Habermas and Taylor on Religious Reasoning in a Liberal Democracy

Bibliography

• Bennett, W. Lance, and Murray Edelman. “Toward a New Political Narrative.” Journal of Communication 35, no. 4 (1985): 156–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, J. M. “Forgetting Isaac: Faith and the Philosophical Impossibility of a Postsecular Society.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 156–76. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Google e-book.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, John. “Why and How Narrative Matters in Deliberative Systems.” Political Studies 61 (2013): 620–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman, Jonathan M. “Why Cosmoipolitanism in a Post-Secular Age? Taylor and Habermas on European vs. American Exceptionalism.” Philosophy Social Criticism 38, no. 2 (2012): 127–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig. “Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by Craig Calhoun, 1–50. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, eds. Habermas and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Google e-book.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun, Craig. “Afterword: Religion’s Many Powers.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, 118–34. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cavanaugh, William. The Myth of Religious Violence: Secular Ideology and the Roots of Modern Conflict. New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Simone. “Rhetoric and the Public Sphere: Has Deliberative Democracy Abandoned Mass Democracy?” Political Theory 37, no. 3 (2009): 323–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. “Authenticity and Autonomy: Taylor, Habermas, and the Politics of Recognition.” Political Theory 25, no. 2 (1997): 258–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. “Salvaging and Secularizing the Semantic Contents of Religion: The Limitations of Habermas’s Postmetaphysical Proposal.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60, no. 1–3 (2006): 187–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlberg, Lincoln. “The Habermasian Public Sphere: A Specification of the Idealized Conditions of Democratic Communication.” Studies in Social and Political Thought 10 (2004): 2–18.
   Google Scholar
• Dillon, Michele. “Can Post-Secular Society Tolerate Religious Differences?” Sociology of Religion 71, no. 2 (2010): 139–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Alessandro. “The Separation of Religion and Politics in a Post-Secular Society.” Philosophy Social Criticism 35, no. 1–2 (2009): 77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, Jeffrey. “Communicative Power in Habermas’s Theory of Democracy.” European Journal of Political Theory 3, no. 4 (2004): 433–54.
   Google Scholar
• Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. 2d ed. New York: Crossroad, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Justification and Application. Translated by Ciaran P. Cronin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “‘The Political’: The Rational Meaning of a Questionable Inheritance of Political Theology.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, 15–33. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 1 (2006): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “A Reply.” In Communicative Action, edited by Axel Honneth and Hans Joas, 214–64. Translated by Jeremy Gaines and Doris L. Jones. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Reply to My Critics.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 342–84. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Google e-book.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, and Charles Taylor. “Dialogue: Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 60–69. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, Jonathan. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Kearney, Richard. On Stories. New York: Routledge, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Christina. “Religion in the Public Sphere: What are the Deliberative Obligations of Democratic Citizens?” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 228–46. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Google e-book.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, David. “Integration and Fragmentation: Patterns of Religion in Europe.” In Religion in the New Europe, edited by Krzysztof Michalski, 64–84. Budapest: CEU Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Piecychna, Beata. “The Act of Translation in Hans Georg Gadamer’s Hermeneutic Philosophy of Language.” Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric 28, no. 41 (2012): 161–82.
   Google Scholar
• Rehg, William. Insight and Solidarity: A Study in the Discourse Ethics of Jürgen Habermas. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. Oneself as Another. Translated by Katheleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative, Volume 1. Translated by Katheleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative, Volume 3. Translated by Katheleen Blamey and David Pellauer. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Robert. C. “Narrative Ethics.” In A Companion to Philosophy of Religion, edited by Philip L. Quinn and Charles Taliaferro. Oxford: Blackwell, 1999. http://0-www.blackwellreference.com.lib.cpce-polyu.edu.hk/subscriber/tocnode.html?id=g9780631213284_chunk_g978063121328463.
   Google Scholar
• Sallis, John. On Translation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Sheedy, Matt. “Religion in the Public Sphere: The Limits of Habermas’s Proposal and the Discourse of ‘World Religions’.” Illumine: Journal of the Centre for Studies in Religion and Society 8, no. 1 (2009): 3–20.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, Karl. Paul Ricoeur. New York: Routledge, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Kimberly K. “Storytelling, Sympathy and Moral Judgment in American Abolitionism.” Journal of Political Philosophy 6, no. 4 (1998): 356–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, Ulrike. “A Difference in Kind? Jürgen Habermas and Charles Taylor on Post-secularism.” In “The Post-Secular Debate: Between Public Reason and Political Theology,” Special Issue, edited by Camil Ungureanu and Lasse Thomassen. The European Legacy 20, no. 2 (2015): 120–35.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. “Conditions of an Unforced Consensus on Human Rights.” In The East Asian Challenge for Human Rights, edited by Joanne R. Bauer and Daniel A. Bell, 124–44. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. The Language Animal: The Full Shape of the Human Linguistic Capacity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. “The Motivation behind a Procedural Ethics.” In Kant and Political Philosophy: The Contemporary Legacy, edited by Ronald Beiner and William James Booth, 337–60. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, 34–59. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• White, Hayden. Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “An Engagement with Jurgen Habermas on Postmetaphysical Philosophy, Religion, and Political Dialogue.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 96–115. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013. Google e-book.
   Google Scholar
• Yates, Melissa. “Rawls and Habermas on Religion in the Public Sphere.” Philosophy Social Criticism 33, no. 7 (2007): 880–91.
   Google Scholar
• Young, Iris Marion. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
   Google Scholar