Do Addiction Science Journals Endorse Unbiased Reporting of Research? A Systematic Evaluation of Instructions for Authors

References

• Ali, P. A., & Watson, R. (2016). Peer review and the publication process. Nursing Open, 3(4), 193–202. Epub 2016/10/07. doi: 10.1002/nop2.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowe, M., & Baker, C. (2017). Reporting reviews for publication in the Journal. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 24(2–3), 91–92. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12370
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demicheli, V., & Di Pietrantonj, C. (2007). Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications. Cochrane Database System Reviews, (2), MR000003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickersin, K., Min, Y. I., & Meinert, C. L. (1992). Factors influencing publication of research results. Follow-up of applications submitted to two institutional review boards. Journal of American Medical Association, 267(3), 374–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekmekci, P. E. (2017). An increasing problem in publication ethics: Publication bias and editors’ role in avoiding it. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 20(2), 171–178. doi: 10.1007/s11019-017-9767-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, G. B., Warme, W. J., Wolf, F. M., Heckman, J. D., Brand, R. A., & Leopold, S. S. (2010). Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review: A randomized controlled trial. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170(21), 1934–1939.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giofrè, D., Cumming, G., Fresc, L., Boedker, I., & Tressoldi, P. (2017). The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors’ reporting of statistics and use of open research practices. PLoS One, 12(4), e0175583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, A., Reeder, R., & Hyun, J. (2011). Survey of editors and reviewers of high-impact psychology journals: Statistical and research design problems in submitted manuscripts. Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 195–209. doi: 10.1080/00223980.2011.555431
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, M., Andrews, M., Wilson, R., Callender, D., O’Malley, P. G., & Douglas, K. (2016). Reporting quality of randomised controlled trial abstracts among high-impact general medical journals: A review and analysis. BMJ Open, 6(7), e011082. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriksma, M., Joosten, M. H., Peters, J. P., Grolman, W., & Stegeman, I. (2017). Evaluation of the quality of reporting of observational studies in otorhinolaryngology – Based on the STROBE Statement. PLoS One, 12(1), e0169316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169316
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hua, F., Walsh, T., Glenny, A. M., & Worthington, H. (2016). Surveys on reporting guideline usage in dental journals. Journal of Dental Research, 95(11), 1207–1213. doi: 10.1177/0022034516657803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansen, M., & Thomsen, S. F. (2016). Guidelines for reporting medical research: A critical appraisal. International Scholarly Research Notices, 22, 1346026. doi: 10.1155/2016/1346026
   Google Scholar
• Knüppel, H., Metz, C., Meerpohl, J. J., & Strech, D. (2013). How psychiatry journals support the unbiased translation of clinical research. A cross-sectional study of editorial policies. PLoS One, 8(10), e75995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunath, F., Grobe, H. R., Rücker, G., Engehausen, D., Antes, G., Wullich, B., & Meerpohl, J. J. (2012). Do journals publishing in the field of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. Urologia Internationalis, 88(1), 54–59. doi: 10.1159/000332742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marušić, A., & Campbell, H. (2016). Reporting guidelines in global health research. Journal of Global Health, 6(2), 020101.doi: 10.7189/jogh.06.020101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazumdar, M., Banerjee, S., & Van Epps, H. L. (2010). Improved reporting of statistical design and analysis: Guidelines, education, and editorial policies. Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.), 620, 563–598. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60761-580-4_22
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meerpohl, J. J., Wolff, R. F., Antes, G., & von Elm, E. (2011). Are pediatric Open Access journals promoting good publication practice? An analysis of author instructions. BMC Pediatrics, 11, 27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, C. M., Rennie, D., Cook, D., Dickersin, K., Flanagin, A., Hogan, J. W., … Pace, B. (2002). Publication bias in editorial decision making. Journal of American Medical Association, 287(21), 2825–2828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orkin, A. M., Phillips, W. R., & Stange, K. C. (2016). Research reporting guidelines and the new annals instructions for authors. Annals of Family Medicine, 14(6), 500–501. doi: 10.1370/afm.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plint, A. C., Moher, D., Morrison, A., Schulz, K., Altman, D. G., & Hill, C. (2006). Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. The Medical Journal of Australia, 185(5), 263–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prady, S. L., Richmond, S. J., Morton, V. M., & Macpherson, H. (2008). A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials. PLoS One, 3(2), e1577. Epub 2008/02/14. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0001577
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkis-Onofre, R., Cenci, M. S., Moher, D., & Pereira-Cenci, T. (2017). Research reporting guidelines in dentistry: A survey of editors. Brazilian Dental Journal, 28(1), 3–8. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201601426
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SCImago. (2016). SJR – SCImago Journal & Country Rank, Retrieved from http://www.scimagojr.com
   Google Scholar
• Sims, M. T., Henning, N. M., Wayant, C. C., & Vassar, M. (2016). Do emergency medicine journals promote trial registration and adherence to reporting guidelines? A survey of “Instructions for Authors”. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, 24(1), 137.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smidt, N., Rutjes, A. W. S., van der Windt, D. A., Ostelo, R. W., Reitsma, J. B., Bossuyt, P. M., … de Vet, H. C. (2005). Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies. Radiology, 235(2), 347–353. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2352040507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strech, D. (2012). Normative arguments and new solutions for the unbiased registration and publication of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(3), 276–281. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayant, C., Smith, C., Sims, M., & Vassar, M. (2017). Hematology journals do not sufficiently adhere to reporting guidelines: A systematic review. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 15(4), 608–617. doi: 10.1111/jth.13637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteford, H. A., Ferrari, A. J., Degenhardt, L., Feigin, V., & Vos, T. (2015). The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: An analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. PLoS One, 10(2), e0116820. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116820
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar