181
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Administrative Burden as Intermediate Negative Policy Feedback: Explaining Low-Income Migrant Exodus amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in India

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Aiyar, Y. (2019). Modi consolidates power: Leveraging welfare politics. Journal of Democracy, 30(4), 78–88. doi:10.1353/jod.2019.0070
  • Akbulut, N., Zick, A., & Razum, O. (2020). Conceptualization of Othering in public health. European Journal of Public Health, 30(Supplement_5). doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.1175
  • Baekgaard, M., & Tankink, T. (2022). Administrative burden: Untangling a bowl of conceptual spaghetti. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(1), 16–21. doi:10.1093/ppmgov/gvab027
  • Basu, R. (2020). The Indian State, Democracy and the Citizen: Public policy challenges in the post-COVID-19 era. In R. Basu (Ed.), Democracy and public policy in the post-COVID-19 world: Choices and outcomes (pp. 200–211). Taylor & Francis.
  • Bhardwaj, S. (2021). Policing the Liberal democratic state in a pandemic: Public safety, state overreach, and the creation of order. India Review, 20(2), 142–157. doi:10.1080/14736489.2021.1895561
  • Biswas, S. (2020, March 30). Coronavirus: India’s pandemic lockdown turns into a human tragedy. British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-52086274.
  • Blessett, B. (2015). Disenfranchisement Historical underpinnings and contemporary manifestations. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 3–50. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24372042
  • Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street‐level to system‐level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. doi:10.1111/0033-3352.00168
  • Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
  • Bozeman, B., & Feeney, M. K. (2015). Rules and red tape: A prism for public administration theory and research. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315701059
  • Bozeman, B., & Youtie, J. (2020). Robotic bureaucracy: Administrative burden and red tape in university research. Public Administration Review, 80(1), 157–162. doi:10.1111/puar.13105
  • Brodkin, E. Z., & Majmundar, M. (2010). Administrative exclusion: Organizations and the hidden costs of welfare claiming. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(4), 827–848. doi:10.1093/jopart/mup046
  • “Burden”. (2022). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/burden.
  • Burden, B. C., Canon, D. T., Mayer, K. R., & Moynihan, D. P. (2012). The effect of administrative burden on bureaucratic perception of policies: Evidence from election administration. Public Administration Review, 72(5), 741–751. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02600.x
  • Burton, M., Macher, J., & Mayo John, W. (2007). Understanding participation in social programs: Why don’t households pick up the lifeline? The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1), 1–26. doi:10.2202/1935-1682.1583
  • Carrns, A. (2016, August 18). Social Security Retreats From Cellphone-Based Online Security. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/19/your-money/social-security-cellphone-text-code.html?
  • Chandrasekhar, C. P., & Ghosh, J. (2018). The financialization of finance? Demonetization and the dubious push to cashlessness in India. Development and Change, 49(2), 420–436. doi:10.1111/dech.12369
  • Clark, B. Y., Brudney, J. L., & Jang, S.-G. (2013). Coproduction of government services and the new information technology: Investigating the distributional biases. Public Administration Review, 73(5), 687–701. doi:10.1111/puar.12092
  • Cohen, E. F. (2009). Semi-citizenship in democratic politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Daugbjerg, C., & Kay, A. (2020). Policy feedback and pathways: When change leads to endurance and continuity to change. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 253–268. doi:10.1007/s11077-019-09366-y
  • Ekman, J., & Amnå, E. (2012). Political participation and civic engagement: Towards a new typology. Human Affairs, 22(3), 283–300. doi:10.2478/s13374-012-0024-1
  • Fouillet, C., Guérin, I., & Servet, J.-M. (2021). Demonetization and digitalization: The Indian government’s hidden agenda. Telecommunications Policy, 45(2), 102079. doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102079
  • Gaikwad, N., & Nellis, G. (2021). Overcoming the political exclusion of migrants: Theory and experimental evidence from India. American Political Science Review, 115(4), 1129–1146. doi:10.1017/S0003055421000435
  • Geertz, C. (1983). “From the native’s point of view”: On the nature of anthropological understanding. In Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology (pp. 55–70). New York: Basic Books.
