An Investigation of Cognitive Processing of Fear Appeal Messages Promoting HPV Vaccination: Predictors and Outcomes of Magnitude and Valence of Cognitive Responses

References

• Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217–232. doi:10.1086/314321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Cancer Society (2019, February 18). HPV and HPV testing. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/infectious-agents/hpv/hpv-and-hpv-testing.html
   Google Scholar
• Banerjee, S. C., & Greene, K. (2012). Role of transportation in the persuasion process: Cognitive and affective responses to antidrug narratives. Journal of Health Communication, 17(5), 564–581. doi:10.1080/10810730.2011.635779
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, K. H., & Frankel, A. (1981). A conceptualization of threat communications and protective health behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 44(3), 204–217. doi:10.2307/3033834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carcioppolo, N., Jensen, J. D., Wilson, S. R., Collins, W. B., Carrion, M., & Linnemeier, G. (2013). Examining HPV threat-to-efficacy ratios in the extended parallel process model. Health Communication, 28(1), 20–28. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.719478
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2013). Fact sheet for public health personnel. https://www.cdc.gov/condomeffectiveness/latex.html
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2017). Genital HPV infection – CDC fact sheet [PDF]. https://www.cdc.gov/std/hpv/hpv-Fs-July-2017.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2019). About HPV. https://www.cdc.gov/hpv/parents/about-hpv.html
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 752–766. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The ontario symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman& & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chen, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. Gollwitzer & J. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553–578). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chandra, A., Copen, C. E., & Mosher, W. D. (2013). Sexual behavior, sexual attraction, and sexual identity in the United States: Data from the 2006–2010 National Survey of Family Growth. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 45–66). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Chaiken., S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken& & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social and cognitive psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Danaher, B. G., Smolkowski, K., Seeley, J. R., & Severson, H. H. (2008). Mediators of a successful web‐based smokeless tobacco cessation program. Addiction, 103(10), 1706–1712. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02295.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., & de Wit, J. B. (2008). The processing of fear‐arousing communications: How biased processing leads to persuasion. Social Influence, 3(2), 84–113. doi:10.1080/15534510802185836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P. (1994). Rethinking the study of fear appeals: An emotional perspective. Communication Theory, 4(4), 295–323. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1994.tb00094.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion: Emotional responses to public service announcements. Communication Research, 27(4), 461–495. doi:10.1177/009365000027004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, & Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. In T. Dalgleish & M. Power (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 45–60). New York, NY: Wiley, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Endler, N. S., Kocovski, N. L., & Macrodimitris, S. D. (2001). Coping, efficacy, and perceived control in acute vs chronic illnesses. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 617–625. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00060-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1984). Controversial issues in emotion theory. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 64–88.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, L. (2011). The opinion factor: The effects of opinionated news on information processing and attitude change. Political Communication, 28(2), 163–181. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.565014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions: Studies in emotion and social interaction. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1988). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. doi:10.1177/002224378802500207
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In T. C. Brock, T. M. Ostrom, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Psychological Foundations of Attitudes (pp. 147–170). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jain, S. P., & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Motivated reasoning: A depth-of-processing perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4), 358–371. doi:10.1086/209568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(1), 78–92. doi:10.1037/h0060732
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855. doi:10.1177/0093650210385813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krieger, J. L., & Sarge, M. A. (2013). A serial mediation model of message framing on intentions to receive the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine: Revisiting the role of threat and efficacy perceptions. Health Communication, 28(1), 5–19. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.734914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühne, R., & Schemer, C. (2015). The emotional effects of news frames on information processing and opinion formation. Communication Research, 42(3), 387–407. doi:10.1177/0093650213514599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, I. M., Watson, B., & White, K. M. (2010). Response efficacy: The key to minimizing rejection and maximizing acceptance of emotion-based anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(2), 459–467. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S. (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(6), 669–679. doi:10.1177/0146167292186002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie, D. M., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). On-line and memory-based modification of attitudes: Determinants of message recall-attitude change correspondence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(1), 5–16. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (1999). A cognitive‐functional model for the effects of discrete negative emotions on information processing, attitude change, and recall. Communication Theory, 9(3), 292–320. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1999.tb00172.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L. (2002). Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: A test of the cognitive-functional model. Communication Monographs, 69(3), 204–216. doi:10.1080/03637750216541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Vaccine Advisory Committee. (2018). Strengthening the effectiveness of national, state, and local efforts to improve HPV vaccination coverage in the United States: Recommendations from the national vaccine advisory committee. Public Health Reports, 133(5), 543–550. doi:10.1177/0033354918793629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (1981). Historical foundations of the cognitive response approach to attitudes and persuasion. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 5–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(1), 69–81. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.69
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plutchik, R. (1997). The circumplex as a general model of the structure of emotions and personality. In R. Plutchik& & H. R. Conte (Eds.), Circumplex models of personality and emotions (pp. 17–45). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Popova, L. (2012). The extended parallel process model: Illuminating the gaps in research. Health Education & Behavior, 39(4), 455–473. doi:10.1177/1090198111418108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(3), 93–114. doi:10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rogers, R. W. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. In J. Cacioppo & R. E. Petty (Eds.), Social psychophysiology (pp. 153–176). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J. (1984). Cognitive determinants of emotion: A structural theory. Review of Personality & Social Psychology, 5, 11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Roser, C., & Thompson, M. (1995). Fear appeals and the formation of active publics. Journal of Communication, 45(1), 103–121. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00717.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, M. L., Injeyan, H. S., Verhoef, M. J., & Eliasziw, M. (2004). Beliefs and behaviours: Understanding chiropractors and immunization. Vaccine, 23(3), 372–379. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2004.05.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senkomago, V., Henley, S. J., Thomas, C. C., Mix, J. M., Markowitz, L. E., & Saraiya, M. (2019). Human papillomavirus–attributable cancers—United States, 2012–2016. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 68(33), 724–728. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6833a3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, F., Ahern, L., & Han, J. (2017). Environmental orientations and news coverage: Examining the impact of individual differences and narrative news. International Journal of Communication, 11, 4018–4031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L., & Dillard, J. P. (2007). The influence of behavioral inhibition/approach systems and message framing on the processing of persuasive health messages. Communication Research, 34(4), 433–467. doi:10.1177/0093650207302787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, J. (2013). A further extension of the extended parallel process model (E-EPPM): Implications of cognitive appraisal theory of emotion and dispositional coping style. Health Communication, 28(1), 72–83. doi:10.1080/10410236.2012.708633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, J., Kuang, K., & Cho, H. (2016). Reexamining fear appeal models from cognitive appraisal theory and functional emotion theory perspectives. Communication Monographs, 83(1), 120–144. doi:10.1080/03637751.2015.1044257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory: STAI (Form Y). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinstein, N. D. (2000). Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 19(1), 65–74. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.1.65
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, S., Metzger, M. J., & Flanagin, A. J. (2016). Selective use of news cues: A multiple-motive perspective on information selection in social media environments. Journal of Communication, 66(4), 669–693. doi:10.1111/jcom.12241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. doi:10.1080/03637759209376276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, K. (1998). Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: Using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures. In P. A. Andersen & L. K. Guerrero (Eds.), Handbook of communication and emotion: Research, theory, applications, and contexts (pp. 423–450). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, K., Cameron, K. A., McKeon, J. K., & Berkowitz, J. M. (1996). Predicting risk behaviors: Development and validation of a diagnostic scale. Journal of Health Communication, 1(4), 317–341. doi:10.1080/108107396127988
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright, P. (1980). Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(2), 151–175. doi:10.1086/jcr.1980.7.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, C. (2015). Persuading people to eat less junk food: A cognitive resource match between attitudinal ambivalence and health message framing. Health Communication, 30(3), 251–260. doi:10.1080/10410236.2013.842525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, D. G. (2008). The privileged role of the late-night joke: Exploring humor’s role in disrupting argument scrutiny. Media Psychology, 11(1), 119–142. doi:10.1080/15213260701837073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Amos, C. (2012). A model of end users’ web threats information processing. Journal of InformationPrivacy and Security, 8(3), 15–36.
   Google Scholar