Fabrication of 3D-printed scaffolds loaded with gallium acetylacetonate for potential application in osteoclastic bone resorption

References

• Arnett T, Spowage M. 1996. Modulation of the resorptive activity of rat osteoclasts by small changes in extracellular pH near the physiological range. Bone. 18(3):277–279. doi: 10.1016/8756-3282(95)00486-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batul R, Tamanna T, Khaliq A, Yu A. 2017. Recent progress in the biomedical applications of polydopamine nanostructures. Biomater Sci. 5(7):1204–1229. doi: 10.1039/c7bm00187h.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beg S, Almalki WH, Malik A, Farhan M, Aatif M, Rahman Z, Alruwaili NK, Alrobaian M, Tarique M, Rahman M, et al. 2020. 3D printing for drug delivery and biomedical applications. Drug Discov Today. 25(9):1668–1681. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.07.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosworth LA, Hu W, Shi Y, Cartmell SH. 2019. Enhancing biocompatibility without compromising material properties: an optimised naoh treatment for electrospun polycaprolactone fibres. J Nanomater. 2019:1–11. doi: 10.1155/2019/4605092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calori IR, Braga G, da Costa Carvalho de Jesus P, Bi H, Tedesco AC. 2020. Polymer scaffolds as drug delivery systems. Eur Polym J. 129:109621. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2020.109621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakka JL, Acri T, Laird NZ, Zhong L, Shin K, Elangovan S, Salem AK. 2021. Polydopamine functionalized VEGF gene-activated 3D printed scaffolds for bone regeneration. RSC Adv. 11(22):13282–13291. doi: 10.1039/d1ra01193f.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakka LRJ, Laird NZ, Acri T, Elangovan S, Salem AK. 2020. Polydopamine functionalized 3D printed scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Trans AMMM. 2(1). doi: 10.18416/AMMM.2020.2009020.
   Google Scholar
• Chen S, Shi Y, Luo Y, Ma J. 2019. Layer-by-layer coated porous 3D printed hydroxyapatite composite scaffolds for controlled drug delivery. Colloids Surf B Biointerf. 179:121–127. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.03.063.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cipitria A, Skelton A, Dargaville TR, Dalton PD, Hutmacher DW. 2011. Design, fabrication and characterization of PCL electrospun scaffolds—a review. J Mater Chem. 21(26):9419. doi: 10.1039/c0jm04502k.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa PF, Puga AM, Díaz-Gomez L, Concheiro A, Busch DH, Alvarez-Lorenzo C. 2015. Additive manufacturing of scaffolds with dexamethasone controlled release for enhanced bone regeneration. Int J Pharm. 496(2):541–550. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.055.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Czech T, Oyewumi MO. 2021. Overcoming barriers confronting application of protein therapeutics in bone fracture healing. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 11(3):842–865. doi: 10.1007/s13346-020-00829-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donate R, Alemán-Domínguez ME, Monzón M. 2021. On the effectiveness of oxygen plasma and alkali surface treatments to modify the properties of polylactic acid scaffolds. Polymers. 13(10):1643. doi: 10.3390/polym13101643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghanta P, Winschel T, Hessel E, Oyewumi O, Czech T, Oyewumi MO. 2023. Efficacy assessment of methylcellulose-based thermoresponsive hydrogels loaded with gallium acetylacetonate in osteoclastic bone resorption. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 13(10):2533–2549. doi: 10.1007/s13346-023-01336-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gómez-Cerezo N, Verron E, Montouillout V, Fayon F, Lagadec P, Bouler JM, Bujoli B, Arcos D, Vallet-Regí M. 2018. The response of pre-osteoblasts and osteoclasts to gallium containing mesoporous bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 76:333–343. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goole J, Amighi K. 2016. 3D printing in pharmaceutics: a new tool for designing customized drug delivery systems. Int J Pharm. 499(1–2):376–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.12.071.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• He F, Lu T, Feng S, Wang Y, Huang C, Zhang Y, Deng X, Ye J. 2021. Alliance of gallium and strontium potently mediates the osteoclastic and osteogenic activities of β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramic scaffolds. Chem Eng J. 412:128709. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.128709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaidev LR, Chatterjee K. 2019. Surface functionalization of 3D printed polymer scaffolds to augment stem cell response. Mater Des. 161(5):44–54. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.11.018.
   Google Scholar
• Jain AK, Goyal AK, Gupta PN, Khatri K, Mishra N, Mehta A, Mangal S, Vyas SP. 2009. Synthesis, characterization and evaluation of novel triblock copolymer based nanoparticles for vaccine delivery against hepatitis B. J Control Release. 136(2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2009.02.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jassal M, Sengupta S, Bhowmick S. 2015. Functionalization of electrospun poly(caprolactone) fibers for pH-controlled delivery of docorubicin hydrochloride. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 26(18):1425–1438. doi: 10.1080/09205063.2015.1100495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jose J, Sultan S, Kalarikkal N, Thomas S, Mathew AP. 2020. Fabrication and functionalization of 3D-printed soft and hard scaffolds with growth factors for enhanced bioactivity. RSC Adv. 10(62):37928–37937. doi: 10.1039/d0ra08295c.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamel R, El-Wakil NA, Abdelkhalek AA, Elkasabgy NA. 2020. Nanofibrillated cellulose/cyclodextrin based 3D scaffolds loaded with raloxifene hydrochloride for bone regeneration. Int J Biol Macromol. 156:704–716. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.04.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao C-T, Lin C-C, Chen Y-W, Yeh C-H, Fang H-Y, Shie M-Y. 2015. Poly(dopamine) coating of 3D printed poly(lactic acid) scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Mater Sci Eng C. 56:165–173. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2015.06.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karanth D, Puleo D, Dawson D, Holliday LS, Sharab L. 2023. Characterization of 3D printed biodegradable piezoelectric scaffolds for bone regeneration. Clin Exp Dent Res. 9(2):398–408. doi: 10.1002/cre2.712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khosla S, Hofbauer LC. 2017. Osteoporosis treatment: recent developments and ongoing challenges. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 5(11):898–907. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30188-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-M, Lin C, Stavre Z, Greenblatt MB, Shim J-H. 2020. Osteoblast-osteoclast communication and bone homeostasis. Cells. 9(9):2073. doi: 10.3390/cells9092073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lees R, Sabharwal V, Heersche J. 2001. Resorptive state and cell size influence intracellular pH regulation in rabbit osteoclasts cultured on collagen-hydroxyapatite films. Bone. 28(2):187–194. doi: 10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00433-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei B, Guo B, Rambhia KJ, Ma PX. 2019. Hybrid polymer biomaterials for bone tissue regeneration. Front Med. 13(2):189–201. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0664-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li C, Jiang Z, Liu X. 2010. Biochemical mechanism of gallium on prevention of fatal cage-layer osteoporosis. Biol Trace Elem Res. 134(2):195–202. doi: 10.1007/s12011-009-8467-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu X, Chen M, Luo J, Zhao H, Zhou X, Gu Q, Yang H, Zhu X, Cui W, Shi Q. 2021. Immunopolarization-regulated 3D printed-electrospun fibrous scaffolds for bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 276:121037. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu S, Qin S, He M, Zhou D, Qin Q, Wang H. 2020. Current applications of poly(lactic acid) composites in tissue engineering and drug delivery. Comp B Eng. 199:108238. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Wang Y, Wang Z, Qi Y, Li L, Zhang P, Chen X, Huang Y. 2018. Composite PLA/PEG/nHA/dexamethasone scaffold prepared by 3D printing for bone regeneration. Macromol Biosci. 18(6):e1800068. doi: 10.1002/mabi.201800068.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maia-Pinto MOC, Brochado ACB, Teixeira BN, Sartoretto SC, Uzeda MJ, Alves ATNN, Alves GG, Calasans-Maia MD, Thiré RMSM. 2020. Biomimetic mineralization on 3D printed PLA scaffolds: on the response of human primary osteoblasts spheroids and in vivo implantation. Polymers (Basel). 13(1):74. doi: 10.3390/polym13010074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maurizi A, Rucci N. 2018. The osteoclast in bone metastasis: player and target. Cancers (Basel). 10(7):218. doi: 10.3390/cancers10070218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellier C, Fayon F, Boukhechba F, Verron E, LeFerrec M, Montavon G, Lesoeur J, Schnitzler V, Massiot D, Janvier P, et al. 2015. Design and properties of novel gallium-doped injectable apatitic cements. Acta Biomater. 24:322–332. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.05.027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk LA, Oyewumi MO. 2021. Integration of 3D printing technology in pharmaceutical compounds: progress, prospects, and challenges. Annals of 3D Printed Med. 4:100035. doi: 10.1016/j.stlm.2021.100035.
   Google Scholar
• Menzies KL, Jones L. 2010. The impact of contact angle on the biocompatibility of biomaterials. Optom Vis Sci. 87(6):387–399. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181da863e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohapatra S, Kar RK, Biswal PK, Bindhani S. 2022. Approaches of 3D printing in current drug delivery. Sensors Int. 3:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100146.
   Google Scholar
• Oyewumi MO, Yokel RA, Jay M, Coakley T, Mumper RJ. 2004. Comparison of cell uptake, biodistribution and tumor retention of folate-coated and PEG-coated gadolinium nanoparticles in tumor-bearing mice. J Control Release. 95(3):613–626. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park S, Kim JE, Han J, Jeong S, Lim JW, Lee MC, Son H, Kim HB, Choung Y-H, Seonwoo H, et al. 2021. 3D-printed poly(ε-caprolactone)/hydroxyapatite scaffolds modified with alkaline hydrolysis enhance osteogenesis in vitro. Polymers (Basel). 13(2):257. doi: 10.3390/polym13020257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu C, Lu T, He F, Feng S, Fang X, Zuo F, Jiang Q, Deng X, Ye J. 2020. Influences of gallium substitution on the phase stability, mechanical strength and cellular response of β-tricalcium phosphate bioceramics. Ceram Int. 46(10):16364–16371. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shibutani T, Dr., Heersche JN. 2020. Effect of medium pH on osteoclast activity and osteoclast formation in cultures of dispersed rabbit osteoclasts. J Bone Miner Res. 8(3):331–336. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080310.
   Google Scholar
• Strazic-Geljic I, Guberovic I, Didak B, Schmid-Antomarchi H, Schmid-Alliana A, Boukhechba F, Bouler J-M, Scimeca J-C, Verron E. 2016. Gallium, a promising candidate to disrupt the vicious cycle driving osteolytic metastaseS. Biochem Pharmacol. 116:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2016.06.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun W, Qi M, Cheng S, Li C, Dong B, Wang L. 2023. Gallium and gallium compounds: new insights into the “Trojan horse” strategy in medical applications. Mater Design. 227:111704. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka Y, Yamaoka H, Nishizawa S, Nagata S, Ogasawara T, Asawa Y, Fujihara Y, Takato T, Hoshi K. 2010. The optimization of porous polymeric scaffolds for chondrocyte/atelocollagen based tissue-engineered cartilage. Biomaterials. 31(16):4506–4516. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.02.028.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trebec DP, Chandra D, Gramoun A, Li K, Heersche JNM, Manolson MF. 2007. Increased expression of activating factors in large osteoclasts could explain their excessive activity in osteolytic diseases. J Cell Biochem. 101(1):205–220. doi: 10.1002/jcb.21171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai WB, Chen WT, Chien HW, Kuo WH, Wang MJ. 2014. Poly(dopamine) coating to biodegradable polymers for bone tissue engineering. J Biomater Appl. 28(6):837–848. doi: 10.1177/0885328213483842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verron E, Bouler JM, Scimeca JC. 2012. Gallium as a potential candidate for treatment of osteoporosis. Drug Discov Today. 17(19–20):1127–1132. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2012.06.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verron E, Loubat A, Carle GF, Vignes-Colombeix C, Strazic I, Guicheux J, Rochet N, Bouler JM, Scimeca JC. 2012. Molecular effects of gallium on osteoclastic differentiation of mouse nad human monocytes. Biochem Pharmacol. 83(5):671–679. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.12.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Duan Y, Duan Y. 2018. Application of polydopamine in tumor targeted drug delivery system and its drug release behavior. J Control Release. 290:56–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2018.10.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Mei Y, Song Y, Bachus C, Sun C, Sheshbaradaran H, Glogauer M. 2020. AP-002: a novel inhibitor of osteoclast differentiation and function without disruption of osteogenesis. Eur J Pharmacol. 889:173613. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warrell RP, Alcock NW, Bockman RS. 1987. Gallium nitrate inhibits accelerated bone turnover in patients with bone metastases. J Clin Oncol. 5(2):292–298. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1987.5.2.292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiao RZ, Zeng ZW, Zhou GL, Wang JJ, Li FZ, Wang AM. 2010. Recent advances in PEG–PLA block copolymer nanoparticles. Int J Nanomed. 5:1057–1065. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S14912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu T, Yao Q, Miszuk JM, Sanyour HJ, Hong Z, Sun H, Fong H. 2018. Tailoring weight ratio of PCL/PLA in electrospun three-dimensional nanofibrous scaffolds and the effect on osteogenic differentiation of stem cells. Colloid Surf B Biointerf. 171:31–39. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.07.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar