380
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A Case Study of a Turnaround High School: An Examination of the Maryland State Department of Education Breakthrough Center Intervention

, &

References

  • American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, Pub. L. 111-005, 123 Stat. Ann. 115 (2009).
  • Anyon, J. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York, NY: Teacher College Press.
  • Anyon, J. (2005). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Baum, H. S. (2010). Brown in Baltimore: School desegregation and the limits of liberalism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  • Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London, UK: Sage.
  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). Schooling in capitalist America. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.
  • Boyd, D., Grossman, P. L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 416–440. doi: 10.3102/0162373709353129
  • Boyd, D., Hamilton, L., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers' preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24, 113–132. doi: 10.1002/pam.20072
  • Bryk, A. S., & Schneider, B. (2003). Trust in schools: A core resource for school reform. Educational Leadership, 60(6), 40–45.
  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Cipollone, D. W. (1997). Gambling on a settlement: The Baltimore City schools' adequacy litigations (Studies in judicial remedies and public engagement). New York, NY: Campaign for Fiscal Equity.
  • Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46. doi: 10.1177/001316446002000104
  • Cohen, J., McCabe, E. M., Michelli, N. M., & Pickeral, T. (2009). School climate: Research policy, practice, and teacher education. Teachers College Record, 111, 180–213.
  • Condron, D. J., & Roscigno, V. J. (2003). Disparities within: Unequal spending and achievement in an urban school district. Sociology of Education, 76, 18–36. doi: 10.2307/3090259
  • Connors-Tadros, L., Dunn, L., Martella, J., & McCauley, C. (2015). Incorporating early learning strategies in the School Improvement Grants (SIG) program: How three schools integrated early childhood strategies into school turnaround efforts to improve instruction for all students. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research. Retrieved from: http://ceelo.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/TurnaroundCaseStudies01-22-15.pdf
  • Council of Chief State School Officers. (2011, April). Interstate teacher assessment and support consortium (InTASC) model core teaching standards: A resource for state dialogue. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Resources/Publications/InTASC_Model_Core_Teaching_Standards_A_Resource_for_State_Dialogue_%28April_2011%29.html
  • Crawford-Garrett, K. (2013). Teach For America and the struggle for urban school reform: Searching for agency in an era of standardization. New York, NY: Peter Lang International Academic.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Danielson, C. (2007). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
  • Darden, E. C., & Cavendish, E. (2012). Achieving resource equity within a single school district. Erasing the opportunity gap by examining school board decisions. Education and Urban Society, 44, 61–82. doi: 10.1177/0013124510380912
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America's commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Chung, R. W., & Johnson, C. M. (2009). Teacher preparation and teacher learning: A changing policy landscape. In G. Sykes, B. Schneider, D. N. Plank, & T. Ford (Eds.), Handbook of educational policy research (pp. 613–636). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D. J., Gatlin, S. J., & Heilig, J. V. (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13, 1–51. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v13n42.2005
  • Datnow, A. (2005). The sustainability of comprehensive school reform models in changing district and state contexts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41, 121–143. doi: 10.1177/0013161×04269578
  • Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. E. (2000). Teachers' responses to Success for All: How beliefs, experiences, and adaptations shape implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 775–799. doi: 10.3102/00028312037003775
  • Datnow, A., & Castellano, M. E. (2001). Managing and guiding school reform: Leadership in Success for All schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 219–249. doi: 10.1177/00131610121969307
  • Datnow, A., Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. (2006). Integrating educational systems for successful reform in diverse contexts. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Day, C. (2007). Sustaining the turnaround: What capacity building means in practice. International Studies in Educational Administration, 35, 39–48.
  • Dee, T. (2012). School turnarounds; Evidence from the 2009 stimulus. (NBER Working Paper 17990). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w17990. doi: 10.3386/w17990
  • Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Duke, D. L. (2012). Tinkering and turnarounds: Understanding the contemporary campaign to improve low-performing schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 17, 9–24. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2012.636696
  • Duke, D. L. (2015, January). Turning around low performing schools. Keynote address at the International Congress of School Effectiveness and Improvement Annual Conference, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
  • Duke, D. L., & Jacobson, M. (2011). Tackling the toughest turnaround—Low-performing high schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 34–38. doi: 10.1177/003172171109200508
  • Elmore, R. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practices and performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Epstein, J., Galindo, C., & Sheldon, S. (2011). Levels of leadership: Effects of district and school leaders on the quality of school programs of family and community involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47, 462–495. doi: 10.1177/0013161x10396929
  • Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces: Probing the depths of educational reform. London, UK: Falmer Press.
  • Galindo, C. (2010). Language minority students' math and reading achievement in early childhood. In E. E. Garcia & E. Frede (Eds.), Young English-language learners: Current research and emerging directions for practice and policy (pp. 42–59). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
  • Hamilton, M. P., Heilig, J. V., & Pazey, B. L. (2014). A nostrum of school reform? Turning around reconstituted urban Texas high schools. Urban Education, 49, 182–215. doi: 10.1177/0042085913475636
  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2000). Mentoring in the new millennium. Theory into Practice, 39, 50–56.
  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  • Heckman, J. J., Stixrud, J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics 24, 411–482. doi: 10.1086/504455
  • Herman, R., Dawson, P., Dee, T., Greene, J., Maynard, R., Redding, S., & Darwin, M. (2008). Turning around chronically low-performing schools: A practice guide (NCES #2008-4020). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides.
  • Honig, M. I. (2004). Where's the “up” in bottom-up reform? Educational Policy, 18, 527–561. doi: 10.1177/0895904804266640
  • Hopkins, M., & Heineke, A. J. (2013). Teach for America and English language learners: Shortcomings of the organization's training model. Critical Education, 4(12), 18–36. Retrieved from http://ojs.library.ubc.ca/index.php/criticaled/article/view/183908.
  • Ingersoll, R. M. (1999). The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educational Researcher, 28, 26–37. doi: 10.3102/0013189x028002026
  • Johnson, S. M., Kardos, S. M., Kauffman, D., Liu, E., & Donald, M. L. (2004). The support gap: New teachers' early experiences in high-income and low-income schools. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 12(61), 1–25. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v12n61.2004 Retrieved from www.epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/216/342.
  • Lane, B., Unger, C., & Rhim, L. M. (2013). Emerging and sustaining practices for school turnaround: An analysis of school and district practices, systems, policies, and use of resources contributing to the successful turnaround efforts in level 4 schools. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Strategic Leadership and Learning. Retrieved from http://sites.bu.edu/miccr/files/2015/03/Emerging-and-Sustaining-Practices-for-School-Turnaround.pdf
  • Lipman, P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
  • Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE). (n.d.a). Maryland's Race to the Top. Retrieved from http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/programs/race_to_the_top.html.
  • Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE). (n.d.b). Breakthrough Center. Retrieved from http://www.marylandpublicschools.org/MSDE/divisions/leadership/breakthrough_center.html
  • Maryland State Department of Education (MSDE). (2014). Reaching world-class: Maryland's Race to the Top accomplishments 2010–2014. Retrieved from http://archives.marylandpublicschools.org/parccworkgroup/docs/Appendix_XI_RTTT.pdf (2010, September).
  • Mawhinney, H. B. (2013). Reactive sequences in the evolution of Maryland's consequential accountability regime. Educational Policy, 27, 279–306. doi: 10.1177/0895904812472723
  • McFarland, J., & Preston, J. (2010). Evaluating the effectiveness of turnaround efforts in low performing high schools. Raleigh, NC: NC Department of Public Instruction. Retrieved from: http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/intern-research/reports/turnaround.pdf
  • McGuinn, P. (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26, 36–159. doi: 10.1177/0895904811425911
  • Murphy, J. (2008). The place of leadership in turnaround schools: Insights from organizational recovery in the public and private sectors. Journal of Educational Administration, 46, 74–98. doi: 10.1108/09578230810849826
  • Murphy, J., & Meyers, C. V. (2009). Rebuilding organizational capacity in turnaround schools: Insights from the corporate, government, and non-profit sectors. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37, 9–27. doi: 10.1177/1741143208098162
  • National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. (2011). The growing numbers of English Learner students: 1998/99–2008/09. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from: http://www.ncela.us/files
  • National Governors Association. (2010). Common Core state standards. Washington, DC: Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/branding-guidelines/
  • Ng, J. C. (2014). Teacher shortages in urban schools: The role of traditional and alternative certification routes in filling the voids. Education and Urban Society, 46, 380–398. doi: 10.1177/0013124503255453
  • Nieto, S. (2005). Affirming diversity, the sociopolitical context of multicultural education (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • No Child Left Behind Act, Pub. L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002). Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml
  • Orfield, G., & Lee, C. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project at UCLA. Retrieved from http://civilrightsproject.ucla.edu/research/k-12-education/integration-and-diversity/why-segregation-matters-poverty-and-educational-inequality/orfield-why-segregation-matters-2005.pdf
  • Orr, M., Stone, C., & Stumbo, C. (2002). Concentrated poverty and educational achievement: Politics and possibility in the Baltimore region. Retrieved from http://www.gvpt.umd.edu/stone/baltimore.html.
  • Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
  • Rehabilitation Act, Pub. L. 93-112, 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1973).
  • Riddle, W., & Kober, N. (2011). State policy differences greatly impact AYP numbers. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy. Retrieved from: file:///C:/Users/Claudia/Downloads/KoberRiddle_Report_AYP_042811.pdf
  • Russell, B., O'Sullivan, D., & Berryman, M. (2010). Scaling up educational reform. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Council for Educational Research Press.
  • Sanders, M., & Galindo, C. (2014). Communities, schools, and teachers. In L. E. Martin, S. Kragler, D. J. Quatroche, & K. S. Bauserman (Eds.), The handbook of professional development, PK–12: Successful models and practices (pp. 103–124). New York, NY: Guilford.
  • Sanders, M., & Sheldon, S. (2009). Principals matter: A guide to comprehensive programs of school, family, and community partnerships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
  • Schaffer, E., Devlin-Scherer, R., & Stringfield, S. (2007). The evolving role of teachers in effective schools. In T. Townsend (Ed.), The international handbook on school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 727–750). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  • Sindelar, P. T., Shearer, D. K., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Liebert, T. W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform. Council for Exceptional Children, 72, 317–331. doi: 10.1177/001440290607200304
  • Slavin, R. E. (2005). Evidence-based reform: Advancing the education of students at risk. Report Prepared for: Renewing Our Schools, Securing Our Future. Retrieved from http://www.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/kf/Slavin%203%2017%20FINAL.pdf.
  • Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Stringfield, S., Reynolds, D., & Schaffer, E. (2008). Improving secondary students' academic achievement through a focus on reform reliability: 4- and 9-year findings from the High Reliability School project. School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research, Policy and Practice, 19, 409–428. doi: 10.1080/09243450802535190
  • Stuit, D., & Stringfield, S. (2012). Responding to the chronic crisis in education: The evolution of the school turnaround mandate. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 17, 1–8. doi: 10.1080/10824669.2012.638262
  • Task Force on the Education of Maryland's African-American Males. (2007). Education of Maryland's African-American males. Baltimore, MD: Maryland K–16 Leadership Council. Retrieved from: http://www.justicepolicy.org/uploads/justicepolicy/documents/blackmales2007.pdf
  • Taylor, J. E. (2006). The struggle to survive: Examining the sustainability of schools' comprehensive school reform efforts. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 11, 331–352. doi: 10.1207/s10824669espr110304_7
  • Teach for America. (n.d.) Teach for America. Retrieved from: http://www.teachforamerica.org/.
  • Teddlie, C., & Reynolds, D. (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness. New York, NY: Falmer Press.
  • Turnbull, B. (2002). Teacher participation and buy-in: Implications for school reform initiatives. Learning Environments Research, 5, 235–252. doi: 10.1023/A:1021981622041
  • Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1997). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Unger, C., & Ingle, G. (2010). Supporting school and district improvement in Maryland: The Breakthrough Center. Providence, RI: The Education Alliance at Brown University.
  • U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). School improvement grants. Retrieved from: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/index.html
  • U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Race to the Top Program executive summary. Retrieved from: https://www2.ed.gov/programs/racetothetop/executive-summary.pdf
  • White House. (2009). White House: Race to the Top. Retrieved from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/fact-sheet-race-top
  • Yeh, S. S. (2008). The cost-effectiveness of comprehensive school reform and rapid assessment. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 16, 1–32. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v16n13.2008
  • Yin, R. (2013). Case study research, design and methods (Applied social research methods) (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Zavadsky, H. (2012). School turnarounds: The essential role of districts. Boston, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.