The reliability of palpatory examinations for pelvic landmarks to determine pelvic asymmetry: a systematic review and meta-analysis

References

• Khan K. ‘Sacrum went out’ … what went wrong? Tiger Woods, media doctors, and collective responsibility: BMJ Blog; 2014. [cited 2015 November 24]. Available from: http://blogs.bmj.com/bjsm/2014/08/08/sacrum-went-out-what-went-wrong-tiger-woods-media-doctors-and-collective-responsiblity/.
   Google Scholar
• O'Sullivan P. Common misconceptions about back pain in sport: Tiger Woods’ case brings five fundamental questions into sharp focus. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(14):905–907.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby J, Heneghan NR, Maybury M. Manual palpation of lumbo-pelvic landmarks: a validity study. Man Ther. 2012;17(3):259–262.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fryer G, Johnson JC, Fossum C. The use of spinal and sacroiliac joint procedures within the British osteopathic profession. Part 1: assessment. Int J Osteopath Med. 2010;13(4):143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byfield D, Mathiasen J, Sangren C. The reliability of osseous landmark palpation in the lumbar spine and pelvis. Eur J Chiropr. 1992;40:83–88.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes MF. Efficacy study of the effect of a myofascial release treatment technique on obtaining pelvic symmetry. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 1997;1(5):289–296.
   Google Scholar
• Chaitow L, Crenshaw K. Muscle energy techniques. London: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fryer G. Muscle energy technique: an evidence-informed approach. Int J Osteopath Med. 2011;14(1):3–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullberg T, Blomberg S, Branth B, et al. Manipulation does not alter the position of the sacroiliac joint. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 1998;23(10):1124–1128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stovall BA, Kumar S. Anatomical landmark asymmetry assessment in the lumbar spine and pelvis: a review of reliability. PM R. 2010;2(1):48–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperstein R, Hickey M. The reliability of palpating the posterior superior iliac spine: a systematic review. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2016;60(1):36–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison F. Getting started with meta‐analysis. Methods Ecol Evol. 2011;2(1):1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger M, Zellweger-Zähner T, Schneider M, et al. Language bias in randomised controlled trials published in English and German. Lancet. 1997;350(9074):326–329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mine K, Nakayama T, Milanese S, et al. Acute effects of stretching on maximal muscle strength and functional performance: a systematic review of Japanese-language randomised controlled trials. Man Ther. 2016;21:54–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lucas N, Macaskill P, Irwig L, et al. The reliability of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013;13(1):111.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spineli LM, Pandis N. Problems and pitfalls in subgroup analysis and meta-regression. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2020;158(6):901–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryer G, McPherson HC, O'Keefe P. The effect of training on the inter-examiner and intra-examiner reliability of the seated flexion test and assessment of pelvic anatomical landmarks with palpation. Int J Osteopath Med. 2005;8(4):131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Potter NA, Rothstein JM. Intertester reliability for selected clinical tests of the sacroiliac joint. Phys Ther. 1985;65(11):1671–1675.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suwanasri C, Sakullertphasuk W, Tosiriphattana M, et al. Inter-and intra-rater reliability of postural assessment for scoliosis. J Med Assoc Thai = Chotmaihet Thangphaet. 2014;97:S1–S5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fryer G. Factors affecting the intra-examiner and inter-examiner reliability of palpation for supine medial malleoli asymmetry. Int J Osteopath Med. 2006;9(2):58–65.
   Google Scholar
• Holmgren U, Waling K. Inter-examiner reliability of four static palpation tests used for assessing pelvic dysfunction. Man Ther. 2008;13(1):50–56.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kmita A, Lucas NP. Reliability of physical examination to assess asymmetry of anatomical landmarks indicative of pelvic somatic dysfunction in subjects with and without low back pain. Int J Osteopath Med. 2008;11(1):16–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddle DL, Freburger JK. Evaluation of the presence of sacroiliac joint region dysfunction using a combination of tests: a multicenter intertester reliability study. Phys Ther. 2002;82(8):772–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong HC, Heyman OG, Lado DA, et al. Interexaminer reliability of three methods of combining test results to determine side of sacral restriction, sacral base position, and innominate bone position. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106(8):464.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O'Haire C, Gibbons P. Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study. Man Ther. 2000;5(1):13–20.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paydar D, Thiel H, Gemmell H. Intra-and interexaminer reliability of certain pelvic palpatory procedures and the sitting flexion test for sacroiliac joint mobility and dysfunction. J Neuromusculoskel Sys. 1994;2(2):65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rajendran D, Gallagher D. The assessment of pelvic landmarks using palpation: a reliability study of undergraduate students. Int J Osteopath Med. 2011;14(2):57–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton C, Nono L, Johnston RG, et al. The effects of experience on the inter-reliability of osteopaths to detect changes in posterior superior iliac spine levels using a hidden heel wedge. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013;17(2):143–150.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindsay DM, Meeuwisse WH, Mooney ME, et al. Interrater reliability of manual therapy assessment techniques. Physiother Can. 1995;47(3):173–180.
   Google Scholar
• Sturesson B, Selvik G, UdÉn A. Movements of the sacroiliac joints. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 1989;14(2):162–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preece SJ, Willan P, Nester CJ, et al. Variation in pelvic morphology may prevent the identification of anterior pelvic tilt. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):113–117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mitchell FL, Mitchell PKG. The muscle energy manual. East Lansing: Met Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Meakins A, Lehman G. Talking about unstable pelvises 2019. [cited 2021 14th January 2021]. Available from: https://ptpodcast.com/the-naf-physio-podcast-episode-37-talking-about-unstable-pelvises/.
   Google Scholar
• Alonso-Perez JL, Lopez-Lopez A, La Touche R, et al. Hypoalgesic effects of three different manual therapy techniques on cervical spine and psychological interaction: a randomized clinical trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21(4):798–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickar JG. Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation. Spine J. 2002;2(5):357–371.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones SL, Jones PK, Katz J. Compliance for low-back pain patients in the emergency department. A randomized trial. Spine (Phila PA 1976). 1988;13(5):553–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'sullivan P. It's time for change with the management of non-specific chronic low back pain. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46(4):224–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar