728
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

“You Gotta Choose Your Words Carefully”: Findings from Interviews with Environmental Health Scientists about Their Research Translation Perceptions and Training Needs

, , , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all

References

  • Bankston, A., & McDowell, G. S. (2018). Changing the culture of science communication training for junior scientists. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1), 19. 1.43. doi:10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1413
  • Baram-Tsabari, A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2017). Science communication training: What are we trying to teach? International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 285–300. doi:10.1080/21548455.2017.1303756
  • Bergeron, C. D., Hilfinger Messias, D. K., Friedman, D. B., Spencer, S. M., & Miller, S. C. (2018). Involvement of family members and professionals in older women’s post-fall decision making. Health Communication, 33(3), 246–253.
  • Bracken, L. J., Bulkeley, H. A., & Whitman, G. (2015). Transdisciplinary research: Understanding the stakeholder perspective. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(7), 1291–1308. doi:10.1080/09640568.2014.921596
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Psychiatric Quarterly, 0887(1), 37–41. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health. doi:10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
  • Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10.
  • Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., … Jandciu, E. W. (2009). Nature Biotechnology. Science Communication Reconsidered, 27(6), 514–518.
  • Clark, G., Russell, J., Enyeart, P., Gracia, B., Wessel, A., Jarmoskaite, I., … Roux, S. (2016). Science educational outreach programs that benefit students and scientists. PLoS Biology, 14(2), e1002368. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002368
  • Cooke, S. J., Gallagher, A. J., Sopinka, N. M., Nguyen, V. M., Skubel, R. A., Hammerschlag, N., … Danylchuk, A. J. (2017). Considerations for effective science communication. Facets, 2, 233–248. doi:10.1139/facets-2016-0055
  • Davis, L. F., Ramirez-Andreotta, M. D., McLain, J. E. T., Kilungo, A., Abrell, L., & Buxner, S. (2018). Increasing environmental health literacy through contextual learning in communities at risk. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15, 10. doi:10.3390/ijerph15102203
  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(1), 80–92. doi:10.1177/160940690600500107
  • Fischhoff, B. (2013). The sciences of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(Supplement 3), 14033–14039.
  • Fischhoff, B., & Scheufele, D. A. (2014). The science of science communication II. PNAS, 111(4), 13583–13584. doi:10.17226/18478
  • Friedman, D. B., Hooker, S. P., Wilcox, S., Burroughs, E. L., & Rheaume, C. E. (2012). African American men’s perspectives on promoting physical activity: “We’re not that difficult to figure out!”. Journal of Health Communication, 17(10), 1151–1170. doi:10.1080/10810730.2012.665424
  • Haynes, E. N., Beidler, C., Wittberg, R., Meloncon, L., Parin, M., Kopras, E. J., … Dietrich, K. N. (2011). Developing a bidirectional academic-community partnership with an Appalachian-American community for environmental health research and risk communication. Environmental Health Perspectives, 119, 1364–1372. doi:10.1289/ehp.1003164
  • Keeler, B. L., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Guerry, A. D., Addison, P. F. E., Bettigole, C., Burke, I. C., … Vira, B. (2017). Society is ready for a new kind of science - is academia? BioScience, 67(7), 591–592. doi:10.1093/biosci/bix051
  • Kendall-Taylor, N., & Levitt, P. (2017). Beyond hat in hand: Science advocacy is foundational for policy decisions. Neuron, 94(4), 708–712. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.04.039
  • Kreps, G. L., & Maibach, E. W. (2008). Transdisciplinary science: The nexus between communication and public health. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 732–748. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00411.x
  • Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
  • Kuehne, L. M., Twardochleb, L. A., Fritschie, K. J., Mims, M. C., Lawrence, D. J., Gibson, P. P., … Olden, J. D. (2014). Practical science communication strategies for graduate students. Conservation Biology, 28(5), 1225–1235. doi:10.1111/cobi.12305
  • Laditka, S. B., Corwin, S. J., Laditka, J. N., Liu, R., Friedman, D. B., Mathews, A. E., & Wilcox, S. (2009). Methods and management of the Healthy Brain Study: A large multisite qualitative research project. Gerontologist, 49((SUPPL), 1. doi:10.1093/geront/gnp076
  • National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Communicating science effectively: A research agenda. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/23674
  • Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C., Balvanera, P., … Österblom, H. (2020). Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research. Nature Sustainability. doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2
  • NVivo qualitative data analysis software. (2019). QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 12.
  • Patton, M. Q. (2001). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
  • Pettibone, K. G., Balshaw, D. M., Dilworth, C., Drew, C. H., Hall, J. E., Heacock, M., … Collman, G. W. (2018). Expanding the concept of translational research: Making a place for environmental health sciences. Environmental Health Perspectives, 126(7), 074501. doi:10.1289/EHP3657
  • Rodgers, S., Wang, Z., Maras, M. A., Burgoyne, S., Balakrishnan, B., Stemmle, J., & Schultz, J. C. (2018). decoding science: Development and evaluation of a science communication training program using a triangulated framework. Science Communication, 40(1), 3–32. doi:10.1177/1075547017747285
  • Rodgers, S., Wang, Z., & Schultz, J. C. (2020). A scale to measure science communication training effectiveness. Science Communication, 42(1), 90–111. doi:1177/1075547020903057
  • Treise, D., & Weigold, M. F. (2002). Advancing science communication: A survey of science communicators. Science Communication, 23(3), 310–322.
  • Wilson, M. J., Ramey, T. L., Donaldson, M. R., Germain, R. R., & Perkin, E. K. (2016). Communicating science: Sending the right message to the right audience. FACETS, 1, 127–137. doi:10.1139/facets-2016-0015
  • Zoom Video Conferencing. (2020). Zoom Video Communications, Inc. Retrieved from https://zoom.us/

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.