A Meta-Analysis of Direct and Mediating Effects of Community Coalitions That Implemented Science-Based Substance Abuse Prevention Interventions

References

• Arthur M. W., Blitz C. Bridging the gap between science and practice in drug abuse prevention through needs assessment and strategic community planning. Journal of Community Psychology 2000; 28(3)241–255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arthur M. W., Hawkins J. D., Catalano R. F. Item-construct dictionary for the Student Survey of Risk and Protective Factors and Prevalence of Alcohol, Tobacco and Other Drug Use. Social Development Research Group, University of Washington and Developmental Research and Programs, Seattle, WA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Backer T. E. The failure of success: Challenges of disseminating effective substance abuse prevention programs. Journal of Community Psychology 2000; 28(3)363–373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton W. H., Watkins M., Harjoura R. Youths and communities: Toward comprehensive strategies for youth development. Social Work 1997; 42: 483–493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker B. J. Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models. Journal of Educational Statistics 1992; 17: 341–362
   Google Scholar
• Becker B. J. Corrections to “Using results from replicated studies to estimate linear models.”. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 1995; 20: 100–102
   Google Scholar
• Becker B. J. Meta-analysis and models of substance abuse prevention. Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs, W. J. Bukoski. NIDA Research Monograph No. 170, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1997; 96–119
   Google Scholar
• Becker B. J., Fahrbach K. A comparison of approaches to the synthesis of correlation matrices. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA, April, 1994
   Google Scholar
• Bell R. M., Ellickson P. L., Harrison E. R. Do drug prevention effects persist into high school? How Project Alert did with ninth graders. Preventive Medicine 1993; 22: 463–483
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvin G. J., Baker E., Dusenberry L., Tortu S., Botvin E. M. Preventing adolescent drug abuse through a multi-model cognitive-behavioral approach: Results of a three-year study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 1990; 58(4)437–446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvin G. J., Renick N. L., Baker E. The effects of scheduling format and booster sessions on a broad-spectrum psychosocial approach to smoking prevention. Journal of Behavioral Medicine 1983; 6(4)359–379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bukoski W. J. Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention program. NIDA Research Monograph No. 170, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD 1997
   Google Scholar
• Butterfoss F., Francisco V. T. Evaluating community partnerships and coalitions with practitioners in mind. Health Promotion Practice 2003; 5(2)108–114
   Google Scholar
• Catalano R. F., Berglund M. L., Ryan J. A. M., Lonczak H. S., Hawkins J. D. Positive youth development in the United States: Research findings on evaluation of positive youth development programs. University of Washington School of Social Work, Seattle, WA 1998
   Google Scholar
• Center for Substance Abuse Prevention. Science-based substance abuse prevention: A guide. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Washington, DC 2001, (DHHS Publication No. (SMA)01-3505)
   Google Scholar
• Collins D., Johnson K. KIP project-level outcome evaluation of science-based interventions in 18 communities: Executive summary. Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Louisville, KY 2003
   Google Scholar
• Cook T. D., Gruder C. L. Meta evaluation research. Evaluation Quarterly 1978; 2(1)5–51
   Google Scholar
• Cooper H. M., Lindsey J. J. Research synthesis and meta-analysis. Handbook of applied social research methods, L. J. Bickman, D. J. Rog. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA 1998; 315–337
   Google Scholar
• Crowley K. M., Yu P., Kaftarian S. J. Prevention actions and activities make a difference: A structural equation model of coalition building. Evaluation and Program Planning 2000; 23: 381–388
   Google Scholar
• Cuijpers P. Effective ingredients of school-based drug prevention programs: A systematic review. Addictive Behaviors 2002; 27(6)1009–1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derzon J. H. A synthesis of the evidence on the Hawkins Risk Factors for Predicting Alcohol, Tobacco, and Marijuana Use. Center for Evaluation Research and Methodology, Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Nashville, TN 1998
   Google Scholar
• duToit M., duToit S. Interactive LISREL: User's guide. Scientific Software International, Lincolnwood, IL 2001
   Google Scholar
• Ellickson P. L., Bell R. M. Drug prevention in junior high: A multi-site longitudinal test. Science, 1990; 247: 1299–1305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellickson P. L., Bell R. M., Harrison E. R. Changing adolescent propensities to use drugs: Results from Project ALERT. Health Education Quarterly 1993; 20(2)227–242
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feinberg M. E., Greenberg M. T., Osgood D. W. Readiness, functioning, and perceived effectiveness in community prevention coalitions: A study of communities that care. American Journal of Community Psychology 2004; 33(3/4)163–176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster-Fishman P. G., Berkowitz S. L., Lounsbury D. W., Jacobson S., Allen N. A. Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology 2001; 29(2)241–261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis-Shepard K. B. OJJDP operates national training and technical assistance center. Corrections Today 1996; 58(6)122
   Google Scholar
• Glass G. V. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 1976; 5(10)3–8
   Google Scholar
• Gottfredson D. C., Wilson D. B. Characteristics of effective school-based substance abuse prevention. Prevention Science 2003; 4(1)27–38
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hair J. F., Anderson R. E., Tatham R. L., Black W. C. Multivariate data analysis with readings. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 1998
   Google Scholar
• Hallfors D., Cho H., Livert D., Kadushin C. How are community coalitions “fighting back” against substance abuse, and are they winning?. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2002; 23: 237–245
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins J. D., Catalano R. F., Miller J. Y. Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin 1992; 112(1)64–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedges L. V., Vevea J. L. Fixed- and random-effects models in meta-analysis. Psychological Methods 1998; 3(4)486–504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson C. A., Hansen W. B., Pentz M. A. Comprehensive community programs for drug abuse prevention. Childhood and chemical abuse: Prevention and intervention, S. Griswold-Ezekoye, L. Kumpfer, W. J. Bukoski. Hawthorne Press, New York 1986; 181–199
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G. Analysis of ordinal variables 2: Cross-sectional data. 2001, http://ssicentral.com/lisrel/ord2.pdf Retrieved from June 1, 2004
   Google Scholar
• Jöreskog K. G., Sörbom D. LISREL 8: User's reference guide. Scientific Software International, Chicago 1996
   Google Scholar
• Judd C. M., Kenny D. A. Process evaluation: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review 1981; 5: 602–619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kam C. M., Greenberg M. T., Walls C. T. Examining the role of implementation quality in school-based prevention using the PATHS curriculum. Prevention Science 2003; 4(1)55–63
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreuter M. W., Lezin N. A., Young L. A. Evaluating community-based collaborative mechanisms: Implications for practitioners. Health Promotion Practice, 2000; 1: 49–63
   Google Scholar
• Reducing the risk for mental disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research, P. J. Mrazek, R. J. Haggerty. National Academy Press, Washington, DC 1994
   Google Scholar
• National Institute on Drug Abuse. Preventing drug use among children and adolescents: A research-based guide for parents, educators, and community leaders, 2nd ed. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 2003
   Google Scholar
• Pentz M. A. Evidence-based prevention: Characteristics, impact and future direction. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs 2003; 35(1)143–152
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pentz M. A., Trebow E. A., Hansen W. B., MacKinnon D. P., Dwyer J. H., Johnson C. A., et al. Effects of program implementation on adolescent drug use behavior: The Midwestern Prevention Project (MPP). Evaluation Review 1990; 14(3)264–289
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry C. L., Williams C. L., Komro K. A., Veblen-Mortensen S. Project Northland: A community-wide approach to prevent young adolescent alcohol use. Improving prevention effectiveness, W. B. Hansen, S. M. Giles, M. D. Fearnow-Kenney. Tanglewood Research, Greensboro, NC 2000; 225–234
   Google Scholar
• Pollard J. A., Hawkins J. D., Arthur M. W. Risk and protection: Are both necessary to understand diverse behavioral outcomes in adolescence?. Social Work Research 1999; 23(3)145–158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussos T. R., Fawcett S. B. A review of collaborative partnerships as a strategy for improving community health. Annual Review of Public Health, 2000; 21: 369–402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoth R., Redmond C., Shin C. Direct and indirect latent parenting outcomes of two universal family-focused preventive interventions: Extending a public health-oriented research base. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1998; 66: 385–399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Pierre T. L., Mark M. M., Kaltreider D. L., Aiken K. J. Involving parents of high-risk youth in drug prevention: A three-year longitudinal study in boys and girls clubs. Journal of Early Adolescence 1997; 17(1)21–50
   Google Scholar
• Tobler N. Meta-analytical issues for prevention intervention research. Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research, L. Seitz, L. Collins. NIDA Research Monograph No. 14, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 1994; 342–403, NIH Pub. No. 94-3499
   Google Scholar
• Tobler N. S. Meta-analysis of 143 adolescent drug prevention programs: Quantitative outcome results of program participants compared to a control or comparison group. Journal of Drug Issues, 1986; 16: 537–568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobler N. S. Drug prevention programs can work: Research findings. Journal of Addictive Diseases, 1992; 11: 1–28
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tobler N. S. Meta-analysis of adolescent drug prevention programs: Results of the 1993 meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of drug abuse prevention programs, W. J. Bukoski. NIDA Research Monograph No. 170, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 1997; 96–119, NIH Pub. No. 97-4147
   Google Scholar
• Werts C. F., Linn R. L., Jöreskog K. L. Intraclass reliability estimates: Testing structural assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1974; 34: 25–33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin R. K., Ware A. J. Using outcome data to evaluate community drug prevention initiatives: Pushing the state-of-the-art. Journal of Community Psychology 2000; 28(3)323–338
   Google Scholar