186
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Article

Core outcome set development for proximal hamstring tendinopathy (COS-PHT): a study protocol

, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 313-319 | Received 07 Dec 2021, Accepted 04 May 2022, Published online: 19 May 2022

References

  • Nasser AM, Pizzari T, Grimaldi A, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy; expert physiotherapists' perspectives on diagnosis, management and prevention. Phys Ther Sport. 2021;48:67–75.
  • Goom TS, Malliaras P, Reiman MP, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy: clinical aspects of assessment and management. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(6):483–493.
  • Nasser AM, Vicenzino B, Grimaldi A, et al. Proximal hamstring tendinopathy; a systematic review of interventions. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021;16(2):288–305.
  • Vicenzino B, de Vos R-J, Alfredson H, et al. ICON 2019-International Scientific Tendinopathy Symposium Consensus: there are nine core health-related domains for tendinopathy (CORE DOMAINS): Delphi study of healthcare professionals and patients. Br J Sports Med. 2020;54(8):444–451.
  • Boers M, Kirwan JR, Wells G, et al. Developing core outcome measurement sets for clinical trials: OMERACT filter 2.0. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(7):745–753.
  • Kirkham JJ, Gorst S, Altman DG, et al. Core outcome Set-STAndardised protocol items: the COS-STAP statement. Trials. 2019;20(1):116.
  • Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18(Suppl 3):280.
  • Hasson F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs. 2000;32(4):1008–1015.
  • Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of web surveys: the checklist for reporting results of internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res. 2004;6(3):e34.
  • Mokkink LP, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN study design checklist for patient-reported outcome measurement instruments. 2019. [cited 2021 Mar]; Available from: https://www.cosmin.nl/wp-content/uploads/COSMIN-study-designing-checklist_final.pdf# .
  • Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147–1157.
  • Hughes KL, Clarke M, Williamson PR. A systematic review finds core outcome set uptake varies widely across different areas of health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;129:114–123.
  • Gargon E, Gurung B, Medley N, et al. Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99111.
  • Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "core outcome set" – a practical guideline. Trials. 2016;17(1):449.
  • Boric K, Boric M, Dosenovic S, et al. Authors' lack of awareness and use of core outcome set on postoperative pain in children is hindering comparative effectiveness research. J Comp Eff Res. 2018;7(5):463–470.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.