Comparison of single pot and multiphase granulation. Part 1: Effect of the high shear granulator on granule properties according to the drug substance and its concentration

References

• Kristensen HG, Schaefer T. Granulation, a review on pharmaceutical wet-granulation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1987;13(4–5):803–873.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl H. Comparing different granulation techniques. Pharm. Technol. Eur. 2004;11:23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Gaillard C, Chulia D, Jeannin C, Ozil P, Paschos S. Granulation à l’aide d’un granulateur-séchoir à grande vitesse. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1989;64(5–6):168–176.
   Google Scholar
• André F, Bouiller B, Adams S, Bagnaro M, Becourt P, Guyot JC. Etude par plan d’expérience de l’influence de trois paramètres de fabrication sur la qualité de grains obtenus en turbosphère. STP Pharma Sci. 1990;6(10):723–727.
   Google Scholar
• Robin P, Luciano LJ, Prealswig DM. Rationale for selection of a single-pot manufacturing process using microwave/vacuum drying. Pharm. Technol. 1994;18(5):28–36.
   Google Scholar
• Giry K, Genty M, Viana M, Wüthrich P, Chulia D. Multiphase versus single pot granulation process: influence of process and granulation parameters on granules properties. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 2006;32(5):509–530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Le Lan A. Traitement mécanique des solides dans les mélangeurs à turbine – influence de la géométrie d’agitation. Int. Sympos. Mixing. 1978:D2-1–D2-30.
   Google Scholar
• Rosetto Y. ϕ 41 Pharmacotechnie industrielle. France: I.M.T., Inc;1998.
   Google Scholar
• Wehrlé P, Nobelis Ph, Cuiné A, Stamm A. Scaling-up of wet granulation. A statistical methodology. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1993;19(16):1983–1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hunter BN, Ganderton D. The influence on pharmaceutical granulation of the type and capacity of mixers. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1973;25(Suppl.):71P–78.
   Google Scholar
• Schæfer T, Bak HH, Jaegerskou A, Kristensen A, Svensson JR, Holm P, Kristensen HG. Granulation in different types of high speed mixers. Part 1: effects of process variables and up-scaling. Pharm. Ind. 1986;48(9):1083–1089.
   Google Scholar
• Holm P. Effect of impeller and chopper design on the granulation in a high speed mixer. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 1987;13(9–11):1675–1701.
   Google Scholar
• Bardin M, Knight PC, Seville JPK. On control of particle size distribution in granulation high-shear mixers. Powder Technol. 2004;140:169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight PC, Seville JPK, Wellm AB, Instone T. Prediction of the impeller torque in high shear powder mixers. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001;56(15):4457–4471.
   Google Scholar
• Lister J, Ilapgood KP, Michael JN, Sims A, Roberts M, Kameneni SK. Scale up of mixer granulators for effective liquid distribution. Powder Technol. 2002;124(3):272–280.
   Google Scholar
• Lister J, Ennis B, Lian L. The Science and Engineering of Granulation Processes. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Iveson SM, Wauters PAL, Forrest S, Litster JD, Meesters GMH, Scarlett B. Growth regime map for liquid-bound granules: further development and experimental validation. Powder Technol. 2001;117(2):83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Rowe RC, Sheskey PJ, Weller PJ. Handbook of Pharmaceutical Excipients. 4th ed. London: Pharmaceutical Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Viana M, Jouannin P, Pontier C, Chulia D. About pycnometric density measurements. Talanta. 2002;57:583–593.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegedös A, Pintye-Hódi K. Comparison of the effects of different drying techniques on properties of granules and tablets made on a production scale. Int. J. Pharm. 2007;330(1–2):99–104.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar V, Reus-Medina ML, Yang D. Preparation, characterisation and tableting properties of a new cellulose-based pharmaceutical aid. Int. J. Pharm. 2002;235(2):129–140.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Pharmacopea. 5th ed. Strasbourg; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Carr RL. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 1965;18:163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Gabaude C, Gautier JC, Saudemon Ph, Chulia D. Validation of a new pertinent packing coefficient to estimate flow properties of pharmaceutical powders at a very early stage, by comparison with mercury intrusion and classical flowability methods. J. Mat. Sci. 2001;36:1763–1773.
   Google Scholar
• Viana M, Gabaude-Renou CMD, Pontier C, Chulia D. The packing coefficient: a suitable parameter to assess the flow properties of powders. Kona. 2001;19:85–93.
   Google Scholar
• Pontier C, Viana M, Champion E, Bernache-Assolant D, Chulia D. Energetic yields in apatic calcium phosphates compression: influence of the Ca/P molar ratio. Polym. Int. 2003;52:625–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viana M, Ribet J, Rodriguez F, Chulia D. Powder functionality test: a methodology for rheological and mechanical characterization. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2005;10(2):327–338.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pontier C. Les phosphates de calcium apatitiques en compression – De la chimie aux qualités d’usage. Thèse de doctorat, Chatenay-Malabry: Université de Paris XI; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Heckel RW. Density-pressure relationship in powder compaction. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME. 1961;221:671–675.
   Google Scholar
• Humbert-Droz P, Mordier D, Doelker E. Méthode rapide de détermination du comportement à la compression pour des études de préformulation. Pharm. Acta Helv. 1982;57:136–143.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts RJ, Rowe RC. The effect of punch velocity on the compaction of a variety of materials. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1985;37:377–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabaude CMD, Guillot M, Gautier JC, Saudemon P, Chulia D. Effects of true density, compacted mass, compression speed, and punch deformation on the mean yield pressure. J. Pharm. Sci. 1999;88(7):725–730.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pontier C, Champion E, Viana M, Chulia D, Bernache-Assolant D. Use of cycles of compression to characterize the behavior of apatitic phosphate powders. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2002;22:1205–1216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fell JT, Newton JM. Determination of tablets strength by the diametral-compression test. J. Pharm. Sci. 1970;59(5):688–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham JC, Sinka IC, Zavaliangos A. Analysis of tablet compaction. I. Characterization of mechanical behaviour of powder and powder/tooling friction. J. Pharm. Sci. 2004;93(8):2022–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribet J. Fonctionnalisation des excipients: application à la comprimabilité des celluloses et des saccharoses. PhD Thesis, Limoges: Université de Limoges; 2003, 236 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gibassier D, Sado P, Le Verge R, Devissaguet JPh. Test de dissolution et fonction de Weibull. Labo Pharm. Probl. Tech. 1982;30(319):249–256.
   Google Scholar
• Costa P, Sousa Lobo JM. Modelling and comparison of dissolution profiles. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2001;13(2):123–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore W, Flanner HH. Mathematical comparison of dissolution profiles. Pharm. Technol. 1996;20:64–74.
   Google Scholar