  • Gettleman, J., Raj, S., Yasir, S., & Singh, K. D. (2020, December 15). Behind the curve the virus trains: how lockdown chaos spread COVID-19 across India. The New York Times.
  • Greer, S. L., Fonseca, E. M., Raj, M., & Willison, C. E. (2022). Institutions and the politics of agency in COVID-19 response: Federalism, executive power, and public health policy in Brazil, India, and the U.S. Journal of Social Policy, 1–19. doi:10.1017/S0047279422000642
  • Gupta, S. (2019). The Modi PMO. In N. G. Jayal (Ed.), Re-forming India the nation today (pp. 3–28). New Delhi: Penguin Random House India.
  • Hansen, T. B. (2019). Democracy against the law: Reflections on India’s illiberal democracy. In C. Jaffrelot, T. B. Hansen, & A. P. Chatterji (Eds.), Majoritarian state: How Hindu Nationalism is changing India (pp. 19–39). New Delhi: HarperCollins India.
  • Herd, P., & Moynihan, D. P. (2018). Administrative burden: Policymaking by other means. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Hern, E. A. (2017). Better than nothing: How policies influence political participation in low-capacity democracies. Governance, 30(4), 583–600. doi: 10.1111/gove.12228
  • Hooghe, M., & Dejaeghere, Y. (2007). Does the ‘monitorial citizen’ exist? An empirical investigation into the occurrence of postmodern forms of citizenship in the nordic countries. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 249–271. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00180.x
  • Jacobs, A. M., & Weaver, R. K. (2015). when policies undo themselves: Self-undermining feedback as a source of policy change. Governance, 28(4), 441–457. doi:10.1111/gove.12101
  • Jayaram, N., & Varma, D. (2020). Examining the ‘labour’ in labour migration: Migrant workers’ informal work arrangements and access to labour rights in urban sectors. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics : The Quarterly Journal of the Indian Society of Labour Economics, 63(4), 999–1019. 10.1007/s41027-020-00288-5.
  • Kavanagh, M. M., & Singh, R. (2020). Democracy, capacity, and coercion in pandemic response: COVID-19 in comparative political perspective. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 45(6), 997–1012. 10.1215/03616878-8641530.
  • Krishnan, S., Deo, S., & Manurkar, S. (2020). 50 Days of lockdown: Measuring India’s success in arresting COVID-19, ORF special report 107. New Delhi: Observer Research Foundation. https://www.orfonline.org/research/50-days-of-lockdown-measuring-indias-success-in-arresting-covid-19-66336/
  • Kumar, S., & Choudhury, S. (2021). Migrant workers and human rights: A critical study on India’s COVID-19 lockdown policy. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 3(1), 100130. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2021.100130
  • Madsen, J. K., Mikkelsen, K. S., & Moynihan, D. P. (2022). Burdens, sludge, ordeals, red tape, oh my!: A user’s guide to the study of frictions. Public Administration, 100(2), 375–393. doi:10.1111/padm.12717
  • Mettler, S. (2002). Bringing the state back in to civic engagement: Policy feedback effects of the GI Bill for World War II veterans. American Political Science Review, 96(02), 351–365. doi:10.1017/S0003055402000217
  • Moynihan, D., & Herd, P. (2010). Red tape and democracy: How rules affect citizenship rights. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(6), 654–670. doi:10.1177/0275074010366732
  • Moynihan, D., Herd, P., & Harvey, H. (2015). Administrative burden: Learning, psychological, and compliance costs in citizen-state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25(1), 43–69. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu009
  • Nisar, M. A. (2018). Children of a lesser god: Administrative burden and social equity in citizen–state interactions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 104–119. doi:10.1093/jopart/mux025
  • Nisar, M. A., & Masood, A. (2022). Are all burdens bad? Disentangling illegitimate administrative burdens through public value accounting. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–19. doi:10.1080/23276665.2022.2088581
  • “Onerous” (2022). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/onerous.
  • Pandey, N. (2020, May 6). ‘Will live on salt’ — UP, Bihar migrants refuse to return to cities, say were disowned by them. theprint.in. https://theprint.in/india/will-live-on-salt-up-bihar-migrants-refuse-to-return-to-cities-say-were-disowned-by-them/415516/.
  • Patashnik, E. M. (2019). Limiting policy backlash: Strategies for taming countercoalitions in an era of polarization. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 685(1), 47–63. doi:10.1177/0002716219862511
  • Peeters, R., & Widlak, A. (2018). The digital cage: Administrative exclusion through information architecture – the case of the Dutch civil registry’s master data management system. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 175–183. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.02.003
  • Prügl, E. (2017). Social mechanisms: A methodological tool for feminist IR. In H. D. Gould (Ed.), The art of world making: Nicholas Greenwood Onuf and his critics (pp. 160–174). New York: Routledge.
  • Pushpendra, & Jha, M. K. (2021). Controlling journeys, controlling labour: COVID-19 and migrants. In A. Hans, K. Kannabiran, M. Mohanty, & Pushpendra (Eds.), Migration, Workers, and Fundamental Freedoms: Pandemic Vulnerabilities and States of Exception in India (pp. 108–120). Routledge.
  • Saldivar, K. M. (2015). A muted voice? Red tape and Latino political participation. Public Administration Quarterly, 39(1), 51.
  • Santis, E. L. (2022). Otherness: An unfinished project in public administration. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 44(2), 133–142. doi:10.1080/10841806.2021.1918989
  • Schaffer, F. C. (2015). Elucidating social science concepts: An interpretivist guide. New York: Routledge.
  • Schaffer, F. C. (2016). A few words about methodology. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research: Newsletter of the American Political Science Association’s QMMR Section, 14(1/2), 52–56.
  • Schatzki, T. R., Cetina, K. K., & Von Savigny, E (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
  • Schneider, A. L., Ingram, H., & Deleon, P. (2014). The social construction of target populations. In P. A. Sabatier & C. Weible (Eds.), Theories of The policy process (pp. 105–149). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Sheingate, A. (2022). Policy regime decay. Policy Studies Journal, 50(1), 65–89. doi:10.1111/psj.12420
  • Srivastava, R. (2020a). Labour migration, vulnerability, and development policy: The pandemic as inflexion point? The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 63(4), 859–883. doi:10.1007/s41027-020-00301-x
  • Srivastava, R. (2020b). Understanding circular migration in India: Its nature and dimensions, the crisis under lockdown and the response of the state. Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, Centre for Employment Studies Working Paper Series WP04/2020, 4, 2020. https://www.thehinducentre.com/publications/policy-watch/article33461900.ece/binary/IHD-CES_WP_04_2020.pdf.
  • Srivastava, R. (2020c). Vulnerable internal migrants in India and portability of social security and entitlements. Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, Centre for Employment Studies Working Paper Series WP02/2020. http://www.ihdindia.org/working-papers/2020/IHD-CES_WP_02_2020.pdf.
  • Subramanian, A. (2018). The two puzzles of demonetization. In Of counsel: The challenges of the Modi-Jaitley economy (pp. 94–101). Gurgaon, India: Penguin Random House India.
  • SWAN. (2020). 21 Days and counting: COVID-19 Lockdown, migrant workers, and the inadequacy of welfare measures in India. Retrieved from https://www.thehindu.com/news/resources/article31442220.ece/binary/Lockdown-and-Distress_Report-by-Stranded-Workers-Action-Network.pdf.
  • Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4(1), 21–41. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.4.1.21
  • Weaver, K. (2010). Paths and forks or chutes and ladders?: Negative feedbacks and policy regime change. Journal of Public Policy, 30(2), 137–162. doi:10.1017/S0143814X10000061
  • Weaver, R. K. (2014). Compliance regimes and barriers to behavioral change. Governance, 27(2), 243–265. doi:10.1111/gove.12032
  • Wheare, K. C. (1950). India’s new constitution analysed. Allahabad Law Journal, XLVIII(6), 2122.
  • Wichowsky, A., & Moynihan, D. P. (2008). Measuring how administration shapes citizenship: A policy feedback perspective on performance management. Public Administration Review, 68(5), 908–920. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2008.00931.x
  • Yerramsetti, S. (2022). Public sector digitalisation and stealth intrusions upon individual freedoms and democratic accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–19. doi:10.1080/23276665.2022.2110909

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.