References
- World Health Organization. World report on disability 2011 [Internet]. 2011. https://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/report.pdf.
- Morris S, Fawcett G, Brisebois L, et al. Canadian Survey on Disability: A demographic, employment and income profile of Canadians with disabilities aged 15 years and over [Internet]. 2018. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/pub/89-654-x/89-654-x2018002-eng.pdf?st=cZ-OyaVk.
- World Health Organization. Detailed classification with definitions: Chapter 4: Mobility. In: International classification of functioning, disability and health: Children and youth version. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2006. p. 150–160.
- Webber SC, Porter MM, Menec VH. Mobility in older adults: a comprehensive framework. Gerontologist. 2010;50(4):443–450.
- Brown CJ, Flood KL. Mobility limitation in the older patient: a clinical review. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310(11):1168–1177.
- Guralnik JM, Lacroix AZ, Abbott RD, et al. Maintaining mobility in late life. I. Demographic characteristics and chronic conditions. Am J Epidemiol. 1993;137(8):845–857.
- Zwibel HL. Contribution of impaired mobility and general symptoms to the burden of multiple sclerosis. Adv Ther. 2009;26(12):1043–1057.
- Dawson J, Shamley D, Jamous MA. A structured review of outcome measures used for the assessment of rehabilitation interventions for spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2008;46(12):768–780.
- Mudge S, Stott NS. Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy. 2007;93(3):189–200.
- McDonough CM, Jette AM. The contribution of osteoarthritis to functional limitations and disability. Clin Geriatr Med. 2010;26(3):387–399.
- Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D, et al. Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2003;51(3):314–322.
- Cavanaugh EJ, Richardson J, Mccallum CA, et al. The predictive validity of physical performance measures in determining markers of preclinical disability in Community-Dwelling Middle-Aged and older adults: a systematic review background. Identifi cation of preclinical disability in Middle-aged and olde. Phys Ther. 2018;98(12):1010–1021. https://academic.oup.com/ptj
- Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, et al. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):743–749.
- Jette DU, Halbert J, Iverson C, et al. Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: Perceptions and applications. Phys Ther. 2009;89(2):125–135.
- Marsh AP, Wrights AP, Haakonssen EH, et al. The virtual short physical performance battery. GERONA. 2015;70(10):1233–1241. https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/70/10/1233/2605478
- Coman L, Richardson J. Relationship between Self-Report and performance measures: a systematic review. Can J Aging. 2006;25(3):253–270. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 9]. https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/cja.2007.0001 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core
- Pinto-Carral A, Fernández-Villa T, De La Torre AJM. Patient-Reported mobility: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(7):1182–1194.
- Soubra R, Chkeir A, Novella JL. A systematic review of Thirty-One assessment tests to evaluate mobility in older adults. Biomed Res Int. 2019;2019:1354362.
- Hawkins EJ, Riddick W. Validity, and responsiveness of clinical Performance-Based outcome measures of walking for individuals with lower limb amputations: a systematic review background. Clinical outcome measures are important to use for individuals with lower. Phys Ther. 2018;98(12):1037–1045. https://academic.oup.com/ptj
- Freiberger E, De Vreede P, Schoene D, et al. Performance-based physical function in older community-dwelling persons: a systematic review of instruments. Age Ageing. 2012;41(6):712–721.
- Beauchamp MK, Jette AM, Ward RE, et al. Predictive validity and responsiveness of Patient-Reported and Performance-Based measures of function in the boston RISE study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(5):616–622. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Nov 18]. https://academic.oup.com/biomedgerontology/article/70/5/616/647499
- Reuben DB, Seeman TE, Keeler E, et al. Refining the categorization of physical functional status: the added value of combining self-reported and performance-based measures. Journals Gerontol - Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2004;59(10):1056–1061.
- Kempen GIJM, Van Heuvelen MJG, Van Den Brink RHS, et al. Factors affecting contrasting results between self-reported and performance-based levels of physical limitations. Age Ageing. 1996;25(6):458–464. [Internet]. https://academic.oup.com/ageing/article/25/6/458/14315
- Reuben DB, Seeman TE, Keeler E, et al. The effect of Self-Reported and Performance-Based functional impairment on future hospital costs of Community-Dwelling older persons. Gerontologist. 2004;44(3):401–407. https://academic.oup.com/gerontologist/article/44/3/401/699480
- Bean JF, Olveczky DD, Kiely DK, et al. Performance-Based versus Patient-Reported physical function: What are the underlying predictors? Background. Functional limitations have been operationally defined for studies. Phys Ther. 2011;91(12):1804–1811. https://academic.oup.com/ptj/article/91/12/1804/2735162
- Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, et al. Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(3):253–257.
- Rejeski WJ, Rushing J, Guralnik JM, for the LIFE Study Group, et al. The MAT-sf: Identifying risk for major mobility disability. GERONA. 2015;70(5):641–646.
- Angel R, Ostir GV, Frisco ML, et al. Comparison of a self-reported and a performance-based assessment of mobility in the hispanic established population for epidemiological studies of the elderly. Res Aging. 2000;22(6):715–737.
- Tuttle KR. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on clinical research. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2020;16(10):562–564.
- Blair CK, Harding E, Herman C, et al. Remote assessment of functional mobility and strength in older cancer survivors: Protocol for a validity and reliability study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(9):e20834–12.
- Lein DH, Willig JH, Smith CR, et al. Assessing a novel way to measure three common rehabilitation outcome measures using a custom mobile phone application. Gait Posture. 2019 Sep 1;73:246–250.
- Keating SE, Barnett A, Croci I, et al. Agreement and reliability of clinician-in-Clinic versus patient-at-Home clinical and functional assessments: Implications for telehealth services. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2020;2(3):100066.
- Münch M, Weibel R, Sofios A, et al. MOBIlity assessment with modern TEChnology in older patients' real-life by the General Practitioner: the MOBITEC-GP study protocol . BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1703–1710.
- Warmerdam E, Hausdorff JM, Atrsaei A, et al. Long-term unsupervised mobility assessment in movement disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19(5):462–470.
- Dorsey ER, Glidden AM, Holloway MR, et al. Teleneurology and mobile technologies: the future of neurological care. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14(5):285–297.
- Fudickar S, Hellmers S, Lau S, et al. Measurement system for unsupervised standardized assessment of timed “up & go” and five times sit to stand test in the community—a validity study. Sensors (Basel). 2020;20(10):2824–2842.
- Du H, Davidson PM, Everett B, et al. Correlation between a self-administered walk test and a standardised six minute walk test in adults. Nurs Health Sci. 2011 Jun;13(2):114–117.
- Midaglia L, Mulero P, Montalban X, et al. Adherence and satisfaction of smartphone- and smartwatch-based remote active testing and passive monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis: Nonrandomized interventional feasibility study. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21(8):e14683.
- Cheng WY, Bourke AK, Lipsmeier F, et al. U-turn speed is a valid and reliable smartphone-based measure of multiple sclerosis-related gait and balance impairment. Gait Posture. 2021;84:120–126. [Internet].
- Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, et al. The COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20(2):105–113. [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 11]. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0143
- Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(7):737–745. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006
- Bartels B, de Groot JF, Terwee CB. The six-minute walk test in chronic pediatric conditions: a systematic review of measurement properties. Phys Ther. 2013;93(4):529–541.
- Bellet RN, Adams L, Morris NR. The 6-minute walk test in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: Validity, reliability and responsiveness-a systematic review. Physiother (United Kingdom). 2012;98(4):277–286. [Internet]. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2011.11.003
- Hafsteinsdóttir TB, Rensink M, Schuurmans M. Clinimetric properties of the timed up and go test for patients with stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2014;21(3):197–210.
- Rydwik E, Bergland A, Forsén L, et al. Psychometric properties of timed up and go in elderly people: a systematic review. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2011;29(2):102–125.
- de Morton NA, Berlowitz DJ, Keating JL. A systematic review of mobility instruments and their measurement properties for older acute medical patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6(Mcid):44–15.
- Bunn JA, Navalta JW, Fountaine CJ, et al. Current state of commercial wearable technology in physical activity. 2015. http://www.intjexersci.com.
- Evenson KR, Goto MM, Furberg RD. Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12(1):159.
- Mani S, Sharma S, Omar B, et al. Validity and reliability of internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(3):379–391.
- Demnitz N, Esser P, Dawes H, et al. A systematic review and Meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies examining the relationship between mobility and cognition in healthy older adults. Gait Posture. 2016;50:164–174.
- Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, PRISMA-P Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and Meta-analysis protocols (prisma-p) 2015: Elaboration and explanation. BMJ. 2015;350(January):g7647–25. [Internet]. doi:https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7647
- Aromataris EMZ, editor. JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis; 2020.
- Mokkink LB, Boers M, van der Vleten C, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability and measurement error of outcome measurement instrument user manual. 2020. https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/user-manual-COSMIN-Risk-of-Bias-tool_v4_dec-2020.pdf.
- Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, et al. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Research. Qual Life Res. 2009;18(8):1115–1123. [Internet]. https://about.jstor.org/terms
- Covidence systematic review software. Melbourne, Australia: Veritas Health Innovation; 2021. Available from: covidence.org.
- Microsoft Corporation. Microsoft Excel for Microsoft 365. Version 2108. Redmond (WA), USA.
- Mokkink Cecilia AC, Prinsen Donald L, Patrick Jordi Alonso LM, Bouter Henrica CW, de Vet Caroline B, Terwee Contact LB, Mokkink LB. COSMIN manual for systematic reviews of PROMs COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) user manual. 2018. [cited 2020 Nov 4]. www.cosmin.nl.
- Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924–926.
- Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157. [Internet]. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3