366
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Implementing indigenous paradigms: the paradoxes of actualizing Sumak Kawsay

References

  • Acosta, A. (2013). El Buen vivir: Sumak kawsay, una oportunidad para imaginar otros mundos. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial.
  • Althaus, C. (2020). Different paradigms of evidence and knowledge: Recognising, honouring, and celebrating Indigenous ways of knowing and being. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 79(2), 187–207. doi:10.1111/1467-8500.12400
  • Alvarez, S. G. (2013). What is sumak kawsay or well-being? Enciclopedia y Biblioteca Virtual de Las Ciencias Sociales, Económicas y Jurídicas. http://Buenvivir.Eumed.Net/What-Is-Sumak-Kawsay-or-Well-Being.
  • Artaraz, K., & Calestani, M. (2015). Suma qamaña in Bolivia: Indigenous understandings of well-being and their contribution to a post-neoliberal paradigm. Latin American Perspectives, 42(5), 216–233. doi:10.1177/0094582X14547501
  • Ashley, S., Kim, S., & Lambright, W. H. (2021). Charting three trajectories for globalising public administration research and theory. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 11–22. doi:10.1080/23276665.2020.1789482
  • Avcı, D., & Fernández-Salvador, C. (2016). Territorial dynamics and local resistance: Two mining conflicts in Ecuador compared. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(4), 912–921. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.007
  • Babb, S. (2013). The Washington Consensus as transnational policy paradigm: Its origins, trajectory and likely successor. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 268–297. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.640435
  • Basheka, B. C. (2012, March 1). The paradigms of public administration re-examined: A reflection. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/sabinet/jpad/2012/00000047/00000001/art00003
  • Bass, M. S., Finer, M., Jenkins, C. N., Kreft, H., Cisneros-Heredia, D. F., McCracken, S. F., … Kunz, T. H. (2010). Global conservation significance of Ecuador’s Yasuní National Park. PLoS One, 5(1), e8767. 10.1371/journal.pone.0008767.
  • Basu, R. (2019). Public administration in the 21st century: A global south perspective. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
  • Becker, M. (2011). Correa, indigenous movements, and the writing of a new constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 47–62. doi:10.1177/0094582X10384209
  • Becker, M. (2012). Building a plurinational Ecuador: Complications and contradictions. Socialism and Democracy, 26(3), 72–92. doi:10.1080/08854300.2012.710000
  • Beckerman, P. (2001). Dollarization and semi-dollarization in Ecuador. Washington, DC: The World Bank. doi:10.1596/1813-9450-2643
  • Beling, A. E., Cubillo-Guevara, A. P., Vanhulst, J., & Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L. (2021). Buen vivir (good living): A “glocal” genealogy of a Latin American Utopia for the world. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 17–34. doi:10.1177/0094582X211009242
  • Beling, A. E., & Vanhulst, J. (2014). Buen Vivir: New wine in old wineskins? Alternautas, 1(1), 13.
  • Bernal, A. M. (2017). Beyond origins: Rethinking founding in a time of constitutional democracy (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brown, D. (2017, August 7). Ecuador’s “citizen revolution.” TheNextSystem.Org. https://thenextsystem.org/learn/stories/ecuadors-citizen-revolution
  • Burbach, R., Fox, M., & Fuentes, F. (2013). Latin America’s turbulent transitions: The future of twenty-first century socialism. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
  • Carter Center (2008). Report on the Constituent Assembly of the Republic of Ecuador (p. 68). https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/peace/americas/report_constituent_assembly_ecuador_english_sep_2008_final.pdf.
  • Catlaw, T. J., & Treisman, C. (2014). Is “man” still the subject of administration? Antihumanism, transhumanism, and the challenge of entangled governance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 36(4), 441–465. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806360401
  • Chafik, S., & Drechsler, W. (2022). In the semi‐shadow of the global west: Moroccan zawāyā as good public administration. Public Administration Review, 82(4), 747–755. doi:10.1111/puar.13475
  • Conaghan, C. M. (2015). Surveil and sanction: The return of the state and societal regulation in Ecuador. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe, 98, 7–27. doi:10.18352/erlacs.9979
  • Coral-Guerrero, C. A., García-Quero, F., & Guardiola, J. (2021). What is Sumak Kawsay? A qualitative study in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 35–50. doi:10.1177/0094582X211004913
  • Drechsler, W. (2013). Three paradigms of governance and administration: Chinese, Western and Islamic. Society and Economy, 35(3), 319–342. doi:10.1556/SocEc.35.2013.3.3
  • Drechsler, W. (2015). Paradigms of non-Western public administration and governance. In The international handbook of public administration and governance (pp. 104–131). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Drechsler, W. (2018). Beyond the western paradigm: Confucian public administration. In S. Bice, A. Poole, & H. Sullivan (Eds.), Public policy in the “Asian Century”: Concepts, cases and futures (pp. 19–40). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:10.1057/978-1-137-60252-7_2
  • Durant, R. F. (2015). Whither power in public administration? Attainment, dissipation, and loss. Public Administration Review, 75(2), 206–218. doi:10.1111/puar.12332
  • Escribano, G. (2013). Ecuador’s energy policy mix: Development versus conservation and nationalism with Chinese loans. Energy Policy, 57, 152–159. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2013.01.022
  • Finer, M., Vijay, V., Ponce, F., Jenkins, C. N., & Kahn, T. R. (2009). Ecuador’s Yasuní Biosphere Reserve: A brief modern history and conservation challenges. Environmental Research Letters, 4(3), 034005. 034005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/034005
  • Friederic, K., & Burke, B. J. (2019). La Revolución Ciudadana and social medicine: Undermining community in the state provision of health care in Ecuador. Global Public Health, 14(6–7), 884–898. 10.1080/17441692.2018.1481219.
  • Gerlach, J. (2017). Ecuador’s experiment in living well: Sumak Kawsay, Spinoza and the inadequacy of ideas. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(10), 2241–2260. doi:10.1177/0308518X17718548
  • Gilberthorpe, E., & Hilson, G. (2016). Natural resource extraction and indigenous livelihoods: Development challenges in an era of globalization. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
  • González, P. A., & Vázquez, A. M. (2015). An ontological turn in the debate on Buen Vivir – Sumak Kawsay in Ecuador: Ideology, knowledge, and the common. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 10(3), 315–334. doi:10.1080/17442222.2015.1056070
  • Grugel, J., & Riggirozzi, P. (2012). Post-neoliberalism in Latin America: Rebuilding and reclaiming the state after crisis. Development and Change, 43(1), 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01746.x
  • Gulrajani, N., & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 78–86. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02489.x
  • Haque, M. (2019). The changing foundations of public administration: From identity to modernity to diversity. International Review of Public Administration, 24(2), 138–145. doi:10.1080/12294659.2019.1632042
  • Haque, M. S., Wal, Z., & Berg, C. (2021). Comparative studies in public administration: Intellectual challenges and alternative perspectives. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 344–348. doi:10.1111/puar.13349
  • Henderson, K. M. (2005). The quest for indigenous administration: Asian communist, Islamic revivalist, and other models. Public Organization Review, 5(1), 55–67. doi:10.1007/s11115-004-6134-4
  • Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., & Cubillo-Guevara, A. (2019). EL ORIGEN DEL BUEN VIVIR El Plan Amazanga de la OPIP (1st ed.). Huelva: Ediciones Bonanza.
  • Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., Cubillo-Guevara, A. P., & Masabalín-Caisaguano, F. (2020). The Ecuadorian indigenist school of good living (sumak kawsay). Ethnicities, 20(3), 408–433. doi:10.1177/1468796819832977
  • Hidalgo-Capitán, A. L., & Cubillo-Guevara, A. P. (2017). Deconstruction and genealogy of Latin American Good Living (Buen Vivir). The (Triune) Good Living. Revue internationale de politique de développement, 9(9), 23–50. doi:10.4000/poldev.2351
  • Iacoviello, M. (2014). Diagnóstico institucional del servicio civil en América Latina: Ecuador. Washington, DC: BID, División de Capacidad Institucional Del Estado. Retrieved from http://www.iadb.org.
  • Jácome, L. I. (2004). The late 1990s financial crisis in Ecuador: Institutional weaknesses, fiscal rigidities, and financial dollarization at work. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
  • Jameson, K. P. (2011). The indigenous movement in Ecuador: The struggle for a plurinational state. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 63–73. doi:10.1177/0094582X10384210
  • Jokisch, B., & Pribilsky, J. (2002). The panic to leave: Economic crisis and the “new emigration” from Ecuador. International Migration, 40(4), 75–102. doi:10.1111/1468-2435.00206
  • Jreisat, J. (2017). Globalism and comparative public administration. Boca Raton: CRC Press. doi:10.4324/9781315093536
  • Jun, J. S. (2000). Transcending the limits of comparative administration: A new internationalism in the making. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 22(2), 273–286. doi:10.1080/10841806.2000.11643451
  • Keast, R., Brown, K., & Mandell, M. (2007). Getting the right mix: Unpacking integration meanings and strategies. International Public Management Journal, 10(1), 9–33. doi:10.1080/10967490601185716
  • Kennemore, A., & Weeks, G. (2011). Twenty-first century socialism? The elusive search for a post-neoliberal development model in Bolivia and Ecuador. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 30(3), 267–281. doi:10.1111/j.1470-9856.2010.00496.x
  • Kettl, D. F. (2015). The transformation of governance: Public administration for the twenty-first century (updated ed.). JHUP. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Khator, R. (1998). The new paradigm: From development administration to sustainable development administration. International Journal of Public Administration, 21(12), 1777–1801. doi:10.1080/01900699808525368
  • King, C. S., Feltey, K. M., & Susel, B. O. (1998). The question of participation: Toward authentic public participation in public administration. Public Administration Review, 58(4), 317–326. doi:10.2307/977561
  • Küffner, I. C. S. (2012, June 1). Ecuador’s poverty benefit motivated by politics, not social welfare, claim critics | Irene Caselli and Stephan Küffner. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2012/jun/01/ecuador-poverty-politics-social-welfare.
  • Lalander, R. (2016). The Ecuadorian resource dilemma: Sumak Kawsay or development? Critical Sociology, 42(4–5), 623–642. doi:10.1177/0896920514557959
  • Larrea, C., & Warnars, L. (2009). Ecuador’s Yasuni-ITT initiative: Avoiding emissions by keeping petroleum underground. Energy for Sustainable Development, 13(3), 219–223. doi:10.1016/j.esd.2009.08.003
  • Lora, E., & Fukuyama, F. (2007). The state of state reform in Latin America. Stanford, CA, Washington D.C.: The World Bank.
  • Lu, J. (2013). Intellectual paradigms in public administration: Why so many and how to bridge them? Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35(2), 308–313. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806350208
  • Maaka, R., & Fleras, A. (2009). Mainstreaming indigeneity by indigenizing policymaking: Towards an indigenous grounded analysis framework as policy paradigm. Indigenous Policy Journal, 20(3), 1–22. doi:http://indigenouspolicy.org/index.php/ipj/article/view/67
  • Martinez, G. X. (2006). The political economy of the Ecuadorian financial crisis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(4), 567–585. doi:10.1093/cje/bei097
  • McLaverty, P. (2017). Public participation and innovations in community governance. London: Taylor & Francis.
  • Meier, K. J. (2005). Public administration and the myth of positivism: The AntiChrist’s view. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), 650–668. doi:10.1080/10841806.2005.11029511
  • Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2015). Postmodern public administration (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315706962
  • Mitchell, G. E., O’Leary, R., & Gerard, C. (2015). Collaboration and performance: Perspectives from public managers and NGO leaders. Public Performance & Management Review, 38(4), 684–716. doi:10.1080/15309576.2015.1031015
  • Neshkova, M. I., & Guo, H. (2012). Public participation and organizational performance: Evidence from state agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(2), 267–288. doi:10.1093/jopart/mur038
  • Nolte, D., & Schilling-Vacaflor, A. (2016). New constitutionalism in Latin America: Promises and practices. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge. doi:10.4324/978131559790
  • Ongaro, E. (2021). Non-Western philosophies and public administration. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 43(1), 6–10. doi:10.1080/23276665.2020.1844027
  • Ortiz, A. (2015). Taking control of the public sphere by manipulating civil society: The citizen revolution in Ecuador. European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies/Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe, 98, 29–48. doi:10.18352/erlacs.9529
  • Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2020). Reshaping the state: The unitary executive presidency of Rafael Correa. In F. Sánchez & S. Pachano (Eds.), Assessing the left turn in Ecuador (pp. 15–39). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-27625-6_2
  • Puig, J. F. (2013, September 19). The world failed Ecuador on its Yasuní initiative | Juan Falconi Puig. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/poverty-matters/2013/sep/19/world-failed-ecuador-yasuni-initiative.
  • Raadschelders, J. (2005). Government and public administration: Challenges to and need for connecting knowledge. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), 602–627. doi:10.1080/10841806.2005.11029515
  • Raadschelders, J. (2008). Understanding government: Four intellectual traditions in the study of public administration. Public Administration, 86(4), 925–949. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00742.x
  • Raadschelders, J. (2011). The study of public administration in the United States. Public Administration, 89(1), 140–155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01906.x
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2010). Identity without boundaries: Public administration’s canon(s) of integration. Administration & Society, 42(2), 131–159. doi:10.1177/0095399710366215
  • Radcliffe, S. A. (2012). Development for a postneoliberal era? Sumak kawsay, living well and the limits to decolonisation in Ecuador. Geoforum, 43(2), 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003
  • Ran, B., & Qi, H. (2018). Contingencies of power sharing in collaborative governance. The American Review of Public Administration, 48(8), 836–851. doi:10.1177/0275074017745355
  • Riofrancos, T. (2017). Ecuador after correa: The fate of the petrostate. N1 Online. https://Nplusonemag.Com/Issue-29/Politics/Ecuador-after-Correa-2/
  • Rival, L. M. (2013). From carbon projects to better land-use planning: Three Latin American initiatives. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 17. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269350
  • Rosenbloom, D. H. (2013). Reflections on “public administrative theory and the separation of powers”. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(4), 381–396. doi:10.1177/0275074013483167
  • Ruales, V. (2017). Rafael correa: The Ecuadorian dream. Harvard Political Review. https://harvardpolitics.com/world/rafael-correa-the-ecuadorian-dream/.
  • Samier, E. A. (2017). Islamic public administration tradition: Historical, theoretical and practical dimensions. Administrative Culture, 18(1), 53–71.
  • Sánchez, F., & Polga-Hecimovich, J. (2019). The tools of institutional change under post-neoliberalism: Rafael Correa’s Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies, 51(2), 379–408. doi:10.1017/S0022216X1800072X
  • Schaffitzel, F., Jakob, M., Soria, R., Vogt-Schilb, A., & Ward, H. (2019). Can government transfers make energy subsidy reform socially acceptable? A case study on Ecuador (Working Paper IDB-WP-01026; IDB Working Paper Series, p. 56). Inter-American Development Bank. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Can_government_transfers_make_energy_subsidy_reform_socially_acceptable_A_case_study_on_Ecuador__en_en.pdf.
  • Smith, S. (2017, April 17). Ecuador’s accomplishments under the 10 years of Rafael Correa’s Citizen’s revolution. COHA.
  • Sovacool, B. K., & Scarpaci, J. (2016). Energy justice and the contested petroleum politics of stranded assets: Policy insights from the Yasuní-ITT initiative in Ecuador. Energy Policy, 95, 158–171. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2016.04.045
  • Stone, D. (2004). Transfer agents and global networks in the ‘transnationalization’ of policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(3), 545–566. doi:10.1080/13501760410001694291
  • Stout, M., & Love, J. M. (2018). Integrative governance: Generating sustainable responses to Global crises. London: Routledge.
  • Tortosa, J. M. (2011). Sumak kawsay, suma qamaña, buen vivir. Aportes Andinos, 28. https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C33&q=umak+kawsay+suma+qamana+buen+vivir+Tortosa&btnG=#d=gs_cit&p=&u=%2Fscholar%3Fq%3Dinfo%3A2iligh8IhFwJ%3Ascholar.google.com%2F%26output%3Dcite%26scirp%3D0%26hl%3Den.
  • Tsui, A. S. (2006). Contextualization in Chinese management research. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge, England,Wiley Online Library.
  • Vallejo, M. C., Burbano, R., Falconí, F., & Larrea, C. (2015). Leaving oil underground in Ecuador: The Yasuní-ITT initiative from a multi-criteria perspective. Ecological Economics, 109, 175–185. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.11.013
  • Van Teijlingen, K. (2016). The ‘will to improve’ at the mining frontier: Neo-extractivism, development and governmentality in the Ecuadorian Amazon. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3(4), 902–911. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2016.10.009
  • Vela-Almeida, D., & Torres, N. (2021). Consultation in Ecuador: Institutional fragility and participation in national extractive policy. Latin American Perspectives, 48(3), 172–191. doi:10.1177/0094582X211008148
  • Vigoda, E. (2002). From responsiveness to collaboration: Governance, citizens, and the next generation of public administration. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 527–540. doi:10.1111/1540-6210.00235
  • Wal, Z. V. D. (2015). “All quiet on the non-Western front?” A review of public service motivation scholarship in non-Western contexts. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 37(2), 69–86. doi:10.1080/23276665.2015.1041223
  • Waldmüller, J. M. (2014). Buen vivir, sumak kawsay,‘good living’: An introduction and overview. Alternautas, 1, 17–28.
  • Waldo, D. (1948). The administrative state; A study of the political theory of American public administration. New York: Ronald Press Co.
  • Weisbrot, M., Johnston, J., & Merling, L. (2017). Decade of reform: Ecuador’s macroeconomic policies, institutional changes, and results (p. 25). Washington, DC: Center for Economic and Policy Research. https://cepr.net/images/stories/reports/ecuador-2017-02.pdf
  • Welch, E., & Wong, W. (1998). Public administration in a global context: Bridging the gaps of theory and practice between western and non-western nations. Public Administration Review, 58(1), 40–49. JSTOR. doi:10.2307/976888
  • Whetsell, T. A., & Shields, P. M. (2015). The dynamics of positivism in the study of public administration: A brief intellectual history and reappraisal. Administration & Society, 47(4), 416–446. doi:10.1177/0095399713490157
  • Williford, B. (2018). Buen Vivir as policy: Challenging neoliberalism or consolidating state power in Ecuador. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(1), 96–122. doi:10.5195/jwsr.2018.629
  • Wiryanto, W. (2018). Developing theories of non western public administration through the islamization of public administration. 2018 Annual Conference of Asian Association for Public Administration: “Reinventing Public Administration in a Globalized World: A Non-Western Perspective”(AAPA 2018). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Atlantis Press.
  • Yang, L. (2020). The good official as a Confucian sage: The focus on morality in traditional Chinese admonitions and its contemporary relevance. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 42(1), 27–43. doi:10.1080/10841806.2019.1571330
  • Zimmerer, K. S. (2012). The indigenous Andean concept of Kawsay, the politics of knowledge and development, and the borderlands of environmental sustainability in Latin America. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 127(3), 600–606. doi:10.1632/pmla.2012.127.3.600

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.