References
- Abhyankar, P., O’connor, D. B., & Lawton, R. (2008). The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: Evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 13(1), 1–16. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13548500701235732
- Alferes, V. R. (2012). Methods of randomization in experimental design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Amsalem, E., & Zoizner, A. (2020). Real, but limited: A meta-analytic assessment of framing effects in the political domain. British Journal of Political Science, 1–17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000253
- Baker, M. (2020, January 9). After a measles scare, Seattle cracks down on vaccine compliance. New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2020/01/08/us/measles-vaccination-washington.html
- Bergkvist, L., & Rossiter, J. R. (2007). The predictive validity of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 175–184. doi:https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.44.2.175
- Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpr057
- Bobkowski, P. S. (2015). Sharing the news: Effects of informational utility and opinion leadership on online news sharing. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 92(2), 320–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699015573194
- Bosone, L., & Martinez, F. (2017). When, how and why is loss-framing more effective than gain- and non-gain-framing in the promotion of detection behaviors? International Review of Social Psychology, 30(1), 184–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.15
- CDC. (2020, January 6). Measles cases and outbreaks. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/measles/cases-outbreaks.html
- Chiou, J.-S., Chi-Fen Hsu, A., & Hsieh, C.-H. (2013). How negative online information affects consumers’ brand evaluation: The moderating effects of brand attachment and source credibility. Online Information Review, 37(6), 910–926. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-02-2012-0014
- Cho, H., & Boster, F. J. (2008). Effects of gain versus loss frame antidrug ads on adolescents. Journal of Communication, 58(3), 428–446. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00393.x
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
- Cornwall, W. (2020). Officials gird for a war on vaccine misinformation. Science, 369(6499), 14–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.369.6499.14
- Dahlstrom, M. F., Dudo, A., & Brossard, D. (2012). Precision of information, sensational information, and self-efficacy information as message-level variables affecting risk perceptions: Message-Level variables affecting risk perceptions. Risk Analysis, 32(1), 155–166. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01641.x
- De Meulenaer, S., De Pelsmacker, P., & Dens, N. (2018). Power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and the effects of source credibility on health risk message compliance. Health Communication, 33(3), 291–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016.1266573
- Donzelli, G., Palomba, G., Federigi, I., Aquino, F., Cioni, L., Verani, M., … Lopalco, P. (2018). Misinformation on vaccination: A quantitative analysis of YouTube videos. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 14(7), 1654–1659. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2018.1454572
- Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03203630
- Fox, J., McKnight, J., Sun, Y., Maung, D., & Crawfis, R. (2020). Using a serious game to communicate risk and minimize psychological distance regarding environmental pollution. Telematics and Informatics, 46, 101320. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101320
- Frank, L. B., Murphy, S. T., Chatterjee, J. S., Moran, M. B., & Baezconde-Garbanati, L. (2015). Telling stories, saving lives: creating narrative health messages. Health communication, 30(2), 154–163.
- Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
- Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., Dunham, R. B., & Pierce, J. L. (1998). Single-Item versus Multiple-Item measurement scales: An empirical comparison. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 898–915. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164498058006003
- Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process. Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024833
- Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of mechanical turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.1753
- Gray, J. B., & Harrington, N. G. (2011). Narrative and framing: A test of an integrated message strategy in the exercise context. Journal of Health Communication, 16(3), 264–281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2010.529490
- Grewal, D., Gotlieb, J., & Marmorstein, H. (1994). The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 145–153. JSTOR. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/209388.
- Gross, K. (2008). Framing persuasive appeals: Episodic and thematic framing, emotional response, and policy opinion. Political Psychology, 29(2), 169–192. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00622.x
- Hart, P. S. (2011). One or many? The influence of episodic and thematic climate change frames on policy preferences and individual behavior change. Science Communication, 33(1), 28–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547010366400
- Hauser, D. J., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z
- Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Homar, A. R., & Cvelbar, L. K. (2021). The effects of framing on environmental decisions: A systematic literature review. Ecological Economics, 183, 106950. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106950
- Huang, Y. L., Starbird, K., Orand, M., Stanek, S. A., & Pedersen, H. T. (2015). Connected through crisis: Emotional proximity and the spread of misinformation online. Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW ’15, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 969–980. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675202
- Jang, S. M., Mckeever, B. W., Mckeever, R., & Kim, J. K. (2019). From social media to mainstream news: The information flow of the vaccine-autism controversy in the US, Canada, and the UK. Health Communication, 34(1), 110–117. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1384433
- Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. JSTOR. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185.
- Kamakura, W. A. (2015). Measure twice and cut once: The carpenter’s rule still applies. Marketing Letters, 26(3), 237–243. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11002-014-9298-x
- Karlova, N. A., & Fisher, K. E. (2012). “Plz RT”: A social diffusion model of misinformation and disinformation for understanding human information behaviour. Proceedings of ISIC the Information Behaviour Conference 2012, Tokyo, Japan, 1–17.
- Kasting, M. L., Head, K. J., Cox, D., Cox, A. D., & Zimet, G. D. (2019). The effects of message framing and healthcare provider recommendation on adult hepatitis B vaccination: A randomized controlled trial. Preventive Medicine, 127, 105798. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105798
- Kim, H. K., & Lee, T. K. (2017). Conditional effects of gain–loss-framed narratives among current smokers at different stages of change. Journal of Health Communication, 22(12), 990–998. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2017.1396629
- Kirkpatrick, A. (2020). The spread of fake science: Lexical concreteness, proximity, misinformation sharing, and the moderating role of subjective knowledge. Public Understanding of Science, 096366252096616. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520966165
- Kwon, K. H., Chadha, M., & Pellizzaro, K. (2017). Proximity and terrorism news in social media: A construal-level theoretical approach to networked framing of terrorism in Twitter. Mass Communication and Society, 20(6), 869–894. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1369545
- Lee, J. A., & Murnighan, J. K. (2001). The empathy-prospect model and the choice to help. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(4), 816–839. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2001.tb01415.x
- Ma, Z., & Nan, X. (2019). Positive facts, negative stories: Message framing as a moderator of narrative persuasion in antismoking communication. Health Communication, 34(12), 1454–1460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2018.1499702
- Madathil, K. C., Rivera-Rodriguez, A. J., Greenstein, J. S., & Gramopadhye, A. K. (2015). Healthcare information on YouTube: A systematic review. Health Informatics Journal, 21(3), 173–194. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458213512220
- Mays, D., & Zhao, X. (2016). The influence of framed messages and self-affirmation on indoor tanning behavioral intentions in 18-to 30-Year-Old women. Health Psychology, 35(2), 123–130. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000253
- Mccullock, S. P., & Perrault, E. K. (2020). Exploring the effects of source credibility and message framing on STI screening intentions: An application of prospect and protection motivation theory. Journal of Health Communication, 25(1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1692262
- Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & DeChurch, L. A. (2009). Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(2), 535–546. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013773
- Mian, A., & Khan, S. (2020). Coronavirus: The spread of misinformation. BMC Medicine, 18(1), 89. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-020-01556-3
- National HPV Roundtable. (2019). Resource library. National HPV Roundtable. https://hpvroundtable.org/resource-library/
- O’Keefe, D. J. (2003). Message properties, mediating states, and manipulation checks: Claims, evidence, and data analysis in experimental persuasive message effects research. Communication Theory, 13(3), 251–274. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2003.tb00292.x
- O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12(7), 623–644. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730701615198
- O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59(2), 296–316. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
- O’Keefe, D. J., & Nan, X. (2012). The relative persuasiveness of gain- and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: A meta-analytic review. Health Communication, 27(8), 776–783. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.640974
- Park, M. (2019). Information sharing to promote risky health behavior on social media. Journal of Health Communication, 24(4), 359–367. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2019.1604914
- Shoemaker, P. J. (1996). Hardwired for News: Using Biological and Cultural Evolution to Explain the Surveillance Function. Journal of Communication, 46(3), 32–47. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1996.tb01487.x
- Shukla, A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic: An analysis of popular YouTube videos as an alternative health information platform. Health Informatics Journal, 27(2), 1460458221994878. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458221994878
- Updegraff, J. A., & Rothman, A. J. (2013). Health message framing: Moderators, mediators, and mysteries: Health message framing. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(9), 668–679. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12056
- Wang, M., & Fischbeck, P. S. (2004). Incorporating framing into prospect theory modeling: A mixture-model approach. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 29(2), 181–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISK.0000038943.63610.16
- Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social Science & Medicine, 240, 112552. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552
- WEF. (2019). The global risks report 2019 (Insight Report 14th Edition; p. 114). World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2019.pdf
- WHO. (2019). Ten threats to global health in 2019. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/feature-stories/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
- Witte, K. (1994). Fear control and danger control: A test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Communication Monographs, 61(2), 113–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759409376328
- Wrench, J. S., Thomas-Maddox, C., Richmond, V. P., & McCroskey, J. C. (2015). Experimental design. In Quantitative research methods for communication (3rd ed., pp. 261–286). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Xu, J., & Huang, G. (2020). The relative effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages in charity advertising: Meta-analytic evidence and implications. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 25(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.1675
- Zhu, D., Xie, X., & Gan, Y. (2011). Information source and valence: How information credibility influences earthquake risk perception. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(2), 129–136. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.09.005
- Zimmerman, R. S., Cupp, P. K., Abadi, M., Donohew, R. L., Gray, C., Gordon, L., & Grossl, A. B. (2014). The effects of framing and fear on ratings and impact of Antimarijuana PSAs. Substance Use & Misuse, 49(7), 824–835. doi:https://doi.org/10.3109/10826084.2014.880721