References
- Atlan, H. (1996). Interview: The frontiers of science. UNESCO Courier, 49(3), 1–3.
- Banks, G. (2009). Evidence-based policy making: What is it? How do we get it? (Issue February). Productivity Commission.
- Banks, G. (2016). Commentary: Could academic research be more policy influential? Public Administration Review, 76(1), 33–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12482
- Bartels, K. P. R. (2012). The actionable researcher cultivating a process-oriented methodology for studying administrative practice. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 34(3), 433–455. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806340306
- Cairney, P. (2012). Complexity theory in political science and public policy. Political Studies Review, 10(3), 346–358. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00270.x
- Cairney, P. (2019). The UK government’s imaginative use of evidence to make policy. British Politics, 14(1), 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41293-017-0068-2
- Cairney, P., Oliver, K., & Wellstead, A. (2016). To bridge the divide between evidence and policy: Reduce ambiguity as much as uncertainty. Public Administration Review, 76(3), 399–402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12555
- Cameron, R. (2013). The state of public administration as an academic field in South Africa. Politikon, 40(3), 565–583. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02589346.2013.856567
- Cloete, F. (2017). The complex dynamics of evidence-informed policy change. Administratio Publica, 25(1), 93–120.
- Cloete, J. J. N. (1981). Introduction to public administration (1st ed.). Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik.
- Cook, S. D. N., & Wagenaar, H. (2012). Navigating the eternally unfolding present: Toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 3–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074011407404
- Daley, B. J. (2001). Learning and professional practice: A study of four professions. Adult Education Quarterly, 52(1), 39–54. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/074171360105200104
- De Beer, C. S. (2007). Knowledge is everywhere: A philosophical exploration. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 3(2), 227–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v3i2.327
- De Beer, C. S. (2014a). Michel Serres’ multidisciplinary philosophy of information and knowledge. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 10(1), 19–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v10i1.12
- De Beer, C. S. (2014b). Reading: The understanding and invention of meaning. In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. C. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (1st ed., pp. 207–223). Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.
- De Beer, C. S. (2015). Multiple, connective intellection: The condition for invention. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 11(2), 122–140. doi:https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v11i2.82
- Fotaki, M. (2010). Why do public policies fail so often? Exploring health policy-making as an imaginary and symbolic construction. Organization, 17(6), 703–720. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508410366321
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews 1972-1977 (C. Gordon (ed.)). New York: Pantheon Books.
- French, R. D. (2019). Is it time to give up on evidence-based policy? Four answers. Policy & Politics, 47(1), 151–168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15333033508220
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Guy, M. E., & Mastracci, S. H. (2018). Making the affective turn: The importance of feelings in theory, praxis, and citizenship. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 40(4), 281–288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1485455
- Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Hobbes, T. (1651). Leviathan, or the matter, forme, & power of a common-wealth, ecclesiasticall and civill (1st ed.). London: Andrew Crooke. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt155jp5n.40
- Howlett, M. (2019). Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy and Administration, 34(4), 405–430. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076718775791
- Illing, J. (2010). Thinking about research: Frameworks, ethics and scholarship. In T. Swanwick (Ed.), Understanding medical education: Evidence, theory and practice (pp. 283–300). Hoboken, NJ: The Association for the Study of Medical Education.
- Juntti, M., Russel, D., & Turnpenny, J. (2009). Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environmental Science & Policy, 12(3), 207–215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2008.12.007
- Kakabadse, N. K., Kakabadse, A., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reviewing the knowledge management literature: Towards a taxonomy. Journal of Knowledge Management, 7(4), 75–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270310492967
- King, L. (2014). Cities, subsidiarity, and federalism. Federalism and Subsidiarity, 55, 291–331.
- Kulldorff, M., Gupta, S., & Bhattacharya, J. (2020). The Great Barrington Declaration. https://gbdeclaration.org.
- Lang, J. C. (2001). Managerial concerns in knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 43–59. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270110384392
- Locke, J. (1690). Two treatises of government. Awnsham Churchill. www.thefederalistpapers.org
- Loxton, A. (1994). Public functions and public institutions: A criteriological approach to the functional structure of central government administration in a liberal democracy, with particular reference to South Africa. Journal of Public Administration, 29(2), 87–147.
- Michael, K., & Michael, M. G. (2008). Australia and the new technologies: Evidence based policy in public administration. In K. Michael & M. G. Michael (Eds.), The social implications of national security: Third workshop. Wollongong: University of Wollongong.
- Morçöl, G., & Wachhaus, A. (2009). Network and complexity theories: A comparison and prospects for a synthesis. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 31(1), 44–58. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806310103
- Neill, C. (2011). Lacanian ethics and the assumption of subjectivity. In C. Neill (Ed.), Lacanian ethics and the assumption of subjectivity. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230305038
- Nutley, S., Walter, I., & Bland, N. (2002). The institutional arrangements for connecting evidence and policy: The case of drug misuse. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 76–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700306
- Ospina, S. M., & Dodge, J. (2005a). Narrative inquiry and the search for connectedness: Practioners and academics develop public administration scholarship. Public Administration Review, 65(4), 409–423. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00468.x
- Ospina, S. M., & Dodge, J. (2005b). It’s about time: Catching method up to meaning - The usefulness of narrative inquiry in public administration research. Public Administration Review, 65(2), 143–157. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00440.x
- Parkhurst, J. (2017). The politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence (1st ed.). London: Routledge.
- Pauw, J. C. (1993). Peter winch: The idea of a social science and its relation to philosophy. In J. Snyman (Ed.), Conceptions of social inquiry (pp. 77–86). Bloemfontein: HSRC Publishers.
- Pauw, J. C. (1995). Wat is die verskynsel publieke administrasie en wat moet ’n student aan die universiteit in die vak met dieselfde naam leer? [What is the phenomenon public administration and what should a student be taught at a university in the subject with the same name?]. Journal of Public Administration, 30(1), 28–52.
- Pauw, J. C. (1996). Waarin lê wetenskaplikheid nou eintlik? en ander kwessies. [What does it really mean to be scientific? and other issues]. Journal of Public Administration, 31(1), 57–69.
- Pauw, J. C., & Louw, V. N. (2014). The concept “public administration.” In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. C. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (pp. 7–18). Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.
- Perry, J. L. (2012). How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals? Public Administration Review, 72(4), 479–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02607.x
- Perry, J. L. (2016). Is public administration vanishing? Public Administration Review, 76(2), 211–212. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12534
- Polanyi, M. (1962). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Harper Torchbooks.
- Powell, A., Davies, H. T. O., & Nutley, S. M. (2018). Facing the challenges of research-informed knowledge mobilization: ‘Practising what we preach’? Public Administration, 96(1), 36–52. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12365
- Quinn, M. (2002). Evidence based or people based policy making? A view from Wales. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 29–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700303
- Raadschelders, J. (2008). Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration. Public Administration, 86(4), 925–949. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00742.x
- Raadschelders, J. (2011). The future of the study of public administration: Embedding research object and methodology in epistemology and ontology. Public Administration Review, 71(6), 916–924. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02433.x
- Raadschelders, J. (2019). The state of theory in the study of public administration in the United States: Balancing evidence-based, usable knowledge, and conceptual understanding. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 41(1), 79–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10841806.2018.1526517
- Raadschelders, J. (2020). The three ages of government: From the person, to the group, to the world. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Raadschelders, J., Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Kisner, M. (2015). Global dimensions of public administration and governance: A comparative voyage. Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.
- Raadschelders, J.C.N., & Whetsell, T.A. (2018). Conceptualizing the landscape of decision making for complex problem solving. International Journal of Public Administration, 41(14), 1132–1144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2017.1347946
- Reiter, R., & Klenk, T. (2019). The manifold meanings of ‘post-New Public Management’ – A systematic literature review. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 11–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318759736
- Robson, I. H. (2006). The assignment of responsibilities for the performance of public functions to levels or spheres of government in South Africa (Issue June) [University of South Africa]. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/2356.
- Rousseau, J. J. (1762). The Social contract and discourses (Translated). JM Dent & Sons. https://oll-resources.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/638/0132_Bk.pdf.
- Rutgers, M. (2010). Theory and scope of public administration: An introduction to the study’s epistemology. The Foundations of Public Administration Series, 1(c), 1–45.
- Saidi, T., Salie, F., & Douglas, T. S. (2017). Towards understanding the drivers of policy change: A case study of infection control policies for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in South Africa. Health Research Policy and Systems, 15(1), 1–11. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0203-y
- Salomon, J. J. (1979). The social function of science today. Technology in Society, 1(3), 205–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0160-791X(79)90023-X
- Salomon, J. J. (1994). Modernity and the uncertain quest. In J. J. Salomon, F. R. Sagasti, & C. Sachs-Jeantet (Eds.), The uncertain quest: Science, technology, and development (pp. 1–3). New York: United Nations Library. http://www.nzdl.org/gsdlmod?e=d-00000-00–-off-0ccgi–00-0––0-10-0–-0–-0direct-10–-4–––-0-1l–11-en-50–-20-about–-00-0-1-00-0–4––0.
- Salomon, J. J. (2000). Recent trends in science and technology policy. Science, Technology and Society, 5(2), 225–249. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/097172180000500206
- Santis, E. L. (2018). Archeology of exclusion: Counter-mapping sites of exclusion and opression in the administrative state using GIS. Public Administration Quarterly, 42(2), 127–157.
- Schwella, E. (2014). Revisiting the paradigmatic debate in South African Public Administration: On the relevance of speaking the truth. In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (pp. 106–140). Pretoria: UNISA Press.
- Scruton, R. (2019). Fools, frauds and firebrands: Thinkers of the new left (New ed.). London: Bloomsbury.
- Searle, J. R. (2010). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Serres, M., (1982). Hermes: Literature, science, philosophy. In J. V. Harari, & D. F. Bell (Eds.), SubStance (Vol. 12). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3684501?origin=crossref.
- Smith, K. E. (2013). Understanding the influence of evidence in public health policy: What can we learn from the “tobacco wars”? Social Policy & Administration, 47(4), 382–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12025
- Stout, M. (2010). Revisiting the (lost) art of ideal-typing in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 32(4), 491–519. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806320401
- Stout, M. (2012). Competing ontologies: A primer for public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(3), 388–398. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02530.x
- Stout, M. (2018). The impossibility of a universal public service perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 36(3), 222–236. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739417738953
- Stout, M., & Staton, C. M. (2011). The ontology of process philosophy in Follett’s administrative theory. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 268–292. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330206
- Tempelhoff, J. W. N., Ginster, M., Mahabir, S., Mtembu, N., Jaka, H., Kruger, A., & Nkomo, L. (2019). Perspectives from below on Emfuleni’s wastewater woes: In search of resolving a wicked problem. Africa Journal of Public Sector Development and Governance, 2(2), 145–170. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC-1b114fd288.
- Terman, J. (2011). Comparative administration: Ontology and epistemology in cross-cultural research. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 33(2), 235–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.2753/ATP1084-1806330204
- UNESCO. (2012). Science and technologies for knowledge societies: What role for UNESCO in 2014-2021. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.
- Van de Walle, S. (2016). When public services fail: A research agenda on public service failure. Journal of Service Management, 27(5), 831–846. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-04-2016-0092
- Von Der Heyden, S., Lukey, P., Celliers, L., Prochazka, K., & Lombard, A. T. (2016). Science to policy - Reflections on the South African reality. South African Journal of Science, 112(11/12), 1–6. doi:https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2016/a0183
- Walsh, J. P., Tushman, M. L., Kimberly, J. R., Starbuck, B., & Ashford, S. (2007). On the relationship between research and practice: Debate and reflections. Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(2), 128–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492607302654
- Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge capacity builders in network challenges, settings and collaborative. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
- Wehrens, R. (2014). Beyond two communities – From research utilization and knowledge translation to co-production? Public Health, 128(6), 545–551. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2014.02.004
- Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133
- Wessels, J. S. (2014). Research in public administration. In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. C. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (1st ed., pp. 141–155). Pretoria: University of South Africa Press.
- Wessels, J. S. (2015). Thinking public servants for a better society. Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe, 55(4), 556–569. doi:https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2015/v55n4a4
- Wessels, J. S. (2020). Challenges to inform the curricula of Master of Public Administration programmes. Teaching Public Administration, 38(2), 144–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739419864130
- Wessels, J. S., & Pauw, J. C. (2018). Die sogenaamde gaping tussen getuienis en beleid: Die geval van die De Lange-verslag. [The so-called “evidence-policy gap”: The case of the De Lange report]. Tydskrif Vir Geesteswetenskappe, 58(4–2), 861–886. doi:https://doi.org/10.17159/2224-7912/2018/v58n4-2a1
- Wessels, J. S., & Thani, X. C. (2014). Research methods in public administration. In J. S. Wessels, J. C. Pauw, & X. C. Thani (Eds.), Reflective public administration: Context, knowledge and methods (1st ed., pp. 156–178). Pretoria: University of South Africa Press. https://doi.org/doi:https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420016994.ch25.
- Whetsell, T. A., Leiblein, M. J., & Wagner, C. S. (2020). Between promise and performance: Science and technology policy implementation through network governance. Science and Public Policy, 47(1), 78–91. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz048
- Wittgenstein, L. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Wyatt, A. (2002). Evidence based policy making: The view from a centre. Public Policy and Administration, 17(3), 12–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/095207670201700302