Slicing parameter optimization for 3D printing of biodegradable drug-eluting tracheal stents

References

• Alhnan MA, Okwuosa TC, Sadia M, Wan KW, Ahmed W, Arafat B. 2016. Emergence of 3D printed dosage forms: opportunities and challenges. Pharm Res. 33(8):1817–1832.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arrhenius SA. 1889. Über die Reaktionsgeschwindigkeit bei der Inversion von Rohrzucker durch Säuren. Z Phys Chem. 4:226–248.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Ner A, Siemsen E. 2017. Decentralization and localization of production: the organizational and economic consequences of additive manufacturing (3D printing). Calif Manag Rev. 59(2):5–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bode C, Kranz H, Fivez A, Siepmann F, Siepmann J. 2019. Often neglected: PLGA/PLA swelling orchestrates drug release: HME implants. J Control Release. 306:97–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia HN, Wu BM. 2015. Recent advances in 3D printing of biomaterials. J Biol Eng. 9(1):4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN EN ISO 527-1. 2012. Kunststoffe – Bestimmung der Zugeigenschaften – Teil 1: Allgemeine Grundsätze (ISO 527-1). [accessed 2020 Feb 13]. https://www.din.de/de.
   Google Scholar
• EDQM. 2019a. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines – Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia. 9th ed., 4.1.3 buffer solutions. [accessed 2020 Feb 13]. https://www.edqm.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• EDQM. 2019b. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines – Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia. 9th ed., 2.9.40 Uniformity of dosage units. [accessed 2020 Feb 13]. https://www.edqm.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• EDQM. 2019c. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines – Council of Europe. European Pharmacopoeia. 9th ed., triamterene monograph. [accessed 2020 Feb 13]. https://www.edqm.eu/.
   Google Scholar
• Evonik. 2019. RESOMER product portfolio; [accessed 2019 Jul 18]. https://healthcare.evonik.com/product/healthcare/en/products/biomaterials/resomer/pages/controlled-release.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Feuerbach T, Callau-Mendoza S, Thommes M. 2019. Development of filaments for fused deposition modeling 3D printing with medical grade poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) copolymers. Pharm Dev Technol. 24(4):487–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerbach T, Kock S, Thommes M. 2018. Characterisation of fused deposition modeling 3D printers for pharmaceutical and medical applications. Pharm Dev Technol. 23(10):1136–1145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag L, Eicker R, Linz B, Greschuchna D. 1994. Theoretical and experimental basis for the development of a dynamic airway stent. Eur Respir J. 7(11):2038–2045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freitag L, Gordes M, Zarogoulidis P, Darwiche K, Franzen D, Funke F, Hohenforst-Schmidt W, Dutau H. 2017. Towards individualized tracheobronchial stents: technical, practical and legal considerations. Respiration. 94(5):442–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyanes A, Scarpa M, Kamlow M, Gaisford S, Basit AW, Orlu M. 2017. Patient acceptability of 3D printed medicines. Int J Pharm. 530(1–2):71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Habibovic P, Gbureck U, Doillon C J, Bassett D C, Van Blitterswijk C A, Barralet J E. 2008. Osteoconduction and osteoinduction of low-temperature 3D printed bioceramic implants. Biomaterials. 29(7):944–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holländer J, Genina N, Jukarainen H, Khajeheian M, Rosling A, Mäkilä E, Sandler N. 2016. Three-dimensional printed PCL-based implantable prototypes of medical devices for controlled drug delivery. J Pharm Sci. 105(9):2665–2676.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonathan G, Karim A. 2016. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 499:376–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kempin W, Franz C, Koster LC, Schneider F, Bogdahn M, Weitschies W, Seidlitz A. 2017. Assessment of different polymers and drug loads for fused deposition modeling of drug loaded implants. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 115:84–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J, Gholizadeh H, Lu J, Bunt C, Seyfoddin A. 2017. Application of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) Method of 3D Printing in Drug Delivery. Curr Pharm Des. 23(3):433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makadia HK, Siegel SJ. 2011. Poly lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) as biodegradable controlled drug delivery carrier. Polymers (Basel). 3(3):1377–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKittrick CM, Kennedy S, Oldroyd KG, McGinty S, McCormick C. 2016. Modelling the impact of atherosclerosis on drug release and distribution from coronary stents. Ann Biomed Eng. 44(2):477–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melgoza EL, Vallicrosa G, Sereno L, Ciurana J. 2014. Rapid tooling using 3D printing system for manufacturing of customized tracheal stent. Rapid Prototyp J. 20(1):2–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melocchi A, Parietti F, Loreti G, Maroni A, Gazzaniga A, Zema L. 2015. 3D printing by fused deposition modeling (FDM) of a swellable/erodible capsular device for oral pulsatile release of drugs. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol. 30:360–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noppen M, Meysman M, Claes I, D’Haese J, Vincken W. 1999. Screw-thread vs Dumon endoprosthesis in the management of tracheal stenosis. Chest. 115(2):532–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrick IJ, Simpson TW. 2013. 3D printing disrupts manufacturing: how economies of one create new rules of competition. Res Technol Manage. 56(6):12–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruessmann K, Wentzlaff M, Schilling R, Seidlitz A. 2019. Influence of dissolution vessel geometry and dissolution medium on in vitro dissolution behaviour of triamterene-coated model stents in different test setups. AAPS PharmSciTech. 20(1):27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandler N, Preis M. 2017. Printed drug-delivery systems for improved patient treatment. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 38(3):317–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert C, van Langeveld MC, Donoso LA. 2014. Innovations in 3D printing: a 3D overview from optics to organs. Br J Ophthalmol. 98(2):159–161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sequeira JAD, Santos AC, Serra J, Veiga F, Ribeiro AJ. 2018. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) matrix implants. In: Grumezescu AM, editor. Nanostructures for the engineering of cells, tissues and organs. 1st ed. Norwich: William Andrew Publishing; p. 375–402.
   Google Scholar
• Sereno L, Freitas MS, Silveria Z, Silva JVL, Ciurana J. 2013. New advances in tracheal stent manufacturing. 6th IFAC Conference on Management and Control of Production and Logistics. IFAC Proc Vol. 46(24):344–349.
   Google Scholar
• Shafiee A, Atala A. 2016. Printing technologies for medical applications. Trends Mol Med. 22(3):254–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma R, Singh R, Penna R, Fraternali F. 2018. Investigations for mechanical properties of Hap, PVC and PP based 3D porous structures obtained through biocompatible FDM filaments. Composites B. 132:237–243.
   Google Scholar
• Skowyra J, Pietrzak K, Alhnan MA. 2015. Fabrication of extended-release patient-tailored prednisolone tablets via fused deposition modelling (FDM) 3D printing. Eur J Pharm Sci. 68:11–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboas JM, Maddox RD, Krebsbach PH, Hollister SJ. 2003. Indirect solid free form fabrication of local and global porous, biomimetic and composite 3D polymer–ceramic scaffolds. Biomaterials. 24(1):181–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ventola CL. 2014. Medical applications for 3D printing: current and projected uses. P T. 39(10):704–711.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang L, Gardner DJ. 2017. Effect of fused layer modelling (FLM) processing parameters on impact strength of cellular polypropylene. Polymer. 113:74–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zein I, Hutmacher DW, Tan KC, Teoh SH. 2002. Fused deposition modeling of novel scaffold architectures for tissue engineering applications. Biomaterials. 23(4):1169–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar