Beyond the two cultures: Democratic virtues and the case for a model of mutuality

References

• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. New York: Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016). Democracy for realists: Why elections do not produce responsive government. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitude and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Angle, S. C., & Slote, M. (Eds.). (2013). Virtue ethics and confucianism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Annas, J. (1993). The morality of happiness. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Annas, J. (1995). Virtue as a skill. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 3(2), 227–243. doi:10.1080/09672559508570812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anscombe, E. (1958). Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy, 33(124), 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0031819100037943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . (1998). Politics (E. Barker & R. F. Stalley, Trans.). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle . (2000). Nicomachean ethics (R. Crisp, Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayer, A. J. (1952). Language, truth and logic. Mineola, NY: Dover Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barro, R., & Lee, J. W. (2013). A new data set of educational attainment in the world, 1950–2010. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 184–198. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batson, C. D. (2011). These things called empathy: Eight related by distinct phenomena. In J. Decety & W. Ickes (Eds.), The social neuroscience of empathy (pp. 3–16). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. (2016). Against empathy: The case for rational compassion. New York: HarperCollins.
   Google Scholar
• Boggs, C. (2001). Social capital and political fantasy: Robert Putnam’s bowling alone. Theory and Society, 30(2), 281–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V., & Levi, M. (Eds.). (1998). Trust and governance. Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Camerer, C. F., & Fehr, E. (2006). When does “economic man” dominate social behavior? Science, 311(5757), 47–52. doi:10.1126/science.1110600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caney, S. (1992). Liberalism and communitarianism: A misconceived debate. Political Studies, 40(2), 273–289. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1992.tb01384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colby, A., & Damon, W. (1992). Some do care: Contemporary lives of moral commitment. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. (1997). Civic virtues: Rights, citizenship, and republican liberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow, and the feeling brain. New York: Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• De Waal, F. (2009). The age of empathy. New York: Three Rivers Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delaney, C. F. (Ed.). (1994). The liberalism-communitarianism debate: Liberty and community values. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, L. (2015). Facing up to the democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 141–155. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. (2002). Lack of character: Personality and moral behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doris, J. M. (Ed.). (2012). The moral psychology handbook (1. pbk. publ). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Honig, B., & Phillips, A. (2011). Overview of Political Theory. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of political science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foot, P. (1978). Virtues and vices and other essays in moral philosophy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Fortna, V. P. (2008). Does peacekeeping work? Shaping belligerents’ choices after civil war. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankish, K. (2010). Dual-processing and dual-system theories of reasoning. Philosophy Compass, 5(10), 914–926. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2010.00330.x
   Google Scholar
• Frohlich, N., & Oppenheimer, J. A. (1993). Choosing justice: An experimental approach to ethical theory (1. paperback printing). Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, E. L., Ponzetto, G. A. M., & Shleifer, A. (2007). Why does democracy need education? Journal of Economic Growth, 12(2), 77–99. doi:10.1007/s10887-007-9015-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814–834. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, K., & Littvay, L. (2016). Contemporary US populism in comparative perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Mason, L., & AarøE, L. (2015). Expressive partisanship: Campaign involvement, political emotion, and partisan identity. American Political Science Review, 109(1), 1–17. doi:10.1017/S0003055414000604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hume, D. (1738). A treatise of human nature. New York: Barnes & Noble.
   Google Scholar
• Hursthouse, R. (1999). On virtue ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy: The human development sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2001). Science, truth, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klimecki, O. M., Leiberg, S., Ricard, M., & Singer, T. (2014). Differential pattern of functional brain plasticity after compassion and empathy training. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(6), 873–879. doi:10.1093/scan/nst060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. (1962). The structures of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. (1978). Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes. In The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2015). The myth of democratic recession. Journal of Democracy, 26(1), 45–58. doi:10.1353/jod.2015.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. doi:10.2307/1951731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1984). Is patriotism a virtue? (The Lindley lecture). Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals: Why human beings need the virtues. Chicago: Open Court.
   Google Scholar
• Mansfield, E. D., & Mutz, D. C. (2009). Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic politics, and out-group anxiety. International Organization, 63(3), 425–457. doi:10.1017/S0020818309090158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2018). Ideologues without issues: The polarizing consequences of ideological identities. Public Opinion Quarterly, 82(S1), 866–301. doi:10.1093/poq/nfy005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. (2013). Moral character: An empirical theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. B. (2014). Character & moral psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monroe, K. R. (Ed.). (2005). Perestroika! The raucous rebellion in political science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2018). Studying populism in comparative perspective: Reflections on the contemporary and future research agenda. Comparative Political Studies, 51 (13), 1667–1693. doi:10.1177/0010414018789490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mutz, D. C. (2006). Hearing the other side: Deliberative versus participatory democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2001). Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of the emotions. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2009). Democratic capital: The nexus of political and economic change. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 1(2), 88–126. doi:10.1257/mac.1.2.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pocock, J. G. A. (1975). The machiavellian moment: Florentine political thought and the atlantic republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/81.4.890
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reimer, K. S., Young, C., Birath, B., Spezio, M. L., Peterson, G., Van Slyke, J., & Brown, W. S. (2012). Maturity is explicit: Self-importance of traits in humanitarian moral identity. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(1), 36–44. doi:10.1080/17439760.2011.626789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riker, W. H. (1988). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. Prospect Heights, Ill: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, R. (2003). Emotions: An essay in aid of moral psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roush, S. (2005). Tracking truth: Knowledge, evidence, and science. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandel, M. J. (1996). Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/102.4.1265
   Google Scholar
• Snow, N. (2010). Virtue as social intelligence: An empirically grounded theory. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spezio, M., Peterson, G., & Roberts, R. C. (2019). Humility as openness to others: Interactive humility in the context of l’Arche. Journal of Moral Education, 48(1), 27–20. doi:10.1080/03057240.2018.1444982
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stichter, M. (2007). Ethical expertise: The skill model of virtue. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 10(2), 183–119. doi:10.1007/s10677-006-9054-2
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. A. (1996). Defining science: A rhetoric of demarcation. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, M. E. (Ed.). (1999). Democracy & trust. New York: Cambridge Universtiy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woodward, S. L. (2017). The ideology of failed states: Why intervention fails. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. T. (1996). Virtues of the mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zagzebski, L. T. (2017). Exemplarist moral theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaki, J., Weber, J., Bolger, N., & Ochsner, K. (2009). The neural bases of empathic accuracy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(27), 11382–11387. doi:10.1073/pnas.0902666106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar