Utilization of the sugar fraction from Arabica coffee pulp as a carbon source for bacteria producing cellulose and cytotoxicity with human keratinocyte

References

• van der Vossen, H.; Bertrand, B.; Charrier, A. Next Generation Variety Development for Sustainable Production of Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica L.): a Review. Euphytica 2015, 204, 243–256. DOI: 10.1007/s10681-015-1398-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Coffee organization (2022, November). Trade Statistics - October 2022. International Coffee Organization. http://www.ico.org.
   Google Scholar
• Craparo, A. C. W.; Van Asten, P. J. A.; Läderach, P.; Jassogne, L. T. P.; Grab, S. W. Coffea arabica Yields Decline in Tanzania Due to Climate Change: Global Implications. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2015, 207, 1–10. DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2015.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. P.; Gole, T. W.; Baena, S.; Moat, J. The Impact of Climate Change on Indigenous Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica): Predicting Future Trends and Identifying Priorities. PLOS One. 2012, 7, e47981. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulloa Rojas, J. B.; Verreth, J. A. J.; Amato, S.; Huisman, E. A. Biological Treatments Affect the Chemical Composition of Coffee Pulp. Bioresour. Technol. 2003, 89, 267–274. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00070-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padmapriya, R.; Tharian, J. A.; Thirunalasundari, T. Coffee Waste management-An Overview. Int. J. Curr. Sci. 2013, 9, 83–91.
   Google Scholar
• Sangta, J.; Wongkaew, M.; Tangpao, T.; Withee, P.; Haituk, S.; Arjin, C.; Sringarm, K.; Hongsibsong, S.; Sutan, K.; Pusadee, T.; et al. Recovery of Polyphenolic Fraction from Arabica Coffee Pulp and Its Antifungal Applications. Plants 2021, 10, 1422. DOI: 10.3390/plants10071422.
   Google Scholar
• Rathinavelu, R.; Graziosi, G. Potential Alternative Use of Coffee Wastes and by-Products. London, UK: International Coffee Organization, 2005; Vol. 942; pp 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Gurram, R.; Al-Shannag, M.; Knapp, S.; Das, T.; Singsaas, E.; Alkasrawi, M. Technical Possibilities of Bioethanol Production from Coffee Pulp: A Renewable Feedstock. Clean Techn. Environ. Policy 2016, 18, 269–278. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-015-1015-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manasa, V.; Padmanabhan, A.; Anu Appaiah, K. A. Utilization of Coffee Pulp Waste for Rapid Recovery of Pectin and Polyphenols for Sustainable Material Recycle. Waste Manag. 2021, 120, 762–771. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayachandra, T.; Venugopal, C.; Anu Appaiah, K. Mycotypha-Treated Coffee Husk–a Novel Feed Stock for Biogas Production. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2011, 15, 104–108. DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2011.01.001.
   Google Scholar
• Heeger, A.; Kosińska-Cagnazzo, A.; Cantergiani, E.; Andlauer, W. Bioactives of Coffee Cherry Pulp and Its Utilisation for Production of Cascara Beverage. Food Chem. 2017, 221, 969–975. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.11.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondam, A. F.; Diolinda da Silveira, D.; Pozzada dos Santos, J.; Hoffmann, J. F. Phenolic Compounds from Coffee by-Products: Extraction and Application in the Food and Pharmaceutical Industries. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 123, 172–186. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.03.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenoy, D.; Pai, A.; Vikas, R. K.; Neeraja, H. S.; Deeksha, J. S.; Nayak, C.; Rao, C. V. A Study on Bioethanol Production from Cashew Apple Pulp and Coffee Pulp Waste. Biomass Bioenergy 2011, 35, 4107–4111. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.05.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menezes, E. G. T.; do Carmo, J. R.; Menezes, A. G. T.; Alves, J. G. L. F.; Pimenta, C. J.; Queiroz, F. Use of Different Extracts of Coffee Pulp for the Production of Bioethanol. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2013, 169, 673–687. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-012-0030-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaifa, M.; Andini, R.; Sulaiman, M.; et al. Novel Utilization of Coffee Processing by-Products: kombucha Cascara Originated from ‘Gayo-Arabica’. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 644, 012048. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/644/1/012048.
   Google Scholar
• Tang, Z.; Li, Q.; Di, J.; Ma, C.; He, Y.-C. An Efficient Chemoenzymatic Cascade Strategy for Transforming Biomass into Furfurylamine with Lobster Shell-Based Chemocatalyst and Mutated ω-Transaminase Biocatalyst in Methyl Isobutyl Ketone-Water. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 369, 128424. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Q.; Tang, W.; Li, L.; Huang, M.; Ma, C.; He, Y.-C. Enhancing Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Waste Sunflower Straw by Clean Hydrothermal Pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 383, 129236. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommano, S. R.; Jantrawut, P.; Sangta, J.; Chanabodeechalermrung, B.; Sunanta, P.; Bakshani, C.; Willats, W. Utilization of Coffee Pulp for the Production of Sustainable Cellulosic Composite and Plant-Based Hydrogel as a Potential Human Wound Dressing. Food Struct. 2023, 37, 100347. DOI: 10.1016/j.foostr.2023.100347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muzaifa, M, Rahmi, F, Syarifudin, Utilization of Coffee by-Products as Profitable Foods – A Mini Review. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021, 672(1), 012077. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/672/1/012077.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, P. S.; Madhava Naidu, M. Sustainable Management of Coffee Industry by-Products and Value Addition—a Review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 66, 45–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.06.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Sariñana, B. Y.; Saldaña-Trinidad, S. Chemistry and Biotransformation of Coffee by-Products to Biofuels. In The Question of Caffeine, Latosińska, J. N., Latosińska, M., Eds. Intech: Rijeka, 2017; pp 143–161.
   Google Scholar
• Braham, J. E.; Bressani, R. Coffee Pulp: Composition, Technology, and Utilization. IDRC: Ottawa, ON, CA, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Reichembach, L. H.; de Oliveira Petkowicz, C. L. Extraction and Characterization of a Pectin from Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Pulp with Gelling Properties. Carbohydr. Polym. 2020, 245, 116473. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greser, A. B.; Avcioglu, N. H. Optimization and Physicochemical Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose by Komagataeibacter nataicola and Komagataeibacter maltaceti Strains Isolated from Grape, Thorn Apple and Apple Vinegars. Arch. Microbiol. 2022, 204, 465. DOI: 10.1007/s00203-022-03083-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orlando, I.; Basnett, P.; Nigmatullin, R.; Wang, W.; Knowles, J. C.; Roy, I. Chemical Modification of Bacterial Cellulose for the Development of an Antibacterial Wound Dressing. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 557885. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.557885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volova, T. G.; Prudnikova, S. V.; Sukovatyi, A. G.; Shishatskaya, E. I. Production and Properties of Bacterial Cellulose by the Strain Komagataeibacter xylinus B-12068. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7417–7428. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-018-9198-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, A.; Kakugo, A.; Gong, J. P.; Osada, Y.; Takai, M.; Erata, T.; Kawano, S. High Mechanical Strength Double‐Network Hydrogel with Bacterial Cellulose. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 1124–1128. DOI: 10.1002/adfm.200305197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ullah, H.; Santos, H. A.; Khan, T. Applications of Bacterial Cellulose in Food, Cosmetics and Drug Delivery. Cellulose 2016, 23, 2291–2314. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0986-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu, L.; Zhang, J.; Yang, G. Present Status and Applications of Bacterial Cellulose-Based Materials for Skin Tissue Repair. Carbohydr. Polym. 2013, 92, 1432–1442. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchavanakit, N.; Sangrungraungroj, W.; Kaomongkolgit, R.; Banaprasert, T.; Pavasant, P.; Phisalaphong, M. Growth of Human Keratinocytes and Fibroblasts on Bacterial Cellulose Film. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22, 1194–1199. DOI: 10.1021/bp060035o.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordli, H. R.; Chinga-Carrasco, G.; Rokstad, A. M.; Pukstad, B. Producing Ultrapure Wood Cellulose Nanofibrils and Evaluating the Cytotoxicity Using Human Skin Cells. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 150, 65–73. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.04.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiaoprakobkij, N.; Seetabhawang, S.; Sanchavanakit, N.; Phisalaphong, M. Fabrication and Characterization of Novel Bacterial Cellulose/Alginate/Gelatin Biocomposite Film. J. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed. 2019, 30, 961–982. DOI: 10.1080/09205063.2019.1613292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singhsa, P.; Narain, R.; Manuspiya, H. Physical Structure Variations of Bacterial Cellulose Produced by Different Komagataeibacter xylinus Strains and Carbon Sources in Static and Agitated Conditions. Cellulose 2018, 25, 1571–1581. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-018-1699-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wongkaew, M.; Kittiwachana, S.; Phuangsaijai, N.; Tinpovong, B.; Tiyayon, C.; Pusadee, T.; Chuttong, B.; Sringarm, K.; Bhat, F. M.; Sommano, S. R.; Cheewangkoon, R. Fruit Characteristics, Peel Nutritional Compositions, and Their Relationships with Mango Peel Pectin Quality. Plants 2021, 10, 1148. DOI: 10.3390/plants10061148.
   Google Scholar
• Wongkaew, M.; Tinpovong, B.; Sringarm, K.; Leksawasdi, N.; Jantanasakulwong, K.; Rachtanapun, P.; Hanmoungjai, P.; Sommano, S. R. Crude Pectic Oligosaccharide Recovery from Thai Chok Anan Mango Peel Using Pectinolytic Enzyme Hydrolysis. Foods 2021, 10, 627. DOI: 10.3390/foods10030627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valera, M. J.; Torija, M. J.; Mas, A.; Mateo, E. Cellulose Production and Cellulose Synthase Gene Detection in Acetic Acid Bacteria. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99, 1349–1361. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-014-6198-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohammadkazemi, F.; Azin, M.; Ashori, A. Production of Bacterial Cellulose Using Different Carbon Sources and Culture Media. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 117, 518–523. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.10.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, Z.; Kim, J. Bacterial Cellulose/Poly(Ethylene Glycol) Composite: characterization and First Evaluation of Biocompatibility. Cellulose 2010, 17, 83–91. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-009-9362-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anicuta, S.-G.; Dobre, L.; Stroescu, M. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy for Characterization of Antimicrobial Films Containing Chitosan. Analele Universită Ńii Din Oradea Fascicula 2010, 2010, 1234–1240.
   Google Scholar
• Segal, L.; Creely, J. J.; Martin, A. E.; Conrad, C. M. An Empirical Method for Estimating the Degree of Crystallinity of Native Cellulose Using the X-Ray Diffractometer. Text. Res. J. 1959, 29, 786–794. DOI: 10.1177/004051755902901003.
   Google Scholar
• Chittasupho, C.; Thongnopkoon, T.; Burapapisut, S.; Charoensukkho, C.; Shuwisitkul, D.; Samee, W. Stability, Permeation, and Cytotoxicity Reduction of Capsicum Extract Nanoparticles Loaded Hydrogel Containing Wax Gourd Extract. Saudi Pharm. J. 2020, 28, 1538–1547. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2020.10.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frómeta, R. A. R.; Sánchez, J. L.; García, J. M. R. Evaluation of Coffee Pulp as Substrate for Polygalacturonase Production in Solid State Fermentation. Emir. J. Food Agric. 2020, 32, 117–124. DOI: 10.9755/ejfa.2020.v32.i2.2068.
   Google Scholar
• Gouvea, B. M.; Torres, C.; Franca, A. S.; Oliveira, L. S.; Oliveira, E. S. Feasibility of Ethanol Production from Coffee Husks. Biotechnol. Lett. 2009, 31, 1315–1319. DOI: 10.1007/s10529-009-0023-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blinová, L.; Sirotiak, M.; Bartošová, A.; Soldán, M. Review: Utilization of Waste from Coffee Production. Research Papers Faculty of Materials Science and Technology Slovak University of Technology, Volume 25, Issue 40, pp. 91–101, 2017. DOI: 10.1515/rput-2017-0011.
   Google Scholar
• Rani, M. U.; Appaiah, K. A. A. Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii UAC09 Using Coffee Cherry Husk. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2013, 50, 755–762. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-011-0401-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, Z.; Sajjad, W.; Khan, T.; Wahid, F. Production of Bacterial Cellulose from Industrial Wastes: A Review. Cellulose 2019, 26, 2895–2911. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-019-02307-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikkelsen, D.; Flanagan, B. M.; Dykes, G. A.; Gidley, M. J. Influence of Different Carbon Sources on Bacterial Cellulose Production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus Strain ATCC 53524. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2009, 107, 576–583. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04226.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, C.-H.; Chen, J.-H.; Liou, B.-K.; Lee, C.-K. Utilization of Acetate Buffer to Improve Bacterial Cellulose Production by Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Food Hydrocoll. 2016, 53, 98–103. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.12.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shigematsu, T.; Takamine, K.; Kitazato, M.; Morita, T.; Naritomi, T.; Morimura, S.; Kida, K. Cellulose Production from Glucose Using a Glucose Dehydrogenase Gene (Gdh)-Deficient Mutant of Gluconacetobacter xylinus and Its Use for Bioconversion of Sweet Potato Pulp. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2005, 99, 415–422. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.99.415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandamme, E. J.; De Baets, S.; Vanbaelen, A.; Joris, K.; De Wulf, P. Improved Production of Bacterial Cellulose and Its Application Potential. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1998, 59, 93–99. DOI: 10.1016/S0141-3910(97)00185-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trovatti, E.; Serafim, L. S.; Freire, C. S.; Silvestre, A. J.; Neto, C. P. Gluconacetobacter sacchari: An Efficient Bacterial Cellulose Cell-Factory. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1417–1420. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk, S.; Sameshima, K. Evaluation of Different Carbon Sources for Bacterial Cellulose Production. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2005, 4, 478–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toda, K.; Asakura, T.; Fukaya, M.; Entani, E.; Kawamura, Y. Cellulose Production by Acetic Acid-Resistant Acetobacter Xylinum. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1997, 84, 228–231. DOI: 10.1016/S0922-338X(97)82059-4.
   Google Scholar
• Norkrans, B. Cellulose and Cellulolysis11The Survey of Literature Pertaining to This Review Was Concluded in November 1966. The References Cited Have Partly Been Selected for the Scope of Information Provided by Summarizing Reviews, Lectures at Symposia, Etc. than in Recognition of Original Sources. In Advances in Applied Microbiology, Umbreit, W. W., Ed; Academic Press: London; 1968; Vol. 9, p. 91–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lynd, L. R.; Weimer, P. J.; van Zyl, W. H.; Pretorius, I. S. Microbial Cellulose Utilization: fundamentals and Biotechnology. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 506–577, table of contents. DOI: 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.506-577.2002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlemont, R.; Gerday, C. 1.18 – Extremophiles. In Comprehensive Biotechnology, 2nd ed.; Moo-Young, M., Ed; Burlington: Academic Press; 2011; pp 229–242.
   Google Scholar
• Gaggìa, F.; Baffoni, L.; Galiano, M.; Nielsen, D. S.; Jakobsen, R. R.; Castro-Mejía, J. L.; Bosi, S.; Truzzi, F.; Musumeci, F.; Dinelli, G. Kombucha Beverage from Green, Black and Rooibos Teas: A Comparative Study Looking at Microbiology, Chemistry and Antioxidant Activity. Nutrients 2018, 11, 1. DOI: 10.3390/nu11010001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saichana, N.; Matsushita, K.; Adachi, O.; Frébort, I.; Frebortova, J. Acetic Acid Bacteria: A Group of Bacteria with Versatile Biotechnological Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2015, 33, 1260–1271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes, R. J.; de Sousa Faria-Tischer, P. C.; Tischer, C. A.; Constantino, L. V.; de Freitas Rosa, M.; Chideroli, R. T.; de Pádua Pereira, U.; Spinosa, W. A. Komagataeibacter intermedius V-05: An Acetic Acid Bacterium Isolated from Vinegar Industry, with High Capacity for Bacterial Cellulose Production in Soybean Molasses Medium. Food Technol. Biotechnol. 2021, 59, 432–442. DOI: 10.17113/ftb.59.04.21.7148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchens, S. A.; León, R. V.; O'neill, H. M.; Evans, B. R. Statistical Analysis of Optimal Culture Conditions for Gluconacetobacter hansenii Cellulose Production. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2007, 44, 175–180. DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.02055.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Son, H. J.; Heo, M. S.; Kim, Y. G.; Lee, S. J. Optimization of Fermentation Conditions for the Production of Bacterial Cellulose by a Newly Isolated Acetobacter. Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2001, 33, 1–5. DOI: 10.1042/ba20000065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoda, M.; Sugano, Y. Recent Advances in Bacterial Cellulose Production. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2005, 10, 1–8. DOI: 10.1007/BF02931175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsouko, E.; Pilafidis, S.; Dimopoulou, M.; Kourmentza, K.; Sarris, D. Bioconversion of Underutilized Brewing by-Products into Bacterial Cellulose by a Newly Isolated Komagataeibacter rhaeticus Strain: A Preliminary Evaluation of the Bioprocess Environmental Impact. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 387, 129667. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshk, S.; Sameshima, K. Influence of Lignosulfonate on Crystal Structure and Productivity of Bacterial Cellulose in a Static Culture. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2006, 40, 4–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2006.07.037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. B.; Wilson, D. B. Why Are Ruminal Cellulolytic Bacteria Unable to Digest Cellulose at Low pH? J. Dairy Sci. 1996, 79, 1503–1509. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76510-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akinsemolu, A. A. The Role of Microorganisms in Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Cleaner Prod. 2018, 182, 139–155. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, J.-C.; Liu, S.-X.; Li, C.-F.; Li, J.; Liu, L.-X.; Deng, J.; Yang, Y.-C. Morphology and Structure Characterization of Bacterial Celluloses Produced by Different Strains in Agitated Culture. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2014, 117, 1305–1311. DOI: 10.1111/jam.12619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, T.; Guedes, G.; Sousa, F. L.; Freire, C. S. R.; Santos, H. A. Latest Advances on Bacterial Cellulose‐Based Materials for Wound Healing, Delivery Systems, and Tissue Engineering. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, e1900059. DOI: 10.1002/biot.201900059.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. F. S.; Almeida, F. C. G.; Vinhas, G. M.; Sarubbo, L. A. Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Gluconacetobacter hansenii Using Corn Steep Liquor as Nutrient Sources. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 2027. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, Y.; Qiu, L.; Cui, J.; Wei, Q. Bacterial Cellulose and Bacterial Cellulose-Vaccarin Membranes for Wound Healing. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2016, 59, 303–309. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W.; Jia, S.; Jia, Y.; Yang, H. The Influence of Fermentation Conditions and Post-Treatment Methods on Porosity of Bacterial Cellulose Membrane. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 26, 125–131. DOI: 10.1007/s11274-009-0151-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camere, S.; Karana, E. Fabricating Materials from Living Organisms: An Emerging Design Practice. J. Cleaner Prod. 2018, 186, 570–584. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina, L.; Corcuera, M. Á.; Gabilondo, N.; Eceiza, A.; Retegi, A. A Review of Bacterial Cellulose: sustainable Production from Agricultural Waste and Applications in Various Fields. Cellulose 2021, 28, 8229–8253. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04020-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revin, V.; Liyaskina, E.; Nazarkina, M.; Bogatyreva, A.; Shchankin, M. Cost-Effective Production of Bacterial Cellulose Using Acidic Food Industry by-Products. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2018, 49(Suppl 1), 151–159. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.12.012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheykhnazari, S.; Tabarsa, T.; Ashori, A.; Shakeri, A.; Golalipour, M. Bacterial Synthesized Cellulose Nanofibers; Effects of Growth Times and Culture Mediums on the Structural Characteristics. Carbohydr. Polym. 2011, 86, 1187–1191. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2011.06.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunusa, W. R.; Isa, I.; Laliyo, L. A.; Iyabu, H. FTIR, XRD and SEM Analysis of Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC) Fibers from Corncorbs in Alkaline Treatment. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1028, 012199. DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1028/1/012199.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, C.; Yang, X.-Y.; Xiong, L.; Guo, H.-J.; Luo, J.; Wang, B.; Zhang, H.-R.; Lin, X.-Q.; Chen, X.-D. Evaluating the Possibility of Using Acetone‐Butanol‐Ethanol (ABE) Fermentation Wastewater for Bacterial Cellulose Production by G Luconacetobacter Xylinus. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2015, 60, 491–496. DOI: 10.1111/lam.12396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khami, S.; Khamwichit, W.; Suwannahong, K. Synthesis of Cellulose Acetate Nanofiber (CANF) from Bacterial Cellulose (BC) Incubated from Cannery Seafood Wastewater (CSW) Using Acetobacter Xylinum. ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2019, 14, 3038–3045.
   Google Scholar
• Tseng, Y. S.; Patel, A. K.; Chen, C.-W.; Dong, C.-D.; Singhania, R. R. Improved Production of Bacterial Cellulose by Komagataeibacter europaeus Employing Fruit Extract as Carbon Source. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 1054–1064. DOI: 10.1007/s13197-022-05451-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treesuppharat, W.; Rojanapanthu, P.; Siangsanoh, C.; Manuspiya, H.; Ummartyotin, S. Synthesis and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose and Gelatin-Based Hydrogel Composites for Drug-Delivery Systems. Biotechnol. Rep. 2017, 15, 84–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.btre.2017.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Dórame-Miranda, R. F.; Gámez-Meza, N.; Medina-Juárez, L. Á.; Ezquerra-Brauer, J. M.; Ovando-Martínez, M.; Lizardi-Mendoza, J. Bacterial Cellulose Production by Gluconacetobacter entanii Using Pecan Nutshell as Carbon Source and Its Chemical Functionalization. Carbohydr. Polym. 2019, 207, 91–99. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.11.067.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Z.; Wang, L.; Hua, J.; Jia, S.; Zhang, J.; Liu, H. Production of Nano Bacterial Cellulose from Waste Water of Candied Jujube-Processing Industry Using Acetobacter Xylinum. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 120, 115–119. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.11.061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, K. Illustration of the Development of Bacterial Cellulose Bundles/Ribbons by Gluconacetobacter xylinus via Atomic Force Microscopy. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 97, 4353–4359. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-013-4752-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasanin, M. S.; Abdelraof, M.; Hashem, A. H.; El Saied, H. Sustainable Bacterial Cellulose Production by Achromobacter Using Mango Peel Waste. Microb. Cell Fact. 2023, 22, 24. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-023-02031-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jittaut, P.; Hongsachart, P.; Audtarat, S.; Dasri, T. Production and Characterization of Bacterial Cellulose Produced by Gluconacetobacter xylinus BNKC 19 Using Agricultural Waste Products as Nutrient Source. Arab J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2023, 30, 221–230. DOI: 10.1080/25765299.2023.2172844.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgi, E.; Homan Gokce, E.; Bayir, E.; Sendemir, A.; Ozer, K. O.; Hames Tuna, E. E. Bacterial Cellulose Based Facial Mask with Antioxidant Property and High Moisturizing Capacity. Cellulose 2021, 28, 10399–10414. DOI: 10.1007/s10570-021-04106-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, D. F.; Frankos, V. H.; Westland, J.; Zoetis, T. Toxicologic Evaluation of Cellulon™ Fiber; Genotoxicity, Pyrogenicity, Acute and Subchronic Toxicity. J. Am. Coll. Toxicol. 1991, 10, 541–554. DOI: 10.3109/10915819109078651.
   Google Scholar
• Moreira, S.; Silva, N. B.; Almeida-Lima, J.; Rocha, H. A. O.; Medeiros, S. R. B.; Alves, C.; Gama, F. M. BC Nanofibres: In Vitro Study of Genotoxicity and Cell Proliferation. Toxicol. Lett. 2009, 189, 235–241. DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.06.849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zillich, O. V.; Schweiggert-Weisz, U.; Eisner, P.; Kerscher, M. Polyphenols as Active Ingredients for Cosmetic Products. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2015, 37, 455–464. DOI: 10.1111/ics.12218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar