A Non-Parametric Item Response Theory Evaluation of the CAGE Instrument Among Older Adults

Reference

• An, X., & Yung, Y. F. (2014). Item Response Theory: What It Is and How You Can Use the IRT Procedure to Apply It. Washington DC: SAS Global Forum Proceeding.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, (57), 289–300.
   Google Scholar
• Beullens, J., & Aertgeerts, B. (2004). Screening for alcohol abuse and dependence in older people using DSM criteria: a review. Aging Ment Health, 8(1), 76–82.
   Google Scholar
• Bisson, J., Nadeau, L., & Demers, A. (1999). The validity of the CAGE scale to screen for heavy drinking and drinking problems in a general population survey. Addiction, 94(5), 715–722.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caputo, F., Vignoli, T., Leggio, L., Addolorato, G., Zoli, G., & Bernardi, M. (2012). Alcohol use disorders in the elderly: A brief overview from epidemiology to treatment options. Experimental Gerontology, 47(6), 411–416.
   Google Scholar
• Dar, K. (2006). Alcohol use disorders in elderly people: fact or fiction? Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 12, 173–181.
   Google Scholar
• DeMars, C. (2010). Item Response Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Dhalla, S., & Kopec, J. A. (2007). The CAGE questionnaire for alcohol misuse: A review of reliability and validity studies. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 30(1), 33–41.
   Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., Thissen, D., Teresi, J. A., Kleinman, M., & Ocepek-Welikson, K. (2006). Identification of differential item functioning using item response theory and the likelihood-based model comparison approach. Application to the Mini-Mental State Examination. Med Care, 44(11 Suppl 3), S134–142.
   Google Scholar
• Edelen, M. O., & Reeve, B. B. (2007). Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation, and refinement. Quality of Life Research, 16, 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Emons, W. H. M., Sijtsma, K., & Meijer, R. R. (2007). On the consistency of individual classification using short scales. Psychological Methods, 12, 105–120.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing, J. A. (1984). Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA, 252(14), 1905–1907.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrando, P. J. (2012). Assessing the discriminating power of item and test scores in the linear factor-analysis model. Psicologica, 33, 111–134.
   Google Scholar
• Galindo-Garre, F., Hidalgo, M. D., Guilera, G., Pino, O., Rojo, J. E., & Gomez-Benito, J. (2015). Modeling the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II using non-parametric item response models. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 24(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Geneste, J., Pereira, B., Arnaud, B., Christol, N., Liotier, J., Blanc, O., Teissedre, F., Hope, S., Schwan, R., Llorca, P. M., Schmidt, J., Cherpitel, C. J., Malet, L., & Brousse, G. (2012). CAGE, RAPS4, RAPS4-QF and AUDIT screening tests for men and women admitted for acute alcohol intoxication to an emergency department: are standard thresholds appropriate? Alcohol Alcohol, 47(3), 273–281.
   Google Scholar
• Hardouin, J.-B. (2011). Nonparametric item response theory using Stata. The Stata Journal, 11, 30–51.
   Google Scholar
• Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999).Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop, Q. N. (2011). cacIRT: Classification accuracy and consistency under Item Response Theory. R package Version, 1, 1. http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=cacIRT.
   Google Scholar
• Lathrop, Q. N., & Cheng, Y. (2013). Two approaches to estimation of classification accuracy rate under Item Response Theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 37(3), 226–241.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. (2010). Classification consistency and accuracy for complex assessments using item response theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 7(4), 328.
   Google Scholar
• Luciano, J. V., Ayuso-Mateos, J. L., Aguado, J., Fernandez, A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Roca, M., & Haro, J. M. (2010).The 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHO-DAS II): A nonparametric item response analysis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 45.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, P., & Hatzinger, R. (2007). Extended Rasch modeling: The eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• McCaul, K. A., Almeida, O. P., Hankey G. J., Jamrozik, K., Byles, J. E., & Flicker, L. (2010). Alcohol use and mortality in older men and women. Addiction, 105(8), 1391–1400.
   Google Scholar
• Mokken, R. J. (1971). A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis with Applications in Political Research. New York: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, T. H., Han, H. R., Kim, M. T., & Chan, K. S. (2014). An introduction to item response theory for patient-reported outcome measurement. Patient, 7(1), 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Offsay, J. (2007). Treatment of alcohol-related problems in the elderly. Annals of Long-Term Care, 39–44, 15.
   Google Scholar
• Orlando, M., & Marshall, G. N. (2002). Differential item functioning in a Spanish translation of the PTSD checklist: Detection and evaluation of impact. Psychological Assessment, 14(1), 50–59.
   Google Scholar
• Oslin, D. W. (2005). Treatment of late-life depression complicated by alcohol dependence. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 13, 491–500.
   Google Scholar
• Reeves, B. B., & Fayers, P. (2005) Applying item response theory modeling for evaluating questionnaire items and scale properties. In P. Fayers, & R. Hays (Eds.), Assessing Quality of Life in Clinical Trials. New York.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W. (2002). Introduction to Nonparametric Item Response Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2005). Nonparametric item response theory models. In K. Kempf-Leonard (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Social Measurement (pp. 875–882). New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Skogen, J. C., Overland, S., Knudsen, A. K., & Mykletun, A. (2011). Concurrent validity of the CAGE questionnaire. The Nord-Trondelag Health Study. Addictive Behaviors, 36(4), 302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Smart, R. G., Adlaf, E. M., & Knoke, D. (1991). Use of the CAGE scale in a population survey of drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(6), 593–596.
   Google Scholar
• Straat, H. (2012). Using Scalability Coefficients and Conditional Association to Assess Monotone Homogeneity. Ridderkerk: Ridderprint.
   Google Scholar
• Stochl, J., Jones, P. B., & Croudace, T. J. (2012). Mokken scale analysis of mental health and well-being questionnaire item responses: A non-parametric IRT method in empirical research for applied health researchers. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 12, 74.
   Google Scholar
• Subramaniam, M., Chong S. A., Vaingankar, J. A., Abdin, E., Chua, B. Y., Chua, H. C., Eng, G. K., Heng, D., Hia, S. B., Huang, W., Jeyagurunathana, A., Kua, J., Lee, S. P., Mahendran, R., Magadi, H., Malladi, S., McCrone, P., Pang, S., Picco, L., Sagayadevan, V., Sambasivam, R., Seng, K. H., Seow, E., Shafie, S., Shahwan, S., Tan, L. L., Yap, M., Zhang, Y., Ng, L. L., & Prince, M. (2015). Prevalence of dementia in people aged 60 years and above: Results from the WiSE study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 45(4), 1127–1138.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., Jones, K. A., & Dening, T. (2014). Detecting alcohol problems in older adults: can we do better? International Psychogeriatrics, 26(11), 1755–1766.
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, L. M., & Carey, K. B. (2000). Temporal stability of alcohol screening measures in a psychiatric setting. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(4), 401–404.
   Google Scholar
• Thissen, D., Steinberg, L., & Gerrard, M. (1986). Beyond group-mean differences: The concept of item bias. Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 118–128.
   Google Scholar
• van Abswoude, A. A. H., Vermunt, Hemker, B. T., & van der Ark, A. (2004). Mokken scale analysis using hierarchical clustering procedures, 28(5), 332–354.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ark, L. A. (2007). Mokken scale analysis in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 20, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Van Schuur, W. H. (2003). Mokken scale anaysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11, 139–363.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. J., & P. Medcalf (2010). Alcohol misuse in the elderly. GM, 10, 251–257.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, C. M. (2009). Evaluation of MIMIC-model methods for DIF testing with comparison to two-group analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44, 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370.
   Google Scholar