References
- Carta, G.; Jungbauer, A. Protein Chromatography Process Development and Scale-Up; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, 2010.
- Guiochon, G.; Felinger, A.; Shirazi, D. G.; Katti, A. M. The Mass Balance Equation of Chromatographyand Its General Properties. In Fundamentals of Preparative and Nonlinear Chromatography, 2nd ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: New York, NY, 2006; pp 19–66.
- Guiochon, G.; B. Modeling For, L. Preparative Chromatography; Elsevier Academic Press: New York, NY, 2003.
- Felinger, A.; Cavazzini, A.; Dondi, F. Equivalence of the Microscopic and Macroscopic Models of Chromatography: Stochastic-Dispersive versus Lumped Kinetic Model. J. Chromatogr. A. 2004, 1043, 149–157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2004.05.081.
- Tingyue, G. Mathematical Modeling and Scale-Up of Liquid Chromatography: With Application Examples, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, 2015.
- Shu, C. W.; Osher, S. Efficient Implementation of Essentially Non-Oscillatory Shock Capturing Schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1988, 77, 439–471. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(88)90177-5.
- Harten, A.; Engquist, B.; Osher, S.; Chakravarthy, S. R. Uniformly High Order Accurate Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes, III. In Upwind and High-Resolution Schemes; Academic press, Inc.: Berlin, Germany, 1987; pp 218–290.
- Morton, K. W.; Sweby, P. K. A Comparison of Flux Limited Difference Methods and Characteristic Galerkin Methods for Shock Modelling. J. Comput. Phys. 1987, 73, 203–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(87)90114-8.
- Harten, A. On a Class of High Resolution Total-Variation-Stable Finite-Difference Schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 1–23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0721001.
- Harten, A. Preliminary Results on the Extension of ENO Schemes to Two-Dimensional Problems. In Nonlinear Hyperbolic Problems. Lecture Notes in Mathematics; Carasso, C., Serre, D., Raviart, P. A. Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1987; pp 23–40.
- Harten, A.; Osher, S. Uniformly High-Order Accurate Nonoscillatory Schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1987, 24, 279–309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0724022.
- Osher, S. Convergence of Generalized MUSCL Schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1985, 22, 947–961. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0722057.
- Osher, S.; Chakravarthy, S. High Resolution Schemes and the Entropy Condition. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 955–984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0721060.
- Osher, S.; Tadmor, E. On the Convergence of Difference Approximations to Scalar Conservation Laws. Math. Comp. 1988, 50, 19–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0917817-X.
- Sanders, R. A Third-Order Accurate Variation Non Expansive Difference Scheme for Single Nonlinear Conservation Laws. Math. Comp. 1988, 51, 535–558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1988-0935073-3.
- Shu, C. W. TVB Uniformly High-Order Schemes for Conservation Laws. Math. Comp. 1987, 49, 105–121. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1987-0890256-5.
- Shu, C. W. TVB Boundary Treatment for Numerical Solutions of Conservation Laws. Math. Comp. 1987, 49, 123–134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1987-0890257-7.
- Shu, C. W. Total-Variation-Diminishing Time Discretizations. SIAM J. Sci. and Stat. Comput. 1988, 9, 1073–1084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0909073.
- Shu, C. Efficient Implementation of Essentially Non-Oscillatory Shock-Capturing Scheme II. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 83, 439–471.
- Javeed, S.; Qamar, S.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Warnecke, G. Efficient and Accurate Numerical Simulation of Nonlinear Chromatographic Processes. J. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2011, 35, 2294–2305. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.10.002.
- Medi, B.; Amanullah, M. Application of a Finite-Volume Method in the Simulation of Chromatographic Systems: Effects of Flux Limiters. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 1739–1748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie100617c.
- Javeed, S.; Qamar, S.; Ashraf, w.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Warnecke, G. Analysis and Numerical Investigation of Two Dynamic Models for Liquid Chromatography. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2013, 90, 17–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.12.014.
- Sweby, P. K. High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1984, 21, 995–1011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0721062.
- Liu, X.-D.; Osher, S.; Chan, T. Weighted Essentially Non-Oscillatory Schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1994, 115, 200–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1994.1187.
- Jiang, G.-S.; Shu, C. W. Efficient Implementation of Weighted ENO Schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 1996, 126, 202–228. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0130.
- Lieres, E. V.; Andersson, J. A Fast and Accurate Solver for the General Rate Model of Column Liquid Chromatography. J. Comput. & Chem. Eng. 2010, 34, 1180–1191. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2010.03.008.
- Javeed, S.; Qamar, S.; Seidel-Morgenstern, A.; Warnecke, G. A Discontinuous Galerkin Method to Solve Chromatographic Models. J. Chroma. A. 2011, 1218, 7137–7146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2011.08.005.
- Koren, B. A Robust Upwind Discretization Method for Advection, Diffusion and Source Terms. Amsterdam: Centrum Voor Wiskunde en Informatica 1993, 45, 117–138.
- Lim, Y-i.; Chang, S.-C.; Jørgensen, S. B. A Novel Partial Differential Algebraic Equation (PDAE) Solver: Iterative Space-Time Conservation Ele Ment/Solution Element (CE/SE) Method. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 1309–1324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.016.
- Shipilova, O.; Sainio, T.; Haario, H. Particle Transport Method for Simulation of Multicomponent Chromatography Problems. J. Chromatogr. A. 2008, 1204, 62–71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.069.
- Reed, W. H.; Hill, T. R. Triangular Mesh Methods for the Neutron Transport Equation; LA-UR-73-479; CONF-730414-2; Los Alamos Scientific Lab: Los Alamos, New Mexico, 1973.
- Lesaint, P.; Raviart, P. A. On a Finite Element Method for Solving the Neutron Transport Equation. Publications mathématiques et informatique de Rennes, no. S4 (1974), article no. 8, 40 p. http://www.numdam.org/item/PSMIR_1974___S4_A8_0/
- Cockburn, B.; Gremaud, P. A. Error Estimates for Finite Element Methods for Scalar Conservation Laws. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1996, 33, 522–554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0733028.
- Bassi, F.; Rebay, S. A High-Order Accurate Discontinuous Finite Element Method for the Numerical Solution of the Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations. J. Comput. Phys. 1997, 131, 267–279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.5572.
- Bassi, F.; Crivellini, A.; Rebay, S.; Savini, M. Discontinuous Galerkin Solution of the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes and k-ω Turbulence Model Equations. Comput. Fluids 2005, 34, 507–540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2003.08.004.
- Bassi, F.; Rebay, S. An Implicit High-Order Discontinuous Galerkin Method for the Steady State Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations. Presented at the Computational Fluid Dynamics 98, Fourth European Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Athens, Greece, September 5–7, 1998.
- Cockburn, B.; Shu, C. W. The Runge-Kutta Local Projection-discontinuous-Galerkin Finite Element Method for Scalar Conservation Laws. Esaim: M2an. 1991, 25, 337–361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1991250303371.
- Cockburn, B.; Shu, C. W. TVB Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Conservation Laws. II. General Framework. Math. Comput. 1989, 52, 411–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2008474.
- Cockburn, B.; Lin, S. Y.; Shu, C. W. TVB Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Conservation Laws III: One Dimensional Systems. J. Comput. Phys. 1989, 84, 90–113. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(89)90183-6.
- Cockburn, B.; Hou, S.; Shu, C. W. The Runge-Kutta Local Projection Discontinuous Galerkin Finite Element Method for Conservation Laws. IV. The Multidimensional Case. Math. Comput. 1990, 54, 545–581. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2008501.
- Cockburn, B.; Shu, C. W. The Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Conservation Laws V: Multidimensional Systems. J. Comput. Phys. 1998, 141, 199–224. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1998.5892.
- Chavent, G.; Cockburn, B. The Local Projection-Discontinuous-Galerkin Finite Element Method for Scalar Conservation Laws. Esaim: M2an. 1989, 23, 565–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/m2an/1989230405651.
- Cockburn, B. Devising Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Non-Linear Hyperbolic Conservation Laws. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2001, 128, 187–204. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-0427(00)00512-4.
- Cockburn, B. Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems. In High-Order Methods for Computational Physics; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1999.
- Tien, V. D. A Kinetic Analysis of Ester Hydrolysis Reactions Considering Volume and Enthalpy Changes Due to Mixing. PhD Dissertation, Otto von Guericke University, 2012.
- Zhou, J. G.; Causon, D. M.; Mingham, C. G.; Ingram, D. M. The Surface Gradient Method for the Treatment of Source Terms in the Shallow-Water Equations. J. Comput. Phys. 2001, 168, 1–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6670.
- Zhang, P.; Liu, R. X. Hyperbolic Conservation Laws with Space-Dependent Fluxes: II. General Study of Numerical Fluxes. J. Comput. Appl. Math 2005, 176, 105–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2004.07.005.
- LeVeque, R. J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2002; Vol. 31.
- Kurganov, A.; Tadmor, E. New High-Resolution Central Schemes for Nonlinear Conservation Laws and Convection-Diffusion Equations. J. Comput. Phys 2000, 160, 241–282. [Database] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.2000.6459.
- Jiang, G. S.; Shu, C. W. On a Cell Entropy Inequality for Discontinuous Galerkin Methods. Math. Comp. 1994, 62, 531–538. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1090/S0025-5718-1994-1223232-7.
- Johnson, C. Error Estimates and Adaptive Time-Step Control for a Class of One-Step Methods for Stiff Ordinary Differential Equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 1988, 25, 908–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1137/0725051.
- Cockburn, B.; Shu, C. W. Runge-Kutta Discontinuous Galerkin Methods for Convection-Dominated Problems. J. Sci. Comp. 2001, 16, 173–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012873910884.