Nonlinear model of liquid chromatography considering finite rates of adsorption-desorption kinetics and core-shell adsorbents

References

• Guiochon, G.; Felinger, A.; Shirazi, D.G., Katti, A.M. Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography, 2nd ed; ELsevier Academic press: New York, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Guiochon, G.; Lin, B. Modeling for Preparative Chromatography; Academic Press: New York, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Ruthven, D.M. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes; Wiley-Interscience: New York, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, J.C. Dynamics of Chromatogrpahy. Part I: Principles and theory; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Gu, T.; Truei, Y.-H.; Tsai, G.-J.; Tsao, G.T. Modeling of Gradient Elution in Multicomponent Nonlinear chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47, 253–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohkuma, T.; Hara, S. Tail-producing Slow Adsorption-desorption Process in Lquid-solid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 1987, 400, 47–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvath, C.G.; Preiss, B.A.; Lipsky, S.R. Fast Liquid Chromatography: An Investigation of Operating Parameters and these Paration of Nucleotides on Pellicular Ion Exchangers. Anal. Chem. 1967, 39, 1422–1428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, J.J. Controlled Surface Porosity Supports for High Speed Gas and Liquid Chromatography. Anal. Chem. 1969, 41, 218–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkland, J.J.; Truszkowski, F.A.; Dilks, C.H.; Engel, G.S. Superficially Porous Silica Microspheres for Fas Thigh-performance Liquid Chromatography of Macromolecules. J. Chromatogr. A 2000, 890, 3–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fanigliulo, A.; Cabooter, D.; Bellazzi, G.; Tramarin, D.; Allieri, B., Rottigni, A.; Desmet, G. Comparison of Performance of High Performance Liquid Chromatography Columns Packed With Superficially and Fully Porous 2.5 mm Particles Using Kinetic Plots. J. Sep. Sci. 2010, 33, 3655–3665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pietrogrande, M.C.; Dondi, F.; Ciogli, A.; Gasparrini, F.; Piccin, A.; Serafini, M. Characterization of New Types of Stationary Phases for Fast and Ultra-fast Liquid Chromatography by Signal Processing Based on AutoCovariance Function: A Case Study of Application to Passiflora Incarnata L. Extract Separations. J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 4355–4364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, I.; Al-Othman, Z.A.; Al-Záabi, M. Superficially Porous Particles Columns for Super Fast HPLC Separations. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2012, 26, 1001–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarski, K.; Guiochon, G. Modeling of the Mass-transfer Kinetics in Chromatographic Columns Packed with Shell and Pellicular Particles. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 4648–4656.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, P.; Yu, J.; Xiu, G.; Rodrigues, A.E. A Strategy for Tail or Eddesign of Efficient and Low-pressure Drop Packed Column Chromatography. AIChE J. 2010, 56, 3091–3098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, T.; Liu, M.; Cheng, K.-S.C.; Ramaswamy, S.; Wang, C. A General Rate Model Approach for the Optimization of the Core Radius Fraction for Multicomponent Isocratic Elution in Preparative Nonlinear Liquid Chromatography Using Cored Beads. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2011, 66, 3531–3539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lomsadze, K.; Jibuti, G.; Farkas, T.; Chankvetadze, B. Comparative High-performance Liquid Chromatography Enantioseparations on Polysaccharide Based Chiral Stationary Phases Prepared by Coating Totally Porous and Core-shell Silica Particles. J. Chromatogr. A. 2012, 1234, 50–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N.; Kiss, I.; Felinger, A. Significance and Estimation of Chromatographic Parameters. J. Chromatogr. A. 2014, 1366, 84–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurdi, S.E.; Musuleq, D.A.; Alhazmi, H.A.; Bratty, M.A., Deeb, S.E. Comparing Monolithic and Fused Core HPLC Columns for Fast Chromatographic Analysis of Fat-soluble Vitamins. Acta Pharm. 2017, 67, 203–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, A.E.; Hashem, H.; Elhenawee, M.; Saleh, H. Comparison Between Core-shell and Totally Porous Particle Stationary Phases for Fast and Green LC Determination of Five Hepatitis-C Antiviral Drugs. J. Sep. Sci. 2018, 41, 1734–1742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gritti, F.; Cavazzini, A.; Marchetti, N.; Guiochon, G. Comparison Between the Efficiencies of Columns Packed with Fully and Partially Porous C18-bonded Silica Materials. J. Chromatogr. A. 2007, 1157, 289–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, S.; Oláh, E.; Fekete, J. Fast Liquid Chromatography: The Domination of Core-shell and Very Fine Particles. J. Chromatogr. A 2012, 1228, 57–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, R.; Ahmed, A.; Edge, T.; Zhang, H. Core-shell Particles: Preparation, Fundamentals and Applications in High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2014, 1357, 36–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ruiz, V.; Olives, A.I.; Martín, M.A. Core-shell Particles Lead the Way to Renewing High-performance Liquid Chromatography. Trend Anal. Chem. 2015, 64, 17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qamar, S.; Sattar, F.A.; Abbasi, J.N.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A. Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Chromatography with Core-shell Particles Applying the General Rate Model. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2016, 147, 54–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Javeed, S.; Qamar, S.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Warnecke, G. Efficient and Accurate Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Chromatographic Processes. J. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 2294–2305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horváth, K.; Felinger, A. Influence of Particle Size and Shell Thickness of Core-shell Packing Materials on Optimum Experimental Conditions in Preparative Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 2015, 1407, 100–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debets, H.J.G.; Bajema, B.L.; Doornbos, D.A. A Critical Evlaution of Quality Criteria for the Optimization of Chromatogrpahic Multicomponent Separations. Andytica. Chimica. Acta 1983, 151, 131–141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cockburn, B.; Shu., C.-W. TVB Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method For Conservation Laws II. General Framework. Math. Comput. 1989, 52, 411–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar