Instruction Matters: Pedagogical Approaches to Increase Engagement in a Juvenile Detention Center

References

• Al-Hendawi, M. (2012). Academic engagement of students with emotional and behavioral disorders: Existing research, issues, and future directions. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 17(2), 125–141. doi:10.1080/13632752.2012.672861
   Google Scholar
• Bicard, S. C., Bicard, D. F, & the IRIS Center. (2012). Measuring behavior. Retrieved from http://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/wp-content/uploads/pdf_case_studies/ics_measbeh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Blomberg, T. G., Bales, W. D., Mann, K., Piquero, A. R., & Berk, R. A. (2011). Incarceration, education, and transition from delinquency. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(4), 355–365. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brophy, J., & McCaslin, M. (1992). Teachers’ reports of how they perceive and cope with problem students. The Elementary School Journal, 93(1), 3–68. doi:10.1086/461712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesney-Lind, M., & Shelden, R. (2004). Girls, delinquency, and juvenile justice. Belmont, CA: Thomson.
   Google Scholar
• Chieu, V. M., Kosko, K. W., & Herbst, P. G. (2015). An analysis of evaluative comments in teachers’ online discussions of representations of practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 35–50. doi:10.1177/0022487114550203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. (2015). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Dotterer, A., & Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(12), 1649–1660. doi:10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drakeford, W. (2002). The impact of an intensive literacy program to increase the literacy skills of youth confined in juvenile corrections. The Journal of Correctional Education, 53(4), 32–42.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J., & Wang, M. T. (2012). Part 1 commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). New York, NY: Springer Science. 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, J. D., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–131). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Foley, R. (2001). Academic characteristics of incarcerated youth and correctional educational programs. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9(4), 248–260. doi:10.1177/106342660100900405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J., McColskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No. 098). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. J., Baltodano, H. M., Bal, A., Jolivette, K., & Malcahy, C. (2009). Reading achievement of incarcerated youth in three regions. Journal of Correctional Education, 60, 120–145.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, H. E., & Chiu, M. M. (2015). Reflective teaching via a problem exploration, teaching adaptations, resolution cycle: A mixed methods study of preservice teachers’ reflective notes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 133–153. doi:10.1177/1558689813509027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holman, B., & Ziedenberg, J. (2006). The dangers of detention. Justice Policy Institute. Retrieved from http://www.justicepolicy.org/images/upload/06-11_rep_dangersofdetention_jj.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Houchins, D. E., Jollvette, K., Krezmien, M. P., & Baltodano, H. M. (2008). A multi-state study examining the impact of explicit reading instruction with incarcerated students. The Journal of Correctional Education, 59(1), 65–85.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobi, T. (2008). Writing for change. The Journal of Correctional Education, 59(2), 71–93.
   Google Scholar
• Karger, J., & Currie-Rubin, R. (2013). Addressing the educational needs of incarcerated youth: Universal design for learning as a transformative framework. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 26(2), 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Katsiyannis, A., Ryan, J.B., Zhang, D., & Spann, A. (2008). Juvenile delinquency and recidivism: The impact on academic achievement. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 177–196.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S., & Guthrie, J. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading & Writing, 28(2), 239–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisberg, B. (2005). Juvenile justice: Redeeming our children. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, K., Royer, D., Messenger, M., Common, E., Ennis, R., & Swogger, E. (2015). Empowering teachers with low-intensity strategies to support academic engagement: Implementation and effects of instructional choice for elementary students in inclusive settings. Education and Treatment of Children, 38(4), 473–504. doi:10.1353/etc.2015.0013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40(2), 353–393. doi:10.3102/00028312040002353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leve, L., Chamberlain, P., & Kim, H. (2015). Risks, outcomes, and evidence-based interventions for girls in the U.S. juvenile justice system. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 18(3), 252–279. doi:10.1007/s10567-015-0186-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malmgren, K. W., & Leone, P. E. (2000). Effects of a short-term auxiliary reading program on the reading skills of incarcerated youth. Education &Treatment of Children, 23(3), 239–247.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, P., Dias, A., Matias, C., Castro, J., Gaspar, T., & Oliveira, J. (2018). School effects on students' engagement with school: Academic performance moderates the effect of school support for learning on students' engagement. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 67–77. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2018.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulcahy, C., Krezmien, M., Leone, P., Houchins, D., & Baltodano, H. (2008). Lessons learned: Barriers and solutions for conducting reading investigations in juvenile corrections settings. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24(2), 239–252. doi:10.1080/10573560701808635
   Google Scholar
• Newmann, F. M., Wehlage, G. G., & Lamborn, S. D. (1992). The significance and sources of student engagement. In F. M. Newman (Ed.), Student engagement and achievement in American secondary schools (pp. 11–39). New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2018, August). Research and statistics. Retrieved from https://www.ojjdp.gov/research/
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E. (2013). ‘I'm a Reader’: transforming incarcerated girls' Lives in the English classroom. The English Journal, 102(4), 67–73.
   Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E. (2014a). ‘It's not simple’: The complex literate lives of youth in a juvenile detention facility. In P. Dunston, L. Grambell, K. Headly, S. Fullerton, & P. Stecker. 63rd Yearbook of the Literacy Research Association. Altamonte Springs, FL: Literacy Research Association,pp. 216–228.
   Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E. & Li, J. (2014b). Youth's dispositions towards writing in a juvenile detention center. The Journal of Correctional Education, 65(3), 24–42.
   Google Scholar
• Pytash, K. E. (2016). Composing screenplays: Youth in detention centers as creative meaning-makers. English Journal, 105(5), 53–60.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, L. M., Pressley, M., & Mohan, L. (2008). Engaging instruction in middle school classrooms: An observational study of nine teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 109(1), 61–81. doi:10.1086/592367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28(2), 147–169. doi:10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers-Adkinson, D., Melloy, K., Stuart, S., Fletcher, L., & Rinaldi, C. (2008). Reading and written language competency of incarcerated youth. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 24, 197–218.
   Google Scholar
• Sander, J. B., Patall, E. A., Amoscato, L. A., Fisher, A. L., & Funk, C. (2012). A meta-analysis of the effect of juvenile delinquency interventions on academic outcomes. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(9), 1695–1708. doi:10.1016/j.childy-outh.2012.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. M., Hirn, R. G., & Alter, P. G. (2014). Teacher instruction as a predictor for student engagement and disruptive behaviors. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 58(4), 193–200. doi:10.1080/1045988X.2013.787588
   Google Scholar
• Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21–44).New York: Springer Science.
   Google Scholar
• Snyder, H., & Sickmund, M. (1999). Juvenile offenders and victims: 1999 National report. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, U.S. Department of Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski. M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student earning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46, 153–84.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, J. (2008). Crime can be prevented if schools teach juvenile offenders to read. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(9), 1055–1062. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winn, M. (2011). Girl time: Literacy, justice, and the school-to-prison pipeline. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/77.5.1500
   Google Scholar