The impact of disability on partnership formation in Sweden during 1990-2009

References

• Andersson, G., Obućina, O., & Scott, K. (2015). Marriage and divorce of immigrants and descendants of immigrants in Sweden. Demographic Research, S18(2), 31–64.
   Google Scholar
• Aquilino, W. S. (1996). The Life course of children born to unmarried mothers: Childhood living arrangements and young adult outcomes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 58(2), 293–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, A., Hakansson, A., Rastam, L., Lithman, T., & Merlo, J. (2006). The role country of birth plays in receiving disability pensions in relation to patterns of health care utilisation and socioeconomic differences: A multilevel analysis of Malmo, Sweden. BMC Public Health, 6, 71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bumpass, L. L. (1990). What’s happening to the family? Interactions between demographic and institutional change. Demography, 27(4), 483–498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, H., & McKay, S. (2014). Disability, partnership and parenting. Disability & Society, 29(4), 543–555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, D. (2013). Partnership in Europe; its variety, trends and dissolution. Finnish Yearbook of Population Research, 48, 5–49. Retrieved from https://journal.fi/fypr/article/view/40927
   Google Scholar
• Danielewicz, A. L., Dos Anjos, J. C., Bastos, J. L., Boing, A. C., & Boing, A. F. (2017). Association between socioeconomic and physical/built neighborhoods and disability: A systematic review. Preventive Medicine, 99, 118–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterlin, R. A. (1980). Birth and fortune. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2015). Marriage and births now more common in Sweden. Marriage and Birth Statistics. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2017). Key figures on Europe (2016 ed., pp. 1–202). Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3217494/7827738/KS-EI-16-001-EN-N.pdf/bbb5af7e-2b21-45d6-8358-9e130c8668ab
   Google Scholar
• Försäkringskassan. (2004). Women, men and sickness absence. Social insurance in Sweden. Stockholm: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, P. A. (1977). Impact of disability on the family structure. Social Security Bulletin, 40(5), 3–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ganong, L. H., Coleman, M., & Mapes, D. (1990). A meta-analytic review of family structure stereotypes. Journal of Marriage and Family, 52(2), 287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gene, H. B. (2004). Siblings’ direct and indirect contributions to child development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(3), 124–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode, W. (1963). World revolution and family patterns. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grönvik, L. (2009). Defining disability: Effects of disability concepts on research outcomes. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 12(1), 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haage, H., Vikström, L., & Häggström Lundevaller, E. (2017). Disabled and unmarried? Marital chances among disabled people in nineteenth-century Northern Sweden. Essays in Economic & Business History, 35(1), 207–238.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. London, UK: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Janus, A. L. (2009). Disability and the transition to adulthood. Social Forces, 88(1), 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jönsson, L., Palme, M., & Svensson, I. (2012). Disability insurance, population health and employment in sweden. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Social security programs and retirement around the world: Historical trends in mortality and health, employment, and disability insurance participation and reforms (pp. 79–126). Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press, University of Chicago
   Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (1998). Intermarriage and homogamy: Causes, patterns, trends. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 395–421.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (2011). The influence of men’s income and employment on marriage and cohabitation: Testing Oppenheimer’s theory in Europe. European Journal of Population, 27(3), 269–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalmijn, M. (2017). The ambiguous link between marriage and health: A dynamic reanalysis of loss and gain effects. Social Forces, 95(4), 1607–1636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koskinen, S., Joutsenniemi, K., Martelin, T., & Martikainen, P. (2007). Mortality differences according to living arrangements. International Journal of Epidemiology, 36(6), 1255–1264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kravdal, Ø. (1999). Does marriage require a stronger economic underpinning than informal cohabitation? Population Studies, 53(1), 63–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesthaeghe, R. (2014). The second demographic transition: A concise overview of its development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(51), 18112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, H., & Zhang, Z. M. (2013). Disability trends by marital status among older Americans, 1997–2010: An examination by gender and race. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(1), 103–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundh, C. (2003). Swedish marriages. Customs, Legislation and Demography in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Retrieved from Lund Papers in Economic History.
   Google Scholar
• MacInnes, M. D. (2011). Altar-Bound? The effect of disability on the hazard of entry into a first marriage. International Journal of Sociology, 41(1), 87–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mills, M. C., Blossfeld, H. P., & Klijzing, E. (2005). Becoming an adult in uncertain times: A 14-country comparison of the losers of globalization. In H. P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 393–411). London, New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, C. J., Lund, R., & Avlund, K. (2008). Cohabitation status and onset of disability among older Danes – Is social participation a possible mediator? Journal of Aging and Health, 20(2), 235–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009a). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Will the recent reforms make it? Author, Sweden. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/sweden/sicknessdisability-andworkbreakingthebarriersswedenwilltherecentreformsmakeit.htm
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. doi:10.1787/9789264088856-en
   Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. (1988). A Theory of marriage timing. American Journal of Sociology, 94(3), 563–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20(2), 293–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. (1997). Women’s employment and the gain to marriage: The specialization and trading model. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 431–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, V. K. (2003). Cohabiting and marriage during young men’s career-development process. Demography, 40(1), 127–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, D. W., Foster, E. M., Flanagan, C., & Ruth, G. R. (2008). On your own without a net. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Queirós, F. C., Wehby, G. L., & Halpern, C. T. (2015). Developmental disabilities and socioeconomic outcomes in young adulthood. Public Health Reports, 130(3), 213–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapegno, N., & Ravaud, J. F. (2017). Disability, residential environment and social participation: Factors influencing daily mobility of persons living in residential care facilities in two regions of France. BMC Health Services Research, 17. doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2602-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, J. M., Morton, M. J. S., Garralda, M. E., Postlethwaite, R. J., & Goh, D. (1993). Psychosocial adjustment of adult survivors of a pediatric dialysis and transplant program. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 68(1), 104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoades, G. K., Stanley, S. M., Markman, H. J., & Ragan, E. P. (2012). Parents’ marital status, conflict, and role modelling: Links with adult romantic relationship quality. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 53(5), 348–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robles, T. F. (2014). Marital quality and health: Implications for marriage in the 21st Century. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(6), 427–432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, C. E., Mirowsky, J., & Goldsteen, K. (1990). The impact of the family on health – The decade in review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52(4), 1059–1078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, A., & McConnell, D. (2016). The marital status of disabled women in Canada: A population-based analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 18(4), 295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott-Marshall, H., Tompa, E., Liao, Q., & Fang, M. (2013). Marital formation in individuals with work-related permanent impairment. Disability and Health Journal, 6(1), 43–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shalash, F. M., Wood, N. D., & Parker, T. S. (2013). Our problems are your sibling’s fault: Exploring the connections between conflict styles of siblings during adolescence and later adult committed relationships. American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(4), 288–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singleton, P. (2012). Insult to injury disability, earnings, and divorce. Journal of Human Resources, 47(4), 972–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sköld, P. (2003). The beauty and the beast – Smallpox and marriage in eighteenth- and nineteenth-century Sweden. Historical Social Research, 28(3), 141–161.
   Google Scholar
• Stattin, M. (2005). Retirement on grounds of ill health. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(2), 135–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, V., Brucker, D. L., Pollack, M. A., & Chang, H. (2016). Community and social participation among adults with mobility impairments: A mixed methods study. Disability and Health Journal, 9(4), 682–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Therborn, G. (2004). Between sex and power. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tumin, D. (2016). Marriage trends among Americans with childhood-onset disabilities, 1997–2013. Disability and Health Journal, 9(4), 713–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42(1), 1–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Kaa, D. J. (2001). Postmodern fertility preferences: From changing value orientation to new behaviour. Population and Development Review, 27, 290–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Hedel, K., Martikainen, P., Moustgaard, H., & Myrskyla, M. (2016). Cohabitation and mental health: Is cohabiting as good for your mental health as marriage is?. European Journal of Public Health, 26, 287–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vespa, J. (2012). Union formation in later life: Economic determinants of cohabitation and remarriage among older adults. Demography, 49(3), 1103–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waite, L. J. (1995). Does marriage matter? Demography, 32(4), 483–507.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar