1,523
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

You Get What You Give: Understanding Reply Reciprocity and Social Capital in Online Health Support Forums

, &

References

  • Amsbary, J. H., & Powell, L. (2012). Content analysis of self-help Internet discussion boards: What they do, what they don’t do. Human Communication, 16, 49–57. Retrieved from http://www.uab.edu/Communicationstudies/humancommunication/02_01_13_Amsbary.pdf
  • Barak, A., & Gluck-Ofri, O. (2007). Degree and reciprocity of self-disclosure in online forums. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 10, 407–417. doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9938
  • Batenburg, A., & Das, E. (2015). Virtual support communities and psychological well-being: The role of optimistic and pessimistic social comparison strategies. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 20, 585–600. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12131
  • Blau, P. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7). New York, NY: Free Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Burleson, B. R., & MacGeorge, E. L. (2002). Supportive communication. In M. L. Knapp & J. A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., pp. 374–424). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423. doi:10.1016/S0191-3085(00)22009-1
  • Burt, R. S. (2001). Closure and social capital. In N. Lin, K. Cook, and R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–55). Aldine.
  • Burt, R. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: Multirole evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 543–591. doi:10.1086/667856
  • Butler, B. S. (2001). Membership size, communication activity, and sustainability: A resource-based model of online social structures. Information Systems Research, 12, 346–362. doi:10.1287/isre.12.4.346.9703
  • Butts, C. T. (2014). SNA: Tools for social network analysis [R package Version 2.3-2]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=sna
  • Butts, C. T., Hunter, D., Handcock, M., Bender-deMoll, S., & Horner, J. (2015). Network: Classes for relational data [R package Version 1.13.0]. Retrieved from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=network
  • Chen, W., & Choi, A. S. K. (2011). Internet and social support among Chinese migrants in Singapore. New Media & Society, 13(7), 1067–1084. doi:10.1177/1461444810396311
  • Chung, J. E. (2014). Social networking in online support groups for health: How online social networking benefits patients. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 639–659. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.757396
  • Cobb, N. K., Graham, A. L., & Abrams, D. B. (2010). Social network structure of a large online community for smoking cessation. American Journal of Public Health, 100, 1282–1289. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2009.165449
  • Cobb, N. K., Jacobs, M. A., Saul, J., Wileyto, E. P., & Graham, A. L. (2014). Diffusion of an evidence-based smoking cessation intervention through Facebook: A randomised controlled trial study protocol. BMJ Open, 4(1), e004089. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004089
  • Deckop, J. R., Cirka, C. C., & Andersson, L. M. (2003). Doing unto others: The reciprocity of helping behavior in organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 47, 101–113. doi:10.1023/A:1026060419167
  • Dennis, C. L. (2003). Peer support within a health care context: A concept analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 40(3), 321–332. doi:10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5
  • DiMaggio, P., & Garip, F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102545
  • Drentea, P., & Moren-Cross, J. L. (2005). Social capital and social support on the Web: The case of an Internet mother site. Sociology of Health & Illness, 27, 920–943. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9566.2005.00464.x
  • Ellison, N. B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12, 1143–1168. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00367.x
  • Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions. British Medical Journal, 328, 1166–1171. doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166
  • Feng, B., Li, S., & Li, N. (2016). Is a profile worth a thousand words? How online support-seeker’s profile features may influence the quality of received support messages. Communication Research, 43, 253–276. doi:10.1177/0093650213510942
  • Fox, S., & Duggan, M. (2013). Health online 2013. Retrieved from the Pew Research Center website: http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/15/health-online-2013/
  • Ganley, D., & Lampe, C. (2009). The ties that bind: Social network principles in online communities. Decision Support Systems, 47, 266–274. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2009.02.013
  • Green‐Hamann, S., Campbell Eichhorn, K., & Sherblom, J. C. (2011). An exploration of why people participate in Second Life social support groups. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 16, 465–491. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2011.01543.x
  • Green-Hamann, S., & Sherblom, J. C. (2014). The influences of optimal matching and social capital on communicating support. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 1130–1144. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.864734
  • Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Retrieved from the University of California, Riverside, website: http://faculty.ucr.edu/∼hanneman/
  • Himelboim, I. (2008). Reply distribution in online discussions: A comparative network analysis of political and health newsgroups. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 156–177. doi:10.1111/j.1083–6101.2008.01435.x
  • Houston, T. K., Cooper, L. A., & Ford, D. E. (2002). Internet support groups for depression: A 1-year prospective cohort study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 2062–2068. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.12.2062
  • Huffaker, D. (2010). Dimensions of leadership and social influence in online communities. Human Communication Research, 36, 593–617. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01390.x
  • Kobayashi, T., Ikeda, K. I., & Miyata, K. (2006). Social capital online: Collective use of the Internet and reciprocity as lubricants of democracy. Information, Communication & Society, 9, 582–611. doi:10.1080/13691180600965575
  • Leshed, G., Hancock, J. T., Cosley, D., McLeod, P. L., & Gay, G. (2007). Feedback for guiding reflection on teamwork practices. In Proceedings of the GROUP’07 Conference on Supporting Group Work (pp. 217–220). New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery Press.
  • Lin, C. P., & Anol, B. (2008). Learning online social support: An investigation of network information technology based on UTAUT. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 11, 268–272. doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0057
  • Manago, A. M., Taylor, T., & Greenfield, P. M. (2012). Me and my 400 friends: The anatomy of college students’ Facebook networks, their communication patterns, and well-being. Developmental Psychology, 48, 369–380. doi:10.1037/a0026338
  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
  • Mills, D. (2016, August 16). Everyone can expect higher healthcare costs next year. Retrieved from http://www.healthline.com/health-news/expect-higher-healthcare-costs-next-year#3
  • Newman, M. E. (2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social Networks, 27(1), 39–54. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009
  • Pan, W., Feng, B., & Wingate, S. (2016, September). What you say is what you get: How self-disclosure in support-seeking affects language use in support provision in online support forums. Paper presented at the National Communication Association Convention, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
  • Rains, S. A., Peterson, E. B., & Wright, K. B. (2015). Communicating social support in computer-mediated contexts: A meta-analytic review of content analyses examining support messages shared online among individuals coping with illness. Communication Monographs, 82, 403–430. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1019530
  • Rains, S. A., & Young, V. (2009). A meta‐analysis of research on formal computer‐mediated support groups: Examining group characteristics and health outcomes. Human Communication Research, 35, 309–336. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01353.x
  • Resnick, P. (2001). Beyond bowling together: Sociotechnical capital. In J. Carroll (Ed.), HCI in the new millennium (pp. 247–272). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Scott, J. (2012). Social network analysis. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Shen, C., & Cage, C. (2013). Exodus to the real world? Assessing the impact of offline meetups on community participation and social capital. New Media & Society, 17, 394–414. doi:10.1177/1461444813504275
  • Shen, C., Monge, P., & Williams, D. (2014). Virtual brokerage and closure: Network structure and social capital in a massively multiplayer online game. Communication Research, 41, 459–480. doi:10.1177/0093650212455197
  • Takahashi, Y., Uchida, C., Miyaki, K., Sakai, M., Shimbo, T., & Nakayama, T. (2009). Potential benefits and harms of a peer support social network service on the Internet for people with depressive tendencies: Qualitative content analysis and social network analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11, e29. doi:10.2196/jmir.1142
  • Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. doi:10.1177/0261927X09351676
  • Wellman, B., & Frank, K. (2001). Network capital in a multi-level world: Getting support from personal communities. In N. Lin, R. Burt, & K. Cook (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 233–273). Chicago, IL: Aldine De Gruyter.
  • Williams, D. (2006). On and off the Net: Scales for social capital in an online era. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 11, 593–628. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00029.x
  • World Health Organization. (2016). Depression. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs369/en/
  • Wright, K. B. (2016). Communication in health-related online social support groups/communities: A review of research on predictors of participation, applications of social support theory, and health outcomes. Review of Communication Research, 4, 65–87. doi:10.12840/issn.2255-4165.2016.04.01.010
  • Zhang, M., & Yang, C. C. (2015). Using content and network analysis to understand the social support exchange patterns and user behaviors of an online smoking cessation intervention program. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66, 564–575. doi:10.1002/asi.23189
  • Zhu, X., Woo, S. E., Porter, C., & Brzezinski, M. (2013). Pathways to happiness: From personality to social networks and perceived support. Social Networks, 35, 382–393. doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2013.04.005

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.