References
- Berlin, I. (1992). The crooked timber of humanity. New York: Vintage Books.
- Bertelli, A. M., & Lynn, L. E. Jr. (2006). Public management in the shadow of the constitution. Administration & Society, 38(1), 31–57. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705284201
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
- Box, R.C., Marshall, G. S., Reed, B.J., & Reed, C.M. (2001). New public management and substantive democracy. Public Administration Review, 61(5), 608–619. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00131
- Brownlow, L., Merriam, C. E., & Gulick, L. (2012). Report of the president’s committee on administrative management. In J. M. Shafritz & A. C. Hyde (Eds.), Classics in public administration (7th ed., pp. 90–94). Boston, MA: Wadsworth. (Original work published in 1937)
- Camus, A. (1991). The rebel: An essay on man in revolt. New York: Vintage Books.
- Camus, A. (1995). Resistance, rebellion, and death. New York: Vintage Books.
- Clarke, B. (1979). Eccentrically contested concepts. British Journal of Political Science, 9(1), 122–126. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400001654
- Connolly, W. E. (1993). The terms of political discourse. 3rd ed. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Crick, B. (2002). Democracy: A very short introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
- DeLeon, L., & Denhardt, R. B. (2000). The political theory of reinvention. Public Administration Review, 60(2), 89–97. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00068
- Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than rowing. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
- Eley, G. (2002). Forging democracy: The history of the left in Europe, 1850–2000. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Finer, H. (1941). Administrative responsibility in democratic government. Public Administration Review, 1(4), 335–350. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/972907
- Freeden, M. (2004). Editorial: Essential contestability and effective contestability. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9, 3–11.
- Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56(1), 167–198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/aristotelian/56.1.167
- Garver, E. (1990). Essentially contested concepts: The ethics and tactics of argument. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 23(4), 251–270.
- Goodnow, F. J. (1900). Politics and administration. New York: Russell & Russell.
- Grafstein, R. (1988). A realist foundation for essentially contested political concepts. The Western Political Quarterly, 41(1), 9–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/448454
- Gray, J. N. (1977). On the contestability of social and political concepts. Political Theory, 5, 331–348.
- Hatab, L. J. (1995). A Nietzschean defense of democracy. Chicago and La Salle, IL: Open Court.
- Heidelberg, R. (2019). The democracy problem. Administration & Society, 51(5), 692–723.
- Hidalgo, O. (2008). Conceptual history and politics: Is the concept of democracy essentially contested? Contributions to the History of Concepts, 4(2), 176–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1163/187465608X363463
- Ingram, J. D. (2016). Cosmopolitanism from below: Universalism as contestation. Critical Horizons, 17(1), 66–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14409917.2016.1117815
- Kurki, M. (2010). Democracy and conceptual contestability: Reconsidering conceptions of democracy in democracy promotion. International Studies Review, 12(3), 362–386. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00943.x
- Long, N. (1949). Power and administration. Public Administration Review, 9(4), 257–264. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/972337
- Machiavelli, N. (1950). The prince and the discourses. New York: Random House.
- Mansbridge, J. (2017). Beyond adversary democracy. In D. Barker & D. W. Brown (Eds.), Higher Education Exchange 2017 (pp. 6–12). Dayton, Ohio: Kettering Foundation.
- Meier, K. J. (1997). Bureaucracy and democracy: The case for more bureaucracy and less democracy. Public Administration Review, 57(3), 193–199. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/976648
- Morgan, D. F., Green, R., Shinn, C. W., & Robinson, K. S. (2013). Foundations of public service. 2nd ed. Armonk, New York: M.E. Sharpe.
- Mosher, F. C. (1968). Democracy and the public service. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541–563. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
- Plattner, M. F. (2010). Populism, pluralism, and liberal democracy. Journal of Democracy, 21, 81–92.
- Redford, E. S. (1969). Democracy in the administrative state. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Roberts, A. (2017). Four Crises of American Democracy: Representation, Mastery, Discipline, Anticipation. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rohr, J. A. (1986). To run a constitution: The legitimacy of the administrative state. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
- Rosenbloom, D. H. (1993). Have an administrative Rx? Don’t forget the politics. Public Administration Review, 53(6), 503–507.
- Spicer, M. W. (2010). In defense of politics in public administration: A value pluralist perspective. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: University of Alabama Press.
- Storing, H. J. (1965). Leonard D. White and the study of public administration. Public Administration Review, 25(1), 38–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/974006
- Trenchard, J., & Gordon, T. (1995). Cato’s letters. 2 Vols. Indianapolis, Indiana: Liberty Press.
- Walzer, M. (2002). Spheres of affection. In J. Cohen (Ed.), For love of country? Martha C. Nussbaum (pp. 125–127). Boston: Beacon Press.
- Wills, G., ed. (1982). The Federalist papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York: Bantam Books.
- Wilson, J. Q. (1989). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
- Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. American Political Science Review, 2, 197–222.