Religion in Habermas’s Two-Track Political Theory

Bibliography

• Asad, Talal. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Audi, Robert, and Nicholas Wolterstorff. Religion in the Public Square: The Place of Religious Convictions in Political Debate. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Benhabib, Seyla. “Democratic Iterations: The Local, the National, and the Global.” In Another Cosmopolitanism, edited by Robert Post, 45–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183221.001.0001/acprof-9780195183221-chapter-3.
   Google Scholar
• Bilgrami, Akeel. Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Böckenförde, Ernst Wolfgang. State, Society, and Liberty: Studies in Political Theory and Constitutional Law. New York: Berg, 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Casanova, José. “Religion, European Secular Identities, and European Integration.” In Religion in an Expanding Europe, edited by Peter J Katzenstein and Timothy A Byrnes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, Simone. “How Religion Speaks to the Agnostic: Habermas on the Persistent Value of Religion.” Constellations 14, no. 2 (June 2007): 210–23. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00434.x.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, William E. Why I Am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. “Salvaging and Secularizing the Semantic Contents of Religion: The Limitations of Habermas’s Postmetaphysical Proposal.” International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 60, no. 1–3 (Nov. 16, 2006): 187–207. doi:10.1007/s11153-006-0006-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. “A Secular State for a Postsecular Society? Postmetaphysical Political Theory and the Place of Religion.” Constellations 14, no. 2 (June 1, 2007): 224–38. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00435.x.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, Maeve. “Violating Neutrality? Religious Validity Claims and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Jonathan VanAntwerpen, and Eduardo Mendieta, 249–74. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrara, Alessandro. “The Separation of Religion and Politics in a Post-Secular Society.” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35, no. 1–2 (Jan. 2009): 77–91. doi:10.1177/0191453708098755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen, ed. An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Boston, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “The European Nation State. Its Achievements and Its Limitations: On the Past and Future of Sovereignty and Citizenship.” Ratio Juris 9, no. 2 (June 1996): 125–37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9337.1996.tb00231.x.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Notes on Post-Secular Society.” New Perspectives Quarterly 25, no. 4 (2008): 17–29. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5842.2008.01017.x.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “On the Relations between the Secular Liberal State and Religion.” In Political Theologies: Public Religions in a Post-Secular World, edited by Hent de Vries and Lawrence Eugene Sullivan. New York: Fordham University Press, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Religion in the Public Sphere.” European Journal of Philosophy 14, no. 1 (2006): 1–25. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00241.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights.” Modern Schoolman 75 (1998): 87–100.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. “Reply to My Critics.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Jonathan VanAntwerpen, and Eduardo Mendieta. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas S. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Kuru, Ahmet T. Secularism and State Policies toward Religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Cristina. “Religion in the Public Sphere: Remarks on Habermas’s Conception of Public Deliberation in Postsecular Societies.” Constellations 14, no. 2 (June 2007): 239–59. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2007.00436.x.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Cristina. “Religion and the Public Sphere: What Are the Deliberative Obligations of Democratic Citizenship?” Philosophy & Social Criticism 35, no. 1–2 (Jan. 2009): 127–50. doi:10.1177/0191453708098758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakatos, Imre. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. “Normal Science and Its Dangers.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, 51–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Portier, Philippe. “Religion and Democracy in the Thought of Jürgen Habermas.” Society 48, no. 5 (July 2011): 426–32. doi:10.1007/s12115-011-9470-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratzinger, Joseph, and Jürgen Habermas. The Dialectics of Secularization: On Reason and Religion. San Francisco, CA: Ignatius Press, 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. “The Idea of Public Reason Revisited.” The University of Chicago Law Review 64, no. 3 (July 1997): 765–807. doi:10.2307/1600311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Josef. “A Dialogue in Which There Can Only Be Winners.” In An Awareness of What Is Missing: Faith and Reason in a Post-Secular Age, edited by Jürgen Habermas, et al., 59–71. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. “The Polysemy of the Secular.” Social Research: An International Quarterly 76, no. 4 (2009): 1143–66.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. “Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Eduardo Mendieta. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles, and Jürgen Habermas. “Dialogue.” In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, edited by Jonathan VanAntwerpen and Eduardo Mendieta. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia. “Laïcité in Reverse: Mono-Religious Democracies and the Issue of Religion in the Public Sphere.” Constellations 17, no. 1 (Mar. 2010): 4–21. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00573.x.
   Google Scholar
• Walhof, Darren R. “Habermas, Same-Sex Marriage and the Problem of Religion in Public Life.” Philosophy & Social Criticism, 39, no. 3 ( Jan. 2013): 225–42. doi:10.1177/0191453712473077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltz, Kenneth N. Progress in International Relations Theory: Appraising the Field. Edited by Colin Elman and Miriam Fendius Elman. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wolterstorff, Nicholas “An Engagement with Jurgen Habermas on Postmetaphysical Philosophy, Religion, and Political Dialogue.” In Habermas and Religion, edited by Craig Calhoun, Jonathan VanAntwerpen, and Eduardo Mendieta. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2013.
   Google Scholar