Intrinsic dissolution rate modeling for the pharmacopoeia apparatus rotating disk compared to flow channel method

References

• Alsenz J, Haenel E, Anedda A, Du Castel P, Cirelli G. 2016. Miniaturized intrinsic dissolution screening (MINDISS) assay for preformulation. Eur J Pharm Sci. 87:3–13. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2015.09.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson SBE, Frenning G, Alderborn G. 2021. Determination of intrinsic drug dissolution and solute effective transport rate during laminar fluid flow at different velocities. Pharmaceutics. 13(6):835. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13060835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avdeef A, Tsinman O. 2008. Miniaturized rotating disk intrinsic dissolution rate measurement: effects of buffer capacity in comparisons to traditional wood’s apparatus. Pharm Res. 25(11):2613–2627. doi: 10.1007/s11095-008-9679-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger CM, Tsinman O, Voloboy D, Lipp D, Stones S, Avdeef A. 2007. Technical note: miniaturized intrinsic dissolution rate (Mini-IDR™) measurement of griseofulvin and carbamazepine. Dissolution Technol. 14(4):39–41. doi: 10.14227/DT140407P39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergström CAS, Box K, Holm R, Matthews W, McAllister M, Müllertz A, Rades T, Schäfer KJ, Teleki A. 2019. Biorelevant intrinsic dissolution profiling in early drug development: fundamental, methodological, and industrial aspects. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 139:101–114. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2019.03.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böswirth L, Bschorer S, Buck T. 2012. Technische Strömungslehre: Lehr- und Übungsbuch. 9., überarb. Aufl. Wiesbaden: Vieweg + Teubner. 352 p. (Vieweg + Teubner Studium). ISBN: 978-3-8348-8647-7; [accessed 2023 Jun 3]. https://​link.springer.com​/​content/​pdf/​10.1007/​978-​3-​8348-​8647-​7_​8.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Edward JT. 1970. Molecular volumes and the stokes-einstein equation. J Chem Educ. 47(4):261. doi: 10.1021/ed047p261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etherson K, Dunn C, Matthews W, Pamelund H, Barragat C, Sanderson N, Izumi T, Da Mathews CC, Halbert G, Wilson C, et al. 2020. An interlaboratory investigation of intrinsic dissolution rate determination using surface dissolution. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 150:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.02.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Pharmacopoeia. 2019. Publ. in accordance with the Convention on the Elaboration of a European Pharmacopoeia. 10th edition. Strassbourg: Council of Europe. bd. (European treaty series; no. 50). ISBN: 9789287189127.
   Google Scholar
• Fokkens JG, van Amelsfoort J, Blaey CJde, Kruif CGde, Wilting J. 1983. A thermodynamic study of the solubility of theophylline and its hydrate. Int J Pharm. 14(1):79–93. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(83)90116-3.
   Google Scholar
• Gopal Rangarao B, Monica K, Bhattacharyya S. 2022. A brief review on pharmaceutical dissolution interlinking the aspect of science and regulation. Bull Pharm Sci. Assiut. 45(1):11–21. doi: 10.21608/bfsa.2022.239165.
   Google Scholar
• Greco K, Bergman TL, Bogner R. 2011. Design and characterization of a laminar flow-through dissolution apparatus: comparison of hydrodynamic conditions to those of common dissolution techniques. Pharm Dev Technol. 16(1):75–87. doi: 10.3109/10837450903499341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grijseels H, Crommelin DJA, Blaey CJd 1981. Hydrodynamic approach to dissolution rate. Pharmaceutisch Weekblad Scientific Edition. 3(1):1005–1020. doi: 10.1007/BF02193318.
   Google Scholar
• Issa MG, Ferraz HG. 2011. Intrinsic dissolution as a tool for evaluating drug solubility in accordance with the biopharmaceutics classification system. Dissolution Technol. 18(3):6–13. doi: 10.14227/DT180311P6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakhi M. 2009. Classification of the flow regimes in the flow-through cell. Eur J Pharm Sci. 37(5):531–544. Epub 2009 Apr 18. eng doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.04.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunisto E, Marucci M, Axelsson A. 2011. Dissolution kinetics or pure mass transfer? A mechanistic study of dissolution. AIChE J. 57(10):2610–2617. doi: 10.1002/aic.12475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaunisto E, Nilsson B, Axelsson A. 2009. Drug dissolution rate measurements - evaluation of the rotating disc method. Pharm Dev Technol. 14(4):400–408. doi: 10.1080/10837450802712641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange L. 2017. Phase behavior of pharmaceutical cocrystals. 1. Auflage. München: Verlag Dr. Hut. IX, 161, A-Z, AA-AI Seiten (Schriftenreihe Thermodynamik; Band 23). ISBN: 978-3-8439-2967-7. Deutsche und englische Zusammenfassung.
   Google Scholar
• Levich VG. 1962. Physicochemical Hydrodynamics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. p. 700. p. (Prentice-Hall international series in the physical and chemical engineering sciences). ISBN: 9780136744405.
   Google Scholar
• Liu C, Dang L, Bai W, Wang R, Wei H. 2014. Solid–liquid equilibrium of theophylline in solvent mixtures. J Chem Eng Data. 59(2):263–268. doi: 10.1021/je400864f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menter FR. 2009. Review of the shear-stress transport turbulence model experience from an industrial perspective. In J Comput Fluid Dyn. 23(4):305–316. doi: 10.1080/10618560902773387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Missel PJ, Stevens LE, Mauger JW. 2004. Reexamination of convective diffusion/drug dissolution in a laminar flow channel: accurate prediction of dissolution rate. Pharm Res. 21(12):2300–2306. doi: 10.1007/s11095-004-1512-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosharraf M, Nyström C. 1995. The effect of particle size and shape on the surface specific dissolution rate of microsized practically insoluble drugs. Int J Pharm. 122(1-2):35–47. doi: 10.1016/0378-5173(95)00033-F.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paus R, Hart E, Ji Y. 2015. A novel approach for predicting the dissolution profiles of pharmaceutical tablets. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 96:53–64. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.06.029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peltonen L, Liljeroth P, Heikkilä T, Kontturi K, Hirvonen J. 2003. Dissolution testing of acetylsalicylic acid by a channel flow method-correlation to USP basket and intrinsic dissolution methods. Eur J Pharm Sci. 19(5):395–401. doi: 10.1016/S0928-0987(03)00140-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shekunov B, Montgomery ER. 2016. Theoretical analysis of drug dissolution: I. Solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate. J Pharm Sci. 105(9):2685–2697. doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2015.12.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiko G, Gladden LF, Sederman AJ, Connolly PC, Butler JM. 2011. MRI studies of the hydrodynamics in a USP 4 dissolution testing cell. J Pharm Sci. 100(3):976–991. doi: 10.1002/jps.22343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Siepmann F. 2013. Mathematical modeling of drug dissolution. Int J Pharm. 453(1):12–24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.04.044.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siepmann J, Siepmann F. 2020. Sink conditions do not guarantee the absence of saturation effects. Int J Pharm. 577:119009. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.119009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sirasitthichoke C, Patel S, Reuter KG, Hermans A, Bredael G, Armenante PM. 2023. Computational determination of hydrodynamics in the USP dissolution testing Apparatus 1 (rotating basket). Chem Eng Sci. 280:118946. doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2023.118946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleziona D, Mattusch A, Schaldach G, Ely DR, Sadowski G, Thommes M. 2021. Determination of inherent dissolution performance of drug substances. Pharmaceutics. 13(2):146. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13020146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teleki A, Nylander O, Bergström CAS. 2020. Intrinsic dissolution rate profiling of poorly water-soluble compounds in biorelevant dissolution media. Pharmaceutics. 12(6):493. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12060493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todaro V, Pearsons T, Grove G, Healy AM, D’Arcy DM. 2017. Characterization and simulation of hydrodynamics in the paddle, basket and flow-through dissolution testing apparatuses - a review. Dissolution Technol. 24(3):24–36. doi: 10.14227/DT240317P24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsinman K, Avdeef A, Tsinman O, Voloboy D. 2009. Powder dissolution method for estimating rotating disk intrinsic dissolution rates of low solubility drugs. Pharm Res. 26(9):2093–2100. doi: 10.1007/s11095-009-9921-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viegas TX, Curatella RU, van Winkle LL, Brinker G. 2001. Measurement of intrinsic drug dissolution rates using two types of apparatus. Pharm Technol. 25:44–35.
   Google Scholar
• Yu LX, Carlin AS, Amidon GL, Hussain AS. 2004. Feasibility studies of utilizing disk intrinsic dissolution rate to classify drugs. Int J Pharm. 270(1–2):221–227. eng doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2003.10.016.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zakeri-Milani P, Barzegar-Jalali M, Azimi M, Valizadeh H. 2009. Biopharmaceutical classification of drugs using intrinsic dissolution rate (IDR) and rat intestinal permeability. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 73(1):102–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2009.04.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang S, Rasmuson ÅC. 2012. The theophylline–oxalic acid co-crystal system: solid phases, thermodynamics and crystallisation. CrystEngComm. 14(14):4644. doi: 10.1039/c2ce25299f.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao YH, Abraham MH, Zissimos AM. 2003. Fast calculation of van der waals volume as a sum of atomic and bond contributions and its application to drug compounds. J Org Chem. 68(19):7368–7373. eng doi: 10.1021/jo034808o.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar