4,818
Views
37
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Health Literacy and Online Health Information Processing: Unraveling the Underlying Mechanisms

, , &

References

  • Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. doi:10.1177/1088868309341564
  • Barry, M. M., D’Eath, M., & Sixsmith, J. (2013). Interventions for improving population health literacy: Insights from a rapid review of the evidence. Journal of Health Communication, 18(12), 1507–1522. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.840699
  • Berkman, N. D., Davis, T. C., & McCormack, L. (2010). Health literacy: What is it? Journal of Health Communication, 15(S2), 9–19. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.499985
  • Bol, N., Smets, E., Eddes, E., De Haes, J., Loos, E., & Van Weert, J. (2015). Illustrations enhance older colorectal cancer patients’ website satisfaction and recall of online cancer information. European Journal of Cancer Care, 24(2), 213–223. doi:10.1111/ecc.12283
  • Bol, N., Van Weert, J. C., De Haes, H. C., Loos, E. F., De Heer, S., Sikkel, D., & Smets, E. M. (2014). Using cognitive and affective illustrations to enhance older adults’ website satisfaction and recall of online cancer-related information. Health Communication, 29(7), 678–688. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.771560
  • Broemer, P. (2004). Ease of imagination moderates reactions to differently framed health messages. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(2), 103–119. doi:10.1002/ejsp.185
  • Chang, Y., & Thorson, E. (2004). Television and Web advertising synergies. Journal of Advertising, 33(2), 75–84. doi:10.1080/00913367.2004.10639161
  • Chin, J., Morrow, D. G., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., Conner-Garcia, T., Graumlich, J. F., & Murray, M. D. (2011). The process-knowledge model of health literacy: Evidence from a componential analysis of two commonly used measures. Journal of Health Communication, 16(Suppl. 3), 222–241. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.604702
  • Diviani, N., Van Den Putte, B., Giani, S., & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2015). Low health literacy and evaluation of online health information: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(5), e112. doi:10.2196/jmir.4018
  • Diviani, N., Van Den Putte, B., Meppelink, C. S., & Van Weert, J. C. M. (2016). Exploring the role of health literacy in the evaluation of online health information: Insights from a mixed-methods study. Patient Education and Counselling, 99(6), 1017–1025. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2016.01.007
  • Dutta‐Bergman, M. J. (2004). The impact of completeness and Web use motivation on the credibility of e‐health information. Journal of Communication, 54(2), 253–269. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02627.x
  • Eveland, W. P., & Dunwoody, S. (2001). User control and structural isomorphism or disorientation and cognitive load? Learning from the Web versus print. Communication Research, 28(1), 48–78. doi:10.1177/009365001028001002
  • Fiordelli, M., Diviani, N., & Schulz, P. J. (2013). Mapping mHealth research: A decade of evolution. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e95. doi:10.2196/jmir.2430
  • Geiger, S., & Newhagen, J. (1993). Revealing the black box: Information processing and media effects. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 42–50. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01303.x
  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • HLS-EU Consortium. (2012). Comparative report of health literacy in eight EU member states. The European Health Literacy Project 2009–2012.Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/chafea/documents/news/Comparative_report_on_health_literacy_in_eight_EU_member_states.pdf
  • Jansen, J., Van Weert, J., Van Der Meulen, N., Van Dulmen, S., Heeren, T., & Bensing, J. (2008). Recall in older cancer patients: Measuring memory for medical information. The Gerontologist, 48(2), 149–157. doi:10.1093/geront/48.2.149
  • Jensen, J. D., King, A. J., Davis, L. S. A., & Guntzviller, L. M. (2010). Utilization of Internet technology by low-income adults: The role of health literacy, health numeracy, and computer assistance. Journal of Aging and Health, 22(6), 804–826. doi:10.1177/0898264310366161
  • Kalyanaraman, S., & Sundar, S. S. (2006). The psychological appeal of personalized content in Web portals: Does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication, 56(1), 110–132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00006.x
  • Keller, P. A., & Block, L. G. (1997). Vividness effects: A resource-matching perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(3), 295–304. doi:10.1086/209511
  • Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2006). The health literacy of America’s adults: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics,U.S.Department of Education.
  • Lachance, C. R., Erby, L. A., Ford, B. M., Allen, V. C., & Kaphingst, K. A. (2010). Informational content, literacy demands, and usability of websites offering health-related genetic tests directly to consumers. Genetics in Medicine, 12(5), 304–312. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181dbd8b2
  • Lang, A. (2000). The limited capacity model of mediated message processing. Journal of Communication, 50(1), 46–70. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02833.x
  • Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56(S1), S57–S80. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00283.x
  • Liu, Y., & Shrum, L. (2009). A dual-process model of interactivity effects. Journal of Advertising, 38(2), 53–68. doi:10.2753/JOA0091-3367380204
  • Lustria, M. L. A. (2007). Can interactivity make a difference? effects of interactivity on the comprehension of and attitudes toward online health content. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 766–776. doi:10.1002/asi.20557
  • Mackert, M., Champlin, S. E., Holton, A., Muñoz, I. I., & Damásio, M. J. (2014). eHealth and health literacy: A research methodology review. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(3), 516–528. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12044
  • Marteau, T. M., Dormandy, E., & Michie, S. (2001). A measure of informed choice. Health Expectations, 4(2), 99–108. doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00140.x
  • Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 85–139. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80005-6
  • McInnes, N., & Haglund, B. J. A. (2011). Readability of online health information: Implications for health literacy. Informatics for Health and Social Care, 36(4), 173–189. doi:10.3109/17538157.2010.542529
  • Meppelink, C. S., Smit, E. G., Buurman, B. M., & Van Weert, J. C. (2015). Should we be afraid of simple messages? The effects of text difficulty and illustrations in people with low or high health literacy. Health Communication, 30(12), 1181–1189. doi:10.1080/10410236.2015.1037425
  • Meppelink, C. S., Van Weert, J. C., Haven, C. J., & Smit, E. G. (2015). The effectiveness of health animations in audiences with different health literacy levels: An experimental study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 17(1), e11. doi:10.2196/jmir.3979
  • Paasche-Orlow, M. K., & Wolf, M. S. (2007). The causal pathways linking health literacy to health outcomes. American Journal of Health Behavior, 31(Suppl. 1), S19–S26. doi:10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S19
  • Pander Maat, H., Essink-Bot, M. L., Leenaars, K. E. F., & Fransen, M. P. (2014). A Short Assessment of Health Literacy (SAHL) in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health, 14, 990. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-990
  • Perrin, A., & Duggan, M. (2015). Americans’ Internet access: 2000-2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/
  • Smith, A. (2015). U.S. smartphone use in 2015. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
  • Sørensen, K., Van Den Broucke, S., Fullam, J., Doyle, G., Pelikan, J., Slonska, Z., … (HLS-EU) Consortium Health Literacy Project European. (2012). Health literacy and public health: A systematic review and integration of definitions and models. BMC Public Health, 12, 80. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-80
  • Statistics Netherlands. (2014). ICT gebruik van personen naar persoonskenmerken [ICT use by persons subject to personal characteristics]. Retrieved from http://statline.cbs.nl/StatWeb/publication/?VW=T&DM=SLNL&PA=71098ned&D1=33,55-59,93-95,97-100,102-104,106-109,112-113,119,124-133&D2=0&D3=0,l&HD=130422-1124&HDR=G2,G1&STB=T
  • Sweller, J., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10(3), 251–296. doi:10.1023/A:1022193728205
  • Tian, C., Champlin, S., Mackert, M., Lazard, A., & Agrawal, D. (2014). Readability, suitability, and health content assessment of Web-based patient education materials on colorectal cancer screening. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 80(2), 284–290. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.034
  • Van Cauwenberge, A., Schaap, G., & Van Roy, R. (2014). “TV no longer commands our full attention”: Effects of second-screen viewing and task relevance on cognitive load and learning from news. Computers in Human Behavior, 38, 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.05.021
  • Von Wagner, C., Semmler, C., Good, A., & Wardle, J. (2009). Health literacy and self-efficacy for participating in colorectal cancer screening: The role of information processing. Patient Education and Counseling, 75(3), 352–357. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2009.03.015
  • Von Wagner, C., Steptoe, A., Wolf, M. S., & Wardle, J. (2009). Health literacy and health actions: A review and a framework from health psychology. Health Education & Behavior, 36(5), 860–877. doi:10.1177/1090198108322819
  • Wilson, E. A., & Wolf, M. S. (2009). Working memory and the design of health materials: A cognitive factors perspective. Patient Education and Counseling, 74(3), 318–322. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.005
  • Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989