Is There a Magnet-School Effect? A Multisite Study of MSAP-Funded Magnet Schools

References

• Ballou, D. (2007). Magnet schools and peers: Effects on mathematics achievement. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
   Google Scholar
• Ballou, D. (2009). Magnet school outcomes. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 409–426). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H., & Robins, J. M. (2005). Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models. Biometrics, 61, 962–973. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00377.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts, J., Rice, L., Zau, A., Tang, E., & Koedel, C. (2006). Does school choice work? Effects on student integration and academic achievement. Los Angeles, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J. R., & Tang, Y. E. (2011). The effect of charter schools on student achievement: A meta-analysis of the literature. Bothell, WA: National Charter School Research Project, Center on Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Biesta, G. (2007). Why “what works” won't work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bifulco, R., Cobb, C., & Bell, C. (2009). Can interdistrict choice boost student achievement? The case of Connecticut's interdistrict magnet school program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31, 323–345. doi: 10.3102/0162373709340917
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, R., & Archbald, D. (1992). Magnet schools and educational quality. Clearinghouse, 66, 81–87.
   Google Scholar
• Blank, R., Dentler, R., Baltzell, C., & Chabotar, K. (1983). Survey of magnet schools: Analyzing a model for quality integrated education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L., & Rothstein, H. (2007). Meta-analysis: Fixed effect vs. random effects. Retrieved from http://www.Meta-Analysis.com
   Google Scholar
• Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
   Google Scholar
• Civil Rights Act of 1964, Pub. L. No. 88-352, 78 Stat. 241 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, D. K., & Hill, H. C. (2001). Learning policy: When state education reform works. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, T. D., Shadish, W. R., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Three conditions under which experiments and observational studies produce comparable causal estimates: New findings from within-study comparisons. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 724–750. doi: 10.1002/9781444307399.ch8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crain, R., Heebner, A., & Si, Y. (1992). The effectiveness of New York City's career magnet schools: An evaluation of ninth grade performance using an experimental design. Berkeley, CA: National Center for Research in Vocational Education.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, J. B., Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. (2003). The effect of school choice on student outcomes: Evidence from randomized lotteries. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 10113. Cambridge, MA: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Deo, S. R. (2007). Where have all the Lovings gone: The continuing relevance of the movement for a multiracial category and racial classification after Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1. Journal of Gender, Race & Justice, 11, 409–452.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, B. L., Pinchback, C. L., & Kennedy, R. L. (2000). Academic achievement and magnet schools. Research in the Schools, 7, 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Duflo, E. (2004). Scaling up and evaluation. In F. Bourguignon & B. Pleskouie (Eds.), Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics 2004 (pp. 341–369). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 100-297, § 3001, 102 Stat. 231 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Extension and Revision of the Emergency School Aid Act, Pub. L. No. 94-482, § 321 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, N. (2012). Magnets adjust to new climate of school choice. Education Week, 31(30), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Flemming, A., Freeman, F., Horn, S., Ruiz, M., Saltzman, M., & Nunez, L. (1979). School desegregation in Tacoma, Washington. A staff report of the United States Commission on Civil Rights. Washington, DC: U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. Retrieved from https://www.law.umaryland.edu/marshall/usccr/documents/cr12t11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., & Le, Q. C. (2008). The post-parents involved challenge: Confronting extralegal obstacles to integration. Ohio State Law Journal, 69, 1015–1072.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., & Siegel-Hawley, G. (2010). Choosing diversity: School choice and racial integration in the age of Obama. Stanford Journal of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 6, 219–252.
   Google Scholar
• Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G., & Orfield, G. (2008). The forgotten choice? Rethinking magnet schools in a changing landscape. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. (1996). Student achievement in public magnet, public comprehensive and private city high schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18, 1–18. doi: 10.2307/1164227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., Levy, D. M., & Myers, D. (2003). Nonexperimental versus experimental estimates of earnings impacts. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 589, 63–93. doi: 10.1177/0002716203254879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldring, E. B. (2009). Perspectives on magnet schools. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 361–378). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goldschmidt, P., & Martinez-Fernandez, J. (2004). The relationship between school quality and the probability of passing high-stakes performance assessments. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Research on Evaluation Standards and Student Testing, Technical Report 644.
   Google Scholar
• Grooms, A. A., & Williams, S. M. (2015). The reversed role of magnets in St. Louis, implications for Black student outcomes. Urban Education, 50, 454–473. doi: 10.1177/0042085913516131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65, 261–294. doi: 10.2307/2971733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V. (1982). Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 490–499. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.92.2.490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, N. E., Castellino, D. R., Lansford, J. E., Nowlin, P., Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. E., & Pettit, G. S. (2004). Parent academic involvement as related to school behavior, achievement, and aspirations: Demographic variations across adolescence. Child Development, 75, 1491–1509. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00753.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (1995). Applied multilevel analysis. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: TT-publikaties.
   Google Scholar
• Hox, J. J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M., Lechner, M., & Steinmayr, A. (2012). Radius matching on the propensity score with bias adjustment: Finite sample behavior, tuning parameters and software implementation. Paper for Swiss Institute for Empirical Economic Research, Sankt Gallen, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, M., Lechner, M., & Wunsch, C. (2010). How to control for many covariates? Reliable estimators based on the propensity score ( Discussion paper 5268). Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.
   Google Scholar
• Judson, E. (2014). Effects of transferring to STEM-focused charter and magnet schools on student achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 107, 255–266. doi: 10.1080/00220671.2013.823367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafer, K. (2012). A chronology of school choice in the U.S. Journal of School Choice, 3, 415–416. doi: 10.1080/15582150903489786
   Google Scholar
• Kalaian, S. A. (2003). Meta-analysis methods for synthesizing treatment effects in multisite studies: Hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) perspective. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8(15). Retrieved from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=15
   Google Scholar
• Kemple, J. J., & Scott-Clayton, J. (2004). Career academies: Impacts on labor market outcomes and educational attainment. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kemple, J. J., & Snipes, J.C. (2000). Career academies: Impacts on students' engagement and performance in high school. New York, NY: Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, J. C., Witte, J. C., Staib, S. K., & Powell, M. I. (1993). A microscope on secondary magnet schools in Montgomery County, Maryland. In D. R. Waldrip, W. L. Marks, & N. Estes (Eds.), Magnet school policy studies and evaluations (pp. 261–435). Austin, TX: Morgan Printing.
   Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, M. W. (1987). Learning from experience: Lessons from policy implementation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9, 171–178. doi: 10.2307/1163728
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and causal inference: Methods and principles for social research. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Alliance of Public Charter Schools. (2016). Facts about charters. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from http://www.publiccharters.org/get-the-facts/public-charter-schools/faqs/
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E., & Garces, L. M. (2008). Statement of American social scientists of research on school desegregation to the U.S. Supreme Court in Parents v. Seattle School District and Meredith v. Jefferson County. Urban Review, 40, 96–136. doi: 10.1007/s11256-007-0073-7
   Google Scholar
• Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 701 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Penta, M. (2001). Comparing student performance at program magnet, year-round magnet, and non-magnet elementary schools. Raleigh, NC: Wake County Public School System, Department of Evaluation and Research. Retrieved June 8, 2011 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED457178http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED457178
   Google Scholar
• Price, J., & Stern, J. (1987). Magnet schools as a strategy for integration and school reform. Yale Law & Policy Review, 5, 291–321.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Sadoff, S. (2008). Statistical inference when classroom quality is measured with error. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 1, 138–154.
   Google Scholar
• Rhea, A., & Regan, R. (2007). Magnet program review. Raleigh, NC: Wake County Public School System, Evaluation and Research Department. Retrieved June 8, 2011, from http://www.aera.net/uploadedFiles/Divisions/School_Evaluation_and_Program_Development_(H)/Awards/Cat%203%20Nancy%20Baenen%20-%20magnet_review_07.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511810725.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1985). Constructing a control group using multivariate matched sampling methods that incorporate the propensity score. American Statistician, 39, 33–38. doi: 10.1017/cbo9780511810725.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 500–504. doi: 10.1037//0033-2909.92.2.500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. H. (1979). Magnet schools as a desegregation tool: The importance of contextual factors in explaining their success. Urban Education, 14, 303–320. doi: 10.1177/0042085979143003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. H. (2005). No longer famous but still intact. Education Next, 5(2), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. H. (2009). Legal aspects in magnet schools. In M. Berends, M. G. Springer, D. Ballou, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of research on school choice (pp. 379–392). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701. doi: 10.1037/h0037350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B. (2005). Causal inference using potential outcomes: Design, modeling, decisions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 100, 322–331. doi: 10.1198/016214504000001880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, D. B., & Thomas, N. (1996). Matching using estimated propensity scores: Relating theory to practice. Biometrics, 52, 249–264. doi: 10.2307/2533160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., & Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating causal effects using experimental and observational designs: A think tank white paper. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Seever, M. (1993). Summative evaluation of the Knotts Environmental Science Magnet Elementary School. In D. R. Waldrip, W. L. Marks, & N. Estes (Eds.), Magnet school policy studies and evaluations (pp. 437–475). Austin, TX: Morgan Printing.
   Google Scholar
• Shadish, W. R., Clark, M. H., & Steiner, P. M. (2008). Can nonrandomized experiments yield accurate answers? A randomized experiment comparing random and nonrandom assignments. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(484), 1334–1344. doi: 10.1198/016214508000000733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegel-Hawley, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2012). Reviving magnet schools: Strengthening a successful choice option. A research brief. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, D., Saunders, M., & Zarate, E. (2008). What factors predict high school graduation in the Los Angeles Unified School District? California Dropout Research Project Report #14, UCLA/IDEA and UC/ACCORD. Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, M. A., Zhu, P., & Wong, E. (2011). Whether and how to use state tests to measure student achievement in a multi-state randomized experiment: An empirical assessment based on four recent evaluations (NCEE 2012-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.
   Google Scholar
• Spillane, J. P. (2009). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steel, L., & Levine, R. (1994). Educational innovations in multiracial contexts: The growth of magnet schools in American education. Palo Alto, CA: American Institute for Research in the Behavioral Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Stein, M. L., Berends, M., Fuchs, D., McMaster, K., Sáenz, L., Yen, L., & Compton, D. L. (2008). Scaling up an early reading program: Relationships among teacher support, fidelity of implementation, and student performance across different sites and years. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 368–388. doi: 10.3102/0162373708322738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. (2007). Estimating causal effects using school-level data sets. Educational Researcher, 36(4), 187–198. doi: 10.3102/0013189x07303396
   Google Scholar
• Stuart, E. A. (2010). Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward. Statistical Science: A Review Journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 25, 1–21. doi: 10.1214/09-sts313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2013). U.S. Department of Education awards $89.8 million in Magnet School Assistance Program grants. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/news/press-releases/us-department-education-awards-898-million-magnet-school-assistance-program-gran
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Programs: Magnet schools assistance. Retrieved from https://www2.ed.gov/programs/magnet/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Herman, J. (2017). Magnet schools: History, description, and effects. In R. Fox & N. Buchanan (Eds.), Handbook of school choice (pp. 158–179). New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• What Works Clearinghouse. (2014). WWC procedures and standards handbook version 3.0. Washington, DC: What Works Clearinghouse, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_procedures_v3_0_standards_handbook.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson III, J. H. (2007). Seattle and Louisville school cases: There is no other way. Harvard Law Review, 121, 158–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkelmayer, W. C., & Kurth, T. (2004). Propensity scores: Help or hype? Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 19(7), 1671–1673. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, J., & Walsh, D. (1990). A systematic test of the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 188–213. doi: 10.2307/1163633
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Li, Y., & Tompkins, L. (2005, April). Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. Retrieved June 8, 2011 from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED490624http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED49062
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K., Schmidt, R. J., & Besag, F. (2006). Aggregating student achievement trends across states with different tests: Using standardized slopes as effect sizes. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(2), 47–61. doi: 10.1207/s15327930pje8102_3
   Google Scholar