The Effect of Temporal Frames in Anti-Smoking Messages on the Extension of Anti-Smoking Arguments to Smokers

References

• Adamic, L. A., Lento, T. M., Adar, E., & Ng, P. C. (2016). Information evolution in social networks. Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (pp. 473–482). doi:10.1145/2835776.2835827
   Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (2014). Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 586–607. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigman, C. A., Mello, S., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Tan, A. S. L. (2018). Speaking up about lighting up in public: Examining psychosocial correlates of smoking and vaping assertive communication intentions among u.s. adults. Health Communication, 1–11. doi:10.1080/10410236.2018.1428849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, E., Durkin, S. J., Wakefield, M., & Kashima, Y. (2017). Why do smokers talk about antismoking campaigns? Predictors of the occurrence and content of campaign-generated conversations. Health Communication, 32, 1539–1556. doi:10.1080/10410236.2016.1239301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N. (2002). Cynicism and social trust in the new media environment. Journal of Communication, 52(1), 229–241. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2002.tb02541.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cappella, J. N., Kim, H. S., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Selection and transmission processes for information in the emerging media environment: Psychological motives and message characteristics. Media Psychology, 18(3), 396–424. doi:10.1080/15213269.2014.941112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandran, S., & Menon, G. (2004). When a day means more than a year: Effects of temporal framing on judgments of health risk. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 375–389. doi:10.1086/422116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coley, H. L., Sadasivam, R. S., Williams, J. H., Volkman, J. E., Schoenberger, Y.-M., Kohler, C. L., … Houston, T. K. (2013). Crowdsourced peer versus expert written smoking-cessation messages. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 45(5), 543–550. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, C., Cappella, J. N., & Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16(1), 118–140. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., Segrin, C., & Harden, J. M. (1989). Primary and secondary goals in the production of interpersonal influence messages. Communication Monographs, 56(1), 19–38. doi:10.1080/03637758909390247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donné, L., Jansen, C., & Hoeks, J. (2017). Uncovering factors influencing interpersonal health communication. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 2333393617711607. doi:10.1177/2333393617711607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2017). No need to watch: How the effects of partisan media can spread via interpersonal discussions. American Journal of Political Science, 1–14. doi:10.1111/ajps.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, J. C., Alexander, T. N., Zhao, X., Delahanty, J. C., Allen, J. A., MacMonegle, A. J., & Farrelly, M. C. (2015). Youth’s awareness of and reactions to The real cost national tobacco public education campaign. PloS One, 10(12), 1–12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, S. M., Cotter, T., & Perez, D. (2014). When your smoking is not just about you: Antismoking advertising, interpersonal pressure, and quitting outcomes. Journal of Health Communication, 19(1), 41–56. doi:10.1080/10810730.2013.798375
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, S. M., Kashima, Y., & Wakefield, M. (2010). Predictors and consequences of conversations about health promoting media messages. Communication Monographs, 77(4), 518–539. doi:10.1080/03637751.2010.502537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eveland, W. (2004). The effect of political discussion in producing informed citizens: The roles of information, motivation, and elaboration. Political Communication, 21(2), 177–193. doi:10.1080/10584600490443877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Food and Drug Administration. (2018). Every try counts campaign [WebContent]. Retrieved from https://www.fda.gov/TobaccoProducts/PublicHealthEducation/PublicEducationCampaigns/EveryTryCountsCampaign/default.htm
   Google Scholar
• Frank, L. B., Chatterjee, J. S., Chaudhuri, S. T., Lapsansky, C., Bhanot, A., & Murphy, S. T. (2012). Conversation and compliance: Role of interpersonal discussion and social norms in public communication campaigns. Journal of Health Communication, 17(9), 1050–1067. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.665426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitas, A. L., Gollwitzer, P., & Trope, Y. (2004). The influence of abstract and concrete mindsets on anticipating and guiding others‘ self-regulatory efforts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(6), 739–752. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2004.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Eyal, T., Chaiken, S., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2008). Influencing attitudes toward near and distant objects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 562–572. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2016). Coping and construal level matching drives health message effectiveness via response efficacy or self-efficacy enhancement. Journal of Consumer Research, 43(3), 429–447. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helme, D. W., Noar, S. M., Allard, S., Zimmerman, R. S., Palmgreen, P., & McClanahan, K. J. (2011). In-depth investigation of interpersonal discussions in response to a safer sex mass media campaign. Health Communication, 26(4), 366–378. doi:10.1080/10410236.2010.551582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, H., de Bruijn, G.-J., & van den Putte, B. (2012). Talking about alcohol consumption: Health campaigns, conversational valence, and binge drinking intentions. British Journal of Health Psychology, 17(4), 843–853. a2h. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02080.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hendriks, H., van den Putte, B., & de Bruijn, G.-J. (2014). Changing the conversation: The influence of emotions on conversational valence and alcohol consumption. Prevention Science, 15(5), 684–693. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0418-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1992). Achieving “shared reality” in the communication game: A social action that creates meaning. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 11(3), 107–131. doi:10.1177/0261927X92113001
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, R. C. (2002). Making sense of contradictory evidence. In R. C. Hornik (Ed.), Public health communication: Evidence for behavior change (pp. 1–19). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Hornik, R. C., & Yanovitzky, I. (2003). Using theory to design evaluations of communication campaigns: The case of the national youth anti-drug media campaign. Communication Theory, 13(2), 204–224. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00289.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, Y. (2012). Social diffusion of campaign effects: Campaign-generated interpersonal communication as a mediator of antitobacco campaign effects. Communication Research, 39(1), 120–141. doi:10.1177/0093650210389029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, M. (2017). Sharing tobacco and e-cigarette information: Predicting its occurrence and valence among youth and young adults. Health Communication, 1–10. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1331310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong, M., Tan, A. S. L., Brennan, E., Gibson, L., & Hornik, R. C. (2015). Talking about quitting: Interpersonal communication as a mediator of campaign effects on smokers’ quit behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 20(10), 1196–1205. doi:10.1080/10810730.2015.1018620
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, P. D., Wakslak, C. J., Raj, M., & Trope, Y. (2016). Communicating with distant others: The functional use of abstraction. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(1), 37–44. doi:10.1177/1948550615590449
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. S. (2015). Attracting views and going viral: How message features and news-sharing channels affect health news diffusion. Journal of Communication, 65(3), 512–534. doi:10.1111/jcom.12160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., & Nan, X. (2016). Temporal framing effects differ for narrative versus non-narrative messages the case of promoting HPV vaccination. Communication Research, 1–17. doi:10.1177/0093650215626980
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Zhang, M., & Li, X. (2008). Effects of temporal and social distance on consumer evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(4), 706–713. doi:10.1086/592131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranzler, E. C., Gibson, L. A., & Hornik, R. C. (2017). Recall of “The Real Cost” anti-smoking campaign is specifically associated with endorsement of campaign-targeted beliefs. Journal of Health Communication, 22(10), 818–828. doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1364311
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A. Y., Keller, P. A., & Sternthal, B. (2010). Value from regulatory construal fit: The persuasive impact of fit between consumer goals and message concreteness. Journal of Consumer Research, 36(5), 735–747. doi:10.1086/605591
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2018). Testing the replication and extension of why-quit and how-to-quit antismoking health messages. Journal of Health Communication, 23(7), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2018.1493062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. J. (2019). The role of construal level in message effects research: A review and future directions. Communication Theory, 29(3), 231–250. doi:10.1093/ct/qty030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutchyn, Y., & Yzer, M. (2011). Construal level theory and theory of planned behavior: Time frame effects on salient belief generation. Journal of Health Communication, 16(6), 595–606. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.551991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z., & Nan, X. (2017). Friends don’t let friends smoke: How storytelling and social distance influence nonsmokers’ responses to antismoking messages. Health Communication, 1–9. doi:10.1080/10410236.2017.1321162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maglio, S. J., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2013). Distance from a distance: Psychological distance reduces sensitivity to any further psychological distance. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 142(3), 644–657. doi:10.1037/a0030258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498. doi:10.1037/bul0000085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nenkov, G. Y. (2012). It’s all in the mindset: Effects of varying psychological distance in persuasive messages. Marketing Letters, 23(3), 615–628. doi:10.1007/s11002-012-9166-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pounders, K. R., Lee, S., & Mackert, M. (2015). Matching temporal frame, self-view, and message frame valence: Improving persuasiveness in health communications. Journal of Advertising, 44(4), 388–402. doi:10.1080/00913367.2015.1071210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimal, R. N., Limaye, R. J., Roberts, P., Brown, J., & Mkandawire, G. (2013). The role of interpersonal communication in reducing structural disparities and psychosocial deficiencies: Experience from the Malawi BRIDGE project. Journal of Communication, 63(1), 51–71. doi:10.1111/jcom.12000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snefjella, B., & Kuperman, V. (2015). Concreteness and psychological distance in natural language use. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1449–1460. doi:10.1177/0956797615591771
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soderberg, C. K., Callahan, S. P., Kochersberger, A. O., Amit, E., & Ledgerwood, A. (2015). The effects of psychological distance on abstraction: Two meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 525–548. doi:10.1037/bul0000005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G. (2013). Social networks and popular understanding of science and health: Sharing disparities. Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., & Yzer, M. C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Communication Yearbook, 31, 419–462.
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., & Yzer, M. C. (2009). When (and why) interpersonal talk matters for campaigns. Communication Theory, 19(1), 1–8. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.01329.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi:10.1037/a0018963
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, J. B. (2017). The merger of mass and interpersonal communication via new media: Integrating metaconstructs. Human Communication Research, 43(4), 559–572. doi:10.1111/hcre.12122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, K., MacDonnell, R., & Dahl, D. W. (2011). It’s the mind-set that matters: The role of construal level and message framing in influencing consumer efficacy and conservation behaviors. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 48(3), 472–485. doi:10.1509/jmkr.48.3.472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., Nan, X., Iles, I. A., & Yang, B. (2015). Temporal framing and consideration of future consequences: Effects on smokers’ and at-risk nonsmokers’ responses to cigarette health warnings. Health Communication, 30(2), 175–185. doi:10.1080/10410236.2014.974122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, X., & Peterson, E. (2017). Effects of temporal framing on response to antismoking messages: The mediating role of perceived relevance. Journal of Health Communication, 22(1), 37–44. doi:10.1080/10810730.2016.1250844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar