Perspectives from research participants. Public Health Genomics, 15, 22–30. doi:10.1159/000327296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grady, C., Eckstein, L., Berkman, B., Brock, D., Cook-Deegan, R., Fullerton, S. M., Wendler, D. (2015). Broad consent for research with biological samples: Workshop conclusions. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 15(9), 34–42. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1062162
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatfield, L. A., & Pearce, M. M. (2014). Factors influencing parents’ decision to donate their healthy infant’s DNA for minimal-risk genetic research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 46(6), 398–407. doi:10.1111/jnu.2014.46.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, A. K. (2010). Biobanks; Importance, implications and opportunities for genetic counselors. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19, 423–429. doi:10.1007/s10897-010-9305-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hebdon, M., Fahnestock, O., & McComb, S. (2014). Shared mental models of patients, oncology providers, and primary care providers regarding roles in cancer survivorship care. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 36(10), 1384–1385. doi:10.1177/0193945914540099
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Henderson, B. J., & Maguire, B. T. (2000). Three lay mental models of disease inheritance. Social Science & Medicine, 50, 293–301. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00286-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, E. M., Turner, E. L., Martin, R. M., & Donovan, J. L. (2013). “Let’s get the best quality research we can”: Public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: A systematic review and qualitative study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(72). doi:10.1186/1471-2288-13-72
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillen, M. A., De Haes, H. C. J. M., & Smets, E. M. A. (2011). Cancer patients’ trust in their physician-a review. Psycho-Oncology, 20, 277–241. doi:10.1002/pon.1745
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homer, N., Szelinger, S., Redman, M., Duggan, D., Tembe, W., Muehling, J., Craig, D. W. (2008). Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLOS Genetics, 4. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter, J., Corcoran, K., Leeder, S., & Phelps, K. (2012). Appealing to altruism is not enough: Motivators for participating in health services research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 7(3), 84–90. doi:10.1525/jer.2012.7.3.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, L., Sapp, J. C., Lewis, K., Yanes, T., Facio, F. M., Biesecker, L. G., & Biesecker, B. B. (2014). Research participants’ attitudes towards the confidentiality of genomic sequence information. European Journal of Human Genetics, 22, 964–968. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2013.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jauffret-Roustide, M., Cohen, J., Poisot-Martin, I., Spire, B., Gossop, M., & Carrieri, M. P.; the Manife 2000 Study Group. (2012). Distributive sharing among HIV-HCV co-infected injecting drug users: The preventive role of trust in one’s physician. AIDS Care, 24, 232–238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J., Curren, L., Anderson, N., Edwards, K., Fullerton, S. M., Kanelopoulou, N., Winter, S. F. (2012). From patients to partners: Participant-centric initiatives in biomedical research. Nature Reviews. Genetics, 13(5), 371–376. doi:10.1038/nrg3218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kealey, E., & Berkman, C. S. (2010). The relationship between health information sources and mental models of cancer: Findings from the 2005 Health Information National Trends Survey. Journal of Health Communication, 15(Suppl 3), 236–251. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.522693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, M., James, C., Alessi Kraft, S., Korngiebel, D., Wijangco, I., Rosenthal, E., Lee, S. S. (2015). Patient perspectives on the learning health system: The importance of trust and shared decision making. American Journal of Bioethics, 15(9), 4–17. doi:10.1080/15265161.2015.1062163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, S. E., Spector, T. D., Cherkas, L. F., Prainsack, B., & Harris, J. M. (2015). Evaluating the consent preferences of UK research volunteers for genetic and clinical studies. PLoS ONE, 10, e0118027. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerner, A. F. (2006). Models of relating—Not relationship models: Cognitive representations of relating across interpersonal relationship domains. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23, 629–653. doi:10.1177/0265407506065989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, D. E., & Rootman, L. (1976). Physician role performance and patient satisfaction. Social Science and Medicine, 10, 29–32. doi:10.1016/0037-7856(76)90136-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, Y.-Y., & Lin, J. L. (2009). The effects of trust in physician on self-efficacy, adherence and diabetes outcomes. Social Science & Medicine, 68, 1060–1068. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.12.033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludman, E. J., Fullerton, S. M., Spangler, L., Trinidad, S. B., Fujii, M. M., Jarvik, G. P., Burke, W. (2010). Glad you asked: Participants’ opinions of re-consent for dbGap data submission. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: An International Journal, 5(3), 9–16. doi:10.1525/jer.2010.5.3.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., Basford, M., Dressler, L. G., Fullerton, S. M., Koenig, B. A., Li, R., Clayton, E. W. (2011). Ethical and practical challenges of sharing data from genome-wide association studies: The eMERGE consortium experience. Genome Research, 21, 1001–1007. doi:10.1101/gr.120329.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie, M., Henderson, G., Garrett, J., & Corbie-Smith, G. (2011). “If I could in a small way help”: Motivations for and beliefs about sample donation for genetic research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(2), 57–70. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.2.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, F. G., Mello, M. M., & Joffe, S. (2008). Incidental findings in human subjects research: What do investigators owe research participants? Journal of Law, Medicine, and Ethics, 36(2), 271–279. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00269.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B., Bostrom, A., & Atman, C. J. (2002). Risk communication. A mental models approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., Scott, J., Kaufman, D., Geller, G., LeRoy, L., & Hudson, K. (2008). Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. The American Journal of Bioethics: AJOB, 8(11), 36–43. doi:10.1080/15265160802513093
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, C. L., Maloney, K. A., Alestock, T. D., Chavez, J., Berman, D., Sharaf, R. M., Mitchel, B. D. (2015). Prioritizing approaches to engage community members and build trust in biobanks: A survey of attitudes and opinions of adults within outpatient practices at the University of Maryland. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 5, 264–279. doi:10.3390/jpm5030264
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Picillo, M., Kou, N., Barone, P., & Fasano, A. (2015). Recruitment strategies and patient selection in clinical trials for parkinson’s disease: Going viral and keeping science and ethics at the highest standards. Parkinsonism and Related Disorders, 21, 1041–1048. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2015.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, J., Bollinger, J., Dvoskin, R., Kardia, S. L. R., & Kaufman, D. (2014). Public preferences regarding informed consent models for participation in population-based genomic research. Genetics in Medicine, 16, 11–18. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.59
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roskos-Ewoldsen, B., Davies, J., & Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R. (2004). Implications of the mental models approach for cultivation theory. European Journal of Communications Research, 29, 345–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz-Canela, M., Valle-Mansilla, J. I., & Sulmasy, D. P. (2011). What research participants want to know about genetic research results: The impact of “genetic exceptionalism.” Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6(3), 39–46. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.3.39
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segall, A. (1976). The sick role concept: Understanding illness behavior. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 17, 162–170. doi:10.2307/2136342
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, C. S., Schildkraut, J. M., Calingaert, B., Hoyo, C., Cranksaw, S. S., Fish, L., Reid, L. (2008). Factors associated with African Americans enrollment in a national cancer genetics registry. Community Genetics, 11, 224–233. doi:10.1159/000116883
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon, D. H., Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2002). Episode type, attachment orientation, and frame salience: Evidence for a theory of relational framing. Human Communication Research, 28, 136–152. doi:10.1111/hcre.2002.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, C. C. (1979). Patient compliance and the role of the expert. Journal of Social Issues, 35, 34–59. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1979.tb00788.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarrant, C., Jackson, C., Dixon-Woods, M., McNicol, S., Kenyon, S., & Armstrong, N. (2015). Consent revisited: The impact of return of results on participants’ views and expectations about trial participation. Health Expectations, 18, 2042–2053. doi:10.1111/hex.12371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S. E., & Croker, J. (1981). Schematic bases of social information processing. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Heran, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 89–134). Hillsdale, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Tindana, P., & De Vries, J. (2016). Broad consent for genomic research and biobanking: Perspectives from low- and middle-income countries. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 17. Posted online February 22 2016. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-083115-022456
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinidad, S. B., Fullerton, S. M., Bares, J. M., Jarvik, G. P., Larson, E. B., & Burke, W. (2012). Informed consent in genome-scale research: What do prospective participants think? AJOB Primary Research., 3(3), 3–11. doi:10.1080/21507716.2012.662575
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood, F., Kowalczuk, J., Elwyn, G., Mitchell, C., & Gallacher, J. (2011). Achieving online consent to participation in large-scale gene-environment studies: A tangible destination. Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(8), 487–492. doi:10.1136/jme.2010.040352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawati, M. N. H., & Rioux, A. (2011). Biobanks and the return of research results: Out with the old and in with the new? The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(4), 614–620. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00628.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., & Wang, E. (2010). Shared mental models as moderators of team process-performance relationships. Social Behavior and Personality, 38(4), 433–444. doi:10.2224/sbp.2010.38.4.433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziniel, S. I., Savage, S. K., Huntington, N., Amatruda, J., Green, R. C., Weitzman, E. R., Holm, I. A. (2014). Parents’ preferences for return of results in pediatric genomic research. Public Health Genomics, 17(2), 105–114. doi:10.1159/000358539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar