Countering Craving with Disgust Images: Examining Nicotine Withdrawn Smokers’ Motivated Message Processing of Anti-Tobacco Public Service Announcements

References

• Bartholow, B. D., & Bolls, P. (2013). Media psychophysiology: The brain. In K. Dill (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of media psychology (p. 474). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudoin, C. E. (2002). Exploring antismoking ads: Appeals, themes, and consequences. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 123–137. doi:10.1080/10810730290088003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benowitz, N. L., Jacob, P., III, Ahijevych, K., Jarvis, M. J., Hall, S., LeHouezec, J., … Hurt, R. D. (2002). Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 4(2). doi:10.1080/14622200210123581
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown, S., & Locker, E. (2009). Defensive responses to an emotive anti-alcohol message. Psychology & Health, 24, 517–528. doi:10.1080/08870440801911130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruner, G. C. (2009). Marketing Scales Handbook (1st ed., vol. 5). Carbondale, IL: GCBII Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839–855. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J., Bindman, A., Sanders-Jackson, A., Forquer, H., & Brechman, J. (2009). Summary of coding: Anti-smoking public service announcements. Philadelphia, PA: Center for Excellence in Cancer Communication Research, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669–679. doi:10.1177/0146167292186002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clayton, R. B., & Leshner, G. (2015). The uncanny valley: The effects of rotoscope animation on motivational processing of depression drug messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 59, 57–75. doi:10.1080/08838151.2014.998227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3, 7–16. doi:10.1080/14622200020032051
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology & Marketing, 21, 909–926. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J., McCauley, C., & Rozin, P. (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 701–713. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(94)90212-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, D., Fong, G. T., McDonald, P. W., Brown, K. S., & Cameron, R. (2004). Graphic Canadian cigarette warning labels and adverse outcomes: Evidence from Canadian smokers. American Journal of Public Health, 94, 1442–1445. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.8.1442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerström, K. O. (1991). The Fagerström test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1119–1127. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hughes, J. R., & Hatsukami, D. (1986). Signs and symptoms of tobacco withdrawal. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 289–294. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800030107013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. E., & Gerard, H. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., Cappella, J. N., Strasser, A. A., & Lerman, C. (2009). The effect of smoking cues in antismoking advertisements on smoking urge and psychophysiological reactions. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 11, 254–261. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntn033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessels, L. T., Ruiter, R. A., & Jansma, B. M. (2010). Increased attention but more efficient disengagement: Neuroscientific evidence for defensive processing of threatening health information. Health Psychology, 29, 346. doi:10.1037/a0019372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (1994). What can the heart tell us about thinking? In A. Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media messages (Vol. II, pp. 99–111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. LEA’s communication series.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, S57–80. doi:10.1111/jcom.2006.56.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Cappella, J. N. (2013). Distraction effects of smoking cues in antismoking messages: Examining resource allocation to message processing as a function of smoking cues and argument strength. Media Psychology, 16(2), 154–176. doi:10.1080/15213269.2012.755454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., Cappella, J. N., Lerman, C., & Strasser, A. A. (2011). Smoking cues, argument strength, and perceived effectiveness of antismoking PSAs. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 13, 282–290. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntq255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, G., Bolls, P., & Wise, K. (2011). Motivated processing of fear appeal and disgust images in televised anti-tobacco ads. Journal of Media Psychology, 23, 77–89. doi:10.1027/1864-1105/a000037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leshner, G., Clayton, R. B., Bhanduri, M., & Bolls, P. (2013). The impact of anger and disgusting images in anti-tobacco ads on viewers’ message processing. Psychophysiology, 50, s45–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, B. B., Jr., & Dufty, P. O. (1972). Strength theory and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 94, 284–290. doi:10.1037/h0032795
   Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2002). The theoretical versus the lay meaning of disgust: Implications for emotion research. Cognition and Emotion, 16, 695–703. doi:10.1080/02699930143000437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13, 251–274. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, R. F., & Bolls, P. D. (2012). Psychophysiological measurement and meaning: Cognitive and emotional processing of media. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug cravings: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubenking, B., & Lang, A. (2014). Captivated and grossed out: An examination of processing core and sociomoral disgust in entertainment media. Journal of Communication, 3, 545–565.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders-Jackson, A., Cappella, J. N., Linebarger, D. L., Piotrowski, J. T., O’Keeffe, M., & Strasser, A. A. (2011). Visual attention to antismoking PSAs: Smoking cues versus other attention-grabbing features. Human Communication Research, 37, 275–292. doi:10.1111/hcre.2011.37.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. A. (1994). Signal detection measures of recognition memory. In Lang (Ed.), Measuring psychological responses to media (pp. 133–148). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Tiffany, S. T. (1990). A cognitive model of drug urges and drug-use behavior: Role of automatic and nonautomatic processes. Psychological Review, 97, 147–168. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.2.147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toll, B. A., Katulak, N. A., & McKee, S. A. (2006). Investigating the factor structure of the Questionnaire on Smoking Urges-Brief (QSU-Brief). Addictive Behaviors, 31 (7), 1231–1239. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasey, M. W., & Thayer, J. F. (1987). The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: A multivariate solution. Psychophysiology, 24, 479–486. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1987.tb00324.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar