Differences in the Early Writing Development of Struggling Children Who Beat the Odds and Those Who Did Not

References

• Beard, R., Myhill, D., Riley, J., & Nystrand, M. (2009). The Sage handbook of writing development. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, L. R., Magnusson, D., & El-Khouri, B. (2003). Studying individual development in an inter-individual context: A person-oriented approach. Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bloodgood, J. (1999). What's in a name? Children's name writing and literacy acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.34.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boocock, C., McNaughton, S., & Parr, J. (1998). The development of a self-extending system in writing. Literacy Teaching and Learning, 3(2), 41–58. Retrieved from http://www.earlyliteracyinfo.org/documents/pdf/doc_124.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Both-de Vries, A., & Bus, A. G. (2008). Name writing: A first step to phonetic writing? Does the name have a special role in understanding the symbolic function of print? Literacy Teaching and Learning, 17, 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, S., Justice, L., Zucker, T., & McGinty, A. (2009). Emergent name-writing abilities of preschool-age children with language impairment. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in Schools, 40, 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2008/07-0052)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins, L. (2013). Writing pathways: Performance assessments and learning progressions, Grades K-8. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Chanquoy, L. (2009). Revision processes. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 80–97). London, UK: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n6
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Across the great divide: Bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and older children's thinking [Monograph]. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(2), 1–105. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3181574
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (1966). Emergent reading behaviors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Auckland, NZ: Department of Curriculum and Pedagogy, University of Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2001). Change over time in children's literacy development. Auckland, NZ: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2005). Literacy lessons designed for individuals: Part 2 teaching procedures. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M. (2013). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Clay, M. M., & Cazden, C. B. (1990). A Vygotskian interpretation of reading recovery. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp. 206–222). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173674.010
   Google Scholar
• D'Agostino, J. V., Rodgers, E., & Mauck, S. (2017). Addressing inadequacies of the Observation Survey of Early Literacy Achievement. Reading Research Quarterly. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.181.
   Google Scholar
• DeFord, D. (1994). Early writing: Teachers and children in Reading Recovery. Literacy Teaching and Learning: An International Journal of Early Literacy, 1, 31–56.
   Google Scholar
• Dockrell, J. E., & Connelly, V. (2015). The role of oral language in underpinning the text generation difficulties in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(1), 18–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01550.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle, M. A. (2013). Marie M. Clay's theoretical perspective: A literacy processing theory. In D. E. Alvermann, N. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading, sixth edition (pp. 636–656). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://doi.org/10.1598/0710.26
   Google Scholar
• Dreyer, L. G., Luke, S. D., & Melican, E. K. (1995). Children's acquisition and retention of word spellings. Neuropsychology and Cognition, 11, 291–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0385-5_9
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H. (1983). Role of oral language in early writing processes. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 1–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J. (1987). Research on revision on writing. Review of Educational Research, 4, 481–506. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057004481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development. Educational Psychologist, 35, 39–50. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3501_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, E., Pine, K., & Lewis, C. (2006). The microgenetic method: Time for change? The Psychologist, 19, 152–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing what we know: Generating ideas in writing. In R. Beard, D. Myhill, J. Riley, & M. Nystrand (Eds.), The Sage handbook of writing development (pp. 48–64). London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857021069.n4
   Google Scholar
• Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. New York, NY: Addison Wesley-Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, M., Milanowski, A., & Miller, J. (2012). Measuring and promoting inter-rater agreement of teacher and principal performance ratings. Center for Educator Compensation Reform. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532068.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Booth Olson, C., D'Aoust, C., MacArthur, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). Teaching elementary school students to be effective writers: A practice guide ( NCEE 2012–4058). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications_reviews.aspx#pubsearch
   Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Hebert, M. (2012). Writing to read: A meta-analysis of the impact of writing and writing instruction on reading. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 710–744. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.81.4.t2k0m13756113566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granott, N., & Parziale, J. (2002). Microdevelopment: A process oriented perspective for studying development and learning. In N. Granott & J. Parziale (Eds.). Microdevelopment: Transition processes in development and learning (pp.1–30). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511489709.001
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M., & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Haney, M. R. (2002). Name writing: A window into the emergent literacy skills of young children. Early Childhood Education Journal, 30, 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021249218339
   Google Scholar
• Harmey, S. (2015). Change over time in children's co-constructed writing (Doctoral dissertation). Columbus, OH: Department of Teaching and Learning, The Ohio State University.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P., Fitzsimmons, P., & McKenzie, B. (2004). Six words of writing, many layers of significance: An examination of writing as a social practice in an early grade classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 27, 27–45. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/era/22/
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, J. R., & Berninger, V. W. (2009). Relationships between idea generation and transcription: How the act of writing shapes what children write. In R. K. Braverman, K. Lunsford, S. McLeod, S. Null, & A. S. P. Rogers (Eds.), Traditions of writing research (pp. 166–180). New York, NY: Taylor and Francis/Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, I. (1998). Peer relationships and writing development: A microgenetic analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01286.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1985). Reading and spelling strategies of first grade children. In J. A. Niles & R. Lalik (Eds.), Issues in literacy: A research perspective (pp. 306–309). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Kamberelis, G. (2002). Coordinating writing and reading competencies during early literacy development. The Fifty-First Yearbook of the National Reading Conference, 51, 227–241.
   Google Scholar
• MacArthur, C., & Graham, S. (2016). Writing research from a cognitive processing perspective. In C. A. McArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 24–40). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, N. M., Scull, J., & Munsie, L. (2013). Analysing writing: The development of a tool for use in the early years of writing. Issues in Educational Research, 23(3), 375–393. Retrieved from http://www.iier.org.au/iier23/mackenzie.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• May, H., Gray, A., Sirinides, P., Goldsworthy, H., Armijo, M., Cecile, S., & Tognatta, N. (2015). Year One results from the multisite randomized evaluation of the i3 scale-up of Reading Recovery. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 547–581. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214565788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: Working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 299–324. https://10.1007/BF01464076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCutchen, D. (2011). From novice to expert: Implications of language skills and writing-relevant knowledge for memory in the development of writing skill. Journal of Writing Research, 3, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2011.03.01.3
   Google Scholar
• McGee, L. M., Kim, H., Nelson, K. S., & Fried, M. D. (2015). Change over time in first graders' strategic use of information at point of difficulty in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 263–291. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (2011a). Sensitive events in literacy development. In H. Hedges, J. Parr, & S. May (Eds.), Changing trajectories in teaching and learning (pp. 1–14). Wellington, NZ: NZCER Press.
   Google Scholar
• McNaughton, S. (2011b). Child development studies over time. In D. Lapp & D. Fisher (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching the English language arts (3rd ed., pp. 400–405). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Myhill, D., & Jones, S. (2009). How talk becomes text: Investigating the concept of oral rehearsal in early years' classrooms. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57, 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00438.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center on Response to Intervention. (2010). Users guide to universal screening tools chart. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention. Retrieved from http://www.rti4success.org/observation-survey-early-literacy-achievement-reading#class
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core state standards. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2008). Pathways to literacy: A study of invented spelling in the role of learning to read. Child Development, 79, 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01166.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Sénéchal, M. (2017). Invented spelling in kindergarten as a predictor of reading and spelling in Grade 1: A new pathway to literacy, or just the same road, less known? Developmental Psychology, 53, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., & Lonigan, C. J. (2014). Emergent writing in preschoolers: Preliminary evidence for a theoretical framework. Reading Research Quarterly, 49, 453–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.79
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puranik, C. S., Lonigan, C. J., & Kim, Y. S. (2011). Contributions of emergent literacy skills to name writing, letter writing, and spelling in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 26, 465–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1999). Learning to spell: Variability, choice, and change in children's strategy use. Child Development, 70, 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, A. C., Sinatra, G. M., & Reynolds, R. E. (2008). The development of children's orthographic knowledge: A microgenetic perspective. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 206–226. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.43.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (1996). The process of change in children's thinking. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analysis of learning. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Volume 2 (pp. 464–509). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, J., & Willett, J. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suggate, S., Pufke, E., & Stoeger, H. (2016). The effect of fine and grapho-motor skill demands on preschoolers' decoding skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 141, 34–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tolchinsky, L. (2016). From text to language and back: The emergence of written language. In C. A. McArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 144–159). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vellutino, F. R., Scanlon, D. M., Sipay, E. R., Small, S. G., Pratt, A., Chen, R. S., & Denckla, M. B. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult to remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.88.4.601
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R., Puranik, C. S., Foorman, B., Foster, E., Wilson, L. G., Tschinkel, E., & Kantor, P. T. (2011). Modeling the development of written language. Reading and Writing, 24, 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9266-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watanbe, L. M., & Hall-Kenyon, K. M. (2011). Improving young children's writing: The influence of story structure on kindergartners’ writing complexity. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 272–293. 10.1080/19388071.2010.514035
   Google Scholar
• Yaden, D. B., & Tardibuono, J. M. (2004). The emergent writing development of urban Latino preschoolers: Developmental perspectives and instructional environments for second-language learners. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 29–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560490242723
   Google Scholar