References
- Nasser AM, Pizzari T, Grimaldi A, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy; expert physiotherapists' perspectives on diagnosis, management and prevention. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;48:67–75.
- Goom TS, Malliaras P, Reiman MP, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy: clinical aspects of assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(6):483–493.
- Nasser AM, Vicenzino B, Grimaldi A, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy; a systematic review of interventions. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(2):288–305.
- Vicenzino B, de Vos R-J, Alfredson H, et al. ICON 2019-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: there are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(8):444–451.
- Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):745–753.
- Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome Set-STAndardised protocol items: the COS-STAP statement. Trials. 2019;20(1):116.
- Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(Suppl 3):280.
- Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–1015.
- Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.
- Mokkink LP, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. [cited 2021 Mar]; Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf# .
- Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
- Hughes KL, Clarke M, Williamson PR. A systematic review finds core outcome set uptake varies widely across different areas of health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;129:114–123.
- Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111.
- Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "core outcome set" – a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17(1):449.
- Boric K, Boric M, Dosenovic S, et al. Authors' lack of awareness and use of core outcome set on postoperative pain in children is hindering comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res. 2018;7(5):463–470.