The Use of Legal Coercion in the Treatment of Substance Abusers: An Overview and Critical Analysis of Thirty Years of Research

REFERENCES

• American Medical Association. Factors Contributing to the Health Care Cost Problem. American Medical Association, Chicago 1993
   Google Scholar
• Anderer S. J. Introduction to the Symposium: integrating legal and psychological perspectives on the right to personal autonomy. Villanova Law Review 1992; 37(6)1563–1568, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Speckart G. Narcotics use, property crime and dealing: structural dynamics across the addiction career. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1986; 2(4)355–375, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Brecht M. L., Maddahian E. Pre-treatment characteristics and treatment performance of legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance admissions. Criminology 1989; 27(3)537–557, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D., Longshore D., Turner S. Treatment alternatives to street crime. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1999; 26(2)168–195, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anglin M. D. The efficacy of civil commitment in treating narcotics addiction. Journal of Drug Issues 1988; 18(4)527–545, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böllinger L. Therapy instead of punishment for drug users: Germany as a model. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 54–60, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bau C. H. D., Spode A., Ponso A. C., Elias E. P., Garcia C. E. D., Costa F. T., Hutz M. H. Heterogeneity in early onset alcoholism suggests a third group of alcoholics. Alcohol 2001; 23(1)9–13, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumrind D. The influence of parenting style on adolescent competence and substance use. Journal of Early Adolescence 1991; 11(1)56–95, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Berkowitz G., Brindis C., Clayson Z., Peterson S. Options for recovery: promoting success among women mandated to treatment. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1996; 28(1)31–38, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bersoff D. N. Autonomy for vulnerable populations: the Supreme Court's reckless disregard for self-determination and social science. Villanova Law Review 1992; 37(6)1569–1605, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brecht M. L., Anglin D., Wang J. Treatment effectiveness for legally coerced versus voluntary methadone maintenance clients. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1993; 19(1)89–106, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Justice Statistics. Drug and Crime Facts, 1994. U. S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• Carney T. Drug Users and the Law in Australia: From Crime Control to Welfare. The Law Book Company, Sydney 1987
   Google Scholar
• Catford J. Illicit Drugs: effective prevention requires a health promotion approach. Health Promotion International 2001; 16(2)107–110, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken J., Chaiken M. Drugs and predatory crime. Drugs and Crime, M. Tony, J. Q. Wilson. University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1990; pp. 203–239
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences2nd Ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey 1988
   Google Scholar
• Collins J. J., Allison M. Legal coercion and retention in drug abuse treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 1983; 34(12)1145–1149, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Condelli W. S. Client evaluations of therapeutic communities and retention. Therapeutic Communities for Addictions: Readings in Theory, Research and Practice., G. De Leon, J. Ziegenfuss. Charles C. Thomas, Springfield, Illinois 1986; pp. 131–140
   Google Scholar
• Condelli W. S. External pressure and retention in a therapeutic community. International Journal of Therapeutic Communities 1989; 10(4)21–33, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Cornish J. W., Metzger D., Woody G. E., Wilson G. E., McLellan A. T., Vandergrift B., O'Brien C. P. Naltrexone pharmacotherapy for opioid dependent federal probationers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 1997; 14(6)529–534, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G., Jainchill N. Circumstance, motivation, readiness, and suitability as correlates of treatment tenure. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1986; 18(3)203–208, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G., Inciardi J. A., Martin S. S. Residential drug abuse treatment research: are conventional control designs appropriate for assessing treatment effectiveness?. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 1995; 27(1)85–91, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leon G. Legal pressure in therapeutic communities. Journal of Drug Issues 1988; 18(4)625–640, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desland M. L., Batey R. G. A 12-month prospective comparison of court-diverted with self-referred heroin users. Drug and Alcohol Review 1992; 11(1)121–129, [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falco M. The Making of a Drug-Free America. Random House, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Leukefeld C. G. Recovery and the criminal justice system. Relapse and Recovery in Addiction, M. T. Frank, C. G. Leukefeld, J. J. Platt. Yale University Press, London 2001; pp. 40–59
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Nelson R., Spence R. Psychosocial profiles of criminal justice- and noncriminal justice-referred substance abusers in treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1993; 20(4)336–346, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Prendergast M., Anglin M. D. The effectiveness of coerced treatment for drug-abusing offenders. Federal Probation 1998; 62(1)3–10, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Farabee D., Shen H., Sanchez S. Perceived coercion and treatment need among mentally ill parolees. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29(1)76–86, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farabee D. Substance Use Among Male Inmates Entering the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Institutional Division, 1993. Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Austin, Texas 1995
   Google Scholar
• Freeman K. New South Wales Drug Court Evaluation: Health, Wellbeing and Participant Satisfaction. New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, Sydney 2002
   Google Scholar
• Friedman S. B., Horvat G. L., Levinson R. B. The Narcotic Addict Rehabilitation Act: its impact on federal prisons. Contemporary Drug Problems 1982; 82(1)101–111, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Gendreau P. Offender rehabilitation: what we know and what needs to be done. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1996; 23(1)144–161, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German D., Sterk C. E. Looking beyond stereotypes: exploring variations among crack smokers. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2002; 34(4)383–392, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glass D. J., Marlowe D. B. Comparing state agency mandated and voluntary outpatients: treatment outcome and retention in a cocaine addiction program. Paper presented at the 1994 Biennial Conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Santa FeNew Mexico, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Goldsmith R. J., Latessa E. Coerced treatment of addictions in the criminal justice system. Psychiatric Annals 2001; 31(11)657–663, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowing L., Proudfoot H., Henry-Edwards S., Teesson M. Evidence Supporting Treatment: The Effectiveness of Interventions for Illicit Drug Use. National Council on Drug Use, Sydney 2001
   Google Scholar
• Graycar A. Crime in twentieth century Australia. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Year Book Australia 2001. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, ACT 2001; pp. 477–495, (ABS cat. No. 1302.0)
   Google Scholar
• Grichting E., Uchtenhagen A., Rehm J. Modes and impact of coercive and inpatient treatment for drug-related Conditions in Switzerland. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 78–83, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall W. The role of legal coercion in the treatment of offenders with alcohol and heroin problems. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 1997; 30(2)103–120, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harford R. J., Ungerer J. C., Kinsella J. K. Effects of legal pressure on prognosis for treatment of drug dependence. American Journal of Psychiatry 1976; 133(12)1399–1404, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harwood H. J., Hubbard R. L., Collins J. J., Rachal J. V. The costs of crime and the benefits of drug abuse treatment: a cost-benefit analysis using TOPS data. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Times. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1998; pp. 209–233, NIDA Monograph No 86
   Google Scholar
• Hasin D. S. Treatment/self-help for alcohol-related problems: relationship to social pressure and alcohol dependence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 1994; 55(6)660–666, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiller M. L., Knight K., Broome K. M., Simpson D. D. Legal pressure and treatment retention in a national sample of long-term residential programs. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1998; 25(4)463–481, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard D. L., McCaughrin W. C. The treatment effectiveness of outpatient substance misuse treatment organizations between court-mandated and voluntary clients. Substance Use and Misuse 1996; 31(7)895–926, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hser Y. I., Anglin M. D., Liu Y. A. Survival analysis of gender and ethnic differences in responsiveness to methadone maintenance treatment. International Journal of Addictions 1991; 25(11A)1295–1315, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi J. A., Surratt H. L., Martin S., Hooper R. M. The importance of aftercare in a correction-based treatment continuum. Treatment of Drug Offenders: Policies and Issues, C. G. Leukefeld, F. Tims, D. Farabee. New York: Springer Publishing Company. 2002; pp. 204–216
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi J. A. Some considerations on the clinical efficacy of compulsory treatment: reviewing the New York experience. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice., C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1988; pp. 126–137, NIDA Monograph No. 86
   Google Scholar
• Inciardi J. A. Screening and Assessment for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse Among Adults in the Criminal Justice System. Centre for Substance Abuse Treatment, Rockville, MD 1994, (TIP #7)
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990
   Google Scholar
• Johnson V. E. Intervention: How to Help Someone Who Doesn't Want Help. Johnson Institute Press, Minneapolis, MN 1986
   Google Scholar
• Kandel D. B., Davies M. Progression to regular marijuana involvement: phenomenology and risk factors for near-daily use. Vulnerability to Drug Abuse, M. Glantz, R. Pickens. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC 1992; pp. 211–253
   Google Scholar
• Kermani E. J., Castaneda R. Psychoactive substance use in forensic psychiatry. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1996; 22(1)1–27, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinig J. Ethical issues of substance use intervention. Substance Use and Misuse 2004; 40(3)369–398, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight K., Simpson D. D., Chatham L. R., Camacho L. M. An assessment of prison-based drug treatment: texas' in-prison therapeutic community program. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 1997; 24(3/4)75–100, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Kosten T. R. Commentary: commitment for substance abuse—current judicial interventions. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 2002; 30(1)46–48, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouri E. M., Pope H. G., Powell K. F., Oliva P. S., Campbell C. Drug use history and criminal behavior among 133 incarcerated men. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1997; 23(3)413–420, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawenthal E., McLellan A., Grissom G., Brill P., O'Brient C. Coerced treatment for substance abuse problems detected through workplace urine surveillance. Is it effective?. Journal of Substance Abuse 1996; 8(1)115–128, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leukefeld C. G., Tims F. M. Compulsory treatment: a review of findings. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1988; pp. 236–249, NIDA Monograph No 86
   Google Scholar
• Liepman M. R., Nirenberg T. D., Begin A. M. Evaluation of a program designed to help family and significant others to motivate resistant alcoholics into recovery. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1989; 15(2)209–222, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindstrom L. Managing Alcoholism: Matching Clients to Treatment. Oxford University Press, New York 1992
   Google Scholar
• Loneck B., Garret J., Banks S. A. Comparison of the Johnson Intervention for four methods of referral to outpatient treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1996; 22(2)233–246, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loneck B., Garret J., Banks S. A. The Johnson Intervention and relapse during outpatient treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1996; 22(3)363–379, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Looney M., Metcalf S. The “fatigue factor” in drug addiction: insufficient motive for treatment. Hospital Community Psychiatry 1974; 23: 528–530, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• MacCoun R. J., Reuter P. Drug War Heresies: Learning from Other Vices, Times, and Places. Cambridge Press, London 2001
   Google Scholar
• Maddux J. F. Clinical experience with civil commitment. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice., C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1988; pp. 35–56, NIDA Monograph No 86
   Google Scholar
• Makkai T. Drug Use Monitoring in Australia: 1999 Annual Report (Research and Public Policy Series no. 26. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra 2000
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe D. B., Kirby K. C., Bonieskie L. M., Glass D. J., Dodds L. D., Husband S. D., Platt J. J., Festinger D. S. Assessment of coercive and noncoercive pressures to enter drug abuse treatment. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1996; 42(2)77–84, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlowe D. B., Glass D. J., Merikle E. P., Festinger D. S., DeMatteo D. S., Marczyk G. R., Platt J. J. Efficacy of coercion in substance abuse treatment. Relapse and Recover in Addiction, F. M. Tims, C. G. Leukefeld, J. J. Platt. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT 2001; pp. 208–227
   Google Scholar
• Marlowe D. B., Merikle E. P., Kirby K. C., Festinger D. S., McLellan A. T. Multidimensional assessment of perceived treatment-entry pressures among substance abusers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 2001; 15(2)97–198, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell J. C. Substance Abuse Trends in Texas. Texas Commission on Drug and Alcohol Abuse, Austin, Texas 1996, December 1995; TCADA Research Briefs
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell S. R. Sanction threats in court-ordered programs: examining their effects on offenders mandated into drug treatment. Crime and Delinquency 2000; 46(4)542–563, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller N. S., Flaherty J. A. Effectiveness of coerced addiction treatment (alternative consequences): a review of the clinical research. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2000; 18(1)9–16, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller W. R. Motivation for treatment: a review with special emphasis on alcoholism. Psychological Bulletin 1985; 98(1)84–107, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss H. B., Kirisic L. Aggressivity in adolescent alcohol abusers: relationship with conduct disorder. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 1995; 19(3)642–646, [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Household Survey on Drug Abuse. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Statistics. Office of Applied Studies. 2001, http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/oasftp.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Nurco D. N., Kinlock T. W., Hanlon T. E. The drugs-crime Connection. Handbook of Drug Control in the United States, J. A. Inciardi. Greenwood Press, New York 1990; pp. 71–90
   Google Scholar
• Nurco D. Drug addiction and crime: a complicated issue. British Journal of Addictions 1986; 82: 7–9, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Oltmanns T. F., Emery R. E. Abnormal Psychology2nd Ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey 1999
   Google Scholar
• Pearson F. S., Lipton D. S. A meta-analytic review of the effectiveness of correction-based treatments for drug abuse. Prison Journal 1999; 79(4)384–410, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Perpich J., DuPont R. L., Brown B. S. Criminal Justice and Voluntary Patients in Treatment for Heroin Addiction. Proceedings, 5th National Conference on Methadone Treatment, New York, 1973. National Association for the Prevention of Addiction to Narcotics
   Google Scholar
• Peters R., Murrin M. Evaluation of Treatment-Based Drug Courts in Florida's First Judicial Circuit. Department of Mental Health Law and Policy, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 1998
   Google Scholar
• Peters R. H., Haas A. L., Hunt W. M. Treatment dosage effects in drug court programs. Drug Courts in Operation: Current Research, J. J. Hennessy, N. J. Pallone, 2001; pp. 63–85
   Google Scholar
• Platt J. J., Buhringer G., Brown B. S., Taube D. O. The prospects and limitations of compulsory treatment for drug addiction. Journal of Drug Issues 1988; 18(4)505–525, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt J. J. Heroin Addiction: Theory, Research and Treatment. The Addict, the Treatment process, and Social Control. Krieger, Malabar, FL 1995; Vol. 2
   Google Scholar
• Polcin D. L., Weisner C. Factors associated with coercion in entering treatment for alcohol problems. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1999; 54(1)63–68, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pompi K. F., Resnick J. Retention of court-ceferred adolescents and young adults in the therapeutic community. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse 1987; 13(3)309–325, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prendergast M. L., Maugh T. H. Drug courts: diversion that works. The Judges Journal Summer, 1995; 10–47, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Prendergast M. L., Farabee D., Cartier J., Henkin S. Involuntary treatment within a prison setting: impact on psychosocial change during treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29(1)5–26, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price D. P., D'Aunno T. NIDA III Respondent Report Drug Abuse Treatment System Survey: A National Study of the Outpatient Drug-Free and Methadone Treatment System, 1988–1990 Results. University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor 1992
   Google Scholar
• Room R., Greenfield T. K., Weisner C. People who might have liked you to drink less”: changing responses to drinking by U.S. family members and friends, 1979–1990. Contemporary Drug Problems Winter, 1991; 573–595, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Rotgers F. Coercion in addiction treatment. Annual Review of Addictions Research and Treatment, J. Langenbucher, B. S. McCrady, W. Frankenstein, P. E. Nathan. Pergamon, New York 1992; pp. 403–416
   Google Scholar
• Satel S. L. Drug Treatment: The Case for Coercion. The AEI Press, Washington, DC 1999
   Google Scholar
• Schnoll S. H., Goldstein M. R., Antes D. E., Rinella V. J. The impact of legal involvement on substance abusers in a residential treatment setting. Corrective and Social Psychology 1980; 26(1)21–28, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Schottenfeld R. S. Involuntary treatment of substance abuse disorders—Impediments to success. Psychiatry 1989; 52(May)164–176, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shearer R. A., Ogan G. D. Voluntary participation and treatment resistance in substance abuse treatment programs. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation 2002; 34(3)31–45, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Google Scholar
• Siddall J. W., Conway G. L. Interaction variables associated with retention and success in residential drug treatment. International Journal of the Addictions 1988; 23(12)1241–1254, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Friend H. J. Legal status and long-term outcomes for addicts in the DARP follow-up project. Compulsory Treatment of Drug Abuse: Research and Clinical Practice, C. G. Leukefeld, F. M. Tims. NIDA, Rockville, MD 1988; pp. 81–89, NIDA Monograph No. 86
   Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Broome K. M., Hiller M. L., Knight K., Rowan-Szal G. A. Program diversity and treatment retention rates in the Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study (DATOS). Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1997; 11(4)279–293, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson D. D., Joe G. W., Rowan-Szal G. A. Drug abuse treatment retention and process effects on follow-up outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 1997; 47(3)227–235, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stice E., Myers M. G., Brown S. A. A longitudinal grouping analysis of adolescent use escalating and de-escalating. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1998; 12(1)14–27, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stice E., Myers M. G., Brown S. A. Relations of delinquency to adolescent substance use and problem use: a prospective study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 1998; 12(2)136–146, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terry C. E., Pellens M. The Opium Problem. Bureau of Social Hygiene, New York 1928
   Google Scholar
• Trace M. HIV and drugs in British prisons. Druglink 1990; 5(1)12–15, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Trone J., Young D. Bridging Drug Treatment and Criminal Justice. Vera Institute of Justice, New York 1996
   Google Scholar
• Turnball P. J., Stimson G. V., Stillwell G. Drug Use in Prison. AVERT, HorshamUnited Kingdom 1994
   Google Scholar
• VanderWaal C. J., McBride D. C., McElrath T., Van Buren H. Breaking the Juvenile Drug-Crime Cycle: A Guide for Practitioners and Policymakers. U.S. Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice 2001, , DC 2001, NIJ Pub. No. NCJ 186156
   Google Scholar
• Vito G. F. The Kentucky Substance Abuse Program: a private program to treat probationers and parolees. Federal Probation 1989; 53(1)65–72, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Ward D. A. The use of legal coercion in the treatment of alcoholism: a methodological review. Journal of Drug Issues 1976; 9(Summer)387–398, [CSA]
   Google Scholar
• Watson C. G., Brown K., Tilleskjor C., Jacobs L., Pucel J. The comparative recidivism rate of voluntary and coerced admission male alcoholics. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1988; 44(4)573–581, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisner C. M. Coercion in alcohol treatment. Broadening the Base of Treatment for Alcohol Problems. Institute of Medicine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1990; pp. 579–609
   Google Scholar
• Wexler H. K., De Leon G., Thomas G., Kressel D., Peters J. The Amity Prison TC Evaluation: reincarceration outcomes. Criminal Justice and Behavior 1999; 26(2)147–167, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wexler D. B. Therapeutic jurisprudence and changing conceptions of legal scholarship. Behavioral Science and Law 1993; 11(1)17–29, [CSA]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T. C., Newton-Taylor B., Alleto R. Perceived coercion among clients entering substance abuse treatment: structural and psychological determinants. Addictive Behaviors 1998; 23(1)81–95, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T. C., Roberts A. B., Cooper E. L. Compulsory substance abuse treatment: an overview of recent findings and issues. European Addiction Research 2002; 8: 84–93, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild T. C. Compulsory substance-user treatment and harm reduction: a critical analysis. Substance Use and Misuse 1999; 34(1)83–102, [PUBMED], [INFOTRIEVE], [CSA]
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young D. Impacts of perceived legal pressure on retention in drug treatment. Criminal Justice and Behavior 2002; 29(1)27–55, [CSA], [CROSSREF]
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar