The comparison between two methods of membrane cleaning to control membrane fouling in a hybrid membrane photobioreactor (HMPBR)

References

• Ruiz-Martinez, A.; Garcia, N. M.; Romero, I.; Seco, A.; Ferrer, J. Microalgae Cultivation in Wastewater: Nutrient Removal from Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor Effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 126, 247–253. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molinuevo-Salces, B.; Riaño, B.; Hernández, D.; García-González, M. C. Microalgae and Wastewater Treatment: Advantages and Disadvantages. In Microalgae Biotechnology for Development of Biofuel and Wastewater Treatment; Springer, Singapore, 2019; pp. 505–533. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-2264-8_20.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, S.; Casagli, F.; Mantovani, M.; Mezzanotte, V.; Ficara, E. Selection of Photosynthesis and Respiration Models to Assess the Effect of Environmental Conditions on Mixed Microalgae Consortia Grown on Wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 305, 122995. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122995.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Georgianna, D. R.; Mayfield, S. P. Exploiting Diversity and Synthetic Biology for the Production of Algal Biofuels. Nature 2012, 488, 329–335. DOI: 10.1038/nature11479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borowitzka, M. A. Algal Growth Media and Sources of Algal Cultures; Micro-algal Biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1988; pp. 456–465.
   Google Scholar
• Seco, A.; Aparicio, S.; González-Camejo, J.; Jiménez-Benítez, A.; Mateo, O.; Mora, J. F.; Noriega-Hevia, G.; Sanchis-Perucho, P.; Serna-García, R.; Zamorano-López, N.; et al. Resource Recovery from Sulphate-Rich Sewage through an Innovative Anaerobic-Based Water Resource Recovery Facility (WRRF). Water Sci. Technol. 2018, 78, 1925–1936. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilad, M. R.; Vandamme, D.; Foubert, I.; Muylaert, K.; Vankelecom, I. F. J. Harvesting Microalgal Biomass Using Submerged Microfiltration Membranes. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 111, 343–352. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.02.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acién, F. G.; Gómez-Serrano, C.; Morales-Amaral, M.; del, M.; Fernández-Sevilla, J. M.; Molina-Grima, E. Wastewater Treatment Using Microalgae: How Realistic a Contribution Might It Be to Significant Urban Wastewater Treatment? Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2016, 100, 9013–9022. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-016-7835-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, Y.; Bokhary, A.; Maleki, E.; Liao, B. A Review of Membrane Fouling and Its Control in Algal-Related Membrane Processes. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 264, 343–358. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keyvan Hosseini, P.; Pajoum Shariati, F.; Delavari Amrei, H.; Heydarinasab, A. The Influence of Various Orifice Diameters on Cake Resistance and Pore Blocking Resistance of a Hybrid Membrane Photobioreactor (HMPBR). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 235, 116187. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Pan, B.; Gao, Y.; Li, C.; Ye, J.; Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Q.; Zhang, X. Efficient Membrane Microalgal Harvesting: Pilot-Scale Performance and Techno-Economic Analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 218, 83–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.321.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S.; Shao, Y.; Gao, N.; Deng, Y.; Li, L.; Deng, J.; Tan, C. Characterization of Algal Organic Matters of Microcystis Aeruginosa: Biodegradability, DBP Formation and Membrane Fouling Potential. Water Res. 2014, 52, 199–207. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X.; Fan, L.; Roddick, F. A. Feedwater Coagulation to Mitigate the Fouling of a Ceramic MF Membrane Caused by Soluble Algal Organic Matter. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2014, 133, 221–226. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.06.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, M. T.; Liu, J. C. Microfiltration for Separation of Green Algae from Water. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2006, 51, 157–164. DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Low, S. L.; Ong, S. L.; Ng, H. Y. Characterization of Membrane Fouling in Submerged Ceramic Membrane Photobioreactors Fed with Effluent from Membrane Bioreactors. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 290, 91–102. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.01.005.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F.; Bi, X.; Ng, H. Y. Effects of Bio-Carriers on Membrane Fouling Mitigation in Moving Bed Membrane Bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2016, 499, 134–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.10.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yusuf, Z.; Abdul Wahab, N.; Sahlan, S. Fouling Control Strategy for Submerged Membrane Bioreactor Filtration Processes Using Aeration Airflow, Backwash, and Relaxation: A Review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 17683–17695. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1086893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezakazemi, M.; Khajeh, A.; Mesbah, M. Membrane Filtration of Wastewater from Gas and Oil Production. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 367–388. DOI: 10.1007/s10311-017-0693-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalboussi, N.; Harmand, J.; Rapaport, A.; Bayen, T.; Ellouze, F.; Amar, N. B. Optimal Control of Physical Backwash Strategy-towards the Enhancement of Membrane Filtration Process Performance. J. Membr. Sci. 2018, 545, 38–48. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W.; Dong, B. Effects of Physical and Chemical Aspects on Membrane Fouling and Cleaning Using Interfacial Free Energy Analysis in Forward Osmosis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 21555–21567.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gul, A.; Hruza, J.; Yalcinkaya, F. Fouling and Chemical Cleaning of Microfiltration Membranes: A Mini-Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 846. DOI: 10.3390/polym13060846.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhm, L.; Drews, A.; Prieske, H.; Bérubé, P. R.; Kraume, M. The Importance of Fluid Dynamics for MBR Fouling Mitigation. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 122, 50–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibisono, Y.; Cornelissen, E. R.; Kemperman, A. J. B.; Van Der Meer, W. G. J.; Nijmeijer, K. Two-Phase Flow in Membrane Processes: A Technology with a Future. J. Membr. Sci. 2014, 453, 566–602. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2013.10.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alipourzadeh, A.; Mehrnia, M. R.; Hallaj Sani, A.; Babaei, A. Application of Response Surface Methodology for Investigation of Membrane Fouling Behaviours in Microalgal Membrane Bioreactor: The Effect of Aeration Rate and Biomass Concentration. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 111182–111189. DOI: 10.1039/C6RA23188H.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amiraftabi, M.-S.; Mostoufi, N.; Hosseinzadeh, M.; Mehrnia, M.-R. Reduction of Membrane Fouling by Innovative Method (Injection of Air Jet). J. Environ. Heal. Sci. Eng. 2014, 12, 128. DOI: 10.1186/s40201-014-0128-0.
   Google Scholar
• Aslam, M.; Charfi, A.; Lesage, G.; Heran, M.; Kim, J. Membrane Bioreactors for Wastewater Treatment: A Review of Mechanical Cleaning by Scouring Agents to Control Membrane Fouling. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 897–913. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2016.08.144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, D.; Chang, H.; Seo, H.; Kim, J. Fouling Behavior and System Performance in Membrane Bioreactor Introduced by Granular Media as a Mechanical Cleaning Effect on Membranes. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 9018–9026. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1049404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siembida, B.; Cornel, P.; Krause, S.; Zimmermann, B. Effect of Mechanical Cleaning with Granular Material on the Permeability of Submerged Membranes in the MBR Process. Water Res. 2010, 44, 4037–4046. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu, O. D.; Huck, P. M. Impact of Support Media in an Integrated Biofilter–Submerged Membrane System. Water Res. 2005, 39, 4220–4228. DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.08.007.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang, X.; Wei, C.-H.; Yu, K.-C. Mechanism of Membrane Fouling Control by Suspended Carriers in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 309, 7–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.09.069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luna, H. J.; Baêta, B. E. L.; Aquino, S. F.; Susa, M. S. R. EPS and SMP Dynamics at Different Heights of a Submerged Anaerobic Membrane Bioreactor (SAMBR). Process Biochem. 2014, 49, 2241–2248. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazrati, H.; Shayegan, J.; Mojtaba Seyedi, S. The Effect of HRT and Carriers on the Sludge Specifications in MBR to Remove VOCs from Petrochemical Wastewater. Desalin. Water Treat. 2016, 57, 21730–21742. DOI: 10.1080/19443994.2015.1125800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, L.; Lei, Q.; Chen, J.-R.; Hong, H.-C.; He, Y.-M.; Lin, H.-J. Membrane Fouling in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor: Impacts of Floc Size. Chem. Eng. J. 2015, 269, 328–334. DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q.-Y.; Yang, T.; Wang, H.-J.; Liu, K.-Q. Filtration Characteristics of Activated Sludge in Hybrid Membrane Bioreactor with Porous Suspended Carriers (HMBR). Desalination 2009, 249, 507–514. DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2008.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javadi, N.; Zokaee Ashtiani, F.; Fouladitajar, A.; Moosavi Zenooz, A. Experimental Studies and Statistical Analysis of Membrane Fouling Behavior and Performance in Microfiltration of Microalgae by a Gas Sparging Assisted Process. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 162, 350–357. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.03.160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, Y.; Ding, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Ma, R. The Influence of Bubble Characteristics on the Performance of Submerged Hollow Fiber Membrane Module Used in Microfiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 61, 89–95. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseini, M. K.; Shariati, F. P.; Bonakdarpour, B.; Heydarinasab, A. The Effect of Mechanical Cleaning Technology (MCT) on Membrane Fouling in a Novel Hybrid Membrane Photobioreactor (HMPBR) Containing Arthrospira Platensis (Spirulina). J. Appl. Phycol. 2020, 32, 83–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10811-019-01944-0.
   Google Scholar
• Zarrouk, C. Contribution a l’etude d’une Cyanophycee. Influence de Divers Facteurs Physiques et Chimiques Sur La Croissance et La Photosynthese de Spirulina Mixima [Thesis]. University of Paris, 1966.
   Google Scholar
• Shariati, F. P.; Mehrnia, M. R.; Sarrafzadeh, M. H.; Rezaee, S.; Grasmick, A.; Heran, M. Fouling in a Novel Airlift Oxidation Ditch Membrane Bioreactor (AOXMBR) at Different High Organic Loading Rate. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 105, 69–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2012.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowry, C.; Rosebrough, O.; Farr, N.; Randall, A. R. Protein Measurement with the Folin Phenol Reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265–275. DOI: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, A. P. S.; Law, A. W. K.; Fane, A. G. Factors Affecting the Performance of a Submerged Hollow Fiber Bundle. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 280, 969–982. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.03.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sofia, A.; Ng, W. J.; Ong, S. L. Engineering Design Approaches for Minimum Fouling in Submerged MBR. Desalination 2004, 160, 67–74. DOI: 10.1016/S0011-9164(04)90018-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda, T.; Hata, K.; Kikuoka, Y.; Seino, O. Effects of Aeration on Suction Pressure in a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor. Water Res. 1997, 31, 489–494. DOI: 10.1016/S0043-1354(96)00292-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, F.; Yang, F.; Shi, B.; Zhang, H. A Comprehensive Study on Membrane Fouling in Submerged Membrane Bioreactors Operated under Different Aeration Intensities. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 59, 91–100. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuthi, M. F. R.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H. H.; Nghiem, D. L.; Hai, F. I.; Xia, S.; Li, J.; Li, J.; Liu, Y. New and Practical Mathematical Model of Membrane Fouling in an Aerobic Submerged Membrane Bioreactor. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 238, 86–94. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.006.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin, H.; Wang, F.; Ding, L.; Hong, H.; Chen, J.; Lu, X. Enhanced Performance of a Submerged Membrane Bioreactor with Powdered Activated Carbon Addition for Municipal Secondary Effluent Treatment. J. Hazard Mater. 2011, 192, 1509–1514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.06.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, F.; Cao, J. S.; Chen, L. N.; Chen, L.; Feng, Q.; Xu, H. L. Enhanced Performance of Dyeing Wastewater Reclamation by PAC Addition in a Membrane Bioreactor. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2012, 10, 1138–1141.
   Google Scholar
• Kurita, T.; Kimura, K.; Watanabe, Y. Energy Saving in the Operation of Submerged MBRs by the Insertion of Baffles and the Introduction of Granular Materials. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 141, 207–213. DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.11.025.
   Google Scholar
• Johir, M. A. H.; Aryal, R.; Vigneswaran, S.; Kandasamy, J.; Grasmick, A. Influence of Supporting Media in Suspension on Membrane Fouling Reduction in Submerged Membrane Bioreactor (SMBR). J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 374, 121–128. DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2011.03.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagaoka, H.; Nemoto, H. Influence of Extracellular Polymeric Substances on Nitrogen Removal in an Intermittently-Aerated Membrane Bioreactor. Water Sci. Technol. 2005, 51, 151–158. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar