Abstract spin in physiotherapy interventions using virtual reality or robotics: protocol for two Meta-research reviews

References

• Burridge JH, Hughes AM. Potential for new technologies in clinical practice. Curr Opin Neurol. 2010;23(6):671–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wintergreen Research, Inc. [Summary accessed only] Rehabilitation Robots: Market Shares, Strategy, and Forecasts, Worldwide, 2018 to 2027. Research & Markets. 2019. [cited 2020 June 29]. Available from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4897419/rehabilitation-robots-global-market-outlook#rela0-4745795.
   Google Scholar
• Markets and Markets. [Summary accessed only] Augmented and Virtual Reality in Healthcare Market by Offering (Hardware and Software), Device Type, End User, Application (Patient Care Management, Medical Training & Education, Pharmacy Management, Surgery), and Geography. Research & Markets. 2017. [cited 2020 Feb 6]. Available from: https://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/4426945/augmented-and-virtual-reality-in-healthcare.
   Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Ravaud P. Misrepresentation and distortion of research in biomedical literature. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(11):2613–2619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailar JC. How to distort the scientific record without actually lying: truth, and the arts of science. Eur J Oncol [Internet]. 2007;11:217–224.
   Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Altman DG, Hopewell S, et al. Impact of spin in the abstracts of articles reporting results of randomized controlled trials in the field of cancer: The SPIIN randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(36):4120–4126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimento DP, Costa LOP, Gonzalez GZ, et al. Abstracts of low back pain trials are poorly reported, contain spin of information, and are inconsistent with the full text: an overview study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019;100(10):1976–1985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu K, Grundy Q, Bero L. Spin’ in published biomedical literature: a methodological systematic review. PLoS Biol. 2017;15(9):e2002173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héroux ME, Gandevia SC. Poor statistical reporting and spin in neuromuscular fatigue research. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2019;119(9):2119–2120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héroux ME. Reporting matters: Brain mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2019;40(1):352–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diong J, Butler AA, Gandevia SC, et al. Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite editorial advice. PLoS One. 2018;13(8):e0202121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héroux M. Inadequate reporting of statistical results. J Neurophysiol. 2016;116(3):1536–1537.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal-Ré R, Castell MV, García-Puig J. If the results of an article are noteworthy, read the entire article; do not rely on the abstract alone. Rev Clin Esp. 2015;215(8):454–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutron I, Dutton S, Ravaud P, et al. Randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results. JAMA. 2010;304(9):965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jørgensen L, Paludan-Müller AS, Laursen DRT, et al. Evaluation of the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias in randomized clinical trials: overview of published comments and analysis of user practice in Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):1–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, et al. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ. 2017;358.:j4008. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j4008.
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Lessons in biostatistics interrater reliability : the kappa statistic. Biochem Med. 2012;22:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C, et al. Evidence for physiotherapy practice: a survey of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Aust J Physiother. 2002;48(1):43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. 2003;83(8):713–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark WE, Sivan M, O’Connor RJ. Evaluating the use of robotic and virtual reality rehabilitation technologies to improve function in stroke survivors: a narrative review. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2019;6:1–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;CD006876. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD006876.pub5.
   Google Scholar
• Krebs H, Volpe B, Aisen M, et al. Increasing productivity and quality of care : robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37(6):639–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jezernik S, Colombo G, Keller T, et al. Robotic orthosis lokomat: a rehabilitation and research tool. Neuromodulation. 2003;6(2):108–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pignolo L. Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(12):955–960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaparro-Cárdenas SL, Lozano-Guzmán AA, Ramirez-Bautista JA, et al. A review in gait rehabilitation devices and applied control techniques. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2018;13(8):819–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luther MS, Krewer C, Müller F, et al. Comparison of orthostatic reactions of patients still unconscious within the first three months of brain injury on a tilt table with and without integrated stepping. A prospective, randomized crossover pilot trial. Clin Rehabil. 2008;22(12):1034–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss P, Kizony R, Feintuch U, et al. Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation. In: Selzer M, Cohen L, Gage F, et al. editors. Textb Neural Repair Rehabil. Cambridge University Press; 2006. p. 182–197.
   Google Scholar
• Rajesh Desai P, Nikhil Desai P, Deepak Ajmera K, et al. A review paper on oculus rift-a virtual reality headset. IJETT. 2014;13(4):175–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dempsey P. The teardown: HTC Vive VR headset. Eng Technol. 2016;11:80–81.
   Google Scholar
• Mann S, Furness T, Yuan Y, et al. All reality: virtual, augmented, mixed (X), mediated (X,Y), and multimediated reality. 2018. Available from: http://arxiv.org/abs/1804.08386.
   Google Scholar