Exploring the Effects of Source Credibility and Message Framing on STI Screening Intentions: An Application of Prospect and Protection Motivation Theory

References

• Abood, D. A., Coster, D. C., Mullis, A. K., & Black, D. R. (2002). Evaluation of a “loss-framed” minimal intervention to increase mammography utilization among medically un-and under-insured women. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 26(5), 394–400. doi:10.1016/S0361-090X(02)00120-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College Health Association. (2015). American college health association-national college health assessment II: Undergraduate student reference group executive summary Spring, 2015. Hanover, MD: Author. Retrieved from http://www.acha-ncha.org/reports_ACHA-NCHAIIc.html
   Google Scholar
• Arora, R., & Arora, A. (2004). The impact of message framing and credibility: Findings for nutritional guidelines. Services Marketing Quarterly, 26(1), 35–53. doi:10.1300/J396v26n01_03
   Google Scholar
• Arora, R., Stoner, C., & Arora, A. (2006). Using framing and credibility to incorporate exercise and fitness in individuals’ lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 23(4), 199–207. doi:10.1108/07363760610674329
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Education Behavior, 31, 143–164. doi:10.1177/1090198104263660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, S. M., Salovey, P., Greener, S., Rothman, A. J., Moyer, A., Beauvais, J., & Epel, E. (1995). The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. Health Psychology, 14(2), 178–184. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.2.178
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker-Olsen, K. L., Cudmore, B. A., & Hill, R. P. (2006). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on consumer behavior. Journal of Business Research, 59(1), 46–53. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2005.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas, D., Biswas, A., & Das, N. (2006). The differential effects of celebrity and expert endorsements on consumer risk perceptions. The role of consumer knowledge, perceived congruency, and product technology orientation. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 17–31. doi:10.1080/00913367.2006.10639231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borah, P., & Xiao, X. (2018). The importance of ‘likes’: The interplay of message framing, source, and social endorsement on credibility perceptions of health information on Facebook. Journal of Health Communication, 23(4), 399–411. doi:10.1080/10810730.2018.1455770
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bring, J. (1994). How to standardize regression coefficients. The American Statistician, 48(3), 209–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CDC (2017, December). Adolescents and young adults. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/life-stages-populations/adolescents-youngadults.htm
   Google Scholar
• CDC (2018, July). National Overview of STDs, 2017. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/std/stats17/natoverview.htm
   Google Scholar
• Cox, A. D., Cox, D., & Zimet, G. (2006). Understanding consumer responses to product risk information. Journal of Marketing, 70(1), 79–91. doi:10.1509/jmkg.2006.70.1.79
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1–15. doi:10.1086/268763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, Z. (2015). How to persuade adolescents to use nutrition labels: Effects of health consciousness, argument quality, and source credibility. Asian Journal of Communication, 25(1), 84–101. doi:10.1080/01292986.2014.989241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, L. Y., Bonhomme, L. A., Cooper, S. C., Joseph, J. G., & Zimet, G. D. (2014). Educational interventions to increase HPV vaccination acceptance: A systematic review. Vaccine, 32(17), 1901–1920. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.01.091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2011). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia, J. R., Reiber, C., Massey, S. G., & Merriwether, A. M. (2012). Sexual hookup culture: A review. Review of General Psychology, 16(2), 161–176. doi:10.1037/a0027911
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Retamero, R., & Cokely, E. T. (2011). Effective communication of risks to young adults: Using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(3), 270–287. doi:10.1037/a0023677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaziano, C., & McGrath, K. (1986). Measuring the concept of credibility. Journalism Quarterly, 63(3), 451–462. doi:10.1177/107769908606300301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145–153. doi:10.1086/jcr.1994.21.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, E. (1996). Exploring the construct of organization as source: Consumers’ understandings of organizational sponsorship of advocacy advertising. Journal of Advertising, 25(2), 19–35. doi:10.1080/00913367.1996.10673497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable moderation, mediation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. Retrieved from http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Horan, S. M., & Cafferty, L. A. (2017). Condom communication: Reports of sexually active young adults’ recent messages with new partners. Journal of Health Communication, 22(9), 763–771. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1355420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650. doi:10.1086/266350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. (1967). Effects of fear arousal on attitude change: Recent developments in theory and experimental research. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 166–224). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L. W., Sinclair, R. C., & Courneya, K. S. (2003). The effects of source credibility and message framing on exercise intentions, behaviors, and attitudes: An integration of the elaboration likelihood model and prospect theory 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1), 179–196. doi:10.1111/jasp.2003.33.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. doi:10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.39.4.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalichman, S. C., & Coley, B. (1995). Context framing to enhance HIV-antibody-testing messages targeted to African American women. Health Psychology, 14(3), 247–254. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kareklas, I., Muehling, D. D., & Weber, T. J. (2015). Reexamining health messages in the digital age: A fresh look at source credibility effects. Journal of Advertising, 44(2), 88–104. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1018461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. B., & Kim, D. Y. (2014). The effects of message framing and source credibility on green messages in hotels. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 64–75. doi:10.1177/1938965513503400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, J. L., & Sarge, M. A. (2013). A serial mediation model of message framing on intentions to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: Revisiting the role of threat and efficacy perceptions. Health Communication, 28(1), 5–19. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.734914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H. (1971). Fear appeals and persuasion: The differentiation of a motivational construct. American Journal of Public Health, 61, 1208–1224. doi:10.2105/AJPH.61.6.1208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, X., Spence, P. R., & Lachlan, K. A. (2016). Social media and credibility indicators: The effect of influence cues. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 264–271. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macapagal, K., Janssen, E., Matson, M., Finn, P. R., & Heiman, J. R. (2017). The impact of gain-and loss-framed messages on young adults’ sexual decision making: An experimental study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 385–394. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0679-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27(3), 361–367. doi:10.1177/002224379002700310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L. H., & Coleman, R. (2012). Source credibility and evidence format: Examining the effectiveness of HIV/AIDS messages for young African Americans. Journal of Health Communication, 17(5), 515–531. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.635771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markham, D. (1968). The dimensions of source credibility of television newscasters. Journal of Communication, 18(1), 57–64. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1968.tb00055.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D. R., & Mccann, R. M. (2003). Credibility in the 21st century: Integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. In P. J. Kalbfleisch (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 27, pp. 293–335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 500–510. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A., Gottfried, J., & Matsa, K. E. (2015). Millennials and political news: Social media—The local TV for the next generation? Pew research center.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, R. E. (2010). Promoting healthy behaviors: How do we get the message across? International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(4), 500–512. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Black, H. G., & Pierce, L. B. (2009). Efficacy of computer technology-based HIV prevention interventions: A meta-analysis. Aids, 23(1), 107–115. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32831c5500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noar, S. M., Zimmerman, R. S., Palmgreen, P., Lustria, M., & Horosewski, M. L. (2006). Integrating personality and psychosocial theoretical approaches to understanding safer sexual behavior: Implications for message design. Health Communication, 19(2), 165–174. doi:10.1207/s15327027hc1902_8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316. doi:10.1111/jcom.2009.59.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrault, E. K., Hildenbrand, G. M., McCullock, S. P., Schmitz, K. J., & Dolick, K. N. (2019). Hashtag health: College health on social media and students’ motivations to follow, interact, and share their social media content. Health Promotion Practice, 20, 721–729. doi:10.1177/1524839919853820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rippetoe, P. A., & Rogers, R. W. (1987). Effects of components of protection-motivation theory on adaptive and maladaptive coping with a health threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 596–604. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change1. The Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93–114. doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In B. L. Cacioppo & L. L. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology: A sourcebook (pp. 153–176). London, UK: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. M., Van Der Pol, B., Fortenberry, J. D., Dodge, B., Reece, M., Certo, D., & Zimet, G. D. (2015). The impact of brief messages on HSV-2 screening uptake among female defendants in a court setting: A randomized controlled trial utilizing prospect theory. Journal of Health Communication, 20(2), 230–236. doi:10.1080/10810730.2014.920062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., Zullo, J., & Rothman, A. J. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20(4), 256–266. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(4), 433–467. doi:10.1177/0093650207302787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steward, W. T., Schneider, T. R., Pizarro, J., & Salovey, P. (2003). Need for cognition moderates responses to framed smoking-cessation messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(12), 2439–2464. doi:10.1111/jasp.2003.33.issue-12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strecher, V. J., McEvoy DeVellis, B., Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1986). The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change. Health Education Quarterly, 13(1), 73–92. doi:10.1177/109019818601300108
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trumbo, C. W., & McComas, K. A. (2003). The function of credibility in information processing for risk perception. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 23(2), 343–353. doi:10.1111/risk.2003.23.issue-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A., Smerecnik, C., & De Vries, H. (2010). Examining the influence of self-efficacy on message-framing effects: Reducing salt consumption in the general population. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 32(2), 165–172. doi:10.1080/01973531003738338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van’t Riet, J., Ruiter, R. A., Werrij, M. Q., & De Vries, H. (2010). Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection. Psychology and Health, 25(3), 339–349. doi:10.1080/08870440802530798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, T., Clarke, V., & Borland, R. (2001). Effects of message framing on breast cancer related beliefs and behaviors: The role of mediating factors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 925–950. doi:10.1111/jasp.2001.31.issue-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communications Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K., Cameron, K. A., McKeon, J. K., & Berkowitz, J. M. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1, 317–341. doi:10.1080/108107396127988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar