The effectiveness of the motor relearning program on upper limb function post-stroke: a systematized review

References

• Stockley R, Peel R, Jarvis K, et al. Current therapy for the upper limb after stroke: a cross-sectional survey of UK therapists. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e030262. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, et al. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil. 1999;21(8):357–364. doi:10.1080/096382899297459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodgers H, Bosomworth H, Krebs HI, et al. Robot assisted training for upper limb after stroke (RATULS): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019;394(10192):51–62. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31055-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprigg N, Selby J, Fox L, et al. Very low quality of life after acute stroke: data from the efficacy of nitric oxide in stroke trial. Stroke. 2013;44(12):3458–3462. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear C, Ackerley S, Byblow W. Rehabilitation is initiated early after stroke, but most motor rehabilitation trials are not a systematic review. Stroke. 2013;44(7):2039–2045. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olaleye OA, Lawal ZI. Utilization of physiotherapy in the continuum of stroke care at a tertiary hospital in Ibadan, Nigeria. Afr Health Sci. 2017;17(1):79–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey L, Walsh A, Adikari A, et al. Finding the intersection of neuroplasticity, stroke recovery, and learning: scope and contributions to stroke rehabilitation. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:5232374. doi:10.1155/2019/5232374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, et al. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3-4):175–189. doi:10.1002/oti.275.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tunney N. Is there a best approach to the rehabilitation of adult hemiplegia? Phys Ther Rev. 2018;23(6):348–354. doi:10.1080/10833196.2018.1539293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valkenborghs SR, Callister R, Visser MM, et al. Interventions combined with task-specific training to improve upper limb motor recovery following stroke: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Phys Ther Rev. 2017;24(3-4):100–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;11(11):CD006073. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006073.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, et al. Systemati literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occup Ther Int. 2007;14(1):11–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(11):CD010820. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010820.pub2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick AW, et al. Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following stroke. J Am Med Assoc. 2016;135(6):571–581.
   Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approached for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(4):CD001920. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001920.pub3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hatem SM, Saussez G, Della Faille M, et al. Rehabilitation of motor function after stroke: a multiple systematic review focused on techniques to stimulate upper extremity recovery. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:442. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer-D'Amato P, Kyvelidou A, Sternad D, et al. Training dual-task walking in community-dwelling adults within 1 year of stroke: a protocol for a single-blind randomized controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2012;12(1):129. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-12-129.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maier M, Ballester BR, Verschure PFM. Principles of neurorehabilitation after stroke based on motor learning and brain plasticity mechanisms. Front Syst Neurosci. 2019;13:74. doi:10.3389/fnsys.2019.00074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(10):e1-34.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Farrugia P, Petrisor BA, Farrokhyar F, et al. Research questions, hypotheses and objectives. Can J Surg. 2010;53(4):278–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paltridge M, Traves A. The health effects of strongyloidiasis on pregnant women and children: a systematic literature review. Trop Med Infet Dis. 2018;3(2):50.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guidelines. BMJ. 2014;348(mar07 3):g1687. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashin AG, McAuley JH. Clinimetrics: physiotherapy evidence database (PEDro) scale. J Physiother. 2020;66(1):59. doi:10.1016/j.jphys.2019.08.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz-Arribas MJ, Martín-Casas P, Cano-de-la-Cuerda R, et al. Effectiveness of Bobath concept in the treatment of stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;42(12):1636–1649. doi:10.1080/09638288.2019.1590865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Challoumas D, Clifford C, Kirwan P, et al. How does surgery compare to sham surgery or physiotherapy as a treatment for tendinopathy? A systematic review of randomised trials. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2019;5(1):e000528. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A follow-up one and four years post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(7):731–734. doi:10.1191/0269215503cr670oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(4):361–369. doi:10.1191/0269215500cr338oa.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immadi SK, Achyutha KK, Reddy A, et al. Effectiveness of the motor relearning approach in promoting physical function of the upper limb after a stroke. Int J Physiother. 2015;2(1):386–390. doi:10.15621/ijphy/2015/v2i1/60047.
   Google Scholar
• El-Bahrawy MN, El-Wishy AAB. Efficacy of motor relearning approach on hand function in chronic stroke patients. A controlled randomized study. Ital J Physiother. 2012;2(4):121–127.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Heß A, Werner C C, et al. Effect on arm function and cost of robot-assisted group therapy in subacute patients with stroke and a moderately to severely affected arm: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28(7):637–647. doi:10.1177/0269215513516967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batool S, Soomro N, Amjad D, et al. To compare the effectiveness of constraint induced movement therapy versus motor relearning programme to improve motor function of hemiplegic upper extremity after stroke. Pak J Med Sci. 2015;31(5):1167–1171. doi:10.12669/pjms.315.7910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehani P, Kumari R, Midha D. Effectiveness of motor relearning programme and mirror therapy on hand functions in patients with stroke-a randomized clinical trial. Int J Ther Rehabil Res. 2015;4(3):20–24.
   Google Scholar
• Pandian S, Arya KN, Davidson EWR. Comparison of Brunnstrom movement therapy and motor relearning program in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiparetic hand: a randomized trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2012;16(3):330–337.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paul J. Comparative study on the effect of task oriented motor relearning program and thermal stimulation over upper limb motor function among stroke subjects. Int J Physiother. 2014;1(4):227–232. doi:10.15621/ijphy/2014/v1i4/54565.
   Google Scholar
• Jan S, Arsh A, Darian H, et al. A randomized control trial comparing the effects of motor relearning programme and mirror therapy for improving upper limb motor functions in stroke patients. J Pak Med Assoc. 2019;69(9):1242–1245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shah MV, Kumar S, Muragod AR. Effect of constraint induced movement therapy v/s motor relearning program for upper extremity function in sub acute hemiparetic patients-a randomized clinical trial. Indian J Physiother and Occup Ther. 2016;10(1):71–75.
   Google Scholar
• Takeshima N, Sozu T, Tajika A, et al. Which is more generalizable, powerful and interpretable in meta-analyses, mean difference or standardized mean difference? BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14(1):30. doi:10.1186/1471-2288-14-30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Freire APCF, Elkins MR, Ramos EMC, et al. Use of 95% confidence intervals in the reporting of between-group differences in randomized controlled trials: analysis of a representative sample of 200 physical therapy trials. Braz J Phys Ther. 2019;23(4):302–310. doi:10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.10.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara ER, Scales CD. Jr. Role of systematic reviews and meta-analysis in evidence-based clinical practice. Indian J Urol. 2016;27(4):520–524.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan S, Ganeshkumar P. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: understanding the best evidence in primary healthcare. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2013;2(1):9–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Damgaard P, Bartels EM, Ris I, et al. Evidence of physiotherapy interventions for patients with chronic neck pain: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. ISRN Pain. 2013;2013:567175–567123. doi:10.1155/2013/567175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke. 2009;40(4):e89-97. doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.108.533828.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl AS, Schwab ME. Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth of the brain at the right moment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:381. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters C, van Wegen EEH, Daffertshofer A, et al. Generalizability of the proportional recovery model for the upper extremity after an ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;29(7):614–622. doi:10.1177/1545968314562115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelly AC, Dettori JR, Brodt ED. Assessing bias: the importance of considering confounding. Evid Based Spine Care J. 2012;3(1):9–12. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1298595.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37(9):2348–2353. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000238594.91938.1e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Winstein C, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. J Am Med Assoc. 2006;296(17):2095–2014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Beige E. How to do a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(2):138–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page P, Hoogenboom B, Voight M. Improving the reporting of therapeutic exercise interventions in rehabilitation research. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2017;12(2):297–304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70150-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charrois TL. Systematic reviews: what do you need to know to get started? Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68(2):144–148.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams J, Hillier-Brown FC, Moore HJ, et al. Searching and synthesising ‘grey literature’ and ‘grey information’ in public health: critical reflections on three case studies. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):164. doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0337y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson H, Williams V, Curtis F, et al. Facilitators and barriers to physical activity following pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a systematic review of qualitative studies. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018;28(1):19. doi:10.1038/s41533-018-0085-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, et al. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):138–144. doi:10.1017/S0266462312000086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jüni P, Holenstein F, Sterne J, et al. Direction and impact of language in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. Int J Epidemiol. 2002;31(1):115–123. doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar