Separation techniques for intact antibody analysis by mass spectrometry

References

• Campuzano, I. D.; Sandoval, W. Denaturing and Native Mass Spectrometric Analytics for Biotherapeutic Drug Discovery Research: Historical, Current, and Future Personal Perspectives. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 1861–1885. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.1c00036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donnelly, D. P.; Rawlins, C. M.; DeHart, C. J.; Fornelli, L.; Schachner, L. F.; Lin, Z.; Lippens, J. L.; Aluri, K. C.; Sarin, R.; Chen, B.; et al. Best Practices and Benchmarks for Intact Protein Analysis for Top-down Mass Spectrometry. Nat. Methods 2019, 16, 587–594. DOI: 10.1038/s41592-019-0457-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catherman, A. D.; Skinner, O. S.; Kelleher, N. L. Top Down Proteomics: Facts and Perspectives. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 445, 683–693. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.02.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, P. D.; Zamdborg, L.; Thomas, P. M.; Kelleher, N. L. On the Scalability and Requirements of Whole Protein Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 6868–6874. DOI: 10.1021/ac2010795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran, J. C.; Zamdborg, L.; Ahlf, D. R.; Lee, J. E.; Catherman, A. D.; Durbin, K. R.; Tipton, J. D.; Vellaichamy, A.; Kellie, J. F.; Li, M.; et al. Mapping Intact Protein Isoforms in Discovery Mode Using Top-Down Proteomics. Nature 2011, 480, 254–258. DOI: 10.1038/nature10575.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Z.; Wei, L.; Cai, W.; Zhu, Y.; Tucholski, T.; Mitchell, S. D.; Guo, W.; Ford, S. P.; Diffee, G. M.; Ge, Y. Simultaneous Quantification of Protein Expression and Modifications by Top-Down Targeted Proteomics: A Case of the Sarcomeric Subproteome. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2019, 18, 594–605. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.TIR118.001086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, I.; van Dongen, W. D. LC–MS-Based Quantification of Intact Proteins: Perspective for Clinical and Bioanalytical Applications. Bioanalysis 2015, 7, 1943–1958. DOI: 10.4155/bio.15.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A.; Sanglier-Cianférani, S.; Van Dorsselaer, A. Biosimilar, Biobetter, and Next Generation Antibody Characterization by Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 4637–4646. DOI: 10.1021/ac3002885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, A.; Terral, G.; Debaene, F.; Wagner-Rousset, E.; Marcoux, J.; Janin-Bussat, M.-C.; Colas, O.; Dorsselaer, A. V.; Cianférani, S. Cutting-Edge Mass Spectrometry Methods for the Multi-Level Structural Characterization of Antibody-Drug Conjugates. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2016, 13, 157–183. DOI: 10.1586/14789450.2016.1132167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B.; Brown, K. A.; Lin, Z.; Ge, Y. Top-Down Proteomics: Ready for Prime Time? Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 110–127. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b04747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piccoli, S.; Mehta, D.; Vitaliti, A.; Allinson, J.; Amur, S.; Eck, S.; Green, C.; Hedrick, M.; Hopper, S.; Ji, A.; et al. 2019 White Paper on Recent Issues in Bioanalysis: FDA Immunogenicity Guidance, Gene Therapy, Critical Reagents, Biomarkers and Flow Cytometry Validation (Part 3–Recommendations on 2019 FDA Immunogenicity Guidance, Gene Therapy Bioanalytical Challenges, Strategies for Critical Reagent Management, Biomarker Assay Validation, Flow Cytometry Validation & CLSI H62). Bioanalysis 2019, 11, 2207–2244. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2019-0271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oquendo, E.; Lin, X.; Ye, S.; Coble, K.; Grimaldi, C. Using Multiple Platforms for Critical Reagents Selection Process to Support Pharmacokinetic Ligand-Binding Assay Development. Bioanalysis 2021, 13, 761–769. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schadt, S.; Hauri, S.; Lopes, F.; Edelmann, M. R.; Staack, R. F.; Villaseñor, R.; Kettenberger, H.; Roth, A. B.; Schuler, F.; Richter, W. F.; Funk, C. Are Biotransformation Studies of Therapeutic Proteins Needed? Scientific Considerations and Technical Challenges. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2019, 47, 1443–1456. DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.088997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, L.; Weng, N.; Jian, W. LC–MS Bioanalysis of Intact Proteins and Peptides. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2020, 34, e4633. DOI: 10.1002/bmc.4633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuster, J.; Koulov, A.; Mahler, H.-C.; Detampel, P.; Huwyler, J.; Singh, S.; Mathaes, R. In Vivo Stability of Therapeutic Proteins. Pharm. Res. 2020, 37, 23. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-019-2689-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobaly, B.; D'Atri, V.; Goyon, A.; Colas, O.; Beck, A.; Fekete, S.; Guillarme, D. Protocols for the Analytical Characterization of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies. II–Enzymatic and Chemical Sample Preparation. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2017, 1060, 325–335. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.06.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobály, B.; Lauber, M.; Beck, A.; Guillarme, D.; Fekete, S. Utility of a High Coverage Phenyl-Bonding and Wide-Pore Superficially Porous Particle for the Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Products. J. Chromatogr. A 2018, 1549, 63–76. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2018.03.043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bults, P.; Spanov, B.; Olaleye, O.; van de Merbel, N. C.; Bischoff, R. Intact Protein Bioanalysis by Liquid Chromatography–High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019, 1110–1111, 155–167. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.01.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kip, Ç.; Liu, S.; Fu, X.; Tuncel, A.; Lämmerhofer, M. In-Situ Photopolymerized C4-Functionalized Organosilicon Monoliths for Reversed-Phase Protein Separation in Nano-Liquid Chromatography. Talanta 2019, 198, 330–336. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2019.01.116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffler, K.; Viner, R.; Damoc, E. High Resolution Top-Down Experimental Strategies on the Orbitrap Platform. J. Proteomics 2018, 175, 42–55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.03.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. E.; Kellie, J. F.; Tran, J. C.; Tipton, J. D.; Catherman, A. D.; Thomas, H. M.; Ahlf, D. R.; Durbin, K. R.; Vellaichamy, A.; Ntai, I.; et al. A Robust Two-Dimensional Separation for Top-Down Tandem Mass Spectrometry of the Low-Mass Proteome. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2009, 20, 2183–2191. DOI: 10.1016/j.jasms.2009.08.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellie, J. F.; Tran, J. C.; Jian, W.; Jones, B.; Mehl, J. T.; Ge, Y.; Henion, J.; Bateman, K. P. Intact Protein Mass Spectrometry for Therapeutic Protein Quantitation, Pharmacokinetics, and Biotransformation in Preclinical and Clinical Studies: An Industry Perspective. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 32, 1886–1900. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosati, S.; Rose, R. J.; Thompson, N. J.; van Duijn, E.; Damoc, E.; Denisov, E.; Makarov, A.; Heck, A. J. Exploring an Orbitrap Analyzer for the Characterization of Intact Antibodies by Native Mass Spectrometry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2012, 51, 12992–12996. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201206745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H.; Cui, W.; Gross, M. L. Mass Spectrometry for the Biophysical Characterization of Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 308–317. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.11.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khalikova, M. A.; Skarbalius, L.; Naplekov, D. K.; Jadeja, S.; Švec, F.; Lenčo, J. Evaluation of Strategies for Overcoming Trifluoroacetic Acid Ionization Suppression Resulted in Single-Column Intact Level, Middle-up, and Bottom-up Reversed-Phase LC-MS Analyses of Antibody Biopharmaceuticals. Talanta 2021, 233, 122512. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen, J. M.; Smith, J.; Rzewuski, S.; Legido-Quigley, C.; Lauber, M. A. High Sensitivity LC-MS Profiling of Antibody-Drug Conjugates with Difluoroacetic Acid Ion Pairing. MAbs 2019, 11, 1358–1366. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2019.1658492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, W.; Kang, L.; Burton, L.; Weng, N. A Workflow for Absolute Quantitation of Large Therapeutic Proteins in Biological Samples at Intact Level Using LC-HRMS. Bioanalysis 2016, 8, 1679–1691. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2016-0096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lanshoeft, C.; Cianférani, S.; Heudi, O. Generic Hybrid Ligand Binding Assay Liquid Chromatography High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry-Based Workflow for Multiplexed Human Immunoglobulin G1 Quantification at the Intact Protein Level: Application to Preclinical Pharmacokinetic Studies. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 2628–2635. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasicek, L. A.; Zhu, X.; Spellman, D. S.; Bateman, K. P. Direct Quantitation of Therapeutic Antibodies for Pharmacokinetic Studies Using Immuno-Purification and Intact Mass Analysis. Bioanalysis 2019, 11, 203–213. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2018-0240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellie, J. F.; Alelyunas, Y. W.; Albert, J.; Schneck, N. A.; Chen, Z.; Sychterz, C. J.; Edwards, I.; Shion, H.; Wrona, M. D.; Szapacs, M. E. Intact mAb LC–MS for Drug Concentration from Pre-Clinical Studies: Bioanalytical Method Performance and In-Life Samples. Bioanalysis 2020, 12, 1389–1403. DOI: 10.4155/bio-2020-0168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellie, J. F.; Pannullo, K. E.; Li, Y.; Fraley, K.; Mayer, A.; Sychterz, C. J.; Szapacs, M. E.; Karlinsey, M. Z. Antibody Subunit LC-MS Analysis for Pharmacokinetic and Biotransformation Determination from In-Life Studies for Complex Biotherapeutics. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 8268–8277. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fekete, S.; Bobály, B.; Nguyen, J. M.; Beck, A.; Veuthey, J.-L.; Wyndham, K.; Lauber, M. A.; Guillarme, D. Use of Ultrashort Columns for Therapeutic Protein Separations. Part 1: Theoretical Considerations and Proof of Concept. Anal. Chem. 2021, 93, 1277–1284. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04082.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsang, E.; Guillarme, D.; Veuthey, J. L.; Beck, A.; Lauber, M.; Schmudlach, A.; Fekete, S. Coupling Non-denaturing Chromatography to Mass Spectrometry for the Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 185, 113207. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deslignière, E.; Ley, M.; Bourguet, M.; Ehkirch, A.; Botzanowski, T.; Erb, S.; Hernandez-Alba, O.; Cianférani, S. Pushing the Limits of Native MS: Online SEC-Native MS for Structural Biology Applications. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 461, 116502. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2020.116502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan, Y.; Xing, T.; Wang, S.; Daly, T. J.; Li, N. Coupling Mixed-Mode Size Exclusion Chromatography with Native Mass Spectrometry for Sensitive Detection and Quantitation of Homodimer Impurities in Bispecific IgG. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 11417–11424. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02793.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ding, L.; Guo, Z.; Hu, Z.; Liang, X. Mixed-Mode Reversed Phase/Positively Charged Repulsion Chromatography for Intact Protein Separation. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2017, 138, 63–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2017.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B.; Lin, Z.; Alpert, A. J.; Fu, C.; Zhang, Q.; Pritts, W. A.; Ge, Y. Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Intact Monoclonal Antibodies. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 7135–7138. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, B.; Peng, Y.; Valeja, S. G.; Xiu, L.; Alpert, A. J.; Ge, Y. Online Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry for Top-down Proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1885–1891. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04285.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodler, A.; Ueberbacher, R.; Beyer, B.; Jungbauer, A. Calorimetry for Studying the Adsorption of Proteins in Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography. Prep. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2019, 49, 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2018.1487852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Füssl, F.; Cook, K.; Scheffler, K.; Farrell, A.; Mittermayr, S.; Bones, J. Charge Variant Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Using Direct Coupled pH Gradient Cation Exchange Chromatography to High-Resolution Native Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 4669–4676. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b05241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu, L.; Valeja, S. G.; Alpert, A. J.; Jin, S.; Ge, Y. Effective Protein Separation by Coupling Hydrophobic Interaction and Reverse Phase Chromatography for Top-down Proteomics. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 7899–7906. DOI: 10.1021/ac501836k.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarin, D.; Kumar, S.; Rathore, A. S. Multiattribute Monitoring of Charge-Based Heterogeneity of Recombinant Monoclonal Antibodies Using 2D HIC-WCX-MS. Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 15018–15026. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, B.; Han, G.; Tang, J.; Sandoval, W.; Zhang, Y. T. Native Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography Hyphenated to Mass Spectrometry for Characterization of Monoclonal Antibody Minor Variants. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 15360–15364. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04467.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yan, Y.; Xing, T.; Wang, S.; Daly, T. J.; Li, N. Online Coupling of Analytical Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography with Native Mass Spectrometry for the Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Products. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 186, 113313. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113313.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muneeruddin, K.; Nazzaro, M.; Kaltashov, I. A. Characterization of Intact Protein Conjugates and Biopharmaceuticals Using Ion-Exchange Chromatography with Online Detection by Native Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Top-Down Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 10138–10145. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b02982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey, A. O.; Han, G.; Phung, W.; Gazis, P.; Sutton, J.; Josephs,J. L.; Sandoval, W. Charge Variant Native Mass SpectrometryBenefits Mass Precision and Dynamic Range of Monoclonal Antibody Intact Mass Analysis. MAbs. 2018, 10, 1214–1225. DOI: 10.1080/19420862.2018.1521131.
   Google Scholar
• Leblanc, Y.; Ramon, C.; Bihoreau, N.; Chevreux, G. Charge Variants Characterization of a Monoclonal Antibody by Ion Exchange Chromatography Coupled On-line to Native Mass Spectrometry: Case Study after a Long-Term Storage at +5 C. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2017, 1048, 130–139. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.02.017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leblanc, Y.; Faid, V.; Lauber, M.; Wang, Q.; Bihoreau, N.; Chevreux, G. A Generic Method for Intact and Subunit Level Characterization of mAb Charge Variants by Native Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2019, 1133, 121814. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2019.121814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda, Y.; Kliman, M.; Mendelsohn, B. A. Application of Native Ion Exchange Mass Spectrometry to Intact and Subunit Analysis of Site-Specific Antibody–Drug Conjugates Produced by AJICAP First Generation Technology. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2020, 31, 1706–1712. DOI: 10.1021/jasms.0c00129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duong, V.-A.; Park, J.-M.; Lee, H. Review of Three-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography Platforms for Bottom-up Proteomics. IJMS 2020, 21, 1524. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21041524.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, X.; Yang, Z.; McCool, E. N.; Lubeckyj, R. A.; Chen, D.; Sun, L. Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry for Top-Down Proteomics. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 120, 115644. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2019.115644.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselberg, R.; de Jong, G. J.; Somsen, G. W. Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry for the Analysis of Intact Proteins 2007–2010. Electrophoresis 2011, 32, 66–82. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201000364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselberg, R.; De Vijlder, T.; Heukers, R.; Smit, M. J.; Romijn, E. P.; Somsen, G. W.; Dominguez-Vega, E. Heterogeneity Assessment of Antibody-Derived Therapeutics at the Intact and Middle-up Level by Low-Flow Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chim. Acta 2018, 1044, 181–190. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2018.08.024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubeckyj, R. A.; McCool, E. N.; Shen, X.; Kou, Q.; Liu, X.; Sun, L. Single-Shot Top-Down Proteomics with Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization-Tandem Mass Spectrometry for Identification of Nearly 600 Escherichia coli Proteoforms. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 12059–12067. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voeten, R. L. C.; Ventouri, I. K.; Haselberg, R.; Somsen, G. W. Capillary Electrophoresis: Trends and Recent Advances. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 1464–1481. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahoual, R.; Beck, A.; Leize-Wagner, E.; Francois, Y. N. Cutting-Edge Capillary Electrophoresis Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies and Related Products. J. Chromatogr. B Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2016, 1032, 61–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.05.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, E. A.; Batz, N. G.; Mellors, J. S.; Ramsey, J. M. Integrated Microfluidic Capillary Electrophoresis-Electrospray Ionization Devices with Online MS Detection for the Separation and Characterization of Intact Monoclonal Antibody Variants. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 2264–2272. DOI: 10.1021/ac503964j.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redman, E. A.; Mellors, J. S.; Starkey, J. A.; Ramsey, J. M. Characterization of Intact Antibody Drug Conjugate Variants Using Microfluidic Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 2220–2226. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Said, N.; Gahoual, R.; Kuhn, L.; Beck, A.; Francois, Y. N.; Leize-Wagner, E. Structural Characterization of Antibody Drug Conjugate by a Combination of Intact, Middle-up and Bottom-up Techniques Using Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis – Tandem Mass Spectrometry as nanoESI Infusion Platform and Separation Method. Anal. Chim. Acta 2016, 918, 50–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2016.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgetti, J.; Beck, A.; Leize-Wagner, E.; Francois, Y. N. Combination of Intact, Middle-up and Bottom-up Levels to Characterize 7 Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies by Capillary Electrophoresis – Mass Spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2020, 182, 113107. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2020.113107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belov, A. M.; Viner, R.; Santos, M. R.; Horn, D. M.; Bern, M.; Karger, B. L.; Ivanov, A. R. Analysis of Proteins, Protein Complexes, and Organellar Proteomes Using Sheathless Capillary Zone Electrophoresis – Native Mass Spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2017, 28, 2614–2634. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-017-1781-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, X.; Liang, Z.; Xu, T.; Yang, Z.; Wang, Q.; Chen, D.; Pham, L.; Du, W.; Sun, L. Investigating Native Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry on a High-End Quadrupole-Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer for the Characterization of Monoclonal Antibodies. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 2021, 462, 116541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.; Feng, P.; Sosic, Z.; Zang, L. Monitoring Glycosylation Profile and Protein Titer in Cell Culture Samples Using ZipChip CE-MS. J. Anal. Bioanal. Tech. 2017, 08, 1–8. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9872.1000359.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, L.; Fabry, D.; Lan, K. Rapid and Comprehensive Monoclonal Antibody Characterization Using Microfluidic CE-MS. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2021, 204, 114251. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2021.114251.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Wu, J.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Nguyen, J. B.; Rosconi, M. P.; Pyles, E. A.; Qiu, H.; Li, N. High-Sensitivity and High-Resolution Therapeutic Antibody Charge Variant and Impurity Characterization by Microfluidic Native Capillary Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2023, 223, 115147. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L.; Chen, D. D. Y. Analysis of Four Therapeutic Monoclonal Antibodies by Online Capillary Isoelectric Focusing Directly Coupled to Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. Electrophoresis 2019, 40, 2899–2907. DOI: 10.1002/elps.201900195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlecht, J.; Jooß, K.; Moritz, B.; Kiessig, S.; Neusüß, C. Two-Dimensional Capillary Zone Electrophoresis-Mass Spectrometry: Intact mAb Charge Variant Separation Followed by Peptide Level Analysis Using In-capillary Digestion. Anal. Chem. 2023, 95, 4059–4066. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c04578.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roda, B.; Zattoni, A.; Reschiglian, P.; Moon, M. H.; Mirasoli, M.; Michelini, E.; Roda, A. Field-Flow Fractionation in Bioanalysis: A Review of Recent Trends. Anal. Chim. Acta 2009, 635, 132–143. DOI: 10.1016/j.aca.2009.01.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kachuk, C.; Faulkner, M.; Liu, F.; Doucette, A. A. Automated SDS Depletion for Mass Spectrometry of Intact Membrane Proteins Though Transmembrane Electrophoresis. J. Proteome Res. 2016, 15, 2634–2642. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H.; Moon, M. H. Chip-Type Asymmetrical Flow Field-Flow Fractionation Channel Coupled with Mass Spectrometry for Top-down Protein Identification. Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 8652–8658. DOI: 10.1021/ac202098b.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H.; Compton, P. D.; Tran, J. C.; Kelleher, N. L. Online Matrix Removal Platform for Coupling Gel-Based Separations to Whole Protein Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 2199–2206. DOI: 10.1021/pr501331q.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, H.-M.; Winton, V. J.; Drader, J. J.; Manalili Wheeler, S.; Lazar, G. A.; Kelleher, N. L.; Liu, Y.; Tran, J. C.; Compton, P. D. Novel Interface for High-Throughput Analysis of Biotherapeutics by Electrospray Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 2186–2193. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b04826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• d‘Atri, V.; Causon, T.; Hernandez‐Alba, O.; Mutabazi, A.; Veuthey, J. L.; Cianferani, S.; Guillarme, D. Adding a New Separation Dimension to MS and LC–MS: What Is the Utility of Ion Mobility Spectrometry? J. Sep. Sci. 2018, 41, 20–67. DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201700919.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Alba, O.; Wagner-Rousset, E.; Beck, A.; Cianférani, S. Native Mass Spectrometry, Ion Mobility, and Collision-Induced Unfolding for Conformational Characterization of IgG4 Monoclonal Antibodies. Anal. Chem. 2018, 90, 8865–8872. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b00912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamid, A. M.; Garimella, S. V. B.; Ibrahim, Y. M.; Deng, L.; Zheng, X.; Webb, I. K.; Anderson, G. A.; Prost, S. A.; Norheim, R. V.; Tolmachev, A. V.; et al. Achieving High Resolution Ion Mobility Separations Using Traveling Waves in Compact Multiturn Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 8949–8956. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L.; Ibrahim, Y. M.; Hamid, A. M.; Garimella, S. V. B.; Webb, I. K.; Zheng, X.; Prost, S. A.; Sandoval, J. A.; Norheim, R. V.; Anderson, G. A.; et al. Ultra-High Resolution Ion Mobility Separations Utilizing Traveling Waves in a 13 m Serpentine Path Length Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations Module. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 8957–8964. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b01915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, Y. M.; Hamid, A. M.; Deng, L.; Garimella, S. V. B.; Webb, I. K.; Baker, E. S.; Smith, R. D. New Frontiers for Mass Spectrometry Based upon Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Analyst 2017, 142, 1010–1021. DOI: 10.1039/c7an00031f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, L.; Webb, I. K.; Garimella, S. V. B.; Hamid, A. M.; Zheng, X.; Norheim, R. V.; Prost, S. A.; Anderson, G. A.; Sandoval, J. A.; Baker, E. S.; et al. Serpentine Ultralong Path with Extended Routing (SUPER) High Resolution Traveling Wave Ion Mobility-MS Using Structures for Lossless Ion Manipulations. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 4628–4634. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagy, G.; Attah, I. K.; Conant, C. R.; Liu, W.; Garimella, S. V. B.; Gunawardena, H. P.; Shaw, J. B.; Smith, R. D.; Ibrahim, Y. M. Rapid and Simultaneous Characterization of Drug Conjugation in Heavy and Light Chains of a Monoclonal Antibody Revealed by High-Resolution Ion Mobility Separations in SLIM. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 5004–5012. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b05209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giles, K.; Ujma, J.; Wildgoose, J.; Pringle, S.; Richardson, K.; Langridge, D.; Green, M. A Cyclic Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry System. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 8564–8573. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b01838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merenbloom, S. I.; Glaskin, R. S.; Henson, Z. B.; Clemmer, D. E. High-Resolution Ion Cyclotron Mobility Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 1482–1487. DOI: 10.1021/ac801880a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, A. T.; Bohnhorst, A.; Raddatz, C.-R.; Allers, M.; Zimmermann, S. Ultra-High-Resolution Ion Mobility Spectrometry—Current Instrumentation, Limitations, and Future Developments. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2019, 411, 6229–6246. DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-01807-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds, J. N.; Baker, E. S. Ion Mobility Spectrometry: Fundamental Concepts, Instrumentation, Applications, and the Road Ahead. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2019, 30, 2185–2195. DOI: 10.1007/s13361-019-02288-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skeene, K.; Khatri, K.; Soloviev, Z.; Lapthorn, C. Current Status and Future Prospects for Ion-Mobility Mass Spectrometry in the Biopharmaceutical Industry. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. Proteins Proteom. 2021, 1869, 140697. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2021.140697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagal, D.; Valliere-Douglass, J. F.; Balland, A.; Schnier, P. D. Resolving Disulfide Structural Isoforms of IgG2 Monoclonal Antibodies by Ion Mobility Mass Spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6751–6755. DOI: 10.1021/ac1013139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, Y.; Han, L.; Buckner, A. C.; Ruotolo, B. T. Collision Induced Unfolding of Intact Antibodies: Rapid Characterization of Disulfide Bonding Patterns, Glycosylation, and Structures. Anal. Chem. 2015, 87, 11509–11515. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.5b03291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pisupati, K.; Tian, Y.; Okbazghi, S.; Benet, A.; Ackermann, R.; Ford, M.; Saveliev, S.; Hosfield, C. M.; Urh, M.; Carlson, E.; et al. A Multidimensional Analytical Comparison of Remicade and the Biosimilar Remsima. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 4838–4846. DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.6b04436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